ML17215A553

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amend 6 to License NPF-16,changing Tech Spec Axial Shape Index Figures 3.2-2 & 3.2-4 to Reflect Fact That Limiting Conditions for Operation Unnecessary Below 30% of Rated Thermal Power
ML17215A553
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie 
Issue date: 08/10/1984
From: John Miller
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML17215A554 List:
References
NUDOCS 8409120456
Download: ML17215A553 (9)


Text

~R Rt'OII A.0 Vl 0> ~

gO 0y*y0 t

UNITEDSTATES t

NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE CITY'F'RLANDO FLORIDA AND'LORIDA'UNICIPAL POWER AGENCY DOCKET'O 50-389 ST; LUCIE PL'ANT UNIT NO.

2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING. LICENSE Amendment No.

6 License No. NPF-'6 1.,

The Nuclear Regulatory COIImfssion (the Comission) has found that:

A'he. application for amendment by Florida Power 8I Light Company,,

et;al

,, (the. 1'icensee) dated. December. 22983 complies with the standards, and. requirements of the Atomic Energy Act" of 1954',

as.

amended.(the Act) and the-Comissi'on's'ules and regulations set.

forth in 10 CFR Chapter. I; B.

The facility wiT1'perate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C'.

There is. reasonable.- assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this'mendment.

can be conducted without endangering the. health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the COIIIIission's regulations;,

D..

The. issuance" of: this. amendment will not be inimical to the common defense.

and security or to the health and safety of the. public;-

and.

E.

The: issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Comission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied..

2.

Accordingly, Facil'ity Operating~ L'i'cense No. NPF-16 is. amended by changes. to the. Technical Specifications as indicated; in the attach-ment to this-license amendment, and by amending paragraph 2.C.(2) to read as. follows:

(2)

Technical S ecifications.

The: Technical: Specifications, contained in Appendices A'

~ and; B,. ar. revised-through'mendment No.. 6.

are hereby incorporated'n the.. 1'i'cense..

The, licensee.- shall operate the: facility'n accordance:. with the Technical Specifica-Uons'..

3'hfs; Ti'cense amendment. is. effective: as. of the date of its issuance..

FOR THE'LEAR REGU 'ATO COMMISSION.

Attachment" Changes to the. Techni'caT Specifications, Date'f Issuance:.

August. 10 lg84 James:

R Mi.l1 erChief Operating, Reactors Branch 8'3 lltvis,ion. of; Licensing.,

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO.

TO FACILITY OPERATING. LICENSE NO., NPF-16 DOCKET NO. 50-389 Replace the. following pages of the Appendix "A" Technical Specifications with the enclosed pages The. revised pages are.- identified by amendment number and'ontain verticaT lines indicating the area of change.

The:

corresponding overTeaf'ages are also provided. to maintain document com-pleteness.

~Pa es 3/4-'-4 3/4. 2-12.

15.0 Lll~

14.0 gh I

WQ XO ccrc z

13'0 gO Ill +

UJ ~

12,0

~

>J

~

~ ~ I ~

~

~

\\

~

~ r

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ v

'\\ 8

~ I

~

~

~

~ I

~ -I'-

U k ~

~ l

~

J ~

~

~ I ACCEPTABLE OP ERATION NACCEPTABLE OPERATION

~"

~ ~

~ ~ ~

) ~.-

~ " ~

11.0 BOL CYCLE LIFE

~

~ I ~ ~

~

~

I 0 ~

EOL Figure 3.2-1 Allowable peak linear heat rate vs burnup ST. LUCIE - UNIT2 3/4 2-3

1.1

~ -

I l

~ ~

~

~

~

~

!;".':".:i::.: i. ';,::.; l l :':I ':~:"

1.0 I

I I

=':':=-'-'j':-': " "-: ~:-'NACCEPTABLE REGION I ~

0.9 L/J o

0.8 0.7 C) o~

0.6 I

CD

,"'..- '. (-0 15, 0 925) '

I'"

':-:---:: (0.1S, 0.92S)

~

I

~

~ 4

~ att

~

I

.'.;.;. I

,I I

4

~

~

~

I

~

L

- ~

t

~

~

.4

~ ~

I

~

~

I ~

~

I

~

t

~ ~ -

I I

~

<< ~

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~-~

A

~

~

I

~ ~

~

~

~

~

4

~

4 I

~ I ~

I

- ~ ~

~

I

(-0.3, 0.70) -i.-

I I ~ ~ ~

~.

I

~

~

~ ~

.':=..(0.3, 0.70)

~

~ ~== >> I4 I

~

~

~ I

~

I ~ ~

4- ~

~

~

~

g

~ ~

~ ~ ~

~

~ I ~ --

~ ~

I

~ t

'I 4 I

t

~ ~

~ ~ I

~

~

-~

~ ~ --j

~"t

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

~ I

~.

~

ACCEPTABLE,......

OPERATION '"

REGION 4..tI

~ ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~ ~

t

~

~

~

I

~

I

>> ~

~

~

~

~

~ I ~

I ~

~

~ ~

~

+

~

I4 I

~

I

~

~

~

I I

0.5

~

I

~

I

~ ~

I

~ '"

I I

~ ~ ~

~: ~

~

~

0.4 I.'::;::

~

  • t

~

I' I

~

~ I

~ $ >> ~

~

4"

\\

~ I I ~

I i

I

~

~

ti

~ It

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

4 I II I

~

4,

~

I 4, M ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~

I I

I *

~

\\

~"

0.3

-0 6

-0.4

~.

-0.2 0.0 0.2 PERIPHERAL AXIAL SHAPE ItSEX 0.4 0.6 Figure 3.2-2 AXIAL.SHAPE INOEX vs fraction of maximum allowable power level per Specification 4.2.1.3 ST. LUCIE-UNIT 2 3/4 2-4 Amendment No. 6

1.1 1.0 h

k h

.I UNACCEPTABLE::;;",',:'::;

REGION

~

~

~

~

~

h

.. (-0.1S, 0. 925)

" 'hh

~

h

~

I

~

~

~

. (0.1S, 0.

~

I ~925).,

0.9 k

~ ~

h ~

a 0.8 0.7 ae h

o~

0.6 l

~ I

~ ~

I

~

~ I

~

~

~

~ i.

h h ~

~

~ A

~

~

I

~

h

'I h ~

I

~ r

~

~

'-0.3, 0.70) -.i h ~

~

I

~ I ~

~

~ ~ ~

~ r ~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

I I ~

h

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

i

~ ~

I

~

~

~ j

=

- ~ ~

~

~

I

~

--"--"".:.'.. --.. ACCEPTABLE.::.:.:;-;.i..:"-

OPERATION;,

',.'EGION I

I

\\

~

~ ~

I ~

~

~

~

I I '

I ~

'. (0.3, 0 70) h

= ~

0.5 I

I h

~

k I

I I

h I

~

~

I

'I

~ k ~

I h

r ~ ~

~

k 0.4 h

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

h 0 3-0. 6

  • r I

~ I

-0.4

-0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PERIPHERAL AXIAL SHAPE INOEX Figure 3.2-2 AXIAL.SHAPE INDEX vs fraction of maximum allowable power level per Specification 4.2.1.3 ST.

LUCIE - UNIT 2 3/4 2-4 Amendment No. 6

TABLE 3.2-1 PENALTY TO BE APPLIED TO F

TO ACCOUNT FOR ROD BOW EFFECTS ON DNBR BURNUP OF BUNDLE DNBR

~/

DNBR PENALTY WITH GRID SPACING P ENALTY

%%uo PENALTY MULTIPLIER TO BE APPLIED TO MEASURED F

0"10. 0

10. 0-20. 0
20. 0-30. 0
30. 0-40. 0
40. 0-50. 0 0.5 1.0 2.0 3.5 5.5 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.5 6.5
1. 013
1. 017
1. 026
1. 038
1. 055 ST.

LUCIE - UNIT 2 3/4 2-11

1.1 1.0

(-0.15, 1.00) 1 i ~ ~

~

~

~

p l

= i l

(0.15, 1.00)

~ -

~ ~

0.9 0 8

'NACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION i

t

~ i ~

~ i i-i

~

i

~ ~

I t=

"l ~

~ ~

UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION i

Q 0.7 o

0 6

(-0.3, 0.75):=

~

~ ~

i

~

n C

i i

.: ACCEPTABLE;.

.....l OPERATION REGION

~

~ '

~

~

l

~

~

.':-; (0.3, 0.75)

~

~ I 0.5

@i

~

~

0.4 2

~

~

0.3

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PERIPHERAL AXIAL SHAPE INOEX (YI)

Figure 3.2-4 AXIAI SHAPE 1%EX oper ating limits Nth four reactor cool ant pumps operating ST.

LUCIE - UNIT 2 3/4 2-12 Amendment No.

1.1 1.0

(-0.15, 1.00)

(0.15, 1.00)

~ j 0.9 UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION 0.8 pJ Om7 0.6

(-0.3, 0.75)

- ACCEPTABLE:

OPERATION REGION

~-

(0.3, 0.75) 0.5 0.4 0.3

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PERI PHERAL AXIAL SHAPE INOEX ( Y1 )

Figure 3.2-4 AXIAL SHAPE IN0EX operating liaits with four reactor coolant pumps operating ST.

LUCIE - UNIT 2 3/4 2-12 Amendment No.