ML17205A122
| ML17205A122 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 05/23/2017 |
| From: | Jesse Seymour Operations Branch III |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16319A344 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML17205A122 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: PBNP Date of Exam: 5lB - 5119, 2017 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3l 4 Operating Test No.: 2017 QUALITATIVE ATTRI BUTES lnitials a
b.
c#
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
/4 'fv t
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
,,4 f1" (,
- 3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
/
l\\- "
- 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
h/ fv
?/
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
r;/ f\\-- (/-
C) lf time compression techntques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
J/ P f
- 7. The simulator modeling is not altered
/r,1 n-9' The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenceci plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
.4/ fu-
@r 9
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
ø1 P ç.'
1 0. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
.¿/ P l/
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
/,/ rt k
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specifed on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
._¿,/ n- /
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensng decisions for each crew position.
-4/ 'lw I Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes 1.
lValfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2t3t3l3 it f-L 9
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 5t3l4l3
'-¿l f*
ç,
- 3.
Major transients (1*2) 1t2t112 ltt ft, I
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1t2t113 JI f-\\- ç
- 5.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0t1l0l1
l'"/ P
(
- 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 21212l2
-4/ lv NOTE
. The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests
- lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Notc l: NC o^-ciIo va);,)nh'on arh'"i*i¿ç lp Lc çonpt<-feJ /""n1 Wtek of /1y;l 10,
^017,