ML17249A185
| ML17249A185 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1979 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17249A181 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-244-79-08, 50-244-79-8, NUDOCS 7910150070 | |
| Download: ML17249A185 (4) | |
Text
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation Docket No. 50-244 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted during the period May 1-18, 1979, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with the conditions of your NRC License No.
DPR-18 as discussed below.
These items are infractions.
A.
10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion XI Test Control, states, in part,
"....test results shall be....evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satisfied."
The Ginna Station guality Assurance Manual, Section 11, Test Control, Revision 6, Paragraph 3.6.1 states, in part, "Additional control procedures shall be instituted, as necessary, to assure timely....evaluation of test results;"
Plant Procedure A-1104, Ginna Station Technical Specification Surveillance
- Program, Revision 0, Section 3.3,
- states, in part, "The Results and Test Engineer, or designated assistant; shall be responsible for reviewing and evaluating the accuracy of all completed Periodic Tests...."
Contrary to the above, on May 9-10, 1979, it was determined that the following Periodic Tests were not properly reviewed in that:
PT-12.2, Emergency Diesel 1B, Revision 10, performed on April 12, 1979, included unacceptable data for engine cooling water pressure which was not identified during post performance procedure review; and PT16, Auxiliary Feedwater Systems Revision 19, was performed on April 25, 1979 but the test results did not receive timely evaluation in that the required data review and approval was not conducted until May 10, 1979 when the oversight was identified during this inspection and after approximately one half of the required surveillance test interval had elapsed.
B.
T.S. 6.8.1 states, in part,'Written procedures shall be'stabl'ished, implemented and maintained covering 'the activities referenced below:
a) the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972...."
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A recommends, in part, that the following safety related activities be covered by written procedures:
"A.3 Equipment Control (e.g. locking and tagging)"
I I
and Procedures for Startup, Operation and Shutdown of Safety Related PWR Systems, including "C.5 Emergency Core Cooling Systems."
Contrary to the above, on May 3, 1979, it was determined that Reactor Plant Systems Operations Procedure S-16A, Safety Injection System Alignment, Revision 14, was not properly established, implemented nor maintained in that it failed to provide instructions for proper positioning of manual valve V-878E, Safety Injection Loop A Cold Leg Injection Throttle Valve.
Furthermore, Valve 878E was found to be locked open but was not included in the locked valve list of A-52.,2, Control'f Locked Valves,,Revision 24, as required by Section 3.4 of that procedure.
C'