ML17252A333

Applicants Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Commonwealth Edison Concurs in Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law by Atomic Energy Commission Regulatory Staff in Form of Proposed Initial Decision Submitted by Counse

ML17252A333
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	09/28/1966
From:	Gehr A Commonwealth Edison Co
To:	US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
References
Download: ML17252A333 (2)

Text

.e UNITED. STATES OF AMERICA _ *;:.

ATOMIC ENERGY CO~ISSION. CH).

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Docket No: 50-249 In the Matter of:

(Dresden Nuclear Pqwer.

station Unit No. 3)

{~?.,,(~ bh APPLICANT'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Applicant concurs in the Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclu-sions of Law by the AEC Regulatory Staff in the form of a Proposed Initial Decision (the 11Proposed Findings") which was submitted*by*

• counsel for the A.Fi; Regulatory Staff with its let.ter of September 21, 1966 to the* members of the Atomic.Safety an*d *Licensing Board subject to the following changes*.

1.

The word "increased 11 in the third *line of paragraph 9 of_

the* Propo~ed Findings should be deleted* *..

~ -*

2 *. *The following should be inserted *at the end of paragraph: *.

• 11 of the Proposed Findings:

1 ~ith respect to the emergency core cooling system ACRS recommended that 'details of design, fabrication "

procedures, plans* for in~service inspections and analyses *** 'be submitted for review by the Regu-latory Staff and.ACRS 'as soon as this information

• • .1

~. ' -

is available and prior to irrevocable construction coinmitments *pertaining thereto.;*

• In* response* to this --i** --- * - **..

• request the Applicant made the commitments to supply *

,.~.. '. :

• -.~ * -~., f '

~...

. *,\\ **

.. *i

, ~..

I

.... ~

f

~,

I i < *

~

,l... :. *

• )**:,

~*-

.... ;... i.

,. ~-.. j

I

~.

/(

e*

Dated: such 'details' or technical information identified in the ACRS letter as soon as possible and, further, that any construction commitments made prior to such Staff and ACRS review of such details would be at the Appl1cant 1s_risk, financial or otherwise."

Respectfully submitted,

,*:.. -COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY

• - ~.

.i:

• .;T

'.J.'

By_. __ __,_..--_..,.,.._,....,. ______ _

September 28,

• I.

1966

. ' ~.

l *.

• ';f.'.

.....,*,~'.,. :.

~

• ~

~-. :.

• ~...

. l" **

• .1

. :. ;~...

Arthur c. Gehr Attorney for Applicant Commonwealth Edison Company

• ' ** -1

~.

~ '1 **

. '**.\\:

j.

. : ~/.

• .. :. -:**'-'1

>~ *.'

~ ) *-'

~-

\\*' ' ;'.

• .. ~.

~'...

.,r-

• ~ ',.. _*,....

• ~'.

.:..:.. . ; ~*..,.

'.........~..-*.... : ~

• .*1*

1'

~.'.. '.

. -***I' I,*. *.

• .... ', :* '. ~* :.. _,..

'*'.*\\'.*

-~*

' ~

-~: '

.'. \\

l

.