ML17255A018

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Presentation Slides for ATF Meeting with NEI
ML17255A018
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/07/2017
From: Jennifer Whitman
NRC/NRR/DSS/SNPB
To:
Nuclear Energy Institute
Golla J, NRR/DPR, 301-415-1002
References
Download: ML17255A018 (12)


Text

US NRCs ATF Plan Josh Whitman US NRC ATF Working Group Technical Lead NRC Public Meeting on ATF 9/7/17

  • Areas covered by NRCs ATF project plan

- Assumptions

- Open items

- Activities

  • Importance of early communication
  • Conclusions and next steps 2
  • Outlines activities associated with preparing the agency to conduct an effective and efficient review of ATF
  • Includes preliminary estimates of lead time necessary to complete activities in each area
  • Focused on activities expected from 2017-2022
  • Is intended to be a living document 3
  • NRC will not perform independent confirmatory testing

- Data will be available from DOE, industry, and others

- All integral fuel behavior data to be provided to NRC to perform code assessments

  • Interaction with DOE, EPRI, vendors, and other organizations will take place:

- in real time

- in advance of experiments when possible

  • Interactions with external stakeholders will keep staff and stakeholders informed about developments that can affect activities in the plan
  • The NRC will be appropriately resourced to execute the activities in the plan 4
  • Identify whether (and what) regulatory guidance needs to be generated to accommodate licensing ATF designs under current framework
  • Establish channels of communication to ensure NRC receives up-to-date information
  • Determine appropriate vehicles for industry to notify NRC of intent to initiate activities
  • Identify any necessary changes to existing regulatory framework

- Example: PRA and 50.69 licensing approaches 5

  • Plan identifies key technical domestic and international update meetings, experimental program review meetings, and conferences
  • NRC staff is committed to participating in industry project update meetings to maintain programmatic awareness of industry and DOE efforts 6
  • More effort needed for revolutionary designs than for evolutionary designs
  • Staff recognizes that there are potentially two types of alterations needed:

- Adjustments to allow the use of ATF (e.g.,

regulatory guidance, changes to 50.68 to allow

>5% enrichment)

- Crediting the safety enhancements obtained by using ATF (e.g., the application of 50.69) 7

  • Fresh and spent fuel transportation

- Existing regulations and regulatory guidance are considered to be adequate for processing limited transportation requests for LTAs

- Shipment of irradiated LTAs for PIE may require further interaction

  • Fuel fabrication

- Evolutionary design fabrication facility licensing can likely take place using existing regulatory processes

- Scoping study necessary for revolutionary designs 8

  • More information needed from industry to create a meaningful plan

- How does industry intend to credit ATF?

- When does industry expect to engage with the NRC in this area?

9

  • Disciplines include thermal-hydraulics, fuel performance, neutronics and source term analysis
  • For each code, estimates consider the need for:

- A scoping study to identify code development needs

- Code architecture modifications (e.g. to remove Zr/UO2 hard wired properties and assumptions)

- Model development

- Model validation

- Integral assessment

  • Lead times to develop full analytical capabilities can vary by discipline, code, and ATF design
  • Lead time is longer for revolutionary designs than for more evolutionary designs 10
  • Many of the activities in the plan have long lead times
  • Advance awareness of plans and progress benefit budget formulation processes 11
  • NRC staff will continue to attend meetings to remain informed on ATF progress
  • Experimental data is a prerequisite for most work to prepare confirmatory codes
  • Vehicles for initiating activities need to be firmed up
  • Staff are prepared to participate in PIRT panels and other gap analysis exercises as they are organized by industry 12