ML17229A340
| ML17229A340 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1996 |
| From: | Evans C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Merschoff E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17229A331 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-335-96-22, 50-389-96-22, NUDOCS 9705190193 | |
| Download: ML17229A340 (1) | |
See also: IR 05000335/1996022
Text
ghee RECT
Cg
~o
4
I
1
~O
+)t **+
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W., SUITE 2900
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323.0199
January
10.
1996
MEMORANDUM TO:
Ellis W. Herschoff, Acting Deputy Regional Administrator
FROM:
Carolyn F.
Evans.
Regional
Counsel
SUBJECT:
'DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL
VIEW REGARDING
ST.
LUCIE NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION
INSPECTION REPORT 50-335/96-22.
50-389/96-22
In response to your request.
the subject inspection report has been reviewed with
special
attention
devoted to the discussion
under the "Prior Opportunity to
Identify" section of the report.
Giving the inspector's
conclusion that "the
licensee's
failure to resolve the first indications of channel
disagreement
in
a formal, technically defensible way ..
. delayed the identification" a literal
reading,
I can only conclude that in the inspector's
view, licensee failure to
address
the first indications'f channel
discrepancy
in
a formal, technical
manner
as opposed to merely advancing explanations
for the channel
disagreement
indications
delayed
identification of the
channel
miswiring.
Whether this
conclusion is itself reasonable
is for others to determine.
'"first indications" is not very specific; arguably it could encompass
the
first
and
second
channel
discrepancies
or the first through the
very last
discrepancy
noted
before the channel
miswiring was identified.
In no event
however
. can it refer to merely the first indication that was noted at 5X'power,
for the plural of indication is used.
9705i90i93 9705i2
ADOCK 05000335
P'DR
I~&l l~
l li 3
Attachment
3