L-81-426, Forwards Responses to NRC Requests for Addl Info Re Fsar. Responses Will Be Incorporated Into FSAR Amend
| ML17212A862 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 09/29/1981 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17212A864 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-REGGD-01.145, RTR-REGGD-1.145 L-81-426, NUDOCS 8110070315 | |
| Download: ML17212A862 (10) | |
Text
REGUL RY INFORMATION DISTRIBUT SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION( V9R:8110070345 DOC ~ DATE(: 81/09/29 NOTARIZED!- NO FACILCSO-389 St. Lucie Planti Unit 2< Florida Power L Liight'os AUTHI,NAME)
AUl'HOR AFFILIATION UHRIG p R ~ E>>,
Florida Power II Light Co, REC IP ~ VAMEI RECX PZ KN1'F F ILCATION KIISKNHLITIED's G Divisi on of Licensing
SUBJECT:
Forwards responses to NRC requests for addi info re FSAR"s Responses will= be incorporated into FSAR amend, DOCKEIT 05090389 DISTRIBOTION CODES BOOIS COPIES RECEIVED:l,iTR I, ENCL'.
T'XTLKI PSAR'/FSAR AMDT8 and Rell a ted Cor respondence-NOTES'.
SIZE':: gS REC IPX ENTI ID'OOK/NAMEI ACT%ON!
A/0>> LCCETVSNG LllC> BR 43>> LA INTERNALS: ACClID KNAL" BRt26'HEM KVG BR 11 CORE PERF. BR 10.
ELOI GEQSC I ENCES 28 HYD'/GEOI BR 30; ILKI 06 IE/KPLBI 36 LIICI QUAL BR 32'.
MECH E'VG BR 18 OP LIC 8RI 34 PROC/TST REV 20.
RAO AS SS BR22t FIL Ol UC=T 8 R25(
COPIES LTTR ENCL' 0
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 0
2 2i 2
3 3
3 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME; LAC" BR tI3 BC NERSESEY ~
04 AUX SYS'R 2'7 CONTII SYS BR 09.
EFF TR SYS BR12'QUIP QUAL'R13" HUM FACT ENG 40 ILC SYS BR 16'E/EPDB35 L'IC GUID BR MATLI KNG BR 17 41P A POWER SYS BR 19 QA BR 21 REAC'YS BR 23.
SIT'NAL" BR 2'4
,COPIEB LITTRI EN C L<
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 3
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1<<
1 0..
1 1 ~
1 1.
1 1
1 1
EXTERNALC ACRS I.PDR IVS'IC 41 03I 05 16 16 1
1 1
1 FEMAR REP DIY 39 NRC PDRl 02 NTIS 1
1 1
1 1
1 TOlTAL NURBER>> OF COPIES REQUIRED LiTTR 62'NCL.
57
C
~
M 47 I
.4 a
77 e
E f
'I f
rr ll 4. Ii>>
If 4%
I I',
~
k~
>>I g 4
I 4
4 ep S
~
I
~
",If I>>
P.O. BOX 529100 MIAMI,FL 33152-FLORIDA POWER & LIGHTCOMPANY September 29, 1981 L-81-426 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Nr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Nr. Eisenhut:
Re:
St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Final Safety Analysis Report Re uests For Additional Information
'fan (pg,~'
OCT elg8 ua,~~
>~
12 O hing)g~g~
Attached are Florida Power 8 Light Company (FPL) responses to NRC staff requests for additional information which have not been formally submitted on the St. Lucie Unit 2 docket.
These responses will be incorporated into the St. Lucie Unit 2 FSAR in a future amendment.
Very truly yours, o
t E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 5 Technology REU/TCG/ah Attachments cc:
J.
P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II (w/o attach!!Ients)
Harold F. Reis, Esquire (w/o attachments) 8110070315 8109H
)
PDR ADOCK 05000389
,PDR
~
PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
t
Attachment L-81-426 September 29, 1981 A.
Flordia Power
& Lights'osition on Purge Valve Qualification.
B.
Table 3.5-12, Allowable Ductility Factors C.
Revision of response to,questions 240.2 and 240.3 D.
Response
to question 451.7
Flordia Power. & Li hts'osi'tion On Pur e Valve uglification Flordia Power
& Light Company commits to provide assurance of operability qualification of containment purge valves prior to power operation above 5% power.
SL2-FSAR TABLE 3.5-)
I ALLOMABLE DUCTILITY F CiORS (P)
Reinforced Concrete a - Flexure (beec:s)
O.l0 + JO p
p b Flexure (slabs) c - Ccrapression (walls 6 colons) d Shear
{bee s
6 slabs)
G.lO <30 p
p l,3 shear carried by concrete only shear carried by concreteIstiryups 9bear carried coepletely by stirrups l.0 l.3 3.0 II ~
Structural Steel g~ $ kyg+
{ 4c~~ p )
f; S4~,
cl ~~a)
+- Aw'~L cue~re5j"g.CQL<kb l p'
As'd
~here:
As
~ area of tension reinforce+ nt As'rea of compression reinforceae~t b
~ width of sections d
de prh of section to centerline f re inforceacnt
S~
FSAR Question No.
240. 2 (3.4)
%he.Saiety Kv'aluation 'Report (Const that stoplog closures are to be prov ta safety related structures up to e closures an the entrances of the Raa the Fuel Eandling Building are shown of the FSAR.
However ~ they. are not other sections of the PSAR dealing ctien Permit Stage) states ded to protect the entrances evation +22 ft. HLM.
~ Stoplog tor Auxiliary Building and in Figures 1.2-l3 and 1.2-16 iscussed ar, described in th flood protection.
State whether the stoplogs Mill be p owdded Xf not, /ustify that they are not needed.
Provide analy s of u3ve runup at all entrances bel~ elevation +22 MLS.
lf the stoplogs are to be installed, provide:
a) the bottom elevation of the door openings and the dimensions of the openings secured by the s oplogs.
b) tbe time required to place the s oplogs into position.
c) the criteria to be used to dere are to be placed into position.
ine Mhen and if the stoplags d) a discussion of the relevant tec nical specifications.
~Ree nnce provided to the entrances of t ng ng Reactor Auxiliary Building by the prl sence of ad5acent buildings and'tructures (see Englarged Site rPot Plan FSILR Figure 1 2-2).
Since no permanent structures are 1
ated on the south side of the Reactor Auxiliary Building, additio l vave runup protection vill 4.
tbe south be provided by installing stoplogs vali and the south rn most entrance he entrance on n-tbe east va11.
Based upon PHF high vater elevation 7.2 ft mean low vater (HLV) vave runup elevation 16e0 ft KLV and plant island elevation 18.5 ft HLQ, flood protection stoplogs at entrances (Mhose aLnieum elevation is at least + L9 5 feet) safety-telated build&ops are nnt deemed necessary.
Additional e runup protection is he Fmk Handli Buildi and nr e t~
or ne-a
-for ach y o ps
'e a
e
) t o
A description of th>> stgplogs found tanned in revised Subsection 3.4,l, at St. Lucie Unit 2 is con-240.2-1 Arnendeent 1lo. 6, (9/81)
t SQ FSAR Question Ro,
- 240-3 (2.4.j.3)
Discuss t.he hydrologic technical measures to be used to monitor t mangrove areas
~hich are relied u Provided the follo~<ng inforaetio (a) the means by which storm eros frequency of such surveys.
cification explaining exf.sting beach dunes and n for hurricane prorection-a vill be measured and t:he
~Res 0((s(.
(b) the means by which the aangrovI areas viLl be monitored to identify blighted areas and t frequency 'of such surveys.
Beach dunes and ~roves areas a
protection from hurricanes.
As di dunes are conservatively assumed t
+4 feet HIM prior to computing the erosion froza High~ay ALA and the p for the. energy dissipated or the t dunes.
Since the "stable base pla the east.
and south of the'lant is north are the nat;ural ground eleva their viability is not dependent o
mangrovcs-In the Mave analysis S
mvc height or energy by the nLangr not, relied upon to provide cussed in Subsection2.4.5, the be eroded to an elevation of maximum possible quantitica of t island..
Ho credi.t is taken ee consumed in erosion of the n
elevations of W feet K.V to and and elevation +5 kG.M on he ions of. extensive flat areas, the existence of the bsection 2.4.5, no rcductfon of ves is assumed.
Ho FSAR change required.
J(gU((.(
IPS/<<~
vg Q 0< ~<~ f~~
T'.~51CP
) o'P.~~)' ~
0 5PtW phcr4g cgcrtv~
Q.~S cc/(j( hc (uib f-Ye h~(c~(
Sp g~ fe, AcQ, i(c g gI((cdPQ G4+2 cAN(. s Wffi Be aVP~ P<<I~~-
~P4 C$
g!ce g~.eh-Cr,~~
CsMC ~ yp~ ~
((4(:o.4(uM 24D.3TX A=.endurant k'o. 4, (6l8l)
l