L-86-189, Revised Application for Amend to License NPF-16,authorizing Changes in Diesel Generator Tech Specs in Response to Generic Ltr 84-15.Revised Specs Eliminate Inconsistencies W/ North Anna Unit 2 STS for Diesel Generators,Per NRC Request
| ML17216A536 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1986 |
| From: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Thadani A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17216A537 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-84-15, L-86-189, NUDOCS 8605140029 | |
| Download: ML17216A536 (6) | |
Text
E REQULAT Y INFORNATION DISTRIBUTIO SYSTEN (R IDS)
SUBJECT:
Revised application for amend to License NPF-i6i authorizing changes in diesel generator Tech Specs in response to Generic Ltr 84-i5. Revised specs eliminate inconsistencies v/
North Anna Unit 2 Sts for diesel generators. per NRC request.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
A056D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE:
OR Submittal: Fast Cold Starts of Diesel Generators QL-83-4i (QL-84-15 NOTES 1
ACCESSION NBR: 8605140029 DOC. DATE: 86/05/07 NOTARIZED:
NO FACIL:50-389 St.
Lucie Plant>
Unit 2i Florida Poeer 5 Light Co.
AUTH. NAl'1E AUTHOR AFFILIATION WOODY> C. O.
Flor 1 da Pobler 8t Lig ht Co.
RECIP. NANE REC IP IENT AFFlt IATION THADANI>A. C.
Division of Pressurized Water Reactor Licensing B (post 8
REC IPIENT ID CODE/MANE PWR-B ADTS PWR-B PEICSB PWR-B PD8 PD Oi PWR-B PEICSB INTERNAL: ADN/LFNB IE/DEPER/EAB 08 NRR PWR-A PSB NRR/DSRO/RSIB E
04 E
AO/RRB i2 I
EXTERNAL: 24X NRC PDR 02 COPlES LTTR ENCL i
i 2
2 3
3i 0i iii i
i i
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NANE PWR-B EB PWR-B FOB SELLSi D PWR-B RSB LPDR NSIC 03 05 AEOD 07 NRR BWR PSB NRR PWR-B PEICS NRR/ORAS BRENNE RES BARANOWSKI RGN2 06 COPIES LTTR ENCL ii i
i TOTAL NURSER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 27 ENCL 26
4
-0 4
r t.
~
jk.
~
f 4
'I 44 I,ffk'4;-"
t 4
1 Z
4 iir I'u 4 <<,ff"I
""D P
f 4
4<<I44 P
g
~ 4 gl jf 4
ri tf
~ tt
$ 4 14 C
- r. t
~
~,I.l 4, iij I(
44 f lf Ir <<, I, <<J rl kl wf lt k
. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, F L 3340B FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY MAY 7 1888 L-86-I89 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. Ashok C. Thadani, Director Division of PWR Licensing - B U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Thadani:
Re:
St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-389 Proposed License Amendment Diesel Generator Technical S ecifications On August 27, l985, Florida Power 8 Light Company submitted a request to amend Facility Operating License NPF-l6.
The amendment requested involved changes to the Diesel Generator Technical Specifications in response to NRC Generic Letter 84-I5, NRC s recommendations regarding'the North Anna Unit 2 Technical Specifications'issued as, Amendment',No.,',48 to Facility Operating License NPF-7, and additional discussions with NRC on Diesel Generator surveillance requirements and reliability.
During review of the'amendment
- request, NRC identified several areas that needed clarification in that there were some inconsistencies between FPL's submittal and the North Anna Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
NRC indicated that the North Anna Unit 2 Technical Specifications should be considered as the "Standard Tech Specs" for Diesel Generator Technical Specifications.
As a result, attached are the revised pages which reflect the North Anna Unit 2 format and wording.
This provides the requested clarification and eliminates the inconsistencies.
It should be pointed out that there are only two areas that differ from the North Anna Unit 2 format.
The first area concerns the offsite circuits (Specification 3.8.l.la.) and is because of the differences between St. Lucie and North Anna designs.
The second difference is in the proposed Tech Spec 4.8.l.l.2d. in that diesel generator operability is independent of its start signals.
Furthermore, diesel generator starts from a simulated loss of offsite power, loss of offsite power in conjunction with an ESF actuation test signal and an ESF actuation test signal by itself are verified under Tech Spec 4.8. I.I.2a.4.
8b05140029 Sb0507 8 PDR ADOCK 05'000389<
P PDRU RJS4/026/
I PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
~
I Y
p k MI t'"
M>>mf I M
M
'I Il t I
Ir li it i, I'J r
l mlf Jl ~
I i, i"
~ I II II k
M
~
il tt p l
MA
~ t m
Mt<<
il Jf>>
C<<
k f'I'f
"f) kf>> r;".
M Eked fk' 3
k f Ii I M f
<It, k
II k
r m J <<>>
l P
( r ikfi
~
~
J r
k I
I, V
- k C
t M
I' I
MP Jk 4
I it f t
~
I' ll k<<
t>>
I",tt li M
I il
~ g ~
I I
I m
It II k" I>>
4
'r ~
Ck~>>
M M
M ii k
t I
I,'llII
<< I I4 I
Y A I',
I l ~
M MJ r
M M
I tpm p
r.
Il
~
I I
IM II M
i>>if M'
m ~
~
QJ
Mr. Ashok C. Thadani, Director L-86-I89 Page two Although the attached revision is mostly editorial in nature, a revised safety evaluation and no significant hazards considerations determination is also at tached.
Should you have any additional questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
~
~
. O. Wood Group Vi resident Nuclear Energy COW/RJS/gp Attachments RJS4/026/2
I I
t I
A
'I