ML17249A294
| ML17249A294 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna |
| Issue date: | 11/19/1979 |
| From: | White L ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17249A295 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0578, RTR-NUREG-578 NUDOCS 7911260288 | |
| Download: ML17249A294 (4) | |
Text
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (BIDS)
AC858 9 NDR:7911280288 OC ~ DATE: 79/11/19 NDTARIZQi ND FAgZt.!5 244 Robeit Emmet Ginna Auctear Plantr Un>t li Rochester G
AL)TH~ NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATIO~
WAIVE,L,D, Rochester Gas '8 Electric Corp, "AECIP',t<AME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ZIEMANNrD ~
Operating Reactois Branch 2
DOCKET 0
05000244
SUBJECT:
Responds to, HR Denton 791030 1 tr.For wards "Discussion of TMI Lessops Lear ned Short Term Requi r ements ~"
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
A039S COPIES RKCEIYKDILTR Q'NCL, 5,
SIZE' TITLE: Resp to"Lesson L.ear n Task For ce'Nest ingliouse NDTE8: I@: v, ~//l//+ICE+ g,~PngWyg ACTIONS INTERNAL9 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME 10 BC dR'r8'~
1 EG FILE 19 T--
20 CORE PKRF BR 22 REAC SFTY 8A 24 KEB 3
LPDR 5 J OLSHINSKI 7
3 BUAOIoA 9
G IHBRO OKLD" COP IFS LTTR ENCL
'7" 1
1 1
i i
1 1
iii i
i i
i RECIPIENT ID COOK/NAME 17 I 8
E 2
NHC PDR 21 ENG BR 23 PLANT SYS BR 25 KFLT'TRT SYS 4'SIC 6
J KERRIGAN 8
C WiLLIS H FIELDS COPIES L'TTA ENCL 2
2 1
1 i
i ii iii i
ii EXTKRNAL8 26 ACRS 16
>q g>9 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED; LTTR ~
ENCL
I C
0
~ <<
I jW ~
Nl a
1 1
t fl H
t 14 l'I
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
~
89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, M.Y. 14649 LEON D. WHITE. JR.
VICC PACSIDCNT TCI,CPHdNC
~eci CddC 7lS 546-2700 November.19, 1979 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN:
Mr. Dennis Ziemann, Chief Operating Reactors Branch I2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
/
Subject:
Discussion of Lessons Learned Short Term Requirements R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Docket No. 50-244
Dear Mr.,
Ziemann:
This letter is in response to a letter from Harold Denton dated October 30, 1979 and received November 8, 1979.
The letter provided clarifications of, and additions to, NRC staff require-ments for short term lessons learned.
We have reviewed the requirements and committed to meet the schedule and method of com-pliance requested or provided justification for any differences.
The attachment to this letter provides our response.
Sincerely yours,
~,p L. D. White, Jr.
Attachment,
J
&