ML17227A712
| ML17227A712 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/1993 |
| From: | Geiger J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17227A713 | List: |
| References | |
| L-93-19, NUDOCS 9302100173 | |
| Download: ML17227A712 (7) | |
Text
ACCEI ERATO DOCUMENT DIST VTION SYSTEM tj REGULAT~ INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO STEM (RIDS) rs ACCESSION NBR:9302100173 DOC.DATE: 93/01/28 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power 6 Light Co.
50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power
& Light Co.
AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION GEIGER,J.E.
Florida Power a Light Co.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
DOCKET 05000335 05000389 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1
=RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRISiJ
SUBJECT:
Forwards Rev 24 to "Topical QA Rept."
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
Q004D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR g ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: QA Topical Report, Amendment, or Correspondence (Docket/Utility Speci NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 LA INTERNAL: ACRS OC/LFMB RGN2 FILE 8
8 1
1 1
1 NRR D
P /LPEB10 01 1
1 2
2 EXTERNAL: IHS 1
1 NRC PDR 1
1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 17 ENCL 17
sC L'
/pe P.O. Box14000, Juno Boach, FL 33408-0420 JAN28 1993 10 CFR 50. 54 (a)
L-93-19 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Re:
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 St. Lucie Units 1 and 2
Docket Nos.
50-335 and 50-389 To ical ualit Assurance Re ort FPLT AR 1-7 6A FPL is proposing a
change to the method of implementing the
. baseline commitment for procurement.
document review contained in the Topical Quality Assurance Report (TQAR).
The change provides for both the technical and quality review of procurement documents
.to be performed by Engineering personnel.
Prior practice by FPL has been for the quality assurance portion of this review to be performed by Quality Assurance personnel.
The reason for this change is to provide a more efficient and effective procurement document review process.
While'his change does not, in our opinion, reduce commitments from the baseline documents contained in Appendix C to the
- TQAR, NRC review and concurrence prior to implementation is being requested in accordance with 10CFR50.54 (a)(3) and FPL TQR 2.0.
The specific revisions proposed to the TQAR to implement this change are contained and highlighted in the following attachments as noted:
(additions are indicated by bold lettering and deletions
- by lining out the item to be deleted).
TQR 1.0, Rev.
24, Draft R770 D, 01/11/93 Page 8, paragraph 1.2.1.4(a)
Page 18, paragraph 1.2.1.5(b)(1)
Page 19 and 20, paragraph 1.2.1.5(b)(2)
NOTE:
Other changes to TQR 1.0 contained in the attachment are non-substantive and are provided for information only.
Formal submittal will occur as part of the next annual update to the NRC.
FPL submitted TQR 1.0, Revision 21, in the 1992 annual update of the FPL TQAR (ref:L-92-165).
Revisions 22 and 23 contain primarily organizational changes to be submitted as part of the next annual update.
. AaQA~G 9302100173 930128 PDR
- DOCK 05000335
'i p
~>>
A l
a v
v,"
V
~ J
L-93-19 Page 2 of 3 2.
TQR 4.0, Rev.
6, Draft C/R772, 07/27/92 Page 2, paragraph 4.2.2 NOTE:
Other changes to TQR 4.0 contained in the attachment are non-substantive and are provided for information only.
Formal submittal will occur as part of the next annual update to the NRC.
3.
Appendix C, Rev.
11, Draft B/R773, 06/24/92 Page 20, ANSI N45.2.13-1976, Section 3.3(a)
NOTE:
Other changes to Appendix C contained in the attachment are non-substantive and are provided for information only.
Formal submittal will occur as part of the next annual update to the NRC.
Our review of commitments in the baseline documents listed in Appendix C to the TQAR including 10CFR50 Appendix B, ANSI N45.2-1971, ANSI N45.2.13-1976 (Regulatory Guide 1.123, Rev. 1), and ANSI N18.7-1976 (Regulatory Guide 1.33, Rev. 2), concluded that in-line review of procurement documents by Quality Assurance personnel is not required.
The review of procurement documents (and changes thereto) by Engineering personnel will continue to meet the requirements of ANSI 45.2.13-1976, paragraph 3.3 as clarified in Appendix C of the TQAR.
FPL is confident that the change will enhance the review process as Engineering personnel will be able to more readily access pertinent information as well as possess a more direct understanding of the requirements and intent of the procurement documents.
To assure that the changeover of responsibility is successfully implemented, Quality Assurance has committed to work closely with Engineering and Materials Management personnel in revising the necessary Quality Instructions and training programs.
In addition, the Quality Assurance audit program will provide increased attention to this area during the transition period, and continued emphasis as warranted in accordance with TQAR requirements.
Upon receipt of written NRC concurrence, or 60 days after submittal, whichever occurs first (in accordance with 10CFR50.54 (a)(3)(iv)),
FPL will proceed to effect the necessary Quality Procedure, Quality Instruction, and training program revisions to implement the changes described above.
Should there be any questions, please contact me.
V truly rs, E.
G iger Vice President Nuclear Assurance JEG/RAS/RGL/e jk Enclosures
.L-93-19 Page 3 of 3 cc:
Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspection, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant
t I
I'
~
'