ML17207A644
| ML17207A644 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 11/29/1979 |
| From: | Bishop C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912140062 | |
| Download: ML17207A644 (4) | |
Text
as UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BO'ARD Michael'C. Farrar, Chairman Richard S; Salzman Dr.
W.
Reed Johnson yO y~~g'io~4
)
In the Natter of
)
I
)
FLORIDA POWER
& LIGHT COMPANY
)
)
(St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant,
)
Unit No.
2)
)
)
Docket No. 50-389 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER November 29, 1979 By our order of november 7,
- 1979, we informed the parties that the evidentiary hearing on the stability of the applicant's electrical grid and the general adequacy of this plant's emergency power supplies would begin on 1/
~Tnesda, December 11, 1979 and be held in or near Miami.
The Office of the Secretary has now found a suitable loca-tion for the hearing.'t will be held in Coral Gables, in the Universit of Miami Law School's Moot Court Room. 's specified in our earlier ordex, on Tuesday we will begin the hearing at 9:30 A.N. but will recess at mid-day to take 1/
A month earlier, we had given the parties advance notice that we anticipated holding the hearing in southern Florida during the week of December 10.
ho I
a guided tour of the applicant's new System Control Center.
On subsequent
- days, we will have to recess the hearing around 4:00 P.M. to accommodate a c'ass that begins in the courtroom at 4:30 P.M.
Xn connection with the hearing, we note that the inter-'enors had until November 16, 1979 to file prepared testimony; 2/
they did not exercise the opportunity.to do so.
The other parties should be prepared to elaborate upon their testimony by identifying and discussing which, if,any, Iof the generic 1
"design and procedural improvements" mentioned in the staff's prepared testimony (Baranowsky, pp.
5-6) have been or are
'/
being adopted at this facility.
Xt is so ORDERED FOR THE APPEAL BOARD C. J n.Bishop Secre ary to the Appeal Board 2/
They did belatedly take certain other action.
See their letter of November 27, 1979, which reached us this afternoon.
3/
This staff testimony says that these improvements "have the potential for minimizing the accident probability for station blackout sequences."
UNITED STATES OF A.'&RICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlSSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BO'ARD Michael C. Farrar, Chairman Richard S;
Salzman Dr. N.
Reed Johnson m4.
y~@gha+~
QO In the Matter of FLORIDA PONER
& LIGHT COMPANY (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No.
2)
)
)
)
)
)
),
')
Docket No. 50-389
)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER November 29, 1979 By our order of november 7, 1979, we informed the parties that the evidentiary hearing on the stability of the applicant's electrical grid and the general adequacy of this plant's emergency power supplies would begin on 1/'Tuesda, December 11, 1979 and be held in or near Miami.
The Office of the Secretary has now found a suitable loca-tion for the hearing.'t will be held in Coral Gables, in the Universit of Miami Law 'School's Moot'Court Room. 's specified in our earlier order, on Tuesday we will begin the hearing at 9:30 A.M. but will recess at mid-day to take 1/
A month earlier, we had given the parties advance notice that we anticipated holding the hearing in southern'lorida during the week of December 10.
'I a guided tour of the applicant's new System Control Center.
On subsequent
- days, we will have to recess the hearing around 4:00 P.M. to accommodate a c'ass that begins in,the courtroom at 4:30 P.X.
In connection with>the hearing, we no~e that the inter-'enors had until November 16, 1979 to file prepared testimony; 2/
they did not exercise the opportunity to do so.
The other I'arties should be piepared to elaborate upon their testimony by identifying and discussing which, if any, jof the generic "design and procedural improvements" mentioned in the staff's prepared testimony (Baranowsky, pp.
5-6) have been or are 3/
being adopted at this facility.
Xt is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD C. J n.Bxs op Secre ary to the Appeal Board 2/
They did belatedly take certain other action.
See their letter of November 27, 1979, which reached us this afternoon.
3/
This staff testimony says that these improvements "have the potential for minimizing the accident probability for station blackout sequences."