ML17251A528
| ML17251A528 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1989 |
| From: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8906060198 | |
| Download: ML17251A528 (10) | |
Text
,
ii'l"~"%"'~l~""~""'".
~'/v,~7$ lifi)r,:~./ii)/",E ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC et@
~
4 yOOK 5TATC CORPORATION
~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.K 14649-0001
. May 26, 1989 ZCI EP ding aeci coot;io 546 2700 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I Attn: Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Reactor Safety 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406
References:
- a. license No.
DPR-18 (Docket No. 50-244) b..Inspection No. 50-244/89-04 By letter dated April 28,
- 1989, the -NRC provided RGRE with the results of Inspection No. 50-244/89-04.
This letter included as Appendix A
a Notice of Violation related to operability of the replacement PORV block valves.
RGGE was requested to respond, within 30 days, and provide a written statement or explanation in reply to the Notice, including (1) the reasons for the violation, (2) corrective steps which'ave been taken and the results
- achieved, (3) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date the full compliance willbe achieved.
The Notice further states that, where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the 'response time.
Pertinent information regarding additional documentation to demonstrate operability'f the PORV block valves, as requested by the NRC inspector, was submitted on May 3, 1989.
This was found to be acceptable, as stated in the NRC response dated May 18, 1989.
Since key RGEE personnel are fully engaged in completing the current Spring 1989 Refueling Outage and its associated modification activities,
- and, since the technical issues concerning the valves have been resolved, it is requested that an additional 45 days be allowed for our formal response to the Inspection Report and Notice of Violation.
Very truly yours, Robert C.
Mec edy General. Manager Nuclear Production
GJWK043 xc:
Allen R. Johnson (Mail Stop 14D1)
Project Directorate I-3 Washington, D.C.
20555 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDE)
ESSION NBR:8906060198 DOC.DATE: 89/05/26 NOTARIZED: NO
~
~
~
CIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G
UTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.
Rochester Gas
& Electric Corp.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTIN,T.T.
Region 1, Ofc of the Director
SUBJECT:
Responds to NRC 890428 ltr re violations noted in Insp Rept 50-244/89-04.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IEOID COPIES RECElVED:LTR g ENCL 0 SIZE:
TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
DOCKET 05000244 05000244 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD INTERNAL: AEOD AEOD/TPAD NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DLPQ/PQEB NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE LXEBERMAN,J 02
'RNAL'PDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME JOHNSON,A AEOD/DEIIB DEDRO NRR/DEST DIR NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 RGN1 FILE 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL Ml~ '1O ALL "RIES" RECIPiE2VS:
D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 22 ENCL P~E EKLP US 1O REMKZ %RPZE!
CDiZAC1'IHE DOCUMEA'7 CCbTRDL DMK, KXK PI-37 (EX1'. 20079)
KO ELIMZNAX'E YOUR NAME FRY DISTRXBVZION LISTS FOR DOCl2K?GS YOU DON'T NEED!
S
p I4l ~
PI 5taTC ROCHESTEP, GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y, 14649-0001 May 26, 1989 l~< ~
iira =e;
~ - <<'e.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I Attn: Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Reactor Safety 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406
References:
- a. License No.
DPR-18 (Docket No. 50-244)
- b. Inspection No. 50-244/89-04
Dear Mr. Martin:
By letter dated.April 28,
- 1989, the NRC provided RG&E with the results of Inspection No. 50-244/89-04.
This letter included as Appendix A
a Notice of Violation related to operability of the replacement PORV block valves.
RG&E was requested to respond, within 30 days, and provide a written statement or explanation in reply to the Notice, including (1) the reasons for the violation, (2) corrective steps which have been taken and the results
- achieved, (3) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date the full compliance willbe achieved.
The Notice further states that, where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Pertinent information regarding additional documentation to demonstrate operability of the PORV block valves, as requested by the NRC inspector, was submitted on May 3, 1989.
This was found to be acceptable, as stated in the NRC response dated May 18, 1989.
Since key RG&E personnel are fully engaged in completing the current Spring 1989 Refueling Outage and its associated modification activities, and since the technical issues concerning the valves have been resolved, it is requested that an additional 45 days be allowed for our formal response to the Inspection Report and Notice of Violation.
Very truly yours, S9C16(l+O jug p ~(pe. (
a
~DOCI~
O~ii.)()r)~.r~z F'C<I C'obert C.
Mec edy General Manager Nuclear Production
GJW4043 xc:
Allen R. Johnson (Mail Stop 14D1)
Project Directorate I-3 Washington, D.C.
20555 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector