ML17205A122

2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Form Es 301-4

ML17205A122
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	05/23/2017
From:	Jesse Seymour Operations Branch III
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Shared Package
ML16319A344	List: ML17205A112 ML17205A122 ML17205A183 ML17205A204 ML17205A215 ML17205A369 ML17205A382 ML17205A396 NRC 2017-0011, 2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Letter Submitting Examination
References
Download: ML17205A122 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: PBNP Date of Exam: 5lB - 5119, 2017 Scenario Numbers: 1I 2 I 3l 4 Operating Test No.: 2017 lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRI BUTES a b. c#

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. /4 'fv t

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

,,4 f1" (,

3. Each event description consists of

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the the the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew expected operator actions (by shift position)

/ l\- "

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. h/ fv ?/

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. r;/ f\-- (/-

lf time compression techntques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

J/ P f C)

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered /r,1 n- 9' The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance @

deficiencies or deviations from the referenceci plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

.4/ fu- r 9 Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. ø1 P ç.'

1 0. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). .¿/ P l/

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) /,/ rt k

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specifed on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). ._¿,/ n- /

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensng decisions for each crew position. -4/ 'lw I Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes 1 . lValfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2t3t3l3 it f-L 9

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 5t3l4l3 '-¿l f* ç,

3. Major transients (1*2) 1t2t112 ltt ft, I

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1t2t113 JI f-\- ç

5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0t1l0l1 l'"/ P (

6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 21212l2 -4/ lv $,

NOTE

. The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests

1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

Notc l: NC o^-ciIo va);,)nh'on arh'"i*i¿ç lp Lc çonpt<-feJ /""n1 Wtek of /1y;l 10,

^017,