ML17252A855

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submittal of Report Periodic Surveillance Test PT-M2, Reactor Coolant Temperature Analog Channel Functional Test T Over Temperature and T Over Power
ML17252A855
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Indian Point  
Issue date: 01/25/1974
From: Cobean W
Consolidated Edison Co of New York
To: O'Leary J
US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
References
Download: ML17252A855 (2)


Text

.,-'

~,. ---i

/.. /

-~!'*~~

??-,

1~t Cl\\~ ED JAN28l974~ l

    • 'Regulatory Docf{et File

.J.

  • Ii s. mm~ El\\E.Rli1 t!Ji.il.1\\SSIOll Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

4 Irving Place, New York, NY 10003 Re:

Mr. J<;>hn F. '0' Leary, Director.

Directorate of Licensing Off ice of Regulations U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C.

20545

Dear Mr. O'Leary:

January 25, 1974 Indian Point Unit No. 2 Facility Operating License DPR-26, A.0.-4 CV 50-247

'C7-The following report is provided pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.12.2(a) of the Technical Specifications to Facility Operating License No. DPR-26.

Rtgljla1ilfY

  • iL!ail sect\\1111 Periodic surveillance test PT-M2, "Reactor Coolant Temperature Analog Channel Functional Test -.6T Overtemperature and~T Over-power", was performed with. Unit No. 2 in the cold shutdown con~

di tion. _.-The limiting safety system settings of Channels I and III of the Qverpower.OT Reactor Trip circuitry were found to be below that required by Technical Specification 2.3.l.B95).

Chan-nels I and III have since been recalibrated and tested satisfac-torily..

'These particular devices are part of a four channel reactor trip logic where activation of any two of the four bistables (one p~r channel) will produce a reactor trip signal.

Since the Channel II and IV bistables were found to be operating correctly, over-power~ T would have caused a reactor trip to occur within the range prescribed by the Technical Specifications.

\\ '

As stated in our January 18, 1974 letter to you, Nuclear Power Generation Department is investigating the setpoint drift problem in conjunction with the manufacturer and our Engineering Depart-ment.* If our investigation substantiates that a particular bi-stable component is the cause of the setpoint drifts experienced, we plan to replace these components on an appropriate progress*ive schedule with priority given to those components in the reactor protection circuitry.

,_,.,.~- ;J. *. -*

---~--------

- ~---

Because the logic circuitry was still operating, s.a~ety irnplica~

tions to the occurrence were not cons:idered significant~

However~

the investigation into the re~son~ for recently reported setpoint drift will continue ~ith th~ *interit of reducing the likelihood of their incidence~

cc:

Mr. James: P. O '*Reilly Very* truly* yours*~

oo~

[2_ ~~1 Warren R.. Cobe*an ~

  • J:r:::...,. Mana,ger Nuclear Power Genera,ti'on

.:..,