Text

Nonproprietary Review of Licensees Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification SERs (F-11,B-60),for Dresden Unit 3, Technical Evaluation Rept
	ML17194B417
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	07/21/1982
From:	Crane C; FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
To:	Le N, Shemanski P; NRC
Shared Package
ML17194B415	List: ML17194B414; ML17194B417;
References
	CON-NRC-03-79-118, CON-NRC-3-79-118 IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, TAC-42487, TER-C5257-476, TER-C5257-476-0, NUDOCS 8301030168
	Download: ML17194B417 (308)
	v • d • e

I 1

j TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT

REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES

-FR'QM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS CF-lL B-60)

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY DRESDEN_ STATION UNIT 2 VOL. 2 OF 2 NRC DOCKET NO. 50-237 FRC PROJECT C5257 NRC TAC NO. 42519 FAC ASSIGNMENT 13 NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79-118 FACTASK 461 Prepared by Franklin Research Center FRC Group Leader: C. J. Crane 20th and Race Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission

. r::

Lead NRC Engineer: N. B. Le P. Shemanski

,* NOTICE - 982 THE ATTACHED FILES ARE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE DIVISION OF DOCUMENT CONTROL. THEY HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD AND MUST BE RETURNED TO THE RECORDS FACILITY unt of work sponsored by an agency of BRANCH 016. PLEASE DO NOT SEND* DOCUMENTS CHARGED OUT THROUGH THE MAIL. REMOVAL OF ANY her the United States Government nor Pf,\f3E!Sl FROM DOCUMENT FOR REPRODUCTION MUST employees. makes any warranty, ex-BE'REF.ERRED TO FILE PERSONNEL. legal liability or responsibility for any ch use. of any information. apparatus.

s report, or represents that its use by DEADLINE RETURN DATE rivately owned rights.

Dooket # 5 o- 2..::, 7 C*omrnl # 8 ~ o t o~ o 1!5'-/

Date 1z . -z. °J. <Dz of Decumrmt:

R£6-<JL\TO*RY DO'C:KU F'lLE Franklin Research Center RECORDS FACILITY BRANCH A Division of The Franklin Institute The Benjamin Frank.Jin Parkway. Phila .. Pa. I 9 I OJ (2 I 5J 448* I 000 r* l REGULATORY DOCKET flt£ COPY'~

8301030168 82ift29'

~- PDR ADOCK 05000237 I .; P

. _,.,,._.r- -

PDR J

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT

REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS ( F- lL B-60)

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY DRESDEN STATION UNIT 2 VOL. 2 OF 2 NRC DOCKET NO. 50-237 FRC PROJECT C5257 NRC TAC NO. 42519 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79* 118 FRCTASK 461 Prepared by Franklin Research Center FRC Group Leader: C. J. Crane 20th anti Race Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Lead NAC Engineer: N. B. Le P. Shemanski June 22, 1982 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, eY-pressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such ust:?, of any inf.ormation, apparatus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights.

~nklin Research Center

REGULATO.RY DOC.KET FILE COPY A Division of The Franklin Institute The Benjamin Franklin Parkway. Phi la .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448* I 000

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 .Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4lo I

,UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5_9 Equipment Item No. 59 Pressure Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Static-0-Ring Model 5N-AA3 Low Pressure Coolant Injection-Discharge Pressure Indication (Ps-2~1466A through D)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 59 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.7, Former Item 32 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B51 (29]; SCEW 339-343 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, <;tr, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,~ RPS, None, Not stated,. Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, )§:.. ~, ~

System Consideration Review ~ ~ ~'ltd, ~,)(f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~'Ai~ )C{, '§ii!, )jc{,

~~~*x nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~~

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 . lb 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 7' '/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

_! Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE enviroru'!lental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

-t- The Licensee (has/has net) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_,l_ Justification for interim operation .(has/has net) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* .item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~Verify qualification by additional (testing/aRal1sis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

---Qualification testing of equipment, .!Jl progress

_L Other ( ?!I~ ~ /i ~ °B'" ~-

___ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification .for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (has/has Ree) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action.

action ff* , (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

.3 o,. I fr/ l.. . *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

--~ ---------- -----* --***----. --- -----------------* ----------- ------ ---- --------- - - - - - - * - - ------- -------*-*- **--

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAsslgnment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 1-fzl QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. £f.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program* Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

.Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

~.Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~ NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 U~~~nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :zti? I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .5' LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): PS-2-1466A through D, PS-2-1554A through H Location: Southeast and-southwest corner rooms FRC Item Number: 32 Response Report Page Number{s): 339-343, 396-402 Companent

Description:

Pressure switches 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualificatio.n deficiency for qualification information 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE* CONCERN(S)

These companents are located in a mild temperature and pressure environment. The past-accident room temperature will not exceed 114F based on room temperature measurements.

Qualification for aging is not justified because the equip-ment is located in an area of the plant where the tempera-ture is controlled to less than 103F during normal opera-tion. Radiation qualification is required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These companents will be tested to meet qualification re-

~ quirements for harsh radiation conditions. A material evaluation to determine if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation in the mild temperature environment will be performed. This action will be completed by June 30, 1982.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These companents are required for ADS only. This is a short-t~rm requirement. Radiation doses would be less than 10 rads, for which the equipment is expected to remain operable.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _Li~la..,.I.._ __

- - - u1PMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. CG.o Equipment Item No. 60 Pressure Switches Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Static-0-Ring Model 5N-AA3 Low Pressure Coolant In*j~ction-Pump Pressure (PS-2-1544A through H)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 60 '

Reference 26, Section 4. 5.1. 7, Former Item 32 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated I Page BSl (29]; SCEW 396-402 [2]

.:DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Q'l', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,~ ~, ~

System Consideration Review ~ ~,)It, ~, ~, .)(

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~ ~ ~, ~ ),~,

!'f(, )Ct, ~, '°

~nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~,~

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTaskNo. "'/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has net) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environrpental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~The Licensee (has/hae net) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/hae net) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

-Li Corrective action st>ecified by t~ Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

X Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipmen~ess -~-.

..4. Other ( ;#;afkJ.+ ~:;J;ri, f r ~ ~ ~

___ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification.for interim operation *

._+, The Licensee (has/has not") provided a schedule for the proposed corrective actio~n~chedule for accomplishing the corrective action -~ J.:>. / ?f'J- .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Modification II I. a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research .Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448* 1000 FRC Task No. 4§/

u1PMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 60 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualificatibn Adequate x Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Ciiteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification x II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26.* See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-Q3-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4<el EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO .NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): PS-2-1466A through *o-,-

PS-2-1554A through H Location: Southeast and southwest corner rooms FRC Item Number: 32 Response Report Page Number(s): 339-343, 396-402 Component

Description:

Pressure switches 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency for qualification information 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components are located in a mild temperature and pressure environment. The post-accident room temperature will not exceed 114F based on room temperature measurements.

Qualification for aging is not justified because the equip-ment is located in an area of the plant where the tempera-ture is controlled to less than 103F during normal opera-tion. Radiation qualification is required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSIO~

These' components will be tested to meet qualification re-quirements for harsh radiation conditions. A material evaluation to determine if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation in the mild temperature environment will be performed. This action will be completed .by June 30, 1982.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These components are required for ADS only. This is a short-t~rm requirement. Radiation doses would be less than 10 rads, for which the equipment is expected to remain operable.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

'ftnklin Research Center . FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20tp and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '*l<al

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Ca.I Equipment Item No. 61 Differential Pressure Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner*Rooms Barton Model 288 Reactor Recirculation Differential Pressure Across Recirculation Pump (DPIS-2-261-35A through -35H)

Licensee Reference 1795 Required Operating Time: Less than 2 minutes TER Checksheet No. 61 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.18, Former Item 37A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B54 [29]; SCEW 313-318 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@) RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No. -

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~, ~ '}c{.

System Consideration Review 1't ~ ~ ~~,~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~, ~, '<<C, 'SQ, ,., ~

~, ~,'.it'!, K.

nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~,~

Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. £~I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/has ~a) provided a response to the SER concerns.

~.,

The .Licensee* (has/has not) -sp1acifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qu~lification deficiencies.

__ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for ~nterim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item. .

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

__ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

__ Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

__ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

__ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

__ Qualifica~i~ipmen~ l_n progress ~

_A Other ( ~~ k ~ '?/-= ~*

~ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification _for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (has/nae not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ~ ..JoJ I 9J2- .)

(J The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification II I

a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established ~ Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No .. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. J/6 /

.UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _£_j_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o P~ak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

_ (If Any) Satisfied Griteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a F.quipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review ~

IV Documentation Not Made Available

Researc~ Center NRC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 e.;nklin FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(p 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.Co LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): DPIS-2-261-35A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H Location: Southeast and southwest corner rooms, racks 2202-35 and 2202-36, elevation 497 1 -0" FRC Item Number: 37A Response Report Page Number(s): 313-318 Component DescriptiOrl: Differential pressure-indicating switches 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency for qualification information, material aging, and radiation 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components are located in a mild- accident temperature and nonharsh radiation and pressure environment. Qualif i-cation for aging is not justified because the equipment is located in an area of the plant where the temperature is controlled to less than l03F during normal operations.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Because of the low level of stress on the equipment caused by the normally nonharsh conditions and the conservative design practices, the licensee's position is that there is adequate assurance that this component is environmentally qualified for the service conditions. A material evaluation to determine if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation in the mild temperature environment will be performed. This action will be completed by June 30, 1982.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION Not applicable because these components are not subjected to harsh environmental conditions.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Ljlol UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITE;M NO. (Q_?_

Equipment Item No. 62 Differential Pr.essure Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner *Rooms Static-0-Ring Model 12R2-KK815-V Actuates Pressure Suppression System Relief Valves (DPIS-2-1622A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet.No. 62 Reference 26, Section 4.6.20, Former Item 37C Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B55 [29]; SCEW 406-408 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll.', RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@) RPS, *.None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~ ~' ~

Syste!ll Consideration Review ~' )Ct;>, 'ff[;,~, ~, ~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~' 'ltl, ~,~, ~, ')(,

~~'~'~

nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6<<t ~

Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ~ ¥.. 11(

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FAC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FAC Task No. 4(o \

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. (o

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Ras Rek) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not)_specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolll!lental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies~

..JS... The Licensee (has~as ae~) proposed a corrective action for this equipment

item whose qualification has not .been fully established.

><. Justification for interim operation (has/has Re*) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

__ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <----------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (aaa/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ¥Exr tfEAtE?tN' G- auTA6J5 A£TE.& tf,g;m r f'JN'..s1re *>

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

,DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

([§) Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qua"lification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa:. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4:..;:,(p.s.a...\- - -

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. g_*_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

'Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment .Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Ass.lgnment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4.a...Co=...1.:.-__

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Qualification Number(s): DPIS-2-1622A,B Location: Southeast and southwest corner room, racks 2203-19A,B FRC Item Number: 37C Response Report Page NWiiber(s): 406-408 Component DescriptTOn: Yressure switches 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed. Qualification deficiency for material aging, temperature, qualification time, radiation, and qualification method (Qualification for humidity has not been dealt with, but should be added.)

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipment is located in a harsh radiation and mild temperature and pressure environment. The equipment was originally purchased before standards existed for the qualification of electrical equipment for harsh radiation conditions. Temperature tests have been made to verify mild temperature conditions. Qualification for radiation is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage.

1.4

CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION An alternative flowpath through the SGTS is available to relieve torus vacuum. Failure of these switches could be resolved by operator action.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. &./tg.I

. UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

Equipment Item No. 63 Flow Switch Located in the Turbine Building McDonnel Model AF2 Trips SGTS Air Heater 2/3-A-7503 on Low Air Flow (FSL-2/3-7541-41A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 63 Reference 26, Section 4.6.19, Former Item 38A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B56 [29]; SCEW 424-426 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RI', P, H, cs, A, s, @ M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item l a "I Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb (

Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~, ~'Si(

System Consideration Review ~ ")lib, lie , M., .._, ~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ""' ~ ~, ~, ~, x

~'MS:, ~ x Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :/=f.I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS. ARE APPLICABLE:

...){_ Tne Licensee (has/ba& Ao.t.J provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/aas nee) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/bas Rot) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_K. Equipment replace.ment with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

___ Other <------------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (Aa.6/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action KEXT<fEf£us=L.iNG ~VTAGE AEr&f tfECE/PT ONstrE .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

- - - - - - - - * * * - ------ ---*------* ~-~---*------*------

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 enklin Research Cente; FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(,1

~QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _§,Z_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Doewnented Evidence of Qualifi~ation Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If.Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray ~atisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

"'Test Dur.ation Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~-*-----**--*---------- - - - -----*--

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. 41 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification -Nuinber( s): FSL-2/3-7541-41A ,B Location: Near columns 44 and G, elevation 545*-on FRC Item Number: 38A Response Report Page Number(s): 424-426 Component

Description:

Flow switches.

1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components are located in a harsh radiation environ-ment. Qualification for radiation is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage.

CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION

.-:** This is a low flow switch used to trip the SGTS air heater on low flow. Because radiation is the only harsh environ-ment, failure of the switch due to radiation buildup on the SGTS filters would not be significant because at those radiation levels, the heat generated in the charcoal would be sufficient to provide some inlet air humidity reduction.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Projt:1ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. -~.a..;C&-.l- - -

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

Equipment Item No. 64 Flow Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Barton Model 288 Opens Valve 1402-38A,B on Low Flow (FS-2-1464A, B)

Licensee Reference 1795 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 64 Reference 26, Section 4.6.17, Former Item 38B Licensee Submittal: .FRC Designated Page B57 [29]; SCEW 336-338 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, qJ:, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, @ M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~ ~ ')c(

System Consideration Review ¥c ~ 4)(c ~ ~, ~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~ ~ !$e.. ~ ~ >(,

~ Sll,, ~ ~

installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation }(. ~

Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 4 Co 1 FRC Task No. -...:..;~~---

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. <o

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Aas net) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically state~ ~hat the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolll!lental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which sho~s there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

-2S_ The Licens~e (has/Ra& got) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_;$,_ Justification for interim operation (has,laa& Roe) been _provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

-4, Cor*rective action specified by the Licensee:

1i._ Equipment replace.ment with qualified equipment

__ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

__ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification .testing of equipment in progress

___ Other ( - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee ('"'6/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action 4/EX.T,fEA/ELING ourAGE 4FTE& &£C!i1pr ON.ftCE .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted fr.om environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency cg) Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 enklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. __.4.....

Co-."\_____

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate

o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4....,Co--.1_ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): FS-2-1464A,B Location: Southeast and southwest corner rooms FRC Item Number: 38B Response Report Page Number(s): 336-338 Component Descript'IOil: Flow switches

1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components were originally purchased before standards existed for the qualification of electrical coments for harsh radiation conditions. Qualification for post-accident radiation is presently required. These components are located in a normally mild environment1 therefore, they are not subject to high stresses.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components. After they have been received onsite, they will. be installed during the next refueling outage *

., 1. 4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These components control the minimum flow valve in the core spray system. Failure of this switch, either closing or opening the minimum flow valve, will not result in fail-ure of the core spray system to deliver the required min-imum flow to the core.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ~ (al UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

Equipment Item No. 65 Flow Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms*

Barton Model 289 LPCI Pump Flow (FS-2-1501-58A, -B)

Licensee Reference 1794

Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 65 Reference 26, Section 4.6.17, Former Item 38D Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B59 (29]; sq;w 403-405 (2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

~ot stated} Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~'~ ~

Syst"em Consideration Review ~ ~~,'>CO, 11<_, K Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~, ~ )E:.., )(,, ~, lict,

~ ~ "'"' -,ij 1 '

nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6)£.. ~

Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary ~ ~' "/(

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. f{, I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT"ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER -*ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

-25_ Tne Licensee (has/l:ias Re-&) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirorlJ!lental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_}{_ The Licensee (has/Ras RQt) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation provided by the Licensee for this ~quipment* item *

.2(. Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

..2!.... Equipment replace.ment with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

___ Other <--------------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation *

.1(.. The Licensee (&as/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N.GXT&EEUlfLtNG flUT4CiE AFTER ,f§'CE/U ON.St r£ *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency .

9II.a Qualification Modification Not Established III.a III.b Exempt Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

v NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 ftnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4~/

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 65" EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate -

Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied x riteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

.Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

- criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

.Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

-e.nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~'

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): FS-2-1501-58A,B Location: Southeast and southwest corner rooms, racks 2203-19A,B FRC Item Number: 3ao Response Report Page NUinber(s): 403-405 Component DescriptIOil: Flow switches l.l IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency for material aging, qualification time, and radiation 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF JI'HE CONCERN(S)

These flow switches are located in mild temperature con-ditions. This was verified by tests to be ll4F. Qualifi-cation for material aging is not required because this equipment is located in an area of the plant where the temperature is controlled to less than l04F during normal operation. When the flow switches were originally purchased, qualification of electrical equipment for harsh radiation was not required. Presently, qualification for harsh radiation of the flow switches is required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These components provide information only. Failure of these switches would not affect safety equipment operation.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4 f___._

......fo......

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

Equipment Item No. 66 Flow Switch Located in the Turbine Building Mercoid Model PPQW Starts SGTS Fan 2/3-7506 and Opens Dampers (FS-2/3-7S41-45A, B).

License~ reference not cited .

Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 66 Reference 26, Section 4.3.2.1, Former Item 39 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B60 [29]; Sc;eW 427-429 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT~ RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~~~

System Consideration Review """ ~, ~ "K,

)cl, K Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~ )JS, 'jt!, ~, )(, .)(_,

~ ~, ')<, .)(

nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~~

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4..,fu-.1...___

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. CD

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESpQNSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/ba& Aet) provided a.response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licens~e has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_!$_, The Licensee (has/Aa& A~) proposed a corrective action for this equipmen~

item whose qualification has not been fully established *

.2i_ Justification for interim operation (has/Rae Ret) been provided by the Licensee for this equipmen~- item *

.2L Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

__ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

___ Other (________________________________________________________

The Licensee has provid~d other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (Aas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N£XT/f§~UEL/N(j OC/TAGE AETl!'lf tfgg1pr ON,CITE .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency g Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

.-*-----~*

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRCAsslgnment_......,.

FRC Task No. 4(o1 No. 13 2 UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Docµmented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Requj.red)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation. Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures o~ Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment_ Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page IA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4..a..o::(p-.1.___ _

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fo LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): FS-2/3-7541-4SA,B Location: Near columns 44 and G

FRC Item Nuiriber: 39 Response Report Page Number(s): 427-429 Component Descript!On: Flow switches l.l IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency for qualification information l.'2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components are located in a harsh radiation environment.

Qualification for radiatiqn is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed ~uring the next refueling outage.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION This switch is used to automatically select one of the two

.::. standby gas treatment trains for service. Failure of this switch would not adversely affect safety because the opera-tor could manually select one of the two trains.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTaskNo. Lf Lat UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. (Q1 Equipment Item No. 67 Flow Transmitter Located in the Reactor Building Foxboro Model 15-A-l Standby Gas Treatment Flow (FT-2/3-7541-40A,B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 67 Reference 26, Section 4.6.12, Former Item 40 Licensee Submittal: FRC.Designated Page B61 (29]; SCEW 421-423 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,Jl.', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), 'M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, ...

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER Ja, ~, Ye:,~

System Consideration Review ~ 4Jl4.. ~ ~ ~ ~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~ ~ ""'- ~ ~ ~,

~~~~

nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation "Eiitr ~

.Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 7 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/aas ftet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environ.mental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows ~here are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_____ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.-

Corrective action specified by the.Licensee:

~ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

_____ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_____ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_____ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (__________________________________________________________

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item

, that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action *)

~------------------------------------------------------~

~ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification andfel" should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification II I

a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established On. 0) Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13

2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %1 UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. -&

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

'Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

'Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I .b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 1'61 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.-~-

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification_Number(s): FSL-2/3-7541-40A,B Location: Near columns G and 4*~, elevation 545'-o" FRC Item Number: 40 Response Report Page Number(s): 421-423 Component DescriptTOn: Flow transmitters l.l IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification.information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These items are pneumatic and are not covered in the scope of Bulletin 79-0lB.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These transmitters do not need to be evaluated because

_they are not electrical components.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION Not applicable because this equipment is not within the scope of Bulletin 79-0lB.

-*--;\ -- ---- -------------------------

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. -':l-...<o-....1_ _ __

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .{g,S Equipment Item No. 68 Differential Pressure Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Barton Model 386 Differential Pressure Low Pressure Coolant Injecticm (DPT-2-1543A, B)

Licensee References 639, 647, 6 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 68 Reference 26, Section 4.6.4, Former Item 41 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B62 [29]; SCEW 385-387 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, C§i) RT, P, H, cs,@ s, @, M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Swmnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~ 3'}'... '$(.

System Consideration Review -44_, ~ ~ ~, 'K, ~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5j(, ~ ~ ':8fi, ~, Sf, 59, Si\,~ K nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~~

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ~~~

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb

. 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 191031215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ' (6 /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

_1 Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

~ The Licensee (has/h'fte-flot) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified ans/e& uHl ftmetien whell Exposed to the app11cable BBB QrAViront'fleRtal service eenditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

_...d:: Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___* Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualificatio~ by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification test~pment j.11._prog~ess ~L JJr

.:.(._Other ( ?!/~ ~ ;ti-~ ~-~~*

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification .for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (has/Aas ftet) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ~ 3 ~ I 'fr! l. .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification

~nd/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification II I. a Exempt *

~Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

*---*--- ------------***-* -*---~-----~------- --- -- ... **-- . ----

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin.Institute FRCAsslgnment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. 'i ~ /

IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fl.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately x Qualified Life or. Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) x Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied riteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied x iteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

'*Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established K II.b Equipment Not Qualified H.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item* description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment No. 13 3a FRC Task No. 1-§, I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ':

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): DPT-2-1543A,B Location: Southeast and -southwest corner rooms, racks 2202-19A,B FRC Item Number: 41 Response Report Page Number(s): 385-387 Component Descripti'On: Pressure transmitters 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S) '

Qualif icafion information is being developed. Qualification deficiency for material aging, qualification time, and radiation 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These pressure transmitters are located in mild temperature conditions. This was verified by tests to be 114F.

Qualification for radiation has been demonstrated by testing.

1.3 LICENSEE*CONCLUSION The overall mild environment causes the components to experi-ence a low level of stress. In combination with conser-vative design practices, the licensee's position is that.

there is adequate assurance that these pressure transmitters are environmentally qualified for their service conditions.

A material evaluation will be. performed to determine if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation or failure. This action will be completed by June 30, 1982.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION Not applicable because these components have been qualified for the harsh radiation environmental conditions (reference Test Report WCAP 7410-L, Section 4).

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

.FRC Project No. C5257 P$ge A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.-~ ~

................../_ __

IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~ i""

Checksheets 5""~ ~ ~A_ have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.*

s .

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Projf!Ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '=Ua l IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM No.<as_

Equipment Item No. 69 Differential Pressure Transmitter Located in the SE Corner Room Manufacturer and Model Not Stated Dry~ell Torus Differential Pre~sure (DPT-2-1602-12)

Licensee reference not cited Required Ope-rating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 69 Reference 26, Section 4.4.4, Former Item 42 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B63 [29]; SCEW 324 [25]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Le9end)

R, T, ql', RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

[Not stated} Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: __,

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~ ~ 3A:

System Consideration Review 4a,~ ~' ~, ~, "<

Environmental Qualification Review ~ '6., ~ k, "1r ~

~ 3t(, ~, ~

Installed TM! Lessons Learned Implementation ~,~

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ~ ~ )c!.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 /' / lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Lj _

~

IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .'-!l

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The .Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirollI!lental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

---The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the LiCensee for this equipment* item.

CorrectiVe action specified by the Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

_Other (

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item

that can be construed as a basis for justification .for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action--------------------------------------------------------~*>

~ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II~c Qualified Life Deficiency Modification di I *@ Exempt

.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope Not Qualified _ IV Documentatlon Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e;nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAssignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000

....~----

FRC Task No. _4.....<D EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o -Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pe,nding Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page IA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4..._(o~"\_ __

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.-.Ytf_*

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): DPT-2-1602-12.

Loeation: Southeast room-FRC Item Number: 42 Response Report Page Number(s): ( 324) of draft report Compon.ent

Description:

Pressure transmitter 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency not stated 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipment has been deleted from the November 1, 1980, final report because it is no longer included within the scope of NRC Bulletin 79-0lB.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLOSIQN Not applicable because the equipment is not safety-related.

_,1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION The equipment is not safety~related.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 4o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. i I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's r.ationale has .been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence/

AeR*concncrencli with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented be).ow.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence

~ Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment/system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment/system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category Illa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the pr.imary equipment.

~- Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment/system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling

accident it is intended to* single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification . Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform

~- Backup (equipment/system) is. its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment/system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single. active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category Illa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _ _.t..f~lo"'-' - -

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .:1.D Equipment Item No. 70 Level Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Room Barton, Model Not Stated Suppression Pool Level Monitor-(LT-2-1641-1)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating*Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 70 Reference 26, Section 4.7.51, Former Item 43 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B64 (29]; SCEW 328 (25]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM{S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Q'l', RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, fNot state(j, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet-Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Swmnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 1i, )r(c, ')<<:

System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, j4, ~' )(

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~ ~, ~ ')Q.. fk, ~

5S.~~~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~~

Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 191031215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 'I' I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifi~ally stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolll!lental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

__ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a correctfve action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* .item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

__ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (______________________________________________________

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

~ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION. EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification CTn .a) Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448: 1000 FRC Task No. 4' I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0.1'?_'

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or- Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate

. o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence, Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

~Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:.

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 . Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4tPI EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number Cs): LT-2-1641-1 Location: Southwest corner room FRC Item Number: 43 Response Report Page Number(s): C 328) of draft report Component

Description:

Level transmitter 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qu~lif ication deficiency not stated 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipm~nt has been deleted from the November 1, 1980, final report because it is no longer included within the scope of NRC Bulletin 79-0lB.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Not applicable because the equipment is not safety-related.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION The equipment is not safety-related.

v y

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAsslgnment No. 13 4o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. £' I

, IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.£ SYSTF.M CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence/

ReR '"'lii'AQUClier.:ice with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented beiow.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence

~ Equipment does not provide a Backup *(equipment/system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment/system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment/system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform

~- Backup (equipment/system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment/system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and . could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation ~ategory IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

~nklin Research Center NRCContract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 4b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. f C, I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.*

I Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence

___ The equipment's accident miti- ___ Although backup equipment is avail-gating function is completed able, it is not technically sound to prior to the onset of the hostile relinquish defense-in-depth for this

¢nvironment. No subsequene function.

functions are. necessary. See note (1) below. (NRC Qualif i- ___ Backup (equipment/system) is not cation Evaluation Category IIIb) safety-related.

___ Other (see page___) ___ This equipment is necessary for the operator to ensure an ESF system is

~ Resultant NRC Qualification performing its intended safety Evaluation Category ~IIIb) function.

Note 1: The Licensee * (hee/ The rationale presented by the has not) stated that failure of Licensee is not supported-by the primary equipment .will not objective technical evidence.

affect other safety-related

equipment or cause an operator:. Other (see page___)

to be misled. (See page-:! q,,..)

LICENSEE STATEMENT See page 3a of this checksheet.

NRC Contract No. NRC--03-79-118 e n k l l n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAsslgnment No.13 4c 20th and Race Streets; Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (21S) 448-1000 FRC Task No. tjt I IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7o SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW EVALUATION OF LICENSEE STATEMENT (Continued)

//

Containment Water Level Manito~ II.F.1.5 The design and qualification of the installed and operational equipment is addressed in previous submittals (CECo letter, E.D. Swartz to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.5, dated 3~1-82; CECo letter, E.D. Swartz to D.G. Eisenhut, dated 2-1-82; CECo letter, E.D. Swartz to D.G. Eisenhut~ Section II.F. 1.5, dated 12-15-81; CECo letter, J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F. 1.5, dated 12-15-81). Data sheets are being generated as appropriate and. will be submitted by 6-30-82.

Modification*Number* * * *

II.F.1.5 Containment Water Level* Ml2-2(3)-79-55 Monitors

//

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. . LJ(p l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 71 Level Indicating Transmitting Switch Located in the Reactor Building Yarway Model 4418CE Monitors Reactor Level, Containment Spray Interlock (LITS-2-263-73A, B)

License~ reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 71 Reference 26, Section 4.6.18, Former Item 46B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B65 [29]; SCEW 443-445 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,[J:, RT, P, H, cs, A, S, 0, M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification SUI1UDary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~ ~ )ia System Consideration Review ~ ptt, "If';_,~ ~ ) (

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review kt Z,S.., ~ ~ ~ .X,

~lf4~~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~ ~

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4_Co_1___

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0 .. .11

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/aae RS&) provided a response to the SER concerns.

~The Licensee CAaeihas not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/A.as noc) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

i Justification for interim operation (has/has Ree) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_____ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_____ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_____ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (______________________________________________________

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

,.2l The Licensee (~(~no+> provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action.. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action @xr t'EEf/#LING avrAGE AFTER tf!§ce1er 0Ns1r£ *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Modification II.a Qualification Not Established III.a III.b Exempt Not in Scope I.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. 05257 Page A Oivisioo of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.-,

4G:> '

EQUIPMENT ENVIRON.MENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X a DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied o Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 4<01 UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .11 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification-Number(s): LITS-2-263-73A,B Location: Reactor building, elevatioh 517 1 -6*

FRC Item Number: 46B Response Report Page Number(s): 443-445 Component DescriptTOil: Level-indicating switches 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components are located in a nonharsh temperature and pressure environment which will result in only a relatively low level of stress on the equipment. Qualification data are not required for these parameters. These components were originally purchased before standards existed for the qualification of electrical components for harsh radiation conditions. Qualification for radiation is presently required *

. 1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components. After they have been received onsite, they ""

will be installed during the next refueling outage.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These switches provide an interlock for containment spray initiation. Other level instruments are available to pro-vide the same information and, if required, operator action to override these instruments could be taken. Additionally, if these switches fail, the safety analysis would not be affected because no ere di t was taken for containme*nt spray operation in the safety analysis.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _'-1...b

.......l ___

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAi- QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 72 Level Transmitter Located in the SE Corner Room General Electric Model GE/MAC 553 Suppression Pool Level Monitor-(LT-2-1626)

Licensee reference not .cited

Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 72 Reference 26, Section 4.7.51, Former Item 47 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B66 [29]; SCEW 32 7 [25]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY TH!:: NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, c,p, RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM,_ RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

.\§ot stated) Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 3a, ~~34.

Licensee Response to NRC SER System Consideration Review 4a, 4b , ""' fi<l..t

..., :ff Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~ ~,~c, ~, ~' ~

)q, 'ilfl, 1'¢, ~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~ ~

Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary ~~¥

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ¥ Io IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 72.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The .Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* .item.

Corrective action specified by .t~ Licensee:

_ Equipment replace.ment with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by ad~itional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <--------------~---------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification.for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

~----------------------------------~----------------

~The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should. be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Modification Q If. v Exempt

.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope

,~-b -Not Qualifled IV DOcumentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

-enklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. fi/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL.QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM D;ESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding R.idiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding *Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or . Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From. Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 . Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :ff>/

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .:zL.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): LT-2-1626 Location: Southeast corner room FRC Item Number: 47 Response Report Page Number(s): ( 327) of draft report Component

Description:

Level transmitter 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency not stated 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipment has been deleted from the November 1, 1980, final report because it is no longer included within the scope of NRC Bulletin 79-0lB.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Not applicable because the equipment is not safety-related *

.1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION The equipment is not safety-related.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of Tile Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 4a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. L/ /6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The

>i Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence/

non-cggcunaAee with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence I

~ Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment/system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment/system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) *~e exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the p~imary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment/system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform

__ Backup (equipment/system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-

forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment/system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 4b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 1215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 1z' kI UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0.12-Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence

__ The equipment's accident miti- -- Although backup equipment is avail-gating function is completed able, it is not technically sound to prior to the onset of the hostile relinquish defense-in-depth for this environment. No subsequent function.

functions are. necessary. See note (1) below. (NRC Qualifi- __ Backup (equipment/system) is not cation Evaluation Category IIIb) safety-related.

__ Other (see page___ ) ___ This equipment is necessary for the operator to ensure an ESF system is

~ Resultant NRC Qualification performing its intended safety Evaluation category (IIIa/IIIb) function.

_.,L Note 1: The Licensee tmrsr" The rationale presented by the has not) stated that failure of Licensee is not supported by the primary equipment .will not objective technical evidence.

affect other safety-related equipment or cause an operator:. __ Other (see page__ )

to be misled. (See page 3 4'...)

LICENSEE STATEMENT See page 3a of this checksheet.

EVALUATION OF LICENSEE STATEMENT

~

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (a I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 73 Level Transmitter Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Model GE/MAC 553 Reactor Vessel Level Indication (LT-2-646A, B; LT-263-61)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 73 Reference 26, Section 4.4.5, Former Item 48 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B67 [29l; SCEW 393-395 (25]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll:, RT," P, H, CS, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

~ot statedJ Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~ Xi .)t.

System Consideration Review ~, ~ fC., f(Q, . , K Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ,., ~ ~ ~ ~;ltf,

~~~jg.

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ~ "'t6 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

~nkiin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '/'I IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23_

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) .been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

Corrective action specified by t~ Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment .* .~

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <-----------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that.can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

~--------------------------------------------------

~ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification ~Exempt

.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e.;nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .* Pa. 19103 (2151 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4-'=Co._.\_ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0*. 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test s*pecimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified.Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

~riteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Ad~quate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b II.a Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b II.c Equipment Not Qualified Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification x III.b IV Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NAC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 Q;nklin Research Center FAC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FAC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FAC Task No. _4..:..;:Co~1.:.__ __

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7~:

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): LT-2-646A,B; LT-2-263-61 Location: Reactor building, rack 2202-5,6; columns 39 and K, 40

and M, and 39 and K FRC _Item Number: 48 Response Report Page Number(s): (393-395) of draft .

report Component

Description:

Level transmitters 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

oualification deficiency not stated 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE; CONCERN(S)

This equipment has been deleted from the November 1, 1980, final report because it is no longer included within the scope of NRC Bulletin 79-0lB.

LICENSEE CONCLUSION Not applicable because the equipment is not safety-related *

.1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION The equipment is not safety-related.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute

FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Lila l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 74 Pressure Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Type 551 Core. Spray Pump Discharge Pressure (PT-1460A, B)

Licensee Reference 838 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 74 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.2, Former Item 49 Licensee 'submittal: FRC Designated Pa~e B68 (29]; SCEW 328-331 [2]*

-*~

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY TH~ NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,!l.', RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,~ ~ ¥ System Consideration Review ~ ~ ~ ~, "filil, )le{

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~, ~ ~, ~ '4., ~

~ ~, ~,~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary

---*---**. -------*---. - ~----*-.- - .-----------*---------*------ -------.-*-- -*-

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 !215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ~~/

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. H_

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

X Tne Licensee (has/.has Ree) provided a response to the SER concerns.

~The Licensee Cmrstfras not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.*

, I

_The Licensee has presented information which shows there are*no outstanding qualifica~ion deficiencies.

X The Licensee (has/~a* Ree) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Qaa not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~- Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

~- Equipment re~ocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/aRaiysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress .

~ Other CMA<<l&.vtL£ EVAL VA rtoA/* ro d£T£Hnl~l

DE6UJJ1tl/0P)

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

)( The Licensee (has/eaa Hot) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action iTWE .Jo 111'? *)

J The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qua~ification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Mod if ica ti on. III.a Exempt rI.a' Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Qnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 61 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding ~rgins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification x II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page IA Equipment Item description.

- ------y*---~---_., -

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :ff>/

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . ..7£.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): PT-2-1460A,B Location: Racks 2202-19A,B, southeast and southwest corner rooms, elevation 476 1 -6* *;-:au.

FRC Item Number: 49-1 Response Report Page Number(s): ~331 Component Descript'I'Oii: Pressure transmitters 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

Qualifi-cation deficiency for temperature and radiation 1.2 *LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components were originally purchased before standards existed for the qualification of electrical components for harsh radiation conditions. Qualification for radiation is presently required. These components are located in a mild accident temperature environment.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These components will be environmentally tested for harsh radiation. A material evaluation to determine if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation in the mild temperature environ-ment will be performed. This action will be completed by June 30, 1982.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These components are required for the operator to verify that flow is established in the core spray system. This action is completed within several hours and failure of these transmitters after that time would not affect system operation. Durigg the first several hours, the radiation exposure is < 10 rads, for which the equipment is expected to remain operable.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj13ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. L/.~ /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 75 Pressure Transmitter Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Type 551 Drywell Pressure (PT-2-1625)

License* reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 75 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.3, Former Item 51A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B71 [29];. SCEW 332 [25]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THB NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,/l.', Rr, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, Jc, 3t1 System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 48, 4e, 4E Equipment Environmental Qualification Review §a, Sb, 5'1, Se, §e, §f, Scj I SA, Si, §j

Installed TM! Lessons !:.earned Implementation ea, ab Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 1-a, :Zb, ~e-

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4.(e

___....1_ __

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0 .. 1.S..

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

>( Tne Licensee (has/baa AQt) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualificatipn testing of equipment in progress

___ Other <--------------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action--------------------------------------------------------*>

~ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt

~ Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope I.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FAC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin lnsttiute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000

.....;-=------

FRCTaskNo. 4Co1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0.1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X .. DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate

.Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life Oli. Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regardin'1 Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure.Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o ' Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established x II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

*---~*-**---*------**---*-***----*-* *---*---*-----*--*---- *--- -*----

~nklin Re~earch Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4.:..;C'o::..1.___ __

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL. QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM No.:li._

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): PT-2-1625 Location: Reactor buildin , racks 2202-7, columns 39 and K FRC* Item Number: lA Response Report Page Number s : 332 of draft report Component

Description:

Pressure transmitter 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Q.µalification deficiency for qualification information 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipment has been deleted from the November 1, 1980, final report because it is no longer included within the scope of NRC Bulletin 79-0lB~

LICENSEE CONCLUSION This pressure transmitt~r has been deleted because it is not required to operate under accident conditions.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION This transmitter.has been deleted.

~nkiin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAsslgnment No.13 4o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '/( /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ?..

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for coAcurrem~e/

non-concurrence w-ith the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented beiow.

Reason-for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment/system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capabie of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment/system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category Illa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

___ Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment/system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate~ See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment/system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The ~ Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment/system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function~

on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category Illa) period necessitates environmental qualification

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

-enklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 4b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Jtt /

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITl;M NO. 7J Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence

~-The equipment's accident miti- ~- Although backup equipment is avail-gating function is completed able, it is not technically sound to prior to the onset of the hostile relinquish defense-in-depth for this environment. No subsequent function.

functions are necessary. See note (1) below. (NRC Qualifi- ~- Backup (equipment/system) is not cation Evaluation Category IIIb} safety-related.

~- Other (see page~_> _x_ This equipment is necessary for the operator to ensure an ESF system is

~- Resultant NRC Qualification performing its intended safety Evaluation Category (IIIa/IIIb) function.

Note l: The Licensee (has/ ~he rationale presented by the has not} stated that failure of Licensee is not supported by the primary equipment .will not objective technical evidence.

affect other safety-related equipment or cause an operator _:/::,,. Other (see page.!/.1.J to be misled. (See page* .}

LICENSEE STATEMENT See page 3a of this checksheet.

EVALUATION OF LICENSEE STATEMENT

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 / / 4c 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. /ffd EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW EVALUATION OF LICENSEE STATEMENT (Continued)

// 2. . PRESSURE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM Containment Pressure Indication (PT-2-1625)

LICENSEE POSITION:

This component has been deleted because its function is required during normal operation only.

FRC EVALUATION:

During accident situations, the plant operator requires indications of ceitain process variables to determine whether safety systems are performing their intended functions and to assess the risk of a breach of the barriers to radioactivity release. Containment pressure instrumentation indicates the effectiveness of the containment system and the poten~ial for leakage from the containment.

FRC CONCLUSION:

Containment pressure indication should not be deleted from the environ-mental qualification list. 11

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4u I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7b Equipment Item No. 76 Pressure Transmitter Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Type GE/MAC 551 Reactor Vessel Pressure (PT-2-647A, B; PT-2-662)

Licensee Reference 838 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 76 Reference 26, Section 4.4.2, Former Item 51B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B72 (29]; SCEW 398-400 (25]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THB NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, qr, RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

("Not stated~ Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, -9b, 3e, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4~, 48, 4e, 4~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review aa, Sb, Se, aa, §e, 5£r Sg' Sh, Si, Sj nstalled TM! Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ile, ;ii,, ile

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 1

/ Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. l/tJ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environl!lental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item.

Corrective action specified by t~ Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

~ Other <-------------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

~ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification ~Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available r-------~----- .----.* - - -

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NR~3-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No.-~-......../.___ __

UIPMENT ENVIRO~MENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Z£ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)' Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied

-riteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied

.riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

'"Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time). Satisfied

~criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 461 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): PT-2-647A,B1 PT-2-662 Loeation: Reactor building1 racks 2202-5, -61 columns 39 and K and 40 and M FRC Item Humber: SlB Response Report Page Number(s): (398-400) of draft report Component

Description:

Pressure transmitters l.l IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency not stated 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE"CONCERN(S)

This equipment has been deleted from the November l, 1980, final report because it is no longer included within the scope of NRC Bulletin 79-0lB.

l.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Not applicable because this equipment is not safety-related.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION The equipment is not safety-related.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTaskNo. 4<ol UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMEN.T ITEM NO. 77 Equipment Item No. 77 Flow Transmitters Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Type 55.~

Core Spray Flow (FT-2-i~61A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 77 Reference 26, Section 4.S.1.4, Former Item 52 Licensee Submittal: FRC ~esignated Page B73 (29]; SCEW 332-335 [2]

.:DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,!l.', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,~ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents . Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses .to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, Jc, Jd System Consideration Review -ta, 4b, 4a, 48, 4e I 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, ae, §a, §e, §f.,.

SIJ' Sh, Si, Sj nstalled TM! Lessons Learned Implementation -6e:, 6b Equipment Summary Ma in tenanc e and Replacement Schedule Summary .+a, 1'b, 1'e

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 !215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4t;I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Aas RQt) provided a response to the SER concerns.

-21.: The Licensee (ft.aa/has not)- specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolll!lental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/Be~ Ant) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/has Re~) been provided by the Licensee -for this equipment* item.

_'5:_ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above .submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

.l(_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

..L Other ( tfMLllCEMEd/T IC <1U&? . CAd/Nl'J r 1JE ESTA .GL1.,;UE/)

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (has/bas Ant) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action jlLJve 3 a I Pcf & *)

J The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC--03-79-118 enklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRCTaskNo. £f,/

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF E9UIPMENT ITEM NO. ZZ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Docilmented Evidence of Qualification Adequat~ x Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

.-.Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

.:Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied *

.:Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

.. :criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied* (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4{e!

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): FT-2-l461A,B Location: Southeast and-southwest corner rooms, racks 2202-l~A,B FRC Item Number: 52-1 Response Report Page Number(s): 332-335 Component Descript'IOii: Flow transmitters l.l IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

l. 2 LICENSEE DISCUSS.ION OF THE CONCERN ( S)

These components are in a mild temperature and harsh radi-ation environment. Mild temperatures were determined in the cornet rooms by onsite testing and found to be ll4F.

Qualification for harsh radiation is presently required.

l.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These flow transmitters will be tested in harsh radiation environments. If this attempt fails, the appropriate equip-ment will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite. A material ev.aluation to

... _. determine-if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation in the mild tem-perature environment will be performed. This action will be completed by June 30, 1982.

l.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These items are required for the operator to verify that flow is established in the core spray system. This action is completed within several hours, and failure of these transmitters after that time would not affect system oper-ation. During 5 the first several hours, the radiation ex-posure is < 10 rads, for which this equipment is expected to remain operable.

--r---*-----r-----*-~--- - -* . .-

--..,...-~..--~~--* __ _____

~nklin Research Center, NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (o I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 'J.K Equipment Item No. 78 Flow Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Type 553 Low Pressure Coolant Injection-LPCI Flow (FT-2-1542A, B; FT-2-1549A, B; FT-2-1551A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 78 Reference 26, .Section 4.5.1.4, Former Item 52 Ll.c~nsee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B74 [29]; SCEW 381-384, 388-395 [2]

.DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

~csee Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Q'l', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, {R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@RPs, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e, Ja System Consideration Review 4.a, 4b, 4c, 4a, 4e, u Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa1 Se, se, * §a1 Se, 5£r

-541, ab, 5i, §j-

. nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary +a' +b1 +e

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin lnstliute . FRCAsslgnment No.13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. _4........,.Ce>:;...1..___ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Rae Aet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

-A., The Licensee (he&/has not) -specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirorll!lental service conditions.

_ The Licensee *has presented information which shows there are rio outstanding ql.lalification deficiencies.

_){,_ The Licensee (has/hse Ae~) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

£ Justification for interim operation (has/ltas not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~- Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

.l(_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/aRalyeis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

~ Other (MAT?f&/ALS EVALllAC/tJN 'Tu d£T&J111#£ 0,;,f,l)c)Jffi.,'M/)

_ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

>( The Licensee (has/eea Aot) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ,Tc1vE ,it! I 9.P.2... *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

y NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 enklin Re5earch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAsslgnment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4.......,(o....1..___ _

µUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO *. ~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o _Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria I

Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

.Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

.:Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

.:Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

..Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c F.quipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a F.quipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4.....

U,.....1..___ _

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO ..

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment* Identification Number( s): FT-2-1542A,B; FT-2-1549A,B; FT-2-1551A,B Location: Southeast and southwest corner rooms, racks 2202-19A,B FRC Item Number: 52-2 Response Report Page Nwnber( s): 381-384 388-395 Component

Description:

Flow transmitters 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipment is located in a harsh radiation and mild temperature and pressure environment. The equipment was originally purchased* before standards existed for the qualif icatio.n of electrical equipment for harsh radiation conditions. Temperature tests have been made to verify mild temperature conditions. Qualification for radiation is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These transmitters will be tested to.meet qualification requirements for harsh radiation conditions. A material

.evaluation to determine if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation in the mild temperature environment will be performed. This action will be completed by June 30, 1982.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION .

These instruments are required for the operator to verify that system flow is established in the LPCI system. This action is completed within several hours, and failure of these transmitters after that time would not affect system operation. During the first several hou5s 1 the radiation exposure is less than or equal to 1 x 10 rads, for which this equipment is expected to remain operable.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 Ca I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /&/

Equipment Item No. 79 Electric Motor Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Models 5K6637XC71A Drives Core Spray Pump (2-1401A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 79 Reference 26, *Section 4.5.1.5, Former Item 53A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B76 [29); SCEW 321-324 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,[l.', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@RPs, Non~,

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Jb, Jc, 36 System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4s, 4e1, 4e I 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review aa, Sb, Sc, Sd, §e, 5£,

~ 5~, Sh, Si, Sj

, nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Q31 89 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary '.1-a, 7b, 7e

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FAC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 ........t.....,t_ _ __

FRC Task No. _4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Ra& A&6) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are rio outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/has ~et) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_!S_ Justification for interim operation (has/Aas a&e) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

~ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_.__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

.2L Otoer ( MATE,f,/.4L. s /FVAL.. VA T/OA/

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation *

.-1£. The Licensee (has/Aas R&t) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action WM§ .Ja t9P2. * *)

.J The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~

Modification III.a Exempt a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Qinklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _Lf....<o...t..__ _ __

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .71 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o

Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

~criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

..Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

Test Duration Margin (1 hour+ Function Time) Satisfied

- criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X.= CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page !A Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. -"1-<a..I_ _ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): 2-1401A,B; 2-A,B,C,D-1502 Location: Southeast and southwest corner rooms FRC Item Number: 53A - Response Report Page Number(s): 321-324, 373-377 Component

Description:

Motor-driven pumps 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONG,ERN(S)

This equipment is located in a* harsh radiation and mild temperature and pressure environment. The equipment was originally purchased before standards existed for the qualification of electrical equipment for harsh radiation conditions. Temperature tests have been made to verify mild temperature conditions. Qualification for material aging is not required because this equipment is located in an area of the plant where the temperature is controlled to less than l04F during normal operation.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These pumps -will be tested to meet qualification require-ments for harsh radiation conditions. A material evaluation will be performed by June 30, 1982, to determine. if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. The harsh temperature and humidity are a direct result of equipment operation, not the postulated accident.

Equipment performance under these temperature/humidity conditions is demonstrated during periodic monthly operability tests.

B. These are the LPCI pump motors. These motors have Class B insulation. Other m~tors with Class B insulation have been tested to > 2 x 10 r~ds and have qualified.

It is expected that these motors would not suffer radi-ation failu5e for the specified doses (ranging from 2.5 to 7.5 x 10 rads).

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 w/

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _gQ Equipment Item No. 80 .

Electric Motor Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric, Model Not Stated Drives Low Pressure Coolant Injection Pumps (2-A, B, C, D-1502)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 80 Reference 26, Section 4.7.19, Former Item 53A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B76 (29]; 373-377 [2]

-DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

'(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,[!', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Respons~s to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, Jd System Consideration Review 4a, 4e, 4c, 4d I 4e, 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -sa, §e, 5G, Sd Se, Sf,

§~, §h, Si, §j '

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ea, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 7b, 7e

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _'t....,..t,...1_ _ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/l=zm::::a111a1:1 ) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

____ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies *

..JI._ The Licensee (has/ha Rat) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established *

.lL. Justification for interim operation (has/ha:aa:=-1*1<<t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item.

l(_ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

____ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shieid equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

-L Other ( mg.fer jB-.\$, E..uoJ. uotj on. )

The Licensee bas provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification.for interim*.

operation *

.Jt. The Licensee (has/Has 1na) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action J'u.0: c,, ;s,oJ 1 q,Al. .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II .b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAsslgnment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. __..4....,._.t____

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _Bg EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented E~idence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Si~ilarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria" Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Regarding Radiation Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied, iteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

-Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified.

I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification x II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documen*tation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Qnklin Research Center FRC Profect No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment No. 13

'i_t,.,_t_ __

FRC Task No. __

3a EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): 2-1401A,B; 2-A,B,C,D-1502 Location: Southeast and southwest co_r_n_e_r__r_o~o~m-s'------'--'----=--------

FRC Item Number: 53A Response Report Page Number(s): 321-3i4, 373-377 Component Descriptions Motor-driven pumps 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification in.formation is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipment is located in a harsh radiation and mild temperature and pressure environment. The equipment was originally purchased before standards existed for the .

qualification of electrical equipment for harsh radiation conditions. Temperature tests have been made to verify mild temperature conditions. Qualification for material aging is not required because this equipment is located in an area of the plant -where the temperature is controlled to less than l04F during normal operation.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These pumps.will be tested to meet qualification require-

~ ments for harsh radiation conditions. A material evaluation will be performed by June 30, 1982, to determine if any materials are utilized which are known to be susceptible to age-related degradation.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION*

A. The harsh temperature and humidity are a direct result of equipment operation, not the postulated accident.

Equipment performance under these temperature/humidity conditions is demonstrated during periodic monthly*

operability tests.

B. These are the LPCI pump motors. These motors have Class B insulation. Other m9tors with Class B insulation have been tested to > 2 x 10 rads and have qualified.

It is expected that these motors would not suffer radi-ation failu5e for the specified doses (ranging from 2.5 to 7.5 x 10 rads).

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC~03-79-118 FRC Proj'3Ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (4 /

'* UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Rl_

Equipment Item No. 81 Local Panel Located in the Turbine Building Manufacturer and Model Not Stated Standby Gas Treatment Panel (2223-28A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No *. 81 Reference 26, Section 4.3.2.2, Former Item 58 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B77 [29]; SCEW 430-432 [2]

,DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, r;tr, RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@RPs, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment. Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e, 3tt System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4e, 4d, 4e, lit Equipment Environmental Qual i f ica ti on Review Sa, Se, §e, §a, §e, 5 f',

SEJ' 58, §i, §j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation aa, 89 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 118, 713, +e.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ?61 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

-5..._ Tne Licensee (has/Qae eat) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE enviroruiiental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

-2(_ The Licensee (has/aaa Ae6) proposed a corrective action for this*equipme~t item whose qualification has not peen fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/R~e aet) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~ F.quipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

~ F.quipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

~ Other <~--------------------------------------------------~>

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

X The Licensee (A.a&,/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action <<xr&£Cjl§'L/IVG Otiz-AGE AErGtf ,eece1er ON,S'<r& .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Lege~d)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

,.....,.------,-----.--*--.--.-- - - - --- ~...-,-~------*-* -**------- ---

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

"@.;nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 2

FRC Task No. fib/

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO * ..Ji_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Docilmented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and ~est Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)' Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding ~est Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

.:*criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualificatio~ Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NAC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 FAC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FAC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FAC Task No. #I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~-

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO.NRC SER Equipment Identification-Number(s): 2223-28A,B .. ~*

Location: Near columns F and 44, elevation 542'-oa FRC Item Number: 58 Response Report Page Number(s): 430-432 Component DescriptIOn: Local panels 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

I Qualification information is be~ng developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S).

These components are located in a harsh radiation environ-ment. Qualification for radiation is presently required.*

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement comp-onents. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These panels contain relays and a timer. The system can be operated without the timer. The relays contaig bakelite and nylon. For the specified service of ~.4 x 10 rads, both relays are expected to perform to 10 rads or greater.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. N.RC-03-79-118 FRC Proj'3Ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4lo I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. g'd.

Equipment Item No. 82 Switchgear Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Magneblast Type AMH 4.76-250 Power Distribution (SWGR 23-1, -sWGR 24-1)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 82 Reference 26, Section 4.3.2.3, Former Item 59 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B78 (29]; SCEW 458-460 [2]

.DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,fl, RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@!) RPS,, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 30 System Consideration Review 4-e, 4b, 4g I 4d, 4e, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Se, ae, §i:j I §e, S£-1 S41 I Sh, Si, Sj nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ea, 6b-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary TS, ~e1 1'c

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 9,1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .F-

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/aas ftet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

---*The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

-15:.. The Licensee (has/1-te n&t!-) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_t[, Justification for interim operation (has/lwe Ret) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~Corrective action.specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

___ Other (_____________....___________________________________________

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

_2!_ The Licensee (Aa&/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

-*-----.--*-~--- -----...-~~------------.----...-..-----

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 ' FRCTask No. 1f>l QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .£.!:.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Crite~ia Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied "Criteria Regarding Functional Testing. Satisfied

_- Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

- Test Duration Margin' (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied

.-*Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): SWGR-23-1, SWGR-24-1 Location: Between columns 41 and 40 and M and N1 between columns 40 and 39 and M and N FRC Item NWUber: 59 Response Report Page Number(s): 458-460 Component DescriptIOn: switchgear 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCEBN(S)

These components are in a nonharsh temperature and pressure and a harsh radiation environment. Qualification for radi-ation is presently required.* These components were origi-nally purchased before standards existed for electrical equipment in harsh radiation.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION This equipment will be analyzed or tested to resolve the qualification status.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION 5 6 The doses in the radiation study of 5.8 x 10 and 1.1 x 10 rads qan be reduced because the isocondenser5 line is shielded.

The remaining dose is in the range of 2 x 10 *rads, which is comparable to the doses for which current equipment is qualified.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Projiact No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 lJ I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~3 Equipment Item No. 83 Motor Control Center Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Type 7700 Power Distribution for Standby-ac Power (MCC-28~1, MCC 28-7, MCC-29-1, MCC-29-3, MCC-29-4, and MCC 29-7)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 83 Reference 26, Section 4.3.2.4, Former Item 60B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B79 [29]; SCEW 461-465 [2]

.DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,fl', RT, P, H, CS, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, ~c, ~a System Consideration Review , 4a, 4b1 4e, 4E1' 4e, u:

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -Sa, §e, Sc:; 5d, Se, 55-r

.§g, Sh, 51, Sj nstalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation .tia; 6b-Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary :;la, :;lb, le

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

4<01 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/has Aet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

__ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/has Aet) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Aas A&e) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item *

.1(, Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

__ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

__ Equipment modification

__ Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/ 11

__ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

__ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

_l(_ The Licensee (.Aa.a/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ------------------------------------------------------*>

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (Se~ Section 3 of this TER for *Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 enklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4....._.l'o..._1_ __

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIP~ENT ITEM NO. 83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Docilmented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similari;y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

..::Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

.::.:Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

.--Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

-Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

-e.nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4...,Co-..1...___ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. B LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number{s): MCC-28-1, -2a~1, 1, 3 4, 7 Location: Reactor building, various elevations FRC Item Number: 60B Response Report Page Number{s): 461-465 Component Descript!Oii: Motor* control centers 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN{S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1. 2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN{S) "

These components were orig*inally purchased before standards existed for the qualification of electrical components for harsh radiation conditions. Qualification for radiation is presently required. These components are located in a normally nonharsh environment. Qualification for aging is not justified.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION These components will be environmentally tested for harsh radiation.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION The dose to motor control centers from CRD piping has been deleted because the scram will be completed and the dis-charge volume will be isolated in seconds. This is a suffi-ciently short time to preclude the source term due to core melt from entering the CRD piping. The remaini~g dose to the motor control centers is in the range of 10 rads, which is what current production motor control centers are qualified for and what {in our evaluation) the materials within the motor control centers will be capable of withstanding.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 lo I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

Equipment Item No. 84 Electric Air Heater Located in the Turbine Building Edwin L *. Weigland Model 1-113462/2-113462 Inlet HeateF. for Standby Gas Treatment System Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 84 Reference 26, Section 4.6.15, Former Item 62A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B80 (29]; SCEW 412-414 (2] 1 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY TH~ NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

- --*(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, <;tr, RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@RPs, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~b, 9c, 9d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4e, 4d, 4e, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5a, 58, §e, §6, Se1 !H, 5~h Sh, 5i, 5:jo Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 'ffJ. , 1'b, ;le ..

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257

Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ?yl EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. F-

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Rae ftet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

~*The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are rto outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_){_ Tne Licensee (has/Ra& AliO'\) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Ra& AQ~) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

_!:(, Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

1'- Equipment:. replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~- Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

___ Other <~--------------------------------------------------~

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation *

.)!'__ The Licensee (~/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N£XZ: te£EVE4 tNG oyrAGE AFrtf &£C1f'r ON..ftrG *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency 0 Modification II.a Qualification Not Established III.a III.b Exempt Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research .Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 41

. QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. £:!i...

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Docilmented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarqing Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

.Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

=-Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

. ***Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

~-Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualifica.tion Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center' NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAssignmentNo.13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4te/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): 2/3-A-7503, 2/3-B-7503 Location: Turbine building, elevation 571 1 -o" FRC Item Number: 62A Response Report Page Number(s): 412-414 Component DescriptTOii: Electric air heaters 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components _were originally purchased before standards existed for the qualification of electrical components for harsh environmental conditions. Qualification for radia-tion is presently required. These components are normally deenergized and in a nonharsh environment. Qualification for aging is not justified.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement com-ponents. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage *.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These air heaters are used to dry gases upstream of the charcoal filters in the SGTS. Because radiation is the only harsh environment, failure of the air heater due to radia-tion buildup on the SGTS filters and charcoal would not be a problem because at those radiation levels, the heat gener-ated in the charcoal would be sufficient to provide some inlet air humidity reduction.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. L/ (;I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~S' Equipment Item No. 85 Electric Motor Located in the Turbine Building General Electric Model 5K256AK2037 Drives Standby Gas Treatment Exhaust. Fans (2/3-7506-A, -B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 85 Reference 26, Section 4.6.16, Former Item 63 Licensee Suqmittal: FRC Designated Page B81 (29]; SCEW 415-417 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THK NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(see Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, qr, RI', P, H, cs, A, s, @ M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@RPs, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summ~ry Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3-e, 3c, 3d System Consideration Review .4a, 413, 4e, 49, 4e, H Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Ss, Sb, Se, Sd, Se, 5£,

5g1 §9, 5i, §;3 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -6a, 6lJ Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary ~a, +e, :;ie ..

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4" EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Rae est) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/has eet) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/baa AQt) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~ F.quipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ .Equipment modification

___ F.quipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_____ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (______________________________________________________ __

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (A.as/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N'qr tf£F<t£..ING avrAGe A~r.ctf £.ec.g1ero11t.r1rE .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 1215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4-1 QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF_ EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ff EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Docilmented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Sublliergence Satisfied Criteria Regard-ing Radiation Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Sequence. Satisfied 0 riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

.Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

_:.Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

~~Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~ NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 U~~ffianklin Research Center . FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO."

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Nwnber(s): 2/3-A&B-7506 Location: 3 feet south of column F and 2 feet east of column 44 or 2* feet west of column 44 FRC Item Nuiriber: 63 Response Report Page Number(s): 415-417 Component DescriptIOn: Exhaust fan motor 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components are located in a harsh radiation environ-ment. Qualification for radiation is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement com-*

ponents. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These moto.rs *have Ciass B insulation, and other motors with Class B insulation have been tested to > 2 x 10 7 rads and qualified. It is expected that this insulation would not suffer ragiation failure for the specified doses (1.6 x 10 rads). .

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC PrOjf3Ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (J) I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 'llo Equipment Item No. 86 Electric Motor Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Gene.ral Electric Model 5Kl84AL2561 Drives Low Pressure Coolant Injection Room Air Coolers (2-5746A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 86 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.8, Former Item 65A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B83 (29]; SCEW 433-436 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this.TER for* Legend)

-R, T, (,[l:, RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R),. M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None*,

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 31::1, ~c, ~a System Consideration Review 4a, 4e, 4e, 4d, 4e, 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review . §a, 59, aG, 5'1, 5e, §f' SfJ' Sh, Si, 5j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -6a, 6b Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary :;?a, +&, +e

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment.No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(o 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ;CS

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Ras ~) provided a response to the SER concerns.

_ The Licensee. (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolll!lental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/aae Ree) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_!:$... Justification for interim operation (has/has Aet) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Correctlve action specified by the Licensee:

~ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

__ Equipment reloca'tion above. submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

__ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <----------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

operation.

~ The Licensee (A.ea/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N)(TtfEEl.t£LtA/G tlUTA<i£ AeT.Ctf tfeC§V!T ONS/Te .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~

Modification I III.a Exempt a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e,;nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13

_........,...._ 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (o1 UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8lo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X a DEFICIENCY DocUlllented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evalu~ted Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pre.ssure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required}* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

...Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

~Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page IA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4_..Co=-1.___ _

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO .. '.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Nwnber(s): 3-5746A,B Location: Southeast and ~outhwest corner rooms FRC Item Number: 65A 'Response Report Page Number(s): 433-436 Component

Description:

Emergency air coolers 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This equipment is located in a harsh radiation and mild tem- .

perature and pressure environment. The equipment was origi-nally purchased before standards existed for the qualif i-cation of electrical equipment for harsh radiation conditions.

Qualification for radiation is presently required. Temperature tests have been made to verify mild accident temperature conditions. Qualification for materi.al aging is not required because this equipment is located in an area of the plant where the temperature is controlled to less than 104F during normal operation.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION The only electrical components within the emergency air coolers are the fan motors. These motors will be replaced with qualified mot.ors during the next refueling outage following receipt of qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION These motors have Class B insulation. Other mo7ors with Class B insulation have been tested to > 2 x 10 rads and qualified. It is expected that this insulation would not 6 suffer radia5ion failure for the specified doses (3.4 x 10 and 4.7 x 10 rads).

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 <D I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. i:J.

Equipment Item No. 87 Electrical Cab*le Located Outside the Drywell Simplex 3TW with Overall SH Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 87 Reference 26, Section 4.5.16, Former Item 78 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B96 (29]; SCEW 495 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

-(*See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, f,ll:, RI', P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms. 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, Jc, 3d" System Consideration Review -4a, 419, 4e r 49, 4e, 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~. 5e; 5c, §9, §er §£1

§Cj I §h, Bi, §j TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -ea, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ;?a, +a, :;?e-

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ¢61 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.r

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/aae ftet) provided a response to the SER concerns *

. The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirorll!lental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/aa~ Rot) proposed a corrective action for this equipment

_item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Aas R9t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item *

.2i_ Corrective action. specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

~ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source JS_ verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~- Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~Qualification testing of equipment in* progress

.2L Other (,e.P~ACEM&1'r IF QVA~. C,4NKor .8.E esnl/.U.l..J"N£/)

~ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for.interim operation.

JS_ The Licensee (Aa&/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed cor~ective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action NexT&<[Ff/ELING OVO!/GE AFT/58. £ECE/&T at<;rtre *)

aF qvAL/F<e.D -ee,,oLAt:EMGIVT C'7M,Ot1N'e1Vr..r.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

<B) Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Q;nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 2

FRC Task No. ?GI QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f::1..

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Doci.imented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

-criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

i Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

Test Duration Margin (l hour+ Function Time) Satisfied "criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY.

I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification N9t Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

~nklin Research Center Page FRC Project No. C5257 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 'fG I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.cf LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification-Number(s): 3 TW with overall sh Location: Outside drywell FRC Item Number: 78 Response Report Page Number(s): 494-495 Component DescriptTOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperatur~, pressure.,

and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging is presently required *

. 1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which. could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in l minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potential harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in l minute or less. In the case of the torus compart-ment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurren with other harsh conditions.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NR0-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. "fW/

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .i.:Z.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur several hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity *

.Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are riot present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels for which they must be qualified.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

page FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 A Division of The Frankiin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 Iu EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~

Equipment Item No. 88 Electrical Cable Located Outside Containment Gene_ral Electric Butyl Rubber Insulation PVC Jacket .

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 88 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 66 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B84 [29]; SCEW 474, 475 {2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,~ RPS, None,.

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3oe, 36 System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 4~, lie, 'If' Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 9a, ,t7, 5~, sa, 5e, Sf,

§~, §a, Si, Sj

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary .:J.a I +a, +e

~nklin Research Center NAC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 FAC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FAC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FAC Task No. _40.......,.._1_ __

",QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO ...ff:_

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/aas ese) provided a response to the SER concerns.

~-* The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies *

.2:(. The Licensee (has/Raa AO~) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has;A.ae ft&t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item *

..2S.. Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~- Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_£ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

__ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress L Other CtfgpL.ACEMENT 1£ t:)uAt.. CAA/Kar Be eSTA!fU.tSHE.lJ

_ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (a.a/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action 4/EX'if&.£t1G?t1V<%J'jf:fAGE ffre<f l?c&CE/(Jr q<<..f!l!i or= VA .I.~ F / ~.L) '11'4ACHM"51t'r ca,.,,,e>oN.<SIV r..r.

.)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qual:if ied Life Deficiency

g Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope OTI.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC--03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page

A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 12151 448-1000 FRC Task No. %I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Dociimented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steain Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfi'ed Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not.Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See *page lA Equipment Item description.

y

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. fi/

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): Butyl rubber insulation, polyvinyl chloride jacket Location: Outside drywel~

FRC Item Nwnber: 66 Response Report Page Number(s): 474-47 5 Component Descript!On: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, radiation, and material aging is presently required.

LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage fol-lowing receipt of the qualified replacement components ~nsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in 1 minute or less. Once equipment functions.

are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potentially harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in l minute or less. In the case of the torus compartment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4te/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO._f_

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

a. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur several hours after the postulated a~cident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials ut"ilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation *

.- *- --. leve~~ .. ~?-~ _which -~~y mus_~--~-9ua~~~~~:!~. _______ _

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4~ I

,UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. gq Equipment Item No. 89 Electrical Cable Located in Containment General Electric PE Insulation PVC Jacket Licensee .reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 89 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.6, Former Item 67 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B85 (29]; SCEW 480, 481 12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THH NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll!, RT, P, H, CS, A, s, . {R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration Review 4a1 4b; 4er 4dr 4e r u Equipment Environmental Qualification Review §a, §e, §e, e9r Se, SfT Slj r §8, §i, s~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -6ar 68 Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary :Za

lb I :Zliil1

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 461 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. *

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

.25_ Tne Licensee (has/has 8&6) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE enviro~ental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_!(_ The Licensee (has/Ra& Rot) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established *

-15.._ Justification for interim operation (has/A~e RQt) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Correc~ive action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipme.nt replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

~- Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~- Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

~ Other (tfERL.4CGMEAIT t6 <2(1A?, C,4,1(N4r QE ESµ4tU.{..fHeO The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (Aa&/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action l(EXTtfVtt£LtlVG OuljfGE ACT<< A!EC#ter QN.S-/TG .)

Or 6!vA~t/:'/El1 ~E~£AC'E/l-tcNr COM/:JrJIVEIVT'".S' The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. 05257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 !2151 448-1000 FRC Task No. 40/

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. L:.2-EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Doci.imented E~idence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required}* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied "Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied

criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X.= CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available valuated in Reference 26. See page lA This equipment item was previ ous 1 Y e Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Str~ets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. UI EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO .

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): Polyethylene insulated polyvinyl

. chloride Jacket Location: Inside drywell a*bove. elevation 533 1 -0 11 FRC Item Number: 67 Response Report Page Number(s): 480-481 Component DescriptiOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located .in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radi-ation, and material aging is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Similar components have been successfully qualified for the required environmental conditions.

B. These components remained functional during the June S, 1970, depressurization incident at Dresden Unit 2. This incident resulted in harsh environmental conditions.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

-enklin Research Center FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila.'. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 ~I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. qo Equipment Item No. 90 Electrical Cable Located Outside Containment General Electric, Cross Link PE Insulation, Neopren~ Jacket Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 90 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 68 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B86 [29]; SCEW 482, 483 -[2]

.;DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM~S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, C,ll', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING.OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, ~, 30-System Consideration Review 4eo 4e, 4c, 4e1; 4e, 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, !Se, !Sf, "59' 511, 5i, 5*J Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a; 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 1-a, 7b, 'fo

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :ft; I .

. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

_?S_ Tne Licensee (has/Rae no~) provided a response to the SER concerns.

"The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/Rae ftee) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not bee_n fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/ftaa ee&) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

~ Equipment relocation above submergence level

~ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_2(_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~.Qualification testing of equipment in progress 1- Other (#PL4CEMENTIF <euAL. CAN N"qr CE E.S'TA.l!'!L.l.SHEO)

~ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation *

...J£. The Licensee (&iwi./has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action u..e;xr<f&E'<£Lt<Y<Z ouP?GE ACTetf R.ECE/er 0N&1r£ .)

c~ QVAL.1/:/.<fiD .es,c4-ACEMEIVT CCM,Dt::Utn!T1V7".S.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency B Modification II.a Qualification Not Established III.a III.b Exempt Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 40 I QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.a_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Doci.imented Evidence of Qualification*Adequate x Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam. Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

. Criteria Regarding FunctJ,onal Testing Satisfied

~'.Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied

~criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification ~t Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Qnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and.Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. ?-6?1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): Cross-link polyethylene-insulated neoprene jackete Location: Outside drywell FRC Item Nuiriber: 68 Response Report Page Number(s): 482-483 Component DescriptIOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, radiation, and material aging is presently require~.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage fol-lowing receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated BPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in 1 minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potentially harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipmnet in that area and which complete their function in 1 minute or less. In the case of the torus compartment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the BPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4-(pl UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT IT~M NO. 2/L LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, norunechanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur several hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are* not present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels for which they must be qualified.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '-I '4 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 91 Electrical Cable Located Outside Containment Gene.ral Electric,* Rubber Insulation, Hypalon Jacket.

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 91 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 69 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B87 [29]; SCEW 484, 485 -[2]

' ~:

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,Ir, Rr, P, H, CS, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, ~N, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER Ja, Jb, 3e, 3d System Consideration Review 4a; 4b1 4c 1 4d, 4e, itf Equipment Environmental Qualification Review §a, 9e, §e, 5a, §e, §i!,

Sg' Sh, Si, Sj

Installed TM! Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary 'Ta, ilb1 :;tQ

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4-ttl QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .2L

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/-Aaa AQ~) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

~- The Licensee has presented information which shows there are rio outstanding qualification deficiencies.

-2t. The Licensee (has/has Aee) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

-)( Justification for interim operation (has/nae aee) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

~- Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

-2(_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~- Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

..)!_ Other (.REf'LAC.M£N7tE QI/AL CM N'fjr OE ESTAOLISHED The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation *

.JL_ The Licensee (&as/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Mg'Xr 4'VVGLIN% tluTAG£ A/:TE,,f R..ECEIPT ONS"IT<f*)

dP G?vAL..11=/cQ GPLACEMJ5NT COMjl!JONeNrs.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope I.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Avai],.able

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC--03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets: Phtla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. % I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~*

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate ?(

Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Fun~tional Testing Satisf'ied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. Se~ page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-~118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4wl

'QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .2.L LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): Rubber-insulated hypalon jacket Location: Outside drywell FRC Item Number: 69 - Response Report Page Number(s): 484-485 Component

Description:

Electrical cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, radiation, and material aging is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage fol-lowing receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in 1 minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except -the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potentially harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in 1 minute or less. In the case of the torus compartment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 F~C Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4Yd EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur sev:eral hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would*be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels for_ whi<:=h _th~y -~ust be qualifie~.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. L/ f.P I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. q~

Equipment Item No. 92 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell General Electric Model SI-57275 Vulkene Licensee reference not cited -

Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 92 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 71 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B90 [29]; SCEW 490, 491 l2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll', RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e, 3d System Consideration Review 4e:; 4e, 4e, 4d; 4e, 4r Environmental Qualification Review Se:' Sb, Sc, So, Se, 5f,

§lj' §a I §i, s;...

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6e, 6e*

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 1-a' :;ie, :;lg

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. fi/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/hes ne-t.) provided a response to the SER concerns.

_The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirorlJ!lental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

X The Licensee (has/has ftet) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Aas AO~) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item*

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

- Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_1!_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

_x_ Other (REPLACEMENT /F rl(IAL.. CAN Nqr 79& £,£rAl3L t,[tl'iD The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (~has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for *accomplishing the corrective action tV§X r tfQ"El/ELING tll/TAG,E AffEl(I tfliCEf,{J T ON.r"fCE *)

dJC° GlthlL..,;.:11:D ~E/'LACGMeNT CtJM/)tJJVell/CS.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~

Mod*ification III .a Exempt a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

v

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 1215) 448-1000 2

FRC Task No. 4<el QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.£.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented EVidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate .

o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe,Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified i.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26.- . See page IA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 461 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Nwnber(s): Vulkene Location: Outside drywell above elevation 533'-0" FRC Item Number: 71 ,, Response Report Page Number( s): 490~491 Component DescriptTOn: Elect~ic cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, hwnidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging is .Presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replac.ement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION -JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. 0£ the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), ail except.

the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in 1 minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potentially harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in 1 minute less. In the case of the torus compartment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 "Qnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. fYI UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. u_

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur several hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels for which they must be qualified.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 ~I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 93 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell General Electric Multi Pair with Overall SH CO-CON Licensee reference not cited -

Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 93 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 72 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B90 [29]; SCEW 498, 499 "[2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY TH~ NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Le9end)

R, T, (,[l', RT, P, H, CS, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None*,

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, '3'C, 3d System Consideration Review -4s, 4b1 4e I 48, 4e, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -§.a, Sb, 5'1, 59, §e, 6f, 59, Sh, §i, s:;.

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a1 ee Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ;ls, ilb, ~e

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _ _.9_,6.,1_ __

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.J...

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE-APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (hasAlae net) provided a response to the SER concerns *

. The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

__ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies *

.X. The Licensee (has/aae Ret) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

2S_ Justification for interim operation (has/h.e& got) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item. .

2S_ Corrective action specified by.. the Licensee:

~- Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

__ Equipment modification

~-* Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

.2S_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~- Equipment relocation to a mild environment

__ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

.2L Other ( tfeeL.AC.<fMJ:NT tr <;?vAL CAA/ tYtZT /SE EST~U3Lt..rf./£0 The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (bae/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action lf".SJSGA?£Ev.e:Lt1Vir quryfi& At=re& &gcE1er av.r1rs d/: {/,I/LI 1=1£ D ~ePLA <:GM£NT Ct:JMPt:VVISNT".J".

. )

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification I II

a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FAC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. ff,/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X a DEFICIENCY DocUJllented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or. Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Re<;iuired Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 29. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46/

1 QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. il LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Nwnber(s):

Location: Outside drywell FRC Item Number: 72 Response Report Page Nwnber(s): 498-499 Component Descripti'On: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure.,

and radiation environment; Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging is presently required *

3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified componen-ts during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in l minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potentially harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in l minute or less. In the case of the torus compartment1 other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditiQns.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 *Page Qnklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4-~1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur s~veral hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidj.ty.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to*

accelerate damage. Finally, JIDst of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels for which they must be qualified.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '-t t.g I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. '14 Equipment Item No. 94 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell General Electric Butyl Rubber Insulation Jacket Licensee re.ference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 94 Reference 26, Section 4.*5.2.16, Former Item 73 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B91 (29]; SCEW 476, 477 -(2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY TH~ NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, qr, RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R) I M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e, 3&

System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, iae, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Se:, Sb, 5e, Sd, Se, 5£-,

-Sg, Sh, Si1 5j

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 613 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary +a' +a, .:jle

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/has n°t) provided a response to the SER concerns.

___,The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

-2S._ The Licensee (has/ftae Aet) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/aa; AQt) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

~Other (tfEPLACEMENT IF QljAL. CAN NOT 4E E3T404trHE/))

___ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

X The Licensee (&as/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!§:~~~~~~~:....J;~.J:.L~:__.)

The qualification DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiepcy Cg) Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 enklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Assignment No. 13 2 FRC Task No. 4(zl QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0.1:1._

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY

- x Docwnented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Es.tablished (If Required)

Program Established to Identify-Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

..*Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied

-~'criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equ'ipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

~nklin Research Centf(!r Page FRC Project No. C5257 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION. REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Nwnber(s): Butyl/rubber Location: Outside drywell FRC Item Number:

73 Response Report Page Number(s): 476-477 Component DescriptIOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts ~ereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near post.ulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in 1 minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potential harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in l minute or less. In the case of the torus compartment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. >-/ (p l UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT IT~M NO. H LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative,*

non~echanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur several hours after. the postulated accident. Actual doses .

would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the .radiation levels for_ which __~~y must_ ~e __<j~_alif ied. ___________ *

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (p I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 95 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell Simplex Anhydrex XX Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 95 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 74 Li_censee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B92 [29]; SCEW 478, 479 -[2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Q'l.', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@ RPS, None,.

Not stated; Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e, 3d System Consideration Review ~a:, 4b1 4e; 4d, 4e, u Equipment Environmental Qualification Review --Set 1 581 §e, Sd, Se, Sf,

--Sg, Sa, §i, §j

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation f;ia, 89 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary +e., ilb, +e

y

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4" I t

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.£...

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

-1£. Tne Licensee (has/Ra& Re~) provided a response to the SER concerns *

- The Licensee ,: (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equip~~nt is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environl!lental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no

outstanding qualification deficiencies.

-25:_ The Licensee (has/hae nee) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_?!_ Justification for interim operation (has/Rae Ret) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item *

.15_ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

--- Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis).

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress

_K... Other (geelACfflENr IF QvAL. CANA(ttT BE ESlj44L /,J"J/£.l)

_ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

X The Licensee (Aue/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N'e~ @FVEL..ING ()f't:Q1IZ£ ,4FT£<f .teEC El pr QN'...iIT§ eJ,,C u4,,,r-,,JUJ )e,ep C~"'1SNT Cowt,OolVLSNT.r

.)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope I.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC--03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :fE I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualifioation Adequate x Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Esta,blished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established

. II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 29. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 461 QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): Anhydrex xx Location: Outside drywell FRC Item Number: 74 Response Report Page Number(s): 478-479 Component DescriptIOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

l.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

l.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-sure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and HWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in l minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potential harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in l minute or less. In the case of the torus compartment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 1215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4fi, I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

a. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanistic models. Mechanistic release models would result in radiation releases which occur several hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels levels for which they . - --**- *,

must

- - **-- -*-* be qualified

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC PrOjf3Ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448*!000 FRC Task No. 4 {D/

. UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. q" Equipment Item No. 96 Electrical Cable Located in the Drywell Simplex Anhydrex XX Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 96 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.6, Former Item 75 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B93 [29]; SCEW 486, 487 "[2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THli NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Q'l', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@RPs, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3-b, ~c, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4e, 4d, 4e, itr Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Ser ab, ae, Ser Se1 Sr, Sg' Sh r Si1 s~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary .:ra, 7b, 7c

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4;1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/hes not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

____;The Licens~e (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environI!lental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

)( The Licensee (has/hae ne~) proposed a corrective qCtion for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Rae Re&) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~- Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

~- Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis) _

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~- Qualification testing of equipment in progress

..2L Other ( ~&f'LA c l!iMEt{T t r QuAL. 09IVN4T SE E.f Pl/3 LIS/IE/) )

_ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

_JS_ The Licensee (A.a.a/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed '

corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the correc~ive action 1'.EX'r &£EV£LIN(i fWpiGE ,4,,CTE!f /:ECEIPT oN.CI TE . )

tJ,&: r:/tn4L..I l'=IE.L) ~EPLAC'EMSIVT Cc:1'°"/(JCUV4!i1VT.r.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

@ Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Researc~ Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No .. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ffl QUIPMENT ENViRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similaril;y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding.Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

.. Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

..Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

_Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established U.b Equipment Not Qualified u.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification UI.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center .

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :ffel EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALiFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification _Number(s): Anh~drex xx prastex insulated jac et Location: Inside drywell above elevation 505'-6R FRC Item Number: 75 Response Report Page Number(s): 486-487 Component DescriptIOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging is p~esently ~equired.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Similar components have been successfully qualified for the required environmental conditions.

B. This component remained functional during the June 5, 1970, depressurization incident at Dresden Unit 2.

This incident resulted in harsh environmental conditions.

~nklin Research .Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '-/~I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. :q7 Equipment Item No. 97 Electrical Cable Located Inside Driwell Simplex Rubber Insulation PVC Jacket Licensee reference not cited -

Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 97 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.6, Former Item 76 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B94 [29]; SCEW 488, 489 T2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Q'l', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental .Qualification Swmnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, Jc, 3d-System Consideration Review 4ar 49, 4e, 41:h 4e, 4~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review §e, Sb, 5c;, 5d, 5e, Sf, Sg' Sn, Si, Sj

'Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6e, ie Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary +e, +e, ;;IQ

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4-1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

.25.._ Tne Licensee (has/eae aet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

_The Licensee (has/has not)-specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

X The Licensee (has/ass ft&&) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Aas aet) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item *

.2S_ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

~- Equipment relocation above submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress ,

.2L Other <&ee~ACllfENr /F QUAL. CANNOT M E.Slt11iJ?J.SN'£/)

~- The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that c_an be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (Ae&/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action tY£xr 4e,.1:uc4t¥G t?t/VIG£ ACTE,. &eCE/f!.JT ON.rt re *)

' t:?rC/C/ALl/=1'£L:J ~epLACISMeNr C0""7,0envB1Vr.S.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITF.M ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency 0 Modification II.a Qualification Not Established III.a III.b Exempt Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

.mg . '--' M '~~*...__,__.. _,,_---'-'.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 2

FRC Task No._....,£...~...' - - -

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X a DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Quaiif ication Adequate x Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

. (If Any) Satisfied

.....Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

__ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

. Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c F.quipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a F.quipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 29. See page IA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page .

A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ~/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number( s): :R'.ubber insulated polyvinyl

. chloride jacket Location: Inside drywell above elevation SOS 1 -6" FRC Item Number: 76 Response Report Page Number(s): 488-489 Component DescriptTOn: Electric cable l.l IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be. replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Similar components have been successfully qualified for the required environmental conditions.

B. This component remained functional during the June s,

1970, depressurization incident at Dresden Unit 2.

This incident resulted in harsh environmental conditions.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3'b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4tel QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification N.umber(s): Butyl/rubber Location: Inside drywell FRC Item NWiiber: 70 Response Report Page Number(s): (476-477) of draft report Component

Description:

Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

~one 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This item has been deleted from the November l, 1980, final report because it is a duplication of previously submittal information under a different item number *

3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION This item has been deleted.

1. 4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFiCATION DISCUSSION This item has been deleted.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Sf 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ~I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

I :J .-

@1r1eaufu J) 19'9 (ab,,,,: 6G I / t N r/,,; ak*ca b,h t1 J

.R q4rm1.(! '/"Y'-

m.uni"A&an *zti . .

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Projf3Ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 f.D I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. q~

Equipment Item No. 98 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell Simplex Poly Nylon Insulation/~hield Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 98 Reference 26, Section 4.5.16, Former Item 77 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B95 [29]; SCEW 492, 493 "[2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY TH~ NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, CJl.', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e; 36 System Consideration Review 4ar 4b; 4c, 4d, 4e, 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, Se, s~

-91]1' ah, Bi, 5j

Installed TM! Lessons Learned Implementation 68: I 613 '

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary -=ia, 7b, 7c

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4t;/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO ..

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/has net) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not)- specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information 'which shows there are rto outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_1S_ The Licensee (has/Aas Ree) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Aas Ret) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

_K.. Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~- Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

~- Equipment relocation above submergence level

~ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_lS._ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~- Equipment relocation to a mild *environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress 2S_ Other (.eEPLACfiMENr 1e QVAL. CAN ll{gr /JS E ..rrA8LISlll:J)

~- The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

_J5_ The Licensee f&ae/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Ne.sr .evv.eLING ovrAg Arre& &Ec1£1,0T ON CtTE *>

"~ t:;vALJ.t:/E.LJ ~e,,044C£MENT COJW/f:JONP:NT.r.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Qualification Mod_ification III.a III.b Exempt II.a Not Established Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

---~-~~.....;-""'-"---'-"--=~------- -------*-

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Qnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151 448-1000 2

FRC Task No. 4-f>/

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 1e EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM QESIGNATION: -

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ---

}(

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

-*Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months . + Function Time) Satisfied

'Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page e n k l i n Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4&t I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification_Number(s): Polyn~lon-in~ulated, shielded, and p astex instrument Location: Outside drywell FRC Item Number: 77 Response Report Page Number(s): 492-493 Component DescriptIOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray,

radiation, and material aging is presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment. by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pressure, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in 1 minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required.. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potential harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in 1 minute or less. In the case of the torus compartment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure.

Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.

...J -- ___,._, - - -~--__._. - - - - - - .~---.........- . ; . - _ . . _ . . _ __ _ ___:...____,_.__

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. 05257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. "!-tel UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0.1.B.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanistic models. Mechanistic* release models would result in radaition releases which occur several hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such con-servative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity. Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to accelerate damage. Fianlly, most of the materials demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels for which they must be qualified.

.!j

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 f.o I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. q Equipment Item No. 99 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell Simplex type not stated Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 99 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 79 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B97 [29]; SCEW 496, 497 l2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,/l.', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE C~KSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c:, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4e, 4e, 4d, 4e, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review §a, ae, Se, sa, Se, 5£,

Sg, §ft I §i I §j

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary :::ja, 7b1 ile

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448- 1000 FRC Task No. 4t;; I QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. !l.1....

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

25._ Tne Licensee (has/ll;a.a Bet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

.2t.; The Licensee (has/aae not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolU!lental service conditions.

__ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~ The Licensee (has/has A&6) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

~ Justification for interim operation (has/Ras AQC) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

__ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_}5_ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

____ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

____ Qualification testing ~f equipment in progress 2(_ Other (Mf'LACEMEff IF t2VAL. CANNt:7T 135 ESTA8Ll..J'/IE..b

____ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

')( The Licensee (Ae&./has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N'§X r #FVGLING Of/TA<iE /lerE& gce1er fZNJ /TE *)

. 17,I= <;II/AL. I ,f:/ELJ ,e4_,p£ACeMe1VT CtJNIPt7N8NT.r'.

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~ Modification III.a Exempt Not in Scope II.a Qualification Not Established III.b I.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 1215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. t~/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL:IFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging _µegradation. Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied.

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied ,

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

I

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II-.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 29. See page lA Equipment Item description.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin lnstlture FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20rh and Race Srreers. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 GI QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT . ITEM NO.#

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): None Location: Outside drywell FRC: Item Number: 79 Response Report Page Number(s): 496-497 Component DescriptIOn: Electric cable 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

This component is located in a harsh temperature, pressure, and radiation environment. Qualification for operating time, temperature, pressure, humidity, chemical spray, radiation, and material aging are presently required.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement equipment onsite.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Of the plant areas which could experience harsh pres-su_re, temperature, and humidity (the steam tunnel, isolation condenser pipe chase, torus compartment near postulated HPCI break only, and RWCU rooms), all except the torus compartment contain equipment which must function in 1 minute or less. Once equipment functions are completed, there would be no further active function required. In all cases except the torus compartment, the only safety-related cables entering the potential harsh environment area are cables which terminate on equipment in that area and which complete their function in 1 minute or less. In the case of the torus compart-ment, other cabling could be in the vicinity of the HPCI line break. However, the torus compartment is so large that the harsh environment would dissipate almost instantly with valve closure. Radiation is not concurrent with other harsh conditions.*

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. fi/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITl~M NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

B. Radiation doses were calculated using conservative, nonmechanist1c models. Mechanistic release models

-would result in radiation releases which occur several hours after the postulated accident. Actual doses would be less than those calculated using such conser-vative assumptions. Additionally, harsh radiation is not concurrent with pressure, temperature, and humidity.

Therefore, although some material degradation may occur due to radiation, stress factors are not present to accelerate damage. Finally, most of the materials utilized for this cable are currently utilized and have demonstrated the ability to withstand the radiation levels for whicfi they must be qualified.

'.!.~

~~klin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Projt:tct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(Q/

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 100 Equipment Item No. 100 Terminal Block Located Within the Drywell Allen Bradley, Model Not Stated Cable/Wire Terminations (7,9-0lB-14, -16, -18, -20)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 100 Reference 26, Section 4.6.14, Former Item 102A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page BlOO [29]; S.CEW 514-517 [2]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TE~ for Legend)

R, T, Q'l', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@!) RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ~e, 3e, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4er 4d, 4e, 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5et1 5b; 5e, so; 5e, §t.,..

59, Sh, Si, s:;

- ea, ea Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary +a, +a, ~

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (Zl5) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ff/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Ras aet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically s~ated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_?5_ The Licensee (has/Ra& RQt) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_!!_ Justification for interim operation (has/Ra& R&9) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

-2t Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

~ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submer.gence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to ~ mild environment

_ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <---------------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

)( The Licensee (.Aee/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action N£XrtfE£VELING OV{jl/G£ AFT&& .tfEC{fl..R T ON..!"/ TE *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~

Modification III.a Exempt a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e,;nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 12151448-1000 2

FRCTask No. fwl QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. It.Jo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate x Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately.-

o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Regarding Radiation Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

'Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

'"Test Duration Margin Cl hour + Function Time) Satisfied

'Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4tiz/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVl~W OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): 79-0lB-14, 79~01B-16, 79-0lB-18, 79-0!B-20 Location: Drywell wall, azimuths 15, 5, and 355 FRC Item Numbe+: !02A Response Report Page Number(s): 514-517 Component DescriptI'Oii: Terminal blocks l.l IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification deficiency for qualif ic~tion method, material aging, humidity, temperature, pressure, qualification time, chemical spray, radiation, and margin 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSIO_N OF THE CONCERN(S)

These components are in harsh environmental conditions. All the above deficiencies have yet to be qualified.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Similar components have been successfully qualified for the required. environmental conditions.

B. These components remained functional during the June 5, 1970, depressurization incident at Dresden Unit 2.

This incident resulted in harsh environmental con.di tions.

y

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 &I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 101 Equipment Item No. 101 Terminal Block Located Within the Drywell GE Model 2648965 _

Cable/Wire Terminations (79-0lB-15, -17, -19, -21)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 101 Reference 26, Section 4.6.14, Former Item 102B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page BlOl SCEW 510-513 [2]

,DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll', RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN,@;)RPs, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c:, 3d-System Consideration Review 4et1 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f Environmental Qualification Review §et, Sb, §e, so, Se, Sf,

..;~, 58, §i I §;3

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a1 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule summary ;la J ~e, ie

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ~/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/Ra~ aet) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

~The Licensee (has/Aas.Re~ proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

-2S_ Justification for interim operation (has/Aas Ret) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_2(_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

~ Equipment modification

~- Equipment relocation above submergence level

~- Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

~ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

~- Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

_Ji_ The Licensee (aes/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ¥exrtfEEVEL/NG avrAGE 4TE.tf 4'£C§&0r t?A/.t"/Z-$ .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Cf§> Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4_.li....t_ _ __

QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /6/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:.

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied*

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies <;.

(If Any) Satisfied "Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

~*Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c F.quipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a F.quipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available This equipment item was previously evaluated in Reference 26. See page lA Equipment Item description.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. -~~--.;I_ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /eJ LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): 79-0lB-15, 79-0lB-17, 79-0lB-19, 79-0lB-21 Location: Inside drywell, azimuths 5, 15, and 355 FRC Item Number: l02B Response Report Page Number(s): 510-513 Component

Description:

Terminal blocks 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

Qualification information is being developed.

1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

These companents are in harsh environmental conditions. All the above deficien~ies have yet to be qualified~

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement com-ponents. After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION A. Similar components have been successfully qualified for the required environmental conditions.

B. These components remained functional during the June 5, 1970, depressurization incident at Dresden Unit 2 *

. This incident resulted in harsh environmental conditions.

y

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4~I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Jo.;).

Equipment Item No. 102 Position Switches Located in the High Pressure Coolant Injection Room Manufacturer and Model Not Stated (POS-2-2301-29, -30, -64, -65)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 102 Reference 26, Section 4.4.1, Former Item 24 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B47 [29]; SCEW 16-19 [2]

""DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,[l', RT, P, H, CS, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

("Not stated) Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e; 38 System Consideration Review 4a1 4b," 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f Environmental Qualification Review 5a, !ie, 5e, Ser Set Sf, SIJ' 58, §i, Sj

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 68 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule summary ila; ile, :;IQ

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment Np_. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :t_(f; I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

~ Tne Licensee (has/has aee) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective* action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

Corrective action specified by t~ Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

. ___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <--------------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for. justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope

~

II.b Not Qualified Documentation Not Availablel

Researc~ Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 e;nklin FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.-....::~...-!_ __

UIPMENT ENV1RONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. t£E..

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration. Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submerg~nce Satisfied iteria Regarding. Radiation Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

~ (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied

~riteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY x*= CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III~a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available x

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRCAsslgnment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. 4'1 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL:IFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Equipment Identification Number(s): POS-2-2301-64, POS-2-2301-29, POS-2-2301-30 Location: HPCI room FRC Item Nuiiiber: 24 Response Report Page Number(s):

(16-19) of Component

Description:

Position switches draft report 1.1 IDENTIFIED CONCERN(S)

None 1.2 LICENSEE DISCUSSION OF THE CONCERN(S)

The status of this equipment will be resolved in accordance with Section 3.1 of Attachment A to the 90-day response.

1.3 LICENSEE CONCLUSION See Section 3.1 of Attachment A.

1.4 CONTINUED OPERATION JUSTIFICATION DISCUSSION See Section 3.1 of Attachment A.

A complete l!.§_tin..g_o.La.lLdis.P-lay instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency* procedures has been included in CECo's November 1, 1980. subm.ittal. It includes instru-ments which provide indication only, as well as those which*

are connected to system control circuitry. The instruments which provide only indication have been excluded from the scope of CECo's November l, 1980, submittal as a result of*

the Dresden Unit 2 NRC site audit carried out between July 28 and 30, 1980. During this audit, the NRC indicated*

that po~i t-.ion switches were not within the scope of __ .fE.

Bulletin 79-0lB. Al tnough thes*e-t)o*si tion switches were excluded from the scope of the November 1, 1980, report, they were retained on the system components list p~ovided in Appendix B of-tha""f report, buc a sing~e rine was drawn through each entry representing such a position switch and a footnote was added to explain its status. Three level t.ransmitters were also excluded from quali.1..l.cation I:o.1. 'the

' same reason. As* a result of the requirement in the NRC 1 s

. SER to*qualify all safety-related display instrumentation which provides only.information to the reactor operators, CECo now plans to qualify any such instrument which is the.

\ .

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Asslgnment!io. 13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 1910312151448-1000 FRC Task No. _ _..fj__t~

J---

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT IT~M NO.L.s.J....J.-.-,-

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued) primary or on~y_me_ans of providing_inf9rmation on the status of safety-related equ{pment. If any display instrument is excluded from q-a-arrfi.cation, a justification will be pro-vided to explain its exclusion and assurance will be provided that any subsequent failure of the instrument will not mis.lead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation of the consequences of the accident. Because of the extensive ongoing work to revise the emergency procedures as required by NUREG 0737 and the potential for future revisions to the list of safety-related display instrumentation, it is not feasible to provide complete component evaluation summary sheets for these-compone?ffs at this time. Tnese summary*

Sn-e-et"S-will be completed. by the d'eadline for establishing complete environmental q¥alif ication of safety-related electrical equipment. . .

.- --*--~-- -- - -*-*------- ----

(1) This component has been deleted because it is used for position indication only and failure of the switch will not affect the associated valve control circuit.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _Cf_h....t _ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I NOTES:

E,LL£>X= 7;c¢A. 7~ ~ ~* ,~tf

y

--............ --~--*---

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 '41 UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 1a3 Equipment Item No. 103 (TMI Action Plan Item II.D.3)

Acoustic Monitor Sensor Located Inside the Drywell NOT Instruments Model 781B _

SRV Position Indication ( l~261-60A through E, 20-261-60A through E, 3-261...;60A through E)

Required Operating Time:* 12 days Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 103 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 1-4 [30]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, qr, RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable tJew :I:i@t't\

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Qnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _If_,"._./.__ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /tJ

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically s>tated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirollI!lental service conditions.

__ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established *.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provide.d by the Licensee for this equipment- item.

~ e:ttcotPk- action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

Equipment modification

__ Equipment reiocation above submergence level

____ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

____ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (_______________________________________________________

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification *for interim operation.

~ The Licensee (has/eae ne4!) provided a schedule for the proposed Q9Efeeei~e a~ct' n. jSch!dule for accomplishing the ~Q&&eQsive--

act~on ;

_3D./ljtf? .)

___ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency p:.5 Modificatiori] III.a Exempt II.a Quali f ica ti on Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

U:W, " & P le

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 ~ (

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied i teria Regarding Radiation Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding** Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c F.quipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a F.quipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Profect No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151 448-1000 FRC Task No. t{<e I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. L Direct Indication of R~lief *and Safety Valve Posit~on A Relief and Safety Valve Acoustic Monitoring Syste~ has been installed and placed into operation*at Dresden Units 2&3 and

Quad Cities Units 1&2. Environmental Qualification of this system is in progress via an Owner's Group testing program.

The current schedul~ for completion of testing is September, 1982. The test report will be available by Nove~ber, 1982.

Pr e l i mi n a r y d at a s he et s are at t a c he d i. nd i c at i ng- t he n o rm a l and acci~ent environments the equipment .may be exposed to as we.11 as the parameters to wh*ich the equipment is being tested.*

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

. Qnklin Research Center . FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of. The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 60 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448*1000 FRC Task No. o/tz /

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO . .L!J3 INSTALLED TMI LESSONS LEARNED IMPLEMENTATION EQUIPMENT

SUMMARY

NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualif ic~tion of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation: The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-0lB, Supplement 3 (item 2), .in accordance with criteria established .. by the NRC (see Section 2 of this rep0rt) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limited to TMI Action Plan equipment associated with specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January 1, 1981 (sections are identified below). Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January 1, 1981 if adequately identified by the licensee_.

This plant is a PWR____ , BWR~.

The NSSS Vendor is Westinghouse (W) ____ , Babcox & Wilcox (B&W) ____ ,

Combustion Engineering (CE) ____ , General Electric (GE)~.

respect to this equipment item, it is noted (applicable section checked):

The Licensee does not provide adequate information with respect to identification of TMI Action Plan equipment installed as of 1/1/81.

_:-__ The Licensee has not provided the correlation o~ this equipment item with the specific sections of NUREG-0737. [The correlation is needed to ensure that all items are included in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is identified as a TMI Action Plan item, are the cable and the terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?]

___ The Licensee has not provided the approximate installation date for the TMI'Action Plan equipment items so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation.

The Licensee has provided a standard Owners* Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area.

The Licensee has requested extensions of implementation dates.

~ The Licensee has stated that this equipment item is associated with the following section of NUREG-0737. (This list of applicable NUREG-0737 sections has been identified by NRC as sections within the scope of this review):

II.B.3 (ALL/l-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant and Containment

~ II.D.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4lQ I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

Equipment Item No. 104 (TMI Action Plan Item II.D.3)

Acoustic Monitor Preamplifier Located Outside the Drywell NDT Instruments Model 400A _

SRV Position Indication (l-262-61A through E, 2-262-61A through E, 3-262...;61A through E)

Required Operating Time: 12 days Licensee teference not cited TER Checksheet No. 104 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 5-8 [30]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, <;ll.', RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable

~ew n~""

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3e, ~e, 39

.4a, 4e, 49, 4e, 4£ System Consideration Review '"*

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5a, 5e, 5e, 59, 5e, 5£,

51]' §8, ai, §j

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sununary ;ta' +a, +e

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Ph Ila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 'ffe (

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolUllental service conditions.

____ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

____ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for ~his equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item *

.X. 9e:l!':l!'eeeive action specified by .the Licensee:

___. _ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

____ Equipment modification

____;, Equipment relocation above submergence level

____ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

____ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

____ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (________________________________________________________ ~

The Licensee has pnovided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

_l(_ The Licensee (has/baa AQ&+---provided a schedule for the proposed e 0 5

!etiue ~ac 'on. JSciledule for accomplishing the ca ceee*~e action

_ /tf?.2_. )

7

____ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

ualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt Ql1alif ication Not Established III.b Not in Scope Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. PhUa .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4te I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documeflted ~vidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

, DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification )(

II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available TML~~ -~.£i.D3.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 191031215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 ~ I*

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QU.ALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

A Relief and Safety Valve Acoustic Monitoring Syst~m has been installed and placed into operation*at Dresden Units 2&3 and

Quad Cities Units 1&2. Environmental Qualification 6f this system is in progress via an Owner's Group testing program.

The current schedule for completion of testing is Septembe.r, 1982. The test report will be available by November, 1982.

Preliminary data sheets are attached indicating the normal and accident environments the equipment may be exposed to as well as the parameters to which the equipment is being tested.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

. FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 60 20th arid Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 " (

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

INSTALLED TMI LF.SSONS LEARNED IMPLEMENTATION EQUIPMENT

SUMMARY

NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment lqcated in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-0lB, Supplement 3 (item 2), .in accordance with criteria established .. by the NRC (see Section 2 of this rep0rt) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. *The scope of this review is limitea to TMI Action Plan equipment associated with specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January l, 1981 (sections are identified below). Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January l, 1981 if adequately identified by the licensee .*

This plant is a PWR____ , BWR~.

The NSSS Vendor is Westinghouse (W) ____ , Babcox & Wilcox (B&W) ,

Combustion Engineering (CE) ___._, General Electric (GE)_k_.

With respect to this equipment item, it is noted (applicable section checked):

The Licensee does not provide adequate information wi,th respect to identification of TM! Action Plan equipment installed as of l/l/8~.

___ The Licensee has not provided the correlation of this equipment item with the specific sections of NUREG-0737. [The correlation is needed to ensure that all items are included in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is identified as a TMI Action Plan item, are the cable and the terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?]

___ The Licensee has not provided the approximate installation date for the TMI"Action Plan equipment items so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation.

___ The Licensee has provided a standard Owners' Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area.

The Licensee has requested extensions of implementation dates.

2(. The Licensee has stated that this equipment item is associated with the following section of NUREG-0737. (This list of applicable NUREG-0737 sections has been identified by NRC as sections within the scope of this review):

II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant and Containment

~ II.D.3 (ALL/l-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position

~nklin Researc.h Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 {f) I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM No.1aS' Equipment Item No. 105 (TMI Action Plan Item II.D.3)

Acoustic Monitor Flow Detector Located in Main Control Room

NDT Instruments Model 104D SRV Position Indication Required Operating Time: 12 days Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 105 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 9-12 [30]

"DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THI!: NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

_(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,ll.', RT, P, H, cs, A, s, (R)' M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, ot apE!_icable New~-teM.

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e, 3d System Consideration Review +a, 49, 4c:, itd' *e' 45 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -&a; Sb, Se, Se, Se, 5f, 5§1 59, Si, 5j

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary "la, 7b, =1e-

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Asslgnmen\No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. __.'::f_...'1....,/..___ _

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

__ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

~ SozzcokPcc action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

_ Equipment modification

__ Equipment relocation above submerge.nee level

__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

__ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( -

~

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

l(_ The Licensee (has/eae Re&) provided a schedule for the proposed

~eEreethe action. (Schedule the -ee~reetioc action *)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Modification III.a Exempt ualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center .

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute

FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. l/(p I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO .. /oS-EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or. Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate

Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria "Regarding Submergence Satisfied iteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied iteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied riteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

(If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

.\

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification x II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

~nklin Research Center FRC ProJect No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Task No. l/-'1 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO .

.Direct-Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Posit~on A Relief and Safety Valve Acoustic Monitoring System has been installed and placed into operation-at Dresden Units 2&3 and

Quad Cities Units 1&2. Environmental Qualifica~ion of this system is in progress via an Owner's Group testing program.

The current schedule for completion of testing is September, 1982~ The t~st repert will be available by November, 1982.

Preliminary data sheets are attached indicating the normal.

and accident environments the equipment may be exposed to as well as the parameters to which the equipment is being tested~

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

. FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 60 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. ~I I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QU.ALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.as-INSTALLED TMI LF.sSONS LEARNED IMPLEMENTATION EQUIPMENT

SUMMARY

NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-0lB, Supplement 3 (item 2), in accordance with criteria established . by the NRC. (see Section 2 of this rep0rt) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limitea to TMI Action Plan equipment associated with specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January 1, 1981 (sections are identified below). Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January l, 1981 if adequately identified by the licensee .*

This plant is a PWR~~' BWR~.

The NSSS Vendor is Westinghouse (W>~~**Babcox & Wilcox (B&W>~~'

Combustion Engineering (CE) , General Electric (GE)~.

respect to this equipment item, it is noted (applicable section checked):

The Licensee does not provide adequate information with respect to identification of TMI Action Plan equipment installed as of l/l/81.

~- The Licensee has not provided the correlation of this equipment item with the specific sections of NUREG-0737. [The correlation is needed to ensure that all items are included in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is identified as a TMI Action Plan item, are the ca~le and the terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?]

~- The Licensee has n~t provided the approximate installation date for the TMI"Action Plan equipment items so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluati.on.

~- The Licensee has provided a standard Owners' Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area.

The Licensee has requested extensions of implementation dates.

~ The Licensee has stated that this equipment item is associated with the following section of NUREG-0737. (This list of applicable NUREG-0737 sections has been identified by NRC as sections within the scope of this review):

II.B.3 (ALL/l-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant and.Containment

~ II.D.3 (ALL/l-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj13ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 'f(p (

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I Equipment Item No. 106 (TMI Action Plan Item II.K.3.13)

Time Delay Relay Located in Auxiliary Electrical Equipment Room Control Products AGASTAT TR14I3B Prevent Spurious Steamline Isolation. ( 102A, 102B) ,,

Required Operating Time: 12 days Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 106 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 13-20 [30]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,!J!, RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable New t t:e""

LISTING.OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Swmnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 38, 3e, 3d--

System Consideration Review 4et, 48, 4er 4d, 4e, 4£ Equipment Environmental Qualification Review §a, Sb, Sc;;, eei, Se1 5£1 59, Sh, Si1 s~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implemen ta ti on 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ile:, 7b, 7c

NRC Contract No. NAC-03-79-118 a n k l i n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FAC Assignment No. 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _4._.6...1..___ __

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N0.106

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a* response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE envirolll!lental service conditions.

__ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* .item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

_ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

__ Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation above submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify. qualifica~ion by additional (testing/analysis)

__ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (. _______________________________________________________

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

SCEWS The LicenseeAstate. that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Modification III.a Exempt

.a Qualification Not Established fIII.b Not in SCOP.e)

Not Qualified *IV Documentation Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. $lG I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC ~UIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established {If Required)

Program Estaplished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Re9arding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Dur a ti on Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure {If ~quired)* Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied {NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b -Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review x IV Documentation Not Made Available TMI ACTION PLAN ITEM II.k.3.15 See Page 3a Equipment located in a mild environment according to the SCEWS

y

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC ProJect No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. S!? /

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.~

Modify Break Detection Logic to Prevent Spurious Isolation of HPCI*and RCIC The isolation relays h~ve been replaced with safety related time delay relays at Dresden Units 2&3 and Quad Cities Units 1&2. Preliminary qualification data sheets are attached for your review. These data sheets will be finalized by 6-30-82.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

. FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 60 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

l/k /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 14 INSTALLED TMI LESSONS LEARNED IMPLEMENTATION EQUIPMENT

SUMMARY

NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation: The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-018, Supplement 3 (item 2), .in accordance with criteria established . by the NRC. (see Section 2 of this rep0rt) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limited to TMI Action Plan equipment associated with specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January 1, 1981 (sections are identified below). Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January l, 1981 if adequately identified by the licensee .*

This plant is a PWR___ , BWR~.

The NSSS Vendor is Westinghouse (W) ___ , Babcox & Wilcox (B&W) ___ ,

Combustion Engineering (CE) _ _ , General Electric (GE)....x._.

With respect to this equipment item, it is noted (applicable section checked):

The Licensee does not provide adequate information with respect to identification of TMI Action Plan equipment installed as of 1/1/81.

___ The Licensee has not provided the correlation of this equipment item with the specific sections of NUREG-0737. [The correlation is needed to ensure that all items are included in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is identified as a '!MI Action Plan item, are the cable and the terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?]

___ The Licensee has not provided the approximate installation date for the TMI.Action Plan equipment items so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation.

_.__ The Licensee has provided a standard Owners' Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area.

The Licensee has requested extensions of implementation dates.

_)(_ The Licensee has stated that this equipment item is associated with the following section of NUREG-0737. (This list of applicable NUREG-0737 sections has been identified by NRC as sections within the scope of this review):

II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant and Containment II.D.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

. FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 6b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 1215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. LQ.l.

II.E.l.2 (PWR/l-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication II.E.3.l (PWR/l-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Heaters (Safety-Grade Interfac~s II.E.4.l (ALL/7-1-81) Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations II.E.4.2 *(ALL/l-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependability II.F.2 (PWR/l-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooiing II.G.l (PWR/l-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizer Equfpment (S~fety Grade Interfaces)

II.K.2.10 (PWR/B&W/7-1-81) _Safety-Grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip

__ II.K.3.9 (PWR/W/l-1-81) PIO Controller Modification (If Hardware Change Involved)

II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/l-1-81) Anticipatory Reactor Trip upon.Turbine Trip ~-

II.K.3.13 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals

~ II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolation of HPCI and RCIC Systems ,,.,

II.K.3.19 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Interlock on Recirculation Pump LOop II.K.3.21 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Systems (If

Hardware Changed Out)

II.K.3.27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level for Vessel Level Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed Out)

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Proj~ct No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 (p /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I Equipment Item No. 107 (TMI Action Plan Item II.K.3.15)

Time Delay Relay Located In Auxiliary Electrical Equipment Room Prevent Spurious Steamline Isolation (13AK7, 13AK21)

Required Operating Time: 10 min

Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 107 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 21-24 [30]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (,[J:, RT, P, H, cs, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, ot applicable

~ et.-" :r:.-t e ""

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Check sheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sunuuary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3e, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, H Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ea, Sb, Se, Sd, Se, Sh 5~' Sa, §i, §j

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation . 6a, 6b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ~l!I:' ~b, ':ie

Y.

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 lb 461 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

___ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment* item.

Corrective action specified by t~ Licensee:

___ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

___ Equipment modification

___ Equipment relocation above.submergence level

___ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

___ Verify qualification by additional (testing/analysis)

___ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

___ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other <----------------------------------------------------

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action SCEWS

~ The Licensee,l\state* that the equipment item does not require qualification

.)

and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Modification III.a Exempt

.a Qualification Not Established I hI.S Not ~D S~g12e)

.b Not Qualified IV *eocumeiitat.iOn Not Available

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Frankiln Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. __4...,6_1_ __

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documenteg Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari~y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature/Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (l hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

.NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Mo_dification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c F.quipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a F.quipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available TMI ACTION PLAN ITEM II.k.3.15 See Page 3a Equipment located in a mild environment according to the SCEWS

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC ProJect No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 3o 20th and Race Streets. Phlla .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. l.f 6 I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. LL7 Modify*Break Detection Logic to*Prevent Spurious Isolation of HPCI*and RCIC The isolation relays have been replaced with safety.related time delay relays at Dresden Units 2&3 and Quad Cities Units 1&2. Preliminary qualification data sheets are attached for your review. These data sheets will be.finalized by 6-30-82.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Qnklin Research Center . FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13

60 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. :I ft; (

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

INSTALLED '!MI LESSONS LEARNED IMPLEMENTATION EQUIPMENT

SUMMARY

NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in* harsh environments required for '!MI Lessons Learned Implementation~ The objective is to evaluate qualification docuiuentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-0lB, Supplement 3 (item 2), .*in accordance with criteria established . by the NRC (see Section 2 of this rep0rt) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limited to TMI Action Plan ~quipment associated with specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January l, 1981 (sections are identified below). Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January l, 1981 if adequately identified by the licensee_.

This plant is a PWR____ , BWR~.

The NSSS Vendor is Westinghouse (W) ___ , Babcox & Wilcox (B&W) ___ ,

Combustion Engineering (CE) ___ , General Electric (GE)~.

With respect to this equipment item, .it is noted (applicable section checked):

The Licensee does not provide adequate information with respect to identification of '!MI Action Plan equipment installed as of l/l/81.

__ The Licensee has not provi.ded the correlation of this equipment item with the specific sections of NUREG-0737. [The correlation is needed to ensure that all items are included in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is identified as a-'IMI Action Plan item, are the cable and the terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?]

__._The Licensee has not provided the approximate installation date for the TMI'Action Plan equipment items so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation.

___ The Licensee has provided a standard Owners' Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area.

The Licensee has requested extensions of implementation dates.

-2s_ The Licensee has stated that this equipment item is associated with the following section of NUREG-0737. (This list of applicable NUREG-0737 sections has been identified by NRC as sections within the scope of this review):

II.B.3 (ALL/l-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant and Containment II.D.3 (ALL/l-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position

v

~nklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

FRC Project No. 05257 Page A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 13 6b 20th and Race Streets. Phila .. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '-I 6 I UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ID-::J II.E.l.2 (PWR/l-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication II.E.3.l (PWR/l-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Beaters (Safety-Grade Interfaces II.E.4.l (ALL/7-1-81) Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations

~-.II.E.4.2 *(ALL/l-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependabil1ty II.F:.2 (PWR/l-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooiing II.G.l (PWR/l-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizer Equipment (S~fety Grade Interfaces)

II.K. 2.10 (PWR/B&W/7-1-81) _Safety-Grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip

~- II.K.3.9 (PWR/W/l-1-81) PIO Controller Modification (If Hardware Change Involved)

II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/l-1-81) Anticipatory Reactor Trip upon_Turbine Trip II.K.3.13 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of BPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals

...X. II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolation of BPCI and RGIC Systems .,

II.K.3.19 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loop II.K.3.21 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Systems (If

Hardware Changed Out)

~- II.K.3.27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level for Vessel Level Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed Out)

TER-C5257-461 S. CONCLUSIONS The tabulations in Section 4.2 represent a summary of the results of the equipment environmental quali~ication (EEQ) assessment conducted in accordance with the methodology presented in Section 3. The evaluations are based on the available qualification documentation provided by the Licensee, complemented in several cases by other relevant technical information. The major qualification deficiencies that have been identified and the results of the evaluation are shown in the Equipment Environmental Qualification S~mmary Forms (Tables 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4).

Although Sections 4.3, 4.4, and Appendix C of this report present a detailed evaluation of (1) the Licensee's qualification methodology, (2) the equipment environmental qualification of each equipment item, and (3) the censee's response to the NRC SER, it is appropriate to highlight for the

,_,_ . censee and the NRC certain conclusions and concerns reached as a result of the review which require special attention. These concerns are summarized below.

o In many instances, the Licensee has committed to replace equipment during a refueling outage following receipt of the qualified components on site. It is concluded that the Licensee has not provided a definitive schedule for the completion of corrective actions in compliance with NRC SER requirements.

o The Licensee has not resolved the NRC concern regarding aging and qualified life (see Section 4.3.1).

o The Licensee has not resolved the NRC concern,regarding identification of safety-related display instrumentation (see Section 4.3.2 and Appendix C). The Licensee will provide component evaluation summary sheets for display instruments that provide information-only to the operators by June 1982. Justification for exclusion of safety-related instruments from this list should contain a description of the ability to meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.97, Revision 2.

o The Licensee has deleted various items from the list of equipment items to be qualified. FRC does not agree with the Licensee in this regard (see Appendix C).

5-1

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 0 Appendix D of this report discusses concerns which require resolution with regard to temperature switches and solenoid valves.

4t o It appears that the Licensee has not resolved the NRC concern regarding margins applied to the in-containment temperature profile (see Section 4.3.3).

o The Licensee has not provided schedule commitments for corrective actions involving equiI>ment replacement or m~~lfications. The Licensee provided the following statement for most items:

"LICENSEE CONCLUSION Work is in progress to purchase qualified replacement components.

I After they have been received onsite, they will be installed during the next refueling outage."

o For all safety-related cables, penetrations, and terminal blocks, the Licensee SCEW sheets in the November 1, 1980 submittal [8] stated the following:

"A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. Failing which the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components."

The Licensee response [28] to the NRC SER states the following for the same cable deficiencies:

"LICENSEE CONCLUSION A contract will be issued for services to qualify this equipment by analysis and/or testing. If this fails, the appropriate equipment or parts thereof will be replaced with qualified components during the next refueling outage following receipt of the qualified replacement components onsite. **

It is not clear what action is being taken by the Licensee to resolve specific deficiencies.

o On April 29, 1982, ,the Licensee provided the following response concerning TMI Action Plan equipment [30]:

"II.B.l Reactor Coolant System Vents This topic has been addressed in previous submittals to the NRC (CECo letter c. Reed to D.G. Eisenhut, Section 2.1.9.e, dated 10-18-79; CECo letter, c. Reed to H.R. Denton, Section 2.1.1, dated 11-21-79; CECo letter, J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.B.l, dated 12-15-80).

Qualification information on the ADS valves can be found in References 1 and 2 under Auto Depressurization Systems.

5-2

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 II.B.2 Design Review of Plant Shielding and Environmental Qualification of Equipment for Spaces/Systems Which May Be used in Post-Accident*Operations The radiation doses calculated in Dresden's and Quad Cities' post-accident radiation review have been considered in establishing the post-accident integrated dose that the equipment would be exposed to and must be qualified for. As such, and modifications required are identified during the qualification documentation review and appropriate action is then taken. As a result of this item several pieces of equipment will be tested to the required radiation dose, shielded or replaced. Additional copies of the Dresden and Quad Cities radiation studies are included for your review.

II.B.3 Post-Accident Sampling Capability The post-accident sampling capability is non-safety related and falls outside the scope of environmental qualification. Accordingly, environmental qualification of post-accident sampling capability is not addressed in this response.

II.D.3 Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position A Relief and Safety Valve Acoustic Monitoring System has been installed and placed into operation at Dresden Units 2 & 3 and Quad Cities Units 1 & 2. Environmental qualification of this system is in progress via an Owner's Group testing program. The current schedule for completion of testing is September, 1982. The test report will be available by November, 1982. Preliminary data sheets are attached indicating the normal and accident environments the equipment maybe exposed to as well as the parameters to which the equipment is being tested.

II.E.4.1 Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations As previously reported (CECo letter L.O. Del George to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.E.4.1, dated 7-1-81) Dresden Units 2 & 3 and Quad Cities Units 1 & 2 have installed and functionally tested an ACAD system. An extensive review of the environmental qualification of the equipment has been under way for several months. A complete set of data sheets will be provided by June 30, 1982. In the meantime, the information is available for review at both Dresden and Quad Cities Stations.

5-3

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 II.E.4.2 Containment Isolation Dependability Containment isolation valves on the torus-to-radwaste transfer line have been installed on Dresden Units 2 & 3. Modifications to the valve operators are now in progress. Data sheets will be generated for these modifications by 6-30-82. Dresden and Quad Cities have modified the Group II isolation circuitry to prevent automatic valve opening upon reset of ~he isolation signal. Also, for Dresden 2 the containment purge and vent valves were modified to auto close on high radiation. Data sheets will be generated as appropriate for this equipment by 6-30-82. The remaining equipment in the containment isolation system has not been changed and its qualification can be found in References 1 and 2. -

II.F.1.1 High-Range Noble Gas Effluent Monitors The high-range noble gas effluent monitors are non-safety-related and fall outside the scope of this review. Accordingly, environmental qualification of these monitors is not addressed in this response.

II.F.1.2 Sampling and Analysis of Plant Effluents The modifications made to provide for sampling and analysis of plant effluents are non-safety-related and fall outside the scope of this review. Accordingly, environmental qualification of these modifications is not addressed in this response.

II.F.1.3 Containment High-Range Radiation Monitor This equipment has been installed and is operational. The system is considered non-safety-related and.falls-outside the scope of this review. See previous submittals (CECo letter, L.O. Del George to D.G.

Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.3, dated 7-1-81; CECo letter~ J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.3, dated 12-31-80; CECo letter J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.3~ dated 12-15-80). Design information is available at the stations for review.

II.F.1.4 Containment Pressure Monitor The design and qualification of the installed and operational equipment is addressed in previous . submittals (CECo letter, J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.4, dated 12-15-80; and CECo letter, E.D. Swartz to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.4, dated 1-8-82). -Data sheets are being generated as appropriate and will be submitted by 6-30-82.

5-4

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 II.F.1.5 Containment Water Level Monitor The design and qualification of the installed and operational equipment is addressed in previous submittals (CECo letter, E.D.

Swartz to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.5, dated 3-1-82; CECo letter, E.D. Swartz to D.G. Eisenhut, dated 2-1-82; CECo letter, E.D. Swartz to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.5, dated 12-15-81; CECo letter, J.S.

Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,_Section II.F.1.5~ dated 12-15-81). Data sheets are being generated as appropriate and will be submitted by 6-30-82.

II.F.1.6 Containment Hydrogen Monitor As discussed in previous submittals (CECo letter, E.D. Swartz to D.G.

Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.6, dated 12-15-81; CECo letter, L.O. Del George to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.6, dated 7-1-81; and CECo

. letter J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.1.6, dated 12-15-80) the equipment in this system is being upgraded. The new monitors will be fully qualified and data sheets will be generated by 6-30-82.

II.F.2 Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling This topic has been addressed in a previous submittal (CECo letter, J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.F.2, dated 12-15-80). Based upon Section 2.3.2 of a General Electric report NED0-24708,

'Additional Information Required for NRC Staff - Generic Report on Boiling Water Reactors', no additional instrumentation is required at Dresden Units 2 & 3 and Quad Cities Units 1 & 2. Qualification information on existing instrumentation that can monitor core cooling can be found under the Reactor Recirculation System in References 1 and 2.

II.K.3.13 Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Levels Analysis and Implementation This topic does nqt apply to Dresden Units 2 & 3 which do not have a RCIC System. CECo' s position for Quad Citie.s has been that which was developed by General Electric for the BWR Owners Group. See previous transmittals (CECo letter, L.O. Del George to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.K.3.13, dated 7-1-81; CECo letter, J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.K.3.13, dated 12-31-80; CECo letter, J.S. Abel to D.G.

Eisenhut,Section II.K.3.13, dated 12-15-80). Installation of the RCIC low water level restart modification has been completed. This system is not considered safety-related; hence environmental qualification is not addressed in this response.

5-5

~nklin Research Center A OMsion of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 II.K.3.15 Modify Break Detection Logic to Prevent Spurious Isolation of HPCI and RCIC The isolation relays have been replaced with safety related time delay relays at Dresden Units 2 & 3 and Quad Cities Units 1 & 2.

Preliminary qualification data sheets are attached for your review.

These data sheets will be finalized by 6-30-82.

I-I.K.3.19 Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loops .

This item is only applicable to~ jet pump plants. Dresden 2 & 3 and Quad Cities 1 & 2 are jet pump BWRs.

II.K.3.21 Restart Of Core Spray And Low Pressure Coolant Injection Systems CECo believes that the proposed change does not represent an enhancement of overall plant safety. No modifications are planned for Dresden Units 2 & 3 and Quad Cities Units 1 & 2. This conclusion is based upon a BWR Owners Group Evaluation (D. B. Water, BWR Owners Group, to D. G. Eisenhut, dated December 29, 1980).

II.K.3.27 Provide Comm.on Reference Level For* Vessel Level Instrumentation The effected instrumentation has been rescaled. See previous submittals (CECo letter, L.O. Del George to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.K.3.27, dated 7-1-81; CECo letter~ J.S. Abel to D.G. Eisenhut,Section II.K.3.27, dated 12-31-80; and CECo letter J.S. Abel to D.G.

Eisenhut,Section II.K.3.27~ dated 12-15-80). Qualification data sheets on associated class IE level instrumentation can be found in References 1 and 2 under Reactor Recirculation System (LITS-2-263-73 A,B).

5-6

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Fn1nklln Institute

TER-C5257-461

- PART II Cross-Reference of NUREG 0737 Item Number to Modification Number and Title for Those Modifications That Were Performed NUREG-0737 D~esden(M12)/Quad Cities(M4) Modification Item No. Title Modification Number Title II.D.3 Direct Indication M12-2(3 )-79-14 (Acoustic Monitors)

Relief and Safety M4-1(2)-79-22 Valve Position II.E.4.1 Dedicated Hydrogen M12-2-75-43 Penetrations M12-3-75-33 CAD/CAM M4-1(2)-76-23 ACAD/CAM II.E.4.2 Containment M12-2(3 )-79-26 (Torus to Radwaste Isolation Line Isolation Dependability Valves)

M12-2-79-52 (Circuitry Change M12-3-79-40 for Group II M4-1{2)-79-16 Isolation Valve*

Reset)

M12-2-81-5 (Auto closure of Purge & Vent Valves on high radiation)

II.F.1.4 Containment M12-2 (3 )-79-55 Containment Monitor pressure and water level monitors M4-1(2)-79-23 Containment pressure monitors II.F.1.5 Containment M12-2 (3 )-79-55 Containment Water Level pressure and water Monitors level monitors M4-1(2)-79-24 Containment water

1evel monitors II.F.1.6 Containment M12-2(3)-81-24 Modify hydrogen Hydrogen monitors Monitor M4-1(2)"."'82-17 Install H2 monitor 5-7

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 PART II (Cont.)

NUREG-0737 Dresden(Ml2)/Quad Cities(M4) Modification Item No. Title Modification Number Title II.K.3.15 Modify Break- Ml2-2(3 )-80-45 Modify HPCI break Detection Logic detection logic.

to prevent Spurious M4-1(2)-80-25 Replace relays with Isolation of M4-1(2)-80-26 time.delay relays.

HPCI & RCIC II.K.3.27 Provide Common Ml2-2(3)-80-31 Provide new Yarway Reference Level *cqc-sec. OSR 80-8) Scales."

for Vessel Level Instru-mentation

~nklin Research Center 5-8 A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461

6. REFERENCES The references listed in this section of the report were used to develop the Equipment Environmental Qu~lification evaluation for th~.~ plant. The references have been separated into *two lists: ( 1) Plant-Specific References and (2) Plant Generic References. All non-generic documents are listed on the "Plant-Specific References" list. All qualification documents that could be applicable to equipment installed in several plants were listrd on the "Plant Generic References" list. These documents include topical reports, test reports, component and material analyses, etc. cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualification in accordance with the documentation reference instructions established by IE Bulletin 79-0lB. Since these documents were compiled by a computer data base, the citation numbering was computer generated and the same document has the same generic reference number in all Technical Evaluation orts prepared under this equipment qualification program.

Throughout the text of the report, references are designated by a bracketed number; the reference numbers are not presented in sequential order.

6-1

~nklin Research Center A Division ol The Franklin Institute

¥ TER-C5257-461 PLANT-SPECIFIC REFERENCES

1. J. S. Abel Letter to D. G. Eisenhut, NRC.

Subject:

Response to NRC Order Concerning Environmental Qualification of Electri-

_c~l Equipment Commonwealth Edison Co., 30-0ct-80

2. Bechtel Power Corp.

Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Unit 2.

Revision 1. Three Volumes.

Commonwealth Edison Co., 01-Nov-80

3. J. S. Abel Letter to D. G. Eisenhut, NRC.

Subject:

Dresden Station Unit 2 - Supplemental Information Concerning Environmental Quali-fication of Class lE Electrical Equipment Commonwealth Edison, 03-Nov-80

4. Bechtei Power Corporation Response to IE Bulletin 79-0lB Post LOCA/HELB Radiation Exposure Lev~ls Received by ESF System Components for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3 Commonwealth Edison, 18-Jul-80

5. Specification (GE No. 27A2428): Consolidatation of the BWR Environmental Conditions Used for Design and Test Purposes General Electric Co.

NED0-24218

6. E. A. Lommatsch Letter to D. Miller, Westinghouse.

Subject:

Electrical Connection-Post Accident Environment Transmitters, with Attachments ITT Barton, 26-Mar-71

7. J. C. Hink Letter to W. H. Koester, CECO.

Subject:

Transmittal of Meeting Notes 635-10-016, Review of Proprietary Qualification Data Bechtel Power Corp., 25-Jun-80 635-11-030 6-2

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 T. J. Victorine and J. J. Kueck Report: Analysis of Effects of Pipe Break Outside the Primary Containment (Main Steam Piping, RFW Piping, HPCI Piping, etc.)

Sargent & Lundy, 00-Feb-75 Special Re pt. 3 7

9. Report: Dresden Technical Specifications Commonwealth Edision Co. -

10. Report: Calibration Procedure DlS 2300-7 Commonwealth Edison Co.

DlS 2300-F

11. D. M. Crutchfield Memo to D. L. Ziemann, NRC.

Subject:

SEP Safety Topic Assessment Inputs, Dresden Unit 2 USNRC, 17-Dec-79

12. G. Lainas Letter to A. Schwencer, NRC.

Subject:

Electrical Equipment Environmental Qualification, USNRC, 19-Feb-80

3. Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment , .

USNRC/IE, 14-Jan-80 IEB 79-0lB

14. Environmental Qualification of Class 1E Equipment USNRC, 29-Feb-80 IEB 79-0lB, Supp. 1

15. N. C. Moseley Letter to B. H. Grier et al., NRC.

Subject:

Supplement No. 2 to Bulletin 79-0lB, Environmental Qualification of Class 1E Equipment USNRC, 29-Sep-80

16. N. c. Moseley Letter to B. H. Grier et al., NRC.

Subject:

Supplement No. 3 to Bulletin 79-0lB, Environmental Qualification of Class 1E Equipment USNRC, 24-0ct-80

17. S. J. Chilk Memorandum and Order pursuant to Union of Concerned Scientists Petition for Emergency and Remedial Relief USNRC, 23-May-80 CLI-80-21 6-3

~nklin Research Center A Division ol The Franklin Institute .

TER-C5257-461

18. D. G. Eisenhut Letter to All Power Reactor Licensees, Applicants, Vendors.

Subject:

Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment; NRC Staff Positions USNRC, 20-Apr-82 Gen. Ltr. 82-09

19. A. J. Szukiewicz Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment; Including Staff Responses to Public Comments USNRC, OO-Jul-81 NUREG-0588, Rev.l

20. Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements USNRC, 00-Nov-80 NUREG-0737

21. S. Brown Memo to D. M. Crutchfield .and C. Allison, NRC.

Subject:

Mark I Long-Term Temperature Transit for Environmental Qualification USNRC, 28-Mar-80

22. R. F. Janesek Letter to D. L. Ziemann, NRC.

Subject:

Dresden Station Unit 2 Response to RF! Concerning SEP Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Commonwealth Edison Co., 01-Apr-80

23. R. F. Janecek Letter to D. M. Crutchfield, NRC.

Subject:

Dresden Station Unit 2 Additional Response Concerning SEP EEQ of Electrical Equipment .

Commonwealth Edison Co., 22-Aug-80

24. M. C. Turbak Letter to V. Stello, NRC.

Subject:

Dresden Station Unit 2 Systematic Evaluation Program Commonwealth Edison Co., 24-Feb-78

25. D. L. Peoples Lette*r to D. M. Crutchfield,* NRC.

Subject:

Dresden Station Units 1 and 2 - SEP: Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Commonwealth Edison, 10-Jun-80 6-4

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Fronklln Institute

TER-C525 7-461 Technical Evaluation Report: Equipment Environmental Qualification; Commonwealth Edison Company, Dresden Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 FRC, 27-Apr-81 TER-C5257-194, Proprietary 27 *. J. S. Abel Letter to J. G. Keppler, NRC.

Subject:

Response to IE Bulletin 79-0lB, Supplement No. 3 -i'Environmental Qualification of E lee trical Equipment. 11 Commonwealth Edison, 02-Feb-81

28. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Safety Evaluation Report for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 2; Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment USNRC, 10-Jun-81

29. Dresden Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 - Attachments A, B & C; 90-Day Response to Safety Evaluation Report Commonwealth Edison, 00-Sep-81

30. E. D. Swartz Letter to D. G. Eisenhut, NRC.

Subject:

Dresden Station Units 2 and 3, Quad Cities Station Units 1 & 2;

Environmental Qualification of TM! Action Plan Equipment Commo.nwealth Edison, 29-Apr-82

31. Draft Interim Technical Evaluation Report on EEQ for Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 FRC, 28-0ct-80

32. Request for Additional Information: Equipment Environmental Qualification (EEQ); Review of Licensees' Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environmental Qualification Safety Evaluation Reports (SER) and TMI Action Plan Installed Equipment; Commonwealth Edison Company, Dresden Station Unit 2 FRC, 10-Nov-81

33. Request for Additional Information: Equipment Environmental Qualification (EEQ); Review of Licensees' Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environmental Qualification Safety Evaluation Reports (SER) and TMI Action Plan Installed Equipment; Commonwealth Edison Company, Dresden Station Unit 2; Revision 1 FRC, 20-May-82 6-5

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 PLANT GENERIC REFERENCES 635. R. C. Herrick and L. E. Witcher Tests of a Limitorque Va.lve Operator and Motor-Brake Assembly, Both With Class B Insulation under Simu-lated *** Post Accident Steam and Chemical Environments FIRL, F-C2485-0l 639. J. Locante Topical Report: Environmental Testing of Engineered Safety Features Related Equipment

(NSSS - Nonstandard Scope). Volumes I and II.

Westinghouse, OO-Dec-70 WCAP-7410-L, Proprietary 647. J. P. Waggener and L. E. Witcher Performance Test of Three Differential Pressure Trans-mitters in a Simulated Reactor Containment Post Accident Steam Environment FIRL, OO-Nov-69 F-C2667 649. Qualification Tests of Solenoid Valves by Environmental Ex-posure to Elevated Tempera~ure, Radiation, Wear Aging, Seis-mic Simulation, Vibration Endurance, Accident Radiation ***

Isomedix Inc., 00-Jul-79 AQS21678/TR, Rev. A, Proprietary 659. J. B. Drab Limitorque Valve Actuator Qualification for Nuclear Power Station Service Limitorque Corp., ll-Jan-80 B0058 662. T. Hess, Jr.

Qualification Type Test Report: Limitorque Valve Actuators for Class 1E Service Outside Primary Containment*in Nuclear Power Station Service Limitorque Corp., 28-May-76 B0003 837. A. LeBourdais Report of Test on Control Model 4-153 FEP/UPX-Y-TDM-SIM3H-SIM3H for Schaub Engineering Co.

Acton Environmental Testing, 26-Apr-72 9306 6-6

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Fronklin Institute

TER-C5257-461

c. A. Vondamm Report: Qualification Test Data General Electric Co., 28-Feb-77 DV145C3006, Proprietary 839. C. R. Oak Containment Environmental Testing: Dresser Electromatic Relief Valve Actuator; Limitorque Valve Control; ASCO Solenoid Control Valve; -Target Rock Relief Valve General Electric Co., 17-Dec-68 PEP No. 42963, Proprietary 1063. T. Hess, W. J. Denkowski, and C. D. Formica Qualification Type Test Report: Limitorque DC Valve Actuator for Nuclear Power Station Service Conditions, per IEEE 382, 323, and 344 Limitorque Corp., 30-Apr-76 B0009 1068. R. E. Trautwein and F. W. Bach Test Report: Yarway Corp. Remote Level Indicator Figure No. 4418TC, S/N 35364 Lockheed Electronics Co., 27-Mar-79 5628-3509

17. S. P. Carfagno and R. J. Gibson A Review of Equipment Aging Theory and Technology EPRI, OO-Sep-80 NP-1558 15~0. R. C. Herrick ~nd L. E. Witcher Test of a Limitorque Valve Operator under a Simulated Reac-.

tor Containment Post-Accident Steam and Chemical Environment FIRL, OO-Nov-68 F-C2232-01 1792. Qualification Test Data (Fenwal Temperature Switch)

General Electric, 28-Feb-77 DV145C3004, Proprietary 1794. Qualification Test Data (ITT Barton Pressure Switch)

General Electric, 28-Feb-77 DV145C3008, Proprietary 1795. Qualification Test Data (ITT Barton Pressure Switch)

General Electric, 28-Feb-77 DV145C3009, Proprietary 6-7

~nklin Research Center A DMsion of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 1796. Qualification Test Data: Pressure Switch Barksdale B2T General Electric, DV145C3010, Proprietary 1797. Qualification Test Data: Pressure Switch Barksdale DlT General Electric, DV145C3028, Proprietary

~nklin Research Center 6-8 A Division ol The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 APPENDIX A - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS In References 1 and 2, the Licensee has .submitted detailed information concerning environmental servi~e conditions in various locations within the plant. The drywell pressure (Figure A-1) and temperature (Figure A-2) responses following the postulated loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) were based on the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) analysis (FSAR Figures- 5.2.11 and 5.2.12, respectively). The drywell temperature response following the postulated main steam line break (MSLB) accident is shown in Figure A-3. It appears that the Licensee has not provided a basis or reference for this MSLB curve. *Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-0lB (see Section 2.2.1 of this report) allows the Licensee to submit plant-specific profiles which account for the LOCA and high energy line breaks inside the primary containment. With respect to Dresden Unit 2, the NRC has determined that the most recent Licensee lysis of environmental service conditions is to be used for this equipment environmenta~ qualification review. The worst-case temperature/pressure profile is that associated with a LOCA. The worst-case environmental conditions for the postulated LOCA are established by the double-ended recirculation line break. Based on these conside~ations, each equipment item was evaluated with respect to the environmental service conditions presented in this appendix.

The specific environmental zones within the plant are shown on the Dresden Unit No. 2 General Arrangement Drawings (Figures A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7, and A-8).

Environment 1 - Inside Drywell Normal Conditions [21 Temperature 135°F (nominal) .

Pressure O psig (atmospheric)

Humidity 50%

A-1

~nklin Research Center A DMsion of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Accident Conditions [l, 2]

The Licensee has stated that the containment spray system is a safety system; however, no credit has been taken in the containment analysis for this system *

. The environmental paramet~rs used for the assessment of qualification of equipm~nt ~?side the drywell are:

LOCA Temperature Profile Figure A-2 LOCA Pressure Profile Figure A-1 MSLB Temperature Profile Figure A-3 Temperature (Peak) 291°F Pressure (Peak) 49 psig Humidity 100%

Spray Composition Demineralized water, manual initiation.

Radiation 43 Mrd at 1 day 100 Mrd at 30 days 110 Mrd at 1 year Flood Elevation

505 I 611 (top Of tOruS Vent pipe)

- Environment 2 - Steam Tunnel Normal Conditions (Assumed)

Temperature ll0°F Pressure 0 psig Humidity 70%

Accident Conditions (Main Steam/Feedwater Pipe Break)[l]

Temperature 242°F Pressure 12 psig Humidity 100%

Radiation 0.19 Mrd at 1 day 0.70 Mrd at 30 days 1.30 Mrd at 1 year Environment 3 - Torus Compartment Normal Conditions (Assumed)

Temperature 104°F Pressure 0 psig Humidity 60%

Accident Conditions (LOCA) [l]

Environmental conditions are based on the following considerations:

A-2

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461

o o

HPCI line break results in elevated temperature/pressure in region of the postulated break.

LOCA inside drywell and recirculation of reactor fluid, post-LOCA, result in a high radiation environment only.

Temperature 242°F Pressure 12 psig Humidity 100%

Radiation 15 Mrd at l day 32 Mrd at 30 days 39 Mrd at l year Environment 4 - SE and SW Corner Rooms (LPCI)

Normal Conditions (Assumed)

Temperatur~ ll0°F Pressure 0 psig Humidity 70%

Accident Conditions (LOCA)[l]

Environmental conditions are based on the following considerations:

o LOCA inside drywell and recirculation of reactor fluids, post-LOCA, result in a radiation environment only.

Radiation 0.24 Mrd at l day 0.94 Mrd at 30 days 1.70 Mrd at l year Environment 5 - High Pressure Coolant Injection Room Normal Conditions (Assumed)

Temperature ll0°F Pressure 0 psig Humidity 60%

Accident Conditions (LOCA) [l]

Environmental conditions are based on the following considerations:

o LOCA inside drywell and recirculation of reactor fluids, post-LOCA, result in a radiation environment only.

Radiation 6.6 Mrd at l day 16.0 Mrd at 30 days 17.0 Mrd at l year A-3

~nklin Research Center A OMslon of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Environment 6 - Reactor Building Normal Conditions (Assumed)

Temperature i03°F Pressure 0 psig Humidity 60%

Accident Conditions (LOCA) [ 1]

Environmental conditions are based on the following considerations:

o LOCA inside drywell and recirculation' of reactor fluids, post-LOCA, result in a radiation environment only.

Radiation (a) elevation 517'6" 2.5 Mrd at 1 day 7.8 Mrd at 30 days 14.0 Mrd at 1 year (b) elevation 545'6" 0.22 Mrd at 1 day 0.62 Mrd at 30 days 1.10 Mrd at 1 year (c) elevation 570'0" 0.22 Mrd at 1 day 0.54 Mrd at 30 days 0.61 Mrd at 1 year (d) elevation 589'0~'

3.2 Mrd at 1 day 11.0*Mrd at 30 days 18.0 Mrd at 1 year Reacto~ Building Accident Conditions (LOCA) for Spe~ial Areas[l]

o Reactor Water Cleanup Room (same conditions as applied to drywell) o Reactor Building Pipe Chase E 1. 589', 5 70', and 545 '6" south of drywell between columns L and M near column 47 (same conditions are applied to Isolation Condenser Area) o Isolation Condenser Area Temperature 242°F Pressure 12 psig Humidity 100%

A-4

~nkli~ Research Center I\ Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 RAL

. The Licensee has stated [29]:

"Where components, because of their location, could be subjected to differing environments for the various accidents, the most severe environmental conditions were utilized for qualification. Components located within compartments with postulated HELB would be subject to pressure, temperature, and humidity conditions resulting from that postulated accident, but would not be subjected to radiation doses in excess of 5 x 104 rads simultaneously. These same components could be subjected to radiation doses in excess of 5 x 104 rads following a LOCA, .but these doses would not be simultaneous with pressure, temperature, and humidity. To simplify this analysis, qualification data was initially sought which demonstrated operability of these components for the combination of all environmental conditions. Where qualification could not be demonstrated for the entire spectrum of conditions simultaneously, components were evaluated for the conditions associated with each individual accident. Environmental conditions are based on accidents for which the specific component must function. Components exposed to harsh environments during accidents for which they are not required to function do not require qualification for those environments."

Further detail is provided in Section 4.3.5.

Regarding radiation levels, the Licensee stated in References 1 and 2:

"For components located outside the drywell, sou-rce terms were established for piping systems containing reactor steam, reactor coolant liquid, suppression pool liquid, and containment atmosphere. Since the piping wall thickness is sufficient to shield against beta radiation, only gamma radiation need be considered. Each Class 1E component was located with respect to the piping systems containing post-LOCA radioactive fluids. The integrated dose was established based on the piping source term, distance from pipe to component, and component operating time. Where a component could receive doses from more than one piping system, the doses were added to derive a total dose. Appendix C, Table C-3, provides integrated doses as a function of time cafculated 1 foot from the greatest single source. in each major plant area."

Detailed calculations are contained in Reference 4 and identified on the SCEW sheets.

~nklin Research Center A-5 A Division of The Franklin Institute

50

a. ONE CONT. COOLING LOOP* l CORE SPRAYS

b. BO.TH CONT' COOLING LOOPS* I CORE SPRAY

c. ONE CONT COOLING LOOP* I CORE SPRAY

d. % CONT COOLING LOOP* I CORE SPRAY 4il c:;

v;

~

IU a:

i V')

VJ UJ a:

0.

i>- Ul INITIATION OF I ~ CONTAINMENT SPRAY (J\

0 u

20 1.

/

10 (bl c oc:::==:._~..L~~~-1.~~~~L-~.,......~-L~~~__Jl---~~-=:r:::=::::::::::~::::J 10-I TIME AFTER ACtlOENT (SECONOSI Figure A-1. Drywell Design Basis Accident Pressure of Time for LOCA AGURE SUPPLIED*

.QV TM&' .\ ~-r.r

ICU --------,-,-------:-------.,-------,-------,------1------,

o. ONE CONT. COOLING LOOP *2 CORE SPRAYS

b. BOTH corn: COOLING LOOPS. I CORE SPRAY 2~0 c. ONE CONT. COOLING LOOP* I CORE SPRAY

d. Y. CONT: COOLING LOOP* I CORE SPRAY 200

( INITATION OF

"'"'=:>

I***

CONTAINMENT SPRAY

I tC

n. 150 UJ

....J I ~1;

-..J ;

"'Cl 100 50 0

10*1 102 .

TIME AFTER ACCIDENT I SECONDS)

Figure A-2. Drywell Design Basis Accident Temperature as a Function of Time for LOCA AGURE SUPPLIED BY THE LICENSEE

DRESDEN TEMPERATURE RESP 5 Hl. 8nl~ SHE:X SBA

. ORI -----

HELL TEMPE Rf TURE-F POOL TEMPERRTUF E-F I

11 300. - - - - *-

,-,o*r= I I I

.. 1..,.\.-,,l....4""""1c:'.'.'tl.* ,~~~~*,*.i*.*,',':.:*.'.'. ~WMMtvvt.1v1vvv

~ I r __L 1ij

i>- t1

1. J CX>

l---

<i

. LJ t1J i ~.o. -*----- 2 2 2 2 r1- *2

'i 1...---"

-\~

(I. __ L_J .-1._l _j_LL_u_ OCI -I

0. 0.7 1. 4 2. 1 TIME-SECONDS Figure A-3. Drywell Design Basis Accident Temperature as a Fune

of Time for MSLB FIGURE SUPPLIE nll T.UC .l U'~.Q&

TER-C52S7-461

/

-~ * ,,_,- -.....

2-" , .,

(., 6~) '*.. , ,..,,, f. ..* ..... r.. *. ... ) '**..

~ ,.. '* l n ".I

.:.. l'* ,, ~** I

, .. ~* . ~.;.,.

I* '

.,_.l*-

.... , )'1 :1 *.. , ** 7

° ' ~* .. ;11 ** )* , ~.- ,., r -:

r ., .. ,,,, ....

LEGEND I ) t "':...Lt*

lj'///;RADIATION, PRESSURE

-. . "'" t" HUMIDITY & TEMPERATURE

-*RADIATION ONLY ,,

'*,I

.I '*~,

i *. ~,)

l , J,.1

\

\ I I

'L C0"111<1L ....... l

.ns:..n-, : '

.~

ikA& l&a-0*11 I I I

j

r*

i, c © -

1*.;

I*

J c;..

-~ ,--

=o

.~

ll

,, I - '

~ ,...-4------+i--+tr.;;~u;

!i.atto1 .....

~:"-';;,.,...___

1

!1**41fttl ... CJ' ~--*

~

~*I--

4. *lll.!--111.)

P*)-. -.. t.

.~:.-...: .c.5==-\~~;-;~ '"l I. U* * -

-- :, - A-- '-~ ... ._.l

., i

c* *4.-: .:;.-*-*

..-.. l'lC.l*U r FIGURE SUPPLIED t.! ~

~\.LL--~~~!:d:====2=====~~~~~======--====::::::========-,

0

~~:::.:: ....+ I ~~*,**

~ __,__ u ... , . , .-Ji___, . ~. -.1{~.;~:'":.*

fir.~* '~[5 BY THE LICENSEE l)lOt I ~UM1Da..LU..~ ,_.11*11 .. Ulll'~t

~

I *.

I,.

~-*,~~,**~r-,

. a..*,...

~ .....

I I

1, - * - * - - --** "N-'T *M-7 1 ). a..:*-----~---__::__-'T~l!..:**c,l*~*-*-----i* ..,; e* THl.S FIGURE REPRODUCED FROM SAL 1-----------""'~'~:~o~*----------:--------~~---------------=.:..:...;:...__________----1 DRAWING M-2 FIGURE C.4 EL 570'0"

. -*----------------- -~--

----*----.* +-- *--.- -- -- . - -*-.-- - -- . .. *x *n*p ~

~-

'**, Figure k~-,,- ~

\.,.

\ ' *

TER-C5257-4.Gl

,/

t-~*:.**-t'

- .1

-i***....

....... '!*1. , Li ,.

- ..*._;_; ** & . "'. ,..... *.. . . I*

- I

------~

T.

LEGEND (.)'I t ~~.~~*;_*

J

/"////,RADIATION, PRESSURE

~ HUMIDITY & TEMPERATURE II PFRADIATION ONLY*

.i.......

r I:

I

'o

~

-c LU,tNQ:

Jo-ii!. .-:)ll:., "l*Ttt. ...L. b*"tHc&,

I

" c::J..,., 1.1111. ..... ~,, ntowr or t~'ll1.

I FIGURE SUPPLIED BY THE LICENSEE

l .. *.--

....,._o*

THIS FIGURE REPRODUCED FROM S&L DRAWING M-3.FIGURE C.3 EL 545'8" l.

.. -~-

Figure A-5.

__ :i

TER~C5257-461 I *.* .. . , , ,.....

1.

~

t --:---!!

i r* ,,

.J LEGEND

.~:~::.<:','PRESSURE, HUMIDITY

& TEMPERATURE ONLY lf;~@kf.IRADIA TION ONLY

~//~RADIATION, PRESSURE HUMIDITY & TEMPERATURE "

i I

,.....,..,....~ ..

,a I

C

---,~

~--.........,

t..0.000 .....

~

ODO

ut: ,,,,,..,

~ .. L D*f ~( l o .. , * .,.

rt1 LL<.l":>:

- a.t-.c.

.... --1 I

'"',.-:'::::: ~Dl""C',l!a. wt.*t1t'\.

~------~....-

-ca.--** "~D* '"'**-~~~*--:-o:--:-r~ . c=:i .1.Y'T 1.*I OIMOTU **1>>11*1~11***1 .. T

.... ... . . , .. , ,,.0 .

f*

FIGURE SUPPLIED BY THE LICENSEE THIS FIGURE REPRODUCED FROM S&L DRAWING M-4 FIGURE C.2 EL 517'6"

Figure A-6.

TER-C5257-461

,_,. * * - -- __,;_________ -~*!._--~---*--------

.. ,. '*. ,, .. ~** *,

'* ,..:-:..* .i.

F- J t.*. ,,. * /I~

.1

.. ,, ,... ....--r I

I I

r..~

I.

i. ,,.,,

., :..-1 -*

I ... J ..

t.

.l i1 ,.. -~~ ,..

~

':,,-~,

"'; '"~-*.

i

'I I

T I

fl ....

I'.1 I

I

o 0

C*

D*

E.

t.

I.

FIGURE SUPPLIED BY THE LICENSEE

,,.., . **?""-

pn.s ......

NUOlAI SAFETY G..--.... ~c- ........ ~~

IElAT~_D All SHOWN.ON ltai DllAW

...,...~

,. 0 THIS FIGURE REPRODUCED FROM S&L DRAWING M-5 FIGURE C.1 El 476'6"

-~7*:

Figure A- 7.

TER-C5257-461 t

-" *., I f.-, :,,

---1"'-*-' .. ,.,.,_.

r."

l-1.*,

- 11.

{.-, 'J ,., )

.l

/1\

. *J I

I LEGEND .. ' I ~-: ~ ....-4-__:_-*-'- L , ..

_ .. _.!.~-.

ij"'/~RADIATION, PRESSURE HUMIDITY & TEMPERATURE m];::;;:m~~~j(RADIATION ONLY Q---:o: .

L *1111..1c. .. - - - - --- Je ( .. a..... \.Oc. &9IOM°ll ( t YP. )

I

>---*---- I*

. . . .l . """i:.*------t-"-i

~*-190::..

~ *--*-~-D_........

__*_:::.::.:-:::::::::::::::::;+-:-:~~==~====;;;;=9.,,,,=="""==5'f.:~

~ ro'-4*10**0**1.MOv**Ll

. . . LL ~Lt1'ION ( &**C.""C.

.,..,... W4L~ ----*-

c c

©~--

D *D*

- P*MlQ .U ..C.! ta.M 1'ANC S*****o*-----ll.._j--,1 .!iil..*tllltk *u11.i.1 L.1i.a.01K" oow..

1

, ..... c 1****9c~

!'lA.DDt* DOW..,

LlC.tNC:

~ M.AY't' ...... .....,.[~* ftClil.1 cs l.Qulhllll't [.

-:c:----- r +/-

I L iC::=*~~---~+r-:;:;.-.;:.J- t--~=,.*-'..,":'.,.:o,,~~ '"=tt:I

'-J...-+-----,-~--'

@~-- '----~-.

c~~ 4':'_~

IDE' !~

a~

I FIGURE SUPPLIED I

L--+--~--!---+---;-----jt-=~-4----~

..... a*

I

.1 .,.*

BY THE LICENSEE t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~u~~~-~;~*~~;t=~*-~*:;;~*~~*-~~~*~~~~~:_'_**-*~-~-~ :iH1i~1ciURE REPRODUCED FROM S&L

@~*- ** *@ r l OOG "'l8 ... N

@'°"' !>8'1'-'"~o*

[L [ ..,.. ,

V q @ ~.s' .: D.RAWING M-6 FIGURE C.5 EL 589'0" & 613'0J' L--------;~*

I Figure A-:B,:;-\- ~-

TER-C5257-461 APPENDIX B - LISTING OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT The following table lists the groupings of safety-related electrical equipment items for the Dresden Unit 2 nuclear power plant. Equipment items provided in the table are used in the detailed equipment environmental qualification evaluation presented in Section 4.4 and summarized in Section 4.2. This table was generated from the lists of equipment provided by the Licensee [2, 25].

The Licensee identified an extensive list of safety-related electrical equipment in various locations of the plant. The equipment listed by the Licensee was analyzed, and all identical equipment located within plant areas that are exposed* to the same environmental service conditions was grouped together and designated an "equipment item." In this report, the term "equipment item" refers to a specific type of electrical equipment, designated by manufacturer and model, which is representative of all identical equipment

\a plant area exposed to the same environmental service conditions (e.g.,

Transmitter, Fischer & Porter, Model 10B2496, located within containment).

Th.is analysis resulted in a reduced listing of equipment (equipment items) that formed the basis for the review. This appendix contains the tabulation of the equipment items, locations, function, plant identification numbers; required operating time, and applicable qualification documentation references.

B-1

~nklin Research Center A OMsion of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 1 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-000 (with Reliance ac Motors)

Actuates Core Spray Minimum Flow Recirculation Valves (M0-2-1402-38A, B)

Licensee Reference 662 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 1 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.5,-Former Item 2E Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B8 [29]; SCEW 325-327 [2]

Equipment Item No. 2 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-2 (with Peerless de Motor)

Actuates HPCI Steam Supply Isolation Valve (M0-2-2301-5)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 2 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.10, Former Item 2F Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B9 [29]; SCEW 346-347 [2]

,Equipment Item No. 3 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Reactor Building Limitorque Model SMB-4 (with Peerless de Motors)

Actuates Containment Isolation Valves to Isolation Condenser (M0-2-1301-2)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 30 seconds TER Checksheet No. 3 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.1, Former Item 3A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page BlO [29]; SCEW 468-469 [2]

Equipment Item No. 4 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Reactor Building Limitorque Model SMB-1 (with Peerless de Motors)

Actuates Containment Isolation Valves to Isolation Condenser (M0-2-1301-3)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 30 seconds TER Checksheet No. 4 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.1, Former Item 3A 0 Licensee Submitt'al: FRC Designated Page BlO [29]; SCEW 470, 471 [2]

B-2

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Fronklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 uipment Item No. 5 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Reactor Building Limitorque Model SMB-1 (with Reliance ac Motors)

Actuates Core Spray Pump Containment Isolation Valves (M0-2-1402-25A, B)

Licensee Reference 662 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 5 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.1, Former Item 3B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bll [29]; SCEW 254-256 [2]

Equipment Item No. 6 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Reactor Building Limitorque Model SMB-2 (with Reliance ac Motors)

Actuates Core Spray Pump Containment Isolation Valves (M0-2-1402-24A, B)

Licensee Reference 662 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 6 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.1, Former Item 3B ,.{

Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bll [29]; SCEW 251-253 [2]

Equipment Item No. 7 orized Valve Actuator Located in the Reactor Building mitorque Model SMB-0 (with Peerless ac Motor) ctuates Containment Spray Outboard Isolation Valves (M0-2-1501-27A, B, M0-2-1501-28A, B)

Licensee Reference 639 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 7 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.7, Former Item 3C Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl2 [29]; SCEW 291-294 [2]

Equipment Item No. 8 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Reactor Building Limitorque Model SMB-5T (with Reliance ac Motors)

Actuates Low*Pressure Coolant Injection Shutoff Valve (M0-2-1501-21A, B)

Licensee Reference 662 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 8 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.8, Former Item 3D Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl3 [29]; SCEW 378-380 [2]

B-3

TER-CS2S7-461 Equipment Item No. 9 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the RWCU Room Limitorque Model SMB-1 (with Peerless de Motors)

Containment Isolation Valve for Reactor Water Cleanup System (M0-2-1201-2, -3)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 30 seconds TER Checksheet No. 9 Reference 26, Section 4.S.2.ll; Former Item 4B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl6 [29]; SCEW 440-442 [2]

Equipment Item No. 10 Motorized Valve Actuator Located Within the Drywell Limitorque Model SMB-00, (with Peerless ac Motors)

Actuates Isolation Valves for Main Steam Lin~ Drain (M0-2-220-1)

Licensee Reference 63S Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 10 Reference 26, Section 4.S.2.2, Former Item SA Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl7[29]; SCEW 273-274 [2]

Equipment Item No. 11 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Drywell Limitorque Model SMB-1 (with Peerless ac Motors)

Actuates Isolation Valves for Reactor Water Cleanup System (M0-2-1201-1)

Licensee References 63S, 639, 6S9 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 11 Reference 26, Section 4.S.2.2, Former Item SA Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl7[29]; SCEW 307-308 [2]

Equipment Item No. 12 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Drywell Limitorque Model SMB-000 (with Peerless ac Motors)

Actuates Isolation Valves for Reactor Building Component Cooling Water System (M0-2-3706)

Licensee References 63S, 639, 6S9 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 12 Reference 26, Section 4.S.2.2, Former Item SA Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl7[29]; SCEW 309-310 [2]

B-4

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-CS2S7-461

~~ipment Item No. 13 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Drywell Limitorque Model SMB-1 (with Reliance ac Motor)

Actuates High Pressure Coolant Injection Steam Supply Isolation Valve (M0-2-2301-4)

Licensee References 6S9, 662 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 13 Reference 26, Section 4.6.1, Former Item SB Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl8 [29]; SCEW 344, 34S [2]

Equipment Item No. 14 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Drywell Limitorque Model SMB-2 (with Reliance ac Motors)

Actuates Containment Isolation *valves (M0-2-1001-lA, B; M0-2-1301-1; M0-2-1301-4)

Licensee References 6S9, 662 Required Operating Time: 40 seconds TER Checksheet No. 14 Reference 26, Section 4.S.2.3, Former Item SC Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl9 [29]; SCEW 437-439, 466, 467, 472, 473 [2] .

quipment Item No. lS Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Drywell Limitorque Model SMB Actuates Reactor Recirculation Line Isolation (M0-2-202-SA, B),

Minimum Flow (M0-2-202-7A, B), and Crosstie Valves (M0-2-202-6A, B; -9A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 2 minutes TER Checksheet No. lS Reference 26, Section 4.S.2.12, Former Item SD Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B20 [29]; SCEW 446-4S7 [2]

Equipment Item No. 16 Motorized Valve Actuators Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Limitorque Model SMB-00 (with Peerless ac Motors)

Actuates Low Pressure Coolant Injection Pump Suction Valves (M0-2-lSOl-SA, B, C, D)

Licensee References 63S, 639, 6S9 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 16 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.10, Former Item 6A

~censee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B21 (29]; SCEW 28S-288 [2]

B-S

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin lnsUtute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 17 Motorized Valve Actuator Located Within the SE and SW Corner Rooms Limitorque Model SMB-1 (with Reliance ac Motors)

Actuates Heat Exchanger Bypass Valves (M0-2-1501-llA, B)

Licensee References 659, 662 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 17 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.11, Former Item 6B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designar::d Page B22 [29]; SCEW 289, 290 [2]

Equipment Item No. 18 Motorized Valve Actuator Located Within the SE and SW Corner Rooms Limitorque Model SMB-1 (with Reliance ac Motors)

Actuates Low Pressure Coolant Injection Equalization Line Shutoff Valves (M0-2-1501-32A, B)

Licensee References 659, 662 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 17 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.11, Former Item 6B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated P*age B22 [29]; SCEW 295, 296 [2]

Equipment Item No. 19 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-000 Actuates Containment Isolation Valve (M0-2-1601-57)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating. Time: 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 19 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.2, Former Item 2A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B4 [29]; SCEW 69 [2]

Equipment Item No. 20 Motorized Valve Actuators Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-2 Actuates Containment Isolation Valve (M0-2-3702)

Licensee References 662, 659 Required Operating Time: 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 20 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.3, Former Item 2B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B5 [29]; SCEW 139 [2]

~nklin Research Center B-6 A Division of The Fronldin Institute

TER-C5257-461

~uipment Item No. 21 Motorized Valve Actuators Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB--000 Actuates Containment Isolation Valve (M0-2-3703)

Licensee References 659, 662 Required Operating Time: 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 21 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.3, Former Item 2B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Pag*e BS [29]; SCEW 140 [2]

Equipment Item No. 22 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Steam Tunnel Limitorque Model SMB--000 (with Peerless ac Motor)

Actuates Reactor Head Spray Inlet Valve (M0-2-205-2-4)

Licensee References 635, 639 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 22 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.4, Former Item 7A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B25 [29]; SCEW 311-312 [2)

Equipment Item No. 23 torized Valve Actuator Located in the Steam Tunnel

'mitorque Model SMB-2 (with Peerless de Motors) ctuates High Pressure Coolant Injection Pump Discharge Valve (M0-2-2301-8)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 35 seconds TER Checksheet No. 23 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.15, Former Item 7B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page* B26 [29]; SCEW 348, 349 [2)

Equipment Item No. 24 Motorized Valve Actuators Located in the Steam Tunnel Limitorque Model SMB--00 (with Peerless de Motors)

Actuates Main Steam Line Drain Containment Isolation Valve (M0-2-220-2)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 35 seconds TER Checksheet No. 24 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.15, Former Item 7B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B26 [29]; SCEW 371, 372 [2]

B-T

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 25 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Turbine Building Limitorque, Model and Size Not Stated; Reliance Motor Actuates Standby Gas Treatment System Inlet Dampers (M0-2/3-7505A, B)

Licensee Reference 662 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 25 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.12, Former Item BB Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B27 (29]; SCEW 303, 304 [2]

Equipment Item No. 26 Motor-Operated Valve Located in the Turbine Building Limitorque Model H-3BC with Reliance ac Motor Actuates Standby Gas Treatment System Discharge Dampers (M0-2/3-7507A, B)

Licensee Reference 662 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 26 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.12, Former Item 8C Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B28. (29]; SCEW 305, 306 (2]

Equipment Item No. 27 Motorized Valve Actuators Loc.ated in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-2 Actuates Low Pressure Coolent Injection Isolation Valves (M0-2-1S01-20A, B) and Shutdown Cooling Isolation Valves (M0-2-1001-5A, B)

Licensee References 659, 662 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 27 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.12, Former Item 2C Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B6 (29]; SCEW 65, 66, 118-120 [2]

Equipment Item No. 28 Motorized Valve Actuators Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-3 Actuates Low Pressure Coolant Injection Isolation Valves (M0-2-1501-38A, B)

Licensee References 639, 662 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 28 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.12, Former Item 2C Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B6 (29]; SCEW 67, 68 [2]

B-8

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

y TER-C5257-461

. .uipment Item No. 29 Motorized Valve Actuators Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-4, Electric Apparatus ac Motor Actuates Low Pressure Coolant Injection Isolation Valves (M0-2-1501-22A, B)

Licensee References 659, 662 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 29 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.12, Former Item 2C Licensee Submittal: FRC Desighated Page B6 [29]; SCEW 63, 64 [2]

Equipment Item No. 30 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-0 (with Peerless ac Motors)

Actuates LPC Isolation Valves (M0-2-1042-3A, B) and Pump Test Return Valve (M0-2-1402-4A, B)

Licensee References 639, 659, 662 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 30 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.4, Former Item 2D Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B7 [29]; SCEW 7-10 [2]

uipment Item No. 31 torized Valve Actuator Located in the Torus Area mitorque Model SMB-00 (with Peerless ac Motors)

- Actuates Test Line Valves (M0-2-1501-18A, B)

Licensee References 639, 659, 662 Required Operating Time: Less* than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 31 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.4; Former Item 2D Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B7 [29]; SCEW 59, 60 [2]

Equipment Item No. 32 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Torus Area Limitorque Model SMB-000 (with Peerless ac Motors)

Actuates Low Pressure Coolant Injection Minimum Flow Valves (M0-2-1501-13A, B) and Test Line Valves (M0-2-1501-19A, B)

Licensee References 639, 659, 662 Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 32 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.4, Former Item 2D Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B7 [29]; SCEW 57, 58, 61, 62 [2]

B-9

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 33 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Turbine Building Limitorque Model SMB-00 Actuates Reactor Building Normal Ventilation Inlet Damper (M0-2-7503)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 1 minute TER Checkshee.t No. 33 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.6, Former Item 3E Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl4 [29]; SCEW 97 [2]

Equipment Item No. 34 Motorized Valve Actuator Located in the Shutdown Cooling Pump Room Limitorque Model SMB-2 with Peerless de Motors Actuates Containment Isolation Valves (MC-2-1001-2A, B, C)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 40 seconds TER Checksheet No. 34 Reference 26, Section 4.3.3.9, Former Item 34 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page Bl5 [29]; SCEW 115-118 [2]

Equipment Item No. 35 Solenoid Valve Located in the Torus Area Versa Model VP5-2402 Pressure Suppression System Pilot Solenoid (50-2-1601-51A, B, -65, -68)

.. Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 10 seconds TER Checksheet No. 35 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.5, Former Item 10 Licensee Submittal.: FRC Designated Page B29 [29]; SCEW 92, 93, 95 [2]"

Equipment Item No. 36 Solenoid Valve Located in the Reactor Building Versa Model VP5-2402 Pressure Suppression System Pilot Solenoid (50-2-1601-52A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 10 seconds TER Checksheet No. 36 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.6, Former Item llA

Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B30 [29]; SCEW 92, 94 [2]

~nklin Research Center B-10 A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461

~ipment Item No. 37 Solenoid Valve Located in the Reactor Building Versa Model VGS-4522/VGS-4422 -

Pressure Suppression System Pilot Solenoid (S0-2-1601-71)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 10 seconds TER Checksheet No. 37 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.6, Former Item llB Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B31 (29]; SCEW 96 [2]

Equipment Item No. 38 Solenoid Valve Located in the Torus Area ASCO Model HT831614 Pressure Suppression System Pilot Solenoid (S0-2-1601-66, -67, -69, -70)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 20 seconds TER Checksheet No. 3&

Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.7, Former Item 13A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B32 (29]; SCEW 70-72 [2]

Equipment Item No. 39 enoid Valve Located in the Torus Area 0 Model Not Stated Pressure Suppression System Pilot Solenoid (S0-2-8501-2A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 20 seconds TER Checksheet No. 39 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.7, Former Item 13B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B33 (29]; SCEW 74-75 [2]

Equipment Item No. 40 Solenoid Valve Located in the Torus Area ASCO Model 831614 Actuates Radwaste-Drain Isolation Valves (A0-2-2001-5, -6)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 20 seconds TER Checksheet No. 40 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.7, Former Item 13C.

Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B34 (29]; SCEW 123-124, 127-128 (2]

B-11

~nklin Research Center A Division of The FronkJln Institute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 41 Solenoid Valve Located in the Steam Tunnel ASCO Model LB831454 Pilot Valves for Pressure Suppression System Isolation Valves (50-2-9203A, B; 50-2-9204A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 5 seconds TER Checksheet No. 41 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.19~ Former Item 15 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B35 [29]; SCEW 300-302 [2]

Equipment Item No. 42 Solenoid Valve Located in the Drywell ASCO Model WPH8300B61F Vessel Head Leakoff Valves (A0-2-220-51, -52)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months TER Checksheet No. 42 Reference 26, Section 4.4.3, Former Item 16A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B36 [29]; SCEW 383-386 [25]

Equipment .Item No. 43 Solenoid Valve Located in the Reactor Building ASCO Model WPH8300B61F Isolation Valve Pilot Solenoid for Reactor Recirculation System Sampling (A0-2~220-45)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 5 seconds TER Checksheet No. 43 Reference 26, Section 4.7.49, Former Item 16B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B37 [29]; SCEW 383-386 [2]

Equipment Item No. 44 Solenoid Valve Located in the Drywell

.Automatic Valve Co. Model C5512 MSIV Pilot Solenoid (A0-2-203-lA, B, C, D)

Licensee Reference 839 Required Operating Time: 10.5 seconds TER Checksheet No. 44 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.8, Former Item 17 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B38 [29]; SCEW 365-368 [2]

~nklin Research Center B-12 A Division of The Franklin institute

v TER-C5257-461

~uipment Item No. 45 Solenoid Valve Located in the Steam Tunnel Automatic Valve Co. Model C5512 Outboard MSIV Pilot Solenoid (A0-2-203-2A, B, C, D)

Licensee Reference 839 Required Operating Time: 10.5 seconds TER Checksheet No. 45 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.9, Former Item 18 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Pag"'"B39 [29]; SCEW 365, 366, 369, 370 [2]

Equipment Item No. 46 Solenoid Valve Located in the Torus Area Versa Model VGS-4522/VGS-4422 1

Pilot Solenoid for A0-2-.1601-20B and -22 ( S0-2-1601-50A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 46 Reference 26, Section 4.6.5, Former Item 19 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B40 [29]; SCEW 409-411 [2]

Equipment Item No. 47 ety Relief Valve and Solenoid Located in the Drywell sser Industrie~ Model C5450-5 ctuates Safety Relief Valves (2-203-3A through E)

Licensee Reference 839 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 47 Reference 26, Section 4.6.2, Former Item 20A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B41 [29]; SCEW 267, 268 [2]

Equipment Item No. 48 Solenoid Valve Located in the Drywell Dresser Industries Model 1525VX Actuates Safety Relief Valves (2-203-3B through E)

Licensee Reference 839 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 48 Reference 26, Section 4.6.2, Former Item 20B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B42 [29]; SCEW 269-272 [2]

B-13

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 49 Solenoid Valve Located in the Drywell ASCO Model 206-380-3F, Type NP-1 Recirculation Loop Sampling Valve (A0-2-220-44)

Licensee Reference 649 Required Operating Time: 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 49 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.17, Former Item 101 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B99 (29]; SCEW 319, 320 (2]

Equipment Item No. 50 Temperature Switch Located in the HPCI Room United Electric Control Type F-7, Model 76B Detects HPCI Steam Line Break (TS-2-2370A through D, TS-2-2371A through D, TS-2-23272A through D, TS-2-2373A through D)

Licensee refere_nce not cited Required Operating Time: Less than 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 50 Reference 26, Section 4.6.3, Former Item 21 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B43 (29]; SCEW 257-266 [2]

Equipment Item No. 51 Temperature Switch Located in the Steam Tunnel United Electric Controls Type F-7, Model 76B MSLB Leak Detection (TS-2~261-15A through D, -16A through D, -17A through D, and -18A through D)

Licensee Reference 10 Required Operating Time: Not stated TER Checksheet No. 51 Reference 26, Section 4.6.6, Former Item 22 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B44 (29], SCEW 275-284 [2]

Equipment Item No. 52 Temperature Switch Located in the Turbine Building Manufacturer and Model Not Stated Standby Gas Treatment High Temperature Switch (TSH-2/3-7541-llA,B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 52 Reference 26, Section 4.6.7, Former Item 23A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B45 (29]; SCEW 418-420 [2]

B-14

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461

~ip~ent Item No. 53

~perature Switch Located in the Reactor Water Cleanup Room Manufacturer and Model Not Stated RWCU Room Leak Detection (TE-2-1290A through H)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 1 Minute TER Checksheet No. 53 Reference 26, Section 4.6.8, Former Item 23B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B46 (29]; SCEW 1-6 [2]

Equipment Item No. 54 Limit Switch Located in the Torus Area NAMCO Model Mark II D 1200G Valve Position Indication (POS~2-1601-20A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 54 Reference 26, Section 4.6.9, Former Item 26B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B48 (29]; SCEW 313-314 (25]

Equipment Item No. 55 Electrical Penetrations Located Within the Drywell neral Electric NEBS, Model Not Stated ctrical Signals/Power (X201B, X202D, X200C) c~nsee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 55 Reference 26, Section 4.6.13, Former Item 83 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B98 (29]; SCEW 16-19 (25]

Equipment Item No. 56 Limit Switch Located in the Drywell NAMCO Model 77050160 Position Indication for Valve A0-2-203-lA, B, C, D* (POS-2-203-lA through lD)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months TER Checksheet No. 56 Reference 26, Section 4.6.10, Former Item 28 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B47 (29]; SCEW 287-290 (25]

B-15

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Frenklln lnsUtute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 57 Limit Switch Located in the Drywell NAMCO Model Snaplock SA5A Valve Position Indication for Air Recirculation Loop Sampling Valve (POS-2-220-44, -45) and Reactor Head Leakoff Valve (POS-2-220-51, -52)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months TER Checksheet No. 57 Reference 26, Section 4.6.10, Former Item 28 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B47 [29]; SCEW 379-382 [25]

Equipment Item No. 58 Position Switch Located in the Steam Tunnel NAMCO Model 77050160 Position Indication for Valves A0-2-203-2A through 2D (POS-2-203-2A through 2D)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 10.5 sec TER Checksheet No. 58 Reference 26, Section 4.6.11~ Former Item 29 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B50 [29]; SCEW 291-292 [25]

Equipment Item No. 59 Pressure Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Static-0-Ring Model 5N-AA3 Low Pressure Coolant Injection Discharge Pressure Indication (PS-2-1466A through D)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 59 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.7, Former Item 32 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B51 [29]; SCEW 339-343 [2]

Equipment Item No. 60 Pressure Switches Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Static-a-Ring Model 5N-AA3 Low Pressure Coolant Injection Pump Pressure (PS-2-1544A through H)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 60 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.7, Former Item 32 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B51 [29]; SCEW 396-402 [2]

B-16

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461

.uipment Item No. 61 Differential Pressure Switch Locat~d in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Barton Model 288 Reactor Recirculation Differential Pressure Across Recirculation Pump (DPIS-2-261-35A through -35H)

Licensee Reference 1795 Required Operating Time: Less than 2 minutes TER Checksheet No. 61 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.18~ Former Item 37A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B54 (29]; SCEW 313-318 [2]

Equipment Item No. 62 Differential Pressure Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Static-0-Ring Model 12R2-KK815-V Actuates Pressure Suppression System Relief Valves (DPIS-2-1622A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 62 Reference 26, Section 4.6.20, Former Item 37C Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B55 [29]; SCEW 406-408 [2]

uipment Item No. 63 w Switch Located in the Turbine Building cDonnel Model AF2 Trips SGTS Air Heater 2/3-A-7503 on Low Air Flow (FSL-2/3-7541-41A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Conti.'nuous TER Checksheet No. 63 Reference 26, Section 4.6.19, Former Item 38A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B56 (29]; SCEW 424...:426 [2]

Equipment Item No. 64 Flow Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Barton Model 288 Open~ Valve 1402-38A,B on Low Flow (FS-2-1464A, B)

Licensee Reference 1795 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 64 Reference 26, Section 4.6.17, Former Item 38B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B57 (29]; SCEW 336-338 [2]

~nklin Research Center B-17 A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 65 :

Flow Switch Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Barton Model 289 LPCI Pump Flow (FS-2-1501-58A, B)

Licensee Reference 1794 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 65 Reference 26, Section 4.6.17, Former Item 38D Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B59 [29]; SCEW 403-405 [2]

Equipment Item No. 66 Flow Switch Located in the Turbine Building Mercoid Model PPQW Starts SGTS Fan 2/3-7506 and Opens Dampers (FS-2/3-7541-45A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 66 Reference 26, Section 4~3.2.1, Former Item 39 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B60 [29]; SCEW 427-429 [2]

Equipment Item No. 67 Flow Transmitter Located in the Reactor Building Foxboro Model 15-A-l Standby Gas Treatment Flow (FT-2/3-7541-40A,B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 67 Reference 26, Section 4.6.12, Former Item 40 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B61 [29]; SCEW 421-423 [2]

Equipment Item No. 68 Differential Pressure Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms Barton Model 386 Differential Pressure Low Pressure Coolant injection (DPT-2-1543A, B)

Licensee References 639, 647, 6 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 68 Reference 26, Section 4.6.4, Former Item 41 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B62 [29]; SCEW 385-387 [2]

~nklin Research Center B-18 A Division of The Frnnk!ln Institute

¥ TER-C525 7-461

~ ipment Item No. 69

~ferential Pressure Transmitter Located in the SE Corner Room Manufacturer and Model Not Stated Drywell Torus Differential Pressure (DPT-2-1602-12)'

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 69 Reference 26, Section 4.4.4, Former Item 42 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B63 [29]; SCEW 324 [25]

Equipment Item No. 70 Level Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Room Barton, Model Not Stated Suppression Pool Level Monitor (LT-2-1641-1)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 70 Reference 26, Section 4.7.51, Former Item 43 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B64 [29]; SCEW 328 [25]

Equipment Item No. 71 vel Indicating Transmitting Switch Located in the Reactor Building ay Mode 1 4418CE

nitors Reactor Level, Containment Spray Interlock (LITS-2-263-73A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 71 Reference 26, Section 4.6.18, Former Item 46B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B65 [29]; SCEW 443-445 [2]

Equipment Item No. 72 Level Transmitter Located in the SE Corner*Room General Electric Model GE/MAC 553 Suppression Pool Level Monitor (LT-2-1626)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 72 Reference 26, Section 4.7.51, Former Item 47 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B66 [29]; SCEW 327 [25]

B-19

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin lnsUtute

TER-C525 7-461 Equipment Item No. 73 Level Transmitter Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Model GE/MAC 553 Reactor Vessel Level Indication (LT-2-646A, B; LT-263-61)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 73 Reference 26, Section 4.4.5, Former Item 48 Licensee Submittal: FRC 'Jesigiiated .Page B67 (29]; SCEW 393-395 (25]

Equipment Item No. 74 Pressure Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Type 551 Core Spray Pump Discharge Pressure (PT-1460A, B~

Licensee Reference 838 Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 74

Reference 26, Section 4. 5.1. 2, Former Item 49 .

Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B68 (29]; SCEW 328-331 [2]

Equipment Item No. 75 Pressure Transmitter Located in the Reactor Building Gzneral Electric Type 551 Drywell Pressure (PT-2-1625)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 75 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.3, Former Item 51A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B71 (29]; SCEW 332 (25]

Equipment Item No. 76 Pressure Transmitter Located in the Rea'ctor Building General Electric Type GE/MAC 551 Reactor Vessel Pressure (PT-2-647A, B; PT-2-662)

Licensee Reference 838 Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 76 Reference 26, Section 4.4.2, Former Item 51B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B72 (29]; SCEW 398-400 (25]

B-20

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

\

TER-C5257-461

~ipment Item No. 77

~w Transmitters Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Type 553 Core Spray* Flow (FT-2-1461A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 77 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.4, Former Item 52 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page, B73 [29]; SCEW 332-335 [2]

Equipment Item No. 78 Flow Transmitter Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Type 553 Low Pressure Coolant Injection LPCI Flow (FT-2-1542A, B; FT-2-1549A, B; FT-2-1551A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 78 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.4, Former Item 52 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B74 [29]; SCEW 381-384, 388-395 [2]

uipment Item No. 79 ctric Motor Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms neral Electric Models 5K6637XC71A Drives.Core Spray Pump (2-1401A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 12 days TER Checksheet No. 79 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.5, Former Item 53A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B76 (29]; SCEW 321-324 [2]

Equipment Item No. 80 Electric Motor Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric, Model Not Stated

Drives Low Pressure Coolant Injection Pumps (2-A, B, C, D-1502)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 80 Reference 26, Section 4.7.19, Former Item 53A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B76 (29]; 373-377 [2]

~nklin Research Center B-21 A Division of The Franklin lnsdtute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 81 Local Panel Located in the Turbine Building Manufacturer and Model Not Stated Standby Gas Treatment Panel (2223-28A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 81 Reference 26, Section 4.3.2.2, Former Item 58 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B77 (29]; SCEW 430-432 [2]

Equipment Item No. 82 Switchgear Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Magneblast Type AMR 4.76-250 Power Distribution (SWGR 23-1, SWGR.24-1)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 82 Reference 26, Section 4.3.2.3, Former Item 59 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B78 (29]; SCEW 458-460 [2]

Equipment Item No. 83 Motor Control Center Located in the Reactor Building General Electric Type 7700 Power Distribution for Standby ac Power (MCC-28-1, MCC 28-7, MCC~29-l, MCC-29-3, MCC-29-4, and MCC 29-7)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 83 Reference 26, Section 4.3.2.4, Former Item 60B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B79 (29]; SCEW 461-465 [2]

Eqµipment Item No. 84 Electric Air Heater Located in the Turbine Building Edwin L. Weigland Model 1-113462/2-113462 Inlet Heater for Standby Gas Treatment System Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 84 Reference 26, Section 4.6.15, Former Item 62A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B80 (29]; SCEW 412-414 [2]

~nklin Research Center B-22 A Division of The Franklin Institute

I TER-C5257-461 ipment Item No. 85 Electric Motor Located in the Turbine Building General Electric Model 5K256AK2037 Drives Standby Gas Treatment Exhaust Fans (2/3-7506-A, -B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 85 Reference 26, Section 4.6.16, Former Item 63 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B81 [29]; SCEW 415-417 [2]

Equipment Item No. 86 Electric Motor Located in the SE and SW Corner Rooms General Electric Model 5Kl84AL2561 Drives Low Pressure Coolant Injection Room Air Coolers (2-5746A, B)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 86 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.8, Former Item 65A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B83 [29]; SCEW 433-436 [2]

Equipment Item No. 87 ctrical Cable Located Outside the Drywell plex 3TW with Overall SH ensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 87 Re.ference 26, Section 4.5.16, Former Item 78 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B96 [29]; SCEW 495 [2]

Equipment Item No. 88 Electrical Cable Located Outside Containment General Electric Butyl Rubber Insulation PVC Jacket Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 88 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 66 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B84 [29]; SCEW 474, 475 [2]

Equipment Item No. 89 Electrical Cable Located in Containment General Electric PE Insulation PVC Jacket Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous R Checksheet No. 89 erence 26, Section 4.5.1.6, Former Item 67 ensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B85 [29]; SCEW 480, 481 [2]

B-23

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Frnnklln Institute

TER-C5257-461 Equipment Item No. 90 Electrical Cable Located Outside Containment General Electric, Cross Link PE Insulation, Neoprene Jacket Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 90 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 68 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B86 [29]; SCEW 482, 483 [2]

Equipment Item No. 91 Electrical Cable Located Outside Containment General Electric, Rubber Insulation, Hypalon Jacket Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet*No. 91 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 69 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B87 [29]; SCEW 484, 485 [2]

Equipment Item No. 92 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell General Electric Model SI-57275 Vulkene Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 92 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 71 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B90 [29]; SCEW 490, 491 [2]

Equipment Item No. 93 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell General Electric Multi Pair with Overall SH CO-CON Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 93 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 72 Licensee Submittal: FRC.Designated Page B90 [29]; SCEW 498, 499 [2]

Equipment Item No. 94 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell General Electric Butyl Rubber Insulation Jacket Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 94 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 73 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B91 [29]; SCEW 476, 477 [2]

B-24

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

I TER-C5257-461 uipment Item No. 95 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell Simplex Anhydrex XX Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 95 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 74 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B92 (29]; SCEW 478, 479 [2]

Equipment Item No. 96 Electrical Cable Located in the Drywell Simplex Anhydrex XX Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 96 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.6, Former Item 75 Lic.ensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B93 (29]; SCEW 486, 487 (2]

Equipment Item No. 97 Electrical Cable Located Inside Driwell Simplex Rubber Insulation PVC Jacket ensee reference not cited uired Operating Time: Continuous ER Checksheet No. 97 Reference 26, Section 4.5.1.6, Former Item 76 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B94 (29]; SCEW 488, 489 [2]

Equipment Item No. 98 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell Simplex Poly Nylon Insulation/Shield Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 98 Reference 26, Section 4.5.16, Former Item 77 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B95 (29]; SCEW 492, 493 [2]

Equipment Item No. 99 Electrical Cable Located Outside Drywell Simplex type not stated Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 99 Reference 26, Section 4.5.2.16, Former Item 79

'censee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B97 (29]; SCEW 496, 497 (2]

B-25

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461 Equipment Item No. 100 Terminal Block Located Within the Drywell Allen Bradley, Model Not Stated Cable/Wire Terminations (79-0lB-14, -16, -18, -20)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 100 Reference 26, Section 4.6.14, Former Item 102A Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page BlOO (29]; SCEW 514-517 [2]

Equipment Item No. 101 Terminal Block Located Within the Drywell GE Model 264B965 Cable/Wire Terminations (79-0lB-15, -17, -19, -21)

Liceni~e reference not cited Required Operating Time: Continuous TER Checksheet No. 101 Reference 26, Section 4.6.14, Former Item 102B Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page BlOl SCEW 510-513 [2]

Equipment Item No. 102 Position Switches Located in the High Pressure Coolant Injection Room Manufacturer and Model Not Stated (POS-2-2301-29, -30, -64, -65)

Licensee reference not cited Required Operating Time: 1 minute TER Checksheet No. 102 Reference 26, Section 4.4.1, Former Item 24 Licensee Submittal: FRC Designated Page B47 (29]; SCEW 16-19 [2]

Equipment Item No. 103 (TMI Action Plan Item II.D.3)

Acoustic Monitor Sensor Located Inside the Drywell NOT Instruments Model 781B SRV Position Indication (l-261-60A through E, 20-261-60A through E, 3-261-60A through E)

Required Operating Time: 12 days Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 103 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 1-4 (30]

~nklin Re.search Center A Division of The Fronklln Institute B-26 *

- - *-----~------*------*-* *---------

v TER-C5257-461 uipment Item No. 104 (TMI Action Plan Item II.D.3)

Acoustic Monitor Preamplifier Located Outside the Drywell NDT Instruments Model 400A SRV Position Indication (l-262-61A through E, 2-262-61A through E, 3-262-61A through E)

Required Operating Time: 12 days Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 104 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 5-8 I::i0']

Equipment Item No. 105 (TMI Actio:p Plan Item II.D.3)

Acoustic Monitor Flow Detector Located in Main Control Room NDT Instruments Model 104D SRV Position Indication Required Operating Time: 12 days Licensee reference not cited T~R Checksheet No. 105 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 9-12 (30]

Equipment Item No. 106 (TMI Action Plan Item II.K.3.13)

Time Delay Relay Located in Auxiliary Electrical Equipment Room trol Products AGASTAT TR14I3B vent Spurious Steamline Isolation (102A, 102B) equired Operating Time: 12 days Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 106 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 13-20 (30]

Equipment Item No. 107 (TMI Action Plan Item II.K.3.15)

Time Delay Relay Located In Auxiliary Electrical Equipment Room Prevent Spurious Steamline Isolation (13AK7, 13AK21)

Required Operating Time: 10 min Licensee reference not cited TER Checksheet No. 107 Licensee Submittal: SCEW 21-24 (30]

B-27

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin institute

TER-C5257-461

APPENDIX C - SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS AND DISPLAY INSTRffi1ENTATION C.l LIST OF SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS In accordance with the DOR Guidelines, the Licensee was directed to establish a list of systems and display instrumentation needed to mitigate the consequences of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) or a high energy line break (HELB), inside or outside containment, and reach safe shutdown. The list of safety-related systems was developed from a review of plant safety analyses and emergency procedures. The systems list was established on the basis of the functions that must be performed for mitigation of the consequences of a LOCA or HELB without regard to location of equipment relative to a potentially hostile environment. The NRC staff verified that the systems considered by the Licensee were those required to achieve or support (1) emergency reactor tdown, (2) containment isolation~ (3) reactor core cooling, (4) containment at removal, (5) core residual heat removal~ and (6) prevention of significant relea.se of radioactive material to the environment.

The staff's systems review has not included those equipment items deferred as cold shutdown or TMI Action Plan items. The systems list is as follows:

Safe Shutdown Systems Reactor Protection System*

Auto-Depressurization System/Main Steam System*

Low-Pressure Coolant Injection and Containment Spray System*

Service Water System Diesel Oil Piping System .

Control Rod Drive Hydraulic System Process Radiation Monitoring System Standby AC Power*

Standby DC Power*

General Use Electrical Equipment

, . s t e m required for both safe shutdown and accident mitigation.

C-1

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 Accident Mitigation Systems (LOCA, MSLB, FWLB)

Core Spray System .

High-Pressure Coolant Injection System Pressure Suppression System (Containment Isolation Valves and Torus Vacuum Breaker)

Standby Gas Treatment System Containment Isolation Sys.tern (Groups I, II, and III)**

Reactor (Nuclear Boiler) Recirculation System Reactor Building Ventilation System (Isolation Function Only)

Control Room, Office~ and Drywell Air Conditioning Isolation Condenser System*

Containment Cooling Service Water Reactor Water Cleanup System (Isolation Function Only)

C.2 SAFETY-RELATED DISPLAY INSTRUMENTATION NRC Statement from SER "Display instrumentation which provides information for the reactor operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not specifically identified by the Licensee. A complete list of all display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures must

be provided. Equipment qualification information in the form of summary sheets should be provided for all components of the display instrumenta- * !

tion exposed to harsh environments. Instrumentation which is not con-sidered to be safety related but which is mentioned in the emergency procedure should appear on the list. For these instruments, (1) justification should be provided for not considering the instrument safety related and (2) assurance should be provided that its subsequent failure will not mislead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation of the consequences of the accident. The environmental qualification of post-accident sampling and monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely related to the review of the TMI Lessons-Learned modifications and will be performed in conjunction with that review."

Licensee Response "In Section 3.1 of the SER, the NRC staff requires CECo to provide additional information on display instrumentation which provides information for the reactor operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant, including:

1) A complete list of all display instrumentation mentioned in the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and high-energy line break (HELB) emergency procedures

- Containment isolation includes all components in various systems performing the containment isolation function.

C-2

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461

2) Equipment qualification information in the form of summary sheets for all display instrumentation components exposed to harsh environments

3) An explanation justifying why some instruments mentioned in the emergency procedure are not considered safety-related. The justification must provide assurance that any subsequent failure of the instrument will not mislead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation of the con~equences of the accident.

A complete listing of all display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures has been included in CECo's November 1, 1980 submittal. It includes instruments which provide indication only, as well as those which are connected to system control circuitry. The instruments which provide only indication have been excluded from the scope of CECo's November 1, 1980 submittal as a result of the Dresden Unit 2 NRC site audit carried out between July 28 and 30, 1980. During this audit, the NRC indicated that position switches were not within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-0lB. Although these position switches were excluded from the scope of the November 1, 1980 report, they were retained on the system components list provided in Appendix B of that report, but a single line was drawn through each entry representing such a position switch and a footnote was added.to explain its status. Three level transmitters were also excluded from qualification for the same reason. As a result of the requirement in the NRC's SER to qualify all safety-related display instrumentation which provides only information to the reactor operators, CECo now plans to qualify any such instrument which is the primary or only means of providing information on the status of safety-related equipment. If any display instrument is excluded from qualification, a justification will be provided to explain its exclusion and assurance will be provided that any subsequent failure of the instrument will not mislead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation of the consequences of the accident. Because of the extensive ongoing work to revise the emergency procedures as required by NUREG 0737 and the potential for future revisions to the list of safety-related display instrumentation, it is not feasible to provide complete component evaluation summary sheets for these components at this time. These summary sheets will be completed by the deadline for establishing complete environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment."

Evaluation The Licensee has stated that because of on-going work to revise the emergency procedures and the potential for future revisions to the list of safety-related display instruments, it is not possible to provide complete

~ponent evaluation summary sheets for these instruments at this time. The censee has committed to provide the summary sheets by June 1982. At the

~nklin Research Center C-3 A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461

~same time, the Licensee's response to the NRC requirement that all safety-related display instruments mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures be included in the list is that the Licensee intends to qualify such instru-ments that provide the primary or only information to the reactor operators.

The Licensee has also stated that justification would be provided for the exclusion of display instrumencs from the list.

In view of the Licensee's position regarding the qualification of safety-related display instrumentation, it should be noted that the req~irements of Regulatory Guide 1.97, Revision 2 become obligatory for operating reactor plants in June 1983. Consequently, any justification for excluding safety-related display instruments from environmental qualification should include a discussion of how the Licensee will satisfy the Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements.

Conclusion The Licensee will provide component evaluation summary sheets for displa~

instruments which provide information only to the operators by June 1982.

Justification for exclusion of safety-related instruments from this list should contain a description of the ability to meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.97, Revision 2.

C.3 INSTRUMENTATION DELETED FROM THE LIST OF ITEMS TO BE ENVIRONMENTALLY QUALIFIED In the response to the NRC SER, the Licensee indicated that certain instrumentation was being deleted from the current listing. The Licensee stated that these instruments were either not safety-related or not required to mitigate the-consequences of LOCAs or HELBs. The following evaluations are provided regarding these instruments.

C-4

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-CS257-461 Suppression Pool Water Level Indication (LT-2-1641-1 and LT-2-1626);

Containment Pressure Indication (PT-2-1626)

Concern from TER-C5257-194 In TER-CS257-194, FRC concluded that these instruments should be retained on the listing of safety-related instrumentation to be considered for environmental qualification. The rationale was that these instruments are required to provide the operators with indication that safety-related systems were performing their safety function.

Licensee Response The Licensee stated that these items were being deleted from the listing because they.are not safety-related.

Evaluation The Licensee's response does not address the concern that these

. icators provide information necessary for plant operators to ensure the proper operation of systems necessary to mitigate the consequences of accidents. Plant operators need information regarding suppression pool water level and containment pressure to assess the operation of several safety systems. Without further justification for deleting these items, the items should not be deleted from the listing of equipment to be considered for environmental qualification.

Conclusion These instruments should not be deleted from the environmental qualification list *

-Qnklin Research Center c-s A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C5257-461 C.3.2 Reactor Vessel Level Transmitters (LT-2-646A/B, LT-2-263-61);

Reactor Vessel Pressure Transmitters (PT-2-647A/B, PT-2-662);

Drywell to Reactor Building d/p Transmitter (DPT-2-1602-12)

Licensee Statement The Licensee has stated that these instruments do not require environ-mental qualific~_rlon because the reactor vessel pressure transmitters are not required to mitigate the consequences of an accident and the others are not safety related.

Evaluation As discussed in Section C.3.1 for other instruments, this indication is necessary for the operator to monitor the performance of systems required to mitigate the consequences of an accident. Without further justification for deleting these items', the items should not be deleted from the listing of equipment to be considered for environmental qualification.

Conclusion These instruments should not be deleted from the environmental qualification list.

~nklin Research Center C-6 A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461

APPENDIX D - REVIEW OF LICENSEE'S RESPONSE TO NRC EEQ SER CONCERNING JUSTIFICATION FOR INTERIM OPERATION

1. BACKGROUND The NRC Safety Evaluation Report (SER) concerning equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) states [28f:

"Subsection 4.2 identified deficiencies that must be resolved to establish the qualification of the equipment; the staff requires that the information lacking in this category be provided within 90 days of receipt of this SER. Within this period, the.licensee should either pro-vide documentation of the missing qualification information which demon-strates that such equipment meets the DOR guidelines or NUREG-0588 or commit to a corrective action (requalification, replacement, relocation, and so forth) consistent with the requirements to establish qualification by June 30, 1982. If the latter option is chosen, the licensee must provide justification for operation until such corrective action is complete."

On January 19, 1982, FRC representatives met with NRC Division of nsing personnel at NRC offices to discuss the potential for FRC to assist the staff in the technical review of licensees' statements regarding justifica-tion for interim plant operation submitted in response to outstanding qualifi-cation deficiencies in the NRC EEQ SERs. The results of the meeting were as follows: (1) FRC was requested to proceed immediately with ~he technical review of licensees' justification for interim operation, (2) the format was established, and (3) the criteria fdr the review were established. These criteria are presented in Section 2 of this appendix.

On January 21, 1982, the NRC provided the following modification to Final Assignment 13 concerning this subject:

"The FRC review will consist of:

o Review the licensee's justification of interim operation and provide FRC independent analysis which shows whether or not licensee provided technically sound rationale as a basis for justification for continued pl~nt operation *

D-1

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Fninklln Institute

TER-C525 7-461 0 On January 27, 1982, FRC shall provide a list of those power reactors ~

that have provided technically sound justification for continued operation. FRC shall also provide a list of those power reactors which have not provided technically sound justification for continued operation. In addition to the lists, FRC may provide any additional information which in FRC's judgment is necessary to support the conclusions regarding justification for continued operation."

On January 25, 1982, the NRC was provided with the completed review of the licensees' statements presented as a basis for justification for interim operation in response to the NRC EEQ SER.* On February 5, 1982, at the NRC's request, the NRC was provided with actual examples of licensees' responses to the NRC EEQ SER that provide adequate rationale as a basis for justification for interim operation.**

2. GENERAL DISCUSSION In general, licensee-submitted justifications for interim operation are based on systems considerations, equipment operability evaluations, or failure-modes-and-effects analyses.

Systems considerations often involve the availability of backup equipment capable of performing the particular safety function of concern. The backup equipment is either environmentally qualified, unqualified but not exposed to a harsh environment at the same time as the primary equipment, or located so that it is unlikely that both the primary and backup equipment would be simultaneously exposed to a severe environment. In general, these systems discussions should consider (1) the possibility of a single-active failure

C. J. Crane Letter to R. A. Clark, NRC.

Subject:

Transmittal of FRC Review of Licensees' Responses to NRC EEQ SER Concerning Justification for Interim Operation FRC, 25-Jan-82

- C. J. Crane Letter to R. A. Clark, NRC.

Subject:

Transmittal of Actual Examples of Licensees' Responses to NRC EEQ SER Which Provide Adequate Rationale as a Basis for Justification of Interim Operation FRC, 5-Feb-82 D-2

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461 sabling the backup equipment, (2) any major differences in the characteristics of the primary and backup equipment (unless it is obvious that the equipment is essentially identical), (3) the possibility of electrical failure of the primary equipment causing an adverse effect on other safety-related equipment or power supplies, and (4) in the case of display instrumentation, the possibility of an operator being misled by the failed primary equipment. Where equipment has not been demonstrated to be qualified, some justifications discuss administrative procedures or revised operating procedures in effect. Depending upon the specific equipment involved, each of the above considerations need not be discussed in every instance, but, in general, a complete systems discussion would consider the above points.

Where equipment qualification eva.luations were used, licensees ~enerally (1) received additional information from manufacturers, (2) applied engineer-ing judgment, (3) performed material analysis, and/or (4) used partial test data in support of the original qualification documentation. Where these

~luations were performed, the licensees determined that, although full

~lification was not documented, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that the equipment would perform its intended safety function, thereby j~stifying interim operation until qualified equipment is installed.

Some 1 icensees provided detailed failure-modes-and-effects analyses of **

electrical circuitry to demonstrate that, under all identified failure modes, the safety function of the equipment could still be accomplished.

Other justifications involved a combination of qualification information and systems information. For example, if a licensee has qualification information (such as a generic test report or other partial qualification documentation) that tends to confirm the ability of the equipment to remain operable for a specified period of time, justification for interim operation often was based upon a discussion of the required safety function* being performed prior to the potential failure. This type of discussion often applies to equipment which performs a short-term trip or isolation function in the early stages of an accident.

D-3

~nklin Research Center A DMsion of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461

3. PLANT-SPECIFIC REVIEW As a result of the review, this plant was evaluated and the results documented on the_"Summary of Review of Licensee's 90-Day Response" form reproduced below:

"EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION (EEQ)

Review of Licensees' Resolution of Outstanding Issues From NRC Equipment Environmental Qualification Safety Evaluation Reports

SUMMARY

OF REVIEW OF LICENSEE 90-DAY RESPONSE Utility: Commonwealth Edison Company Plant Name:_ Dresden Station Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-237 NRC TAC No. 42519 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 FRC Assignment No. 13 FRC Task No. 461

References:

a. Commonweal-th Edison Company Response to NRC Safety Evaluation Report on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment, Attachments A, B, and C September 1981

b. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Safety Evaluation Report for Dresden Station Unit 2 Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment NRC, 10-Jun-81 D-4

~nklin Research Center A Division of The F ronklln Institute

TER-C525 7-461 The Licensee has submitted technical information in Reference a in

~

response to the NRC SER [b] on environmental qualification. FRC has reviewed these documents [a, b]. As a result of this review, FRC concludes that the Licensee has stated that the equipment items are environmentally qualified; or has provided a technically sound rationale as a basis for justification for continued plant operation; or has provided a technically sound rationale or other additional information which in FRC's judgment provides a basis for justification for continued operation; with the following exceptions:

Equipment Equipment Description/ SCEW Sheet Basis for Item Function No. Status Code Deficiency TE-2-1290A Temperature switches 2 Note 1 through H located in the RWCU room.

These switches are for leak detection The Licensee's submittal addressed the deficiencies identified in the however, the Licensee provided justification for interim operation which was brief and in general was not technically sound. In many cases, it was necessary for FRC to extrapolate the Licensee's justification and to augment the information with FRC's understanding of system and component functions in order to conclude that adequate rationale existed.

D-5

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461 JUSTIFICATION FOR INTERIM OPERATION (JIO) STATUS CODE:

1. No justification for interim operation provided.

2. Justification for interim operation submitted but technically deficient.

3. Justification for interim operation submitted and requires further evaluation:

a. Systems response

b. Non-systems response.

4. Licensee states the item is or should be exempted from qualification:

a. Basis for exemption technically deficient, both as an exemption request and as a justification for interim operation.

b. Basis for exemption requires further evaluation as a justification for interim operation:

(1) System response (2) Non-systems response.

Basis for deficiency is provided in Note 1.

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Fronldln Institute D-6

- --- - -----------*-~..---

WI

TER-C525 7-461 E 1 The Licensee stated:

'These kinds of components, which are of relatively simple construction, are typically designed for and utilized in industrial applications where the operating temperature range requirement is well in excess of the 200°F postulated for Dresden Unit 2 post-accident condition~.*

FRC EVALUATION FRC concludes that the Licensee's statement is not fully cor~ect.

Although most devices of tqis type are designed for trip operation at ambient temperatures consistent with the DBE conditions," the fact remains that the Licensee has not specified the manufacturer and model number, and no evidence was provided to demonstrate that the devices have been tested and operated successfully under all HE4B steam conditions. The Licensee has not established.

that the device will work and has not assessed the consequences if they do not

k. II D-7

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461 APPENDIX E - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This appendix contains the Request for Additional Information (RA.I) that was developed during the cours~ of the review and issued to the NRC for forwarding to the Licensee. The RAI was revised throughout the review to reflect the Licensee's response(s) to the initial RAI.

The reader is cautioned that the numbers in brackets refer to citations found in the list of references at the end of this appendix and not to the citations listed in Section 6, References, of the TER *

~nklin Research Center E-1 A Division of The Franklin lnsUtute

TER-C525 7-461 APPENDIX E REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION (EEQ)

REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (SER) AND TMI ACTION PLAN INSTALLED EQUIPMENT Commonwealth Edison Company Dresden Station Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-237 November 10, 1981 Rev. 1, May 20, 1982 NRC TAC No. 42519

~nklin Research Center E-2 A Division of The Franklin Institute

y TER-C525 7-461

BACKGROUND Franklin Research Center (FRC) of Philadelphia, Pa. is providing assis-tance to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) review of operating reactors. FRC will perform an EEQ review of. the Licensee's 90-day response to outstanding issues from the NRC Equipment Environmental Qualification Safety Evaluation Report (SER) and the installed TMI Action Plan equipment. The review will be limited to safety-related equipment potentially exposed to a harsh environment. The results will be presented in the form of a technical evaluation report for each plant.

This request for additional information (RAI) is the result of an evaluation of the information provided by letters dated September 1981 [l] and February 2, 1981 [2].* FRC previously requested TMI Action Plan information by a telephone memorandum dated October l; 1981 [3].

On May 3, 1982, FRC received a letter dated April 29, 1982 [6]. This etter contained Commonwealth Edison's response to the RAI for the TMI Action (l)**

Plan equipment. The package included the following:

1. Environmental qualification/status information on TMI modifications

2. Cross-reference of NUREG-0737 item number to modification number and title for those modifications that were performed .

3. Preliminary system component evaluation worksheets.

4. Dresden Station Radiation Study [7].(l)

FRC notes that the SCEW sheets are preliminary and that no qualification documents have been submitted. In Reference 6, the Licensee stated:

Numbers in brackets refer to citations found in the list of references.

- Throughout the text, superscript numbers in parentheses indicate the revision in which the underlined material preceding the superscript was added.

E-3

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461 "The attachment to this letter provides an interim response to your re uest. Please note that we have included a res onse for some NUREG 0737 items in addition to those requested in Reference a

We believe that the environmental qualification of these items must also be addressed in order to provide a complete accounting of the environmental qualification for TM! Action Plan equipment. *However, we consider non-safety related equipment to fall outside the scope of the Franklin Research Center review and have so indicated.

Because the equipment identified in the attachment has not pre~iously been reviewed under our IE Bulletin 79-0lB program, a review has now been initiated. The quantity of data requested to be compiled on worksheets for this e ui ment is rather extensive. Therefore we do not ex ect to be in a position to submit completed data sheets Part III of the attachment) until July 1, 1982.

If, as a result of our review, equipment is identified which does not meet the required qualifications, appropriate action will be taken such as qualification testing, shielding, relocation or replacement. In the interim, documentation of existing qualification of TMI Action Plan e ui ment can be made available for NRC review at our Dresden and ad Cities Stations."

A. FRC REVIEW OF INSTALLED TMI ACTION PLAN ITEMS INFORMATION REQUESTED DATE RECEIVED BY FRC***

1. Reference 2 does not provide adequate detail with respect to identification of TMI Action Plan equipment installed as of 1/1/81. -

a. Identification of all TMI Action Plan May 3, 1982 [6J(l) equipment installed as of 1/1/81 is requested.

b. Identification of TMI Action Plan May '3, 1982 [6]{1) equipment installed with implementation dates after 1/1/81 is requested.

c. The correlation of these equipment items May 3, 1982 [6J(l) with the specific sections of NUREG-0737

[SJ presented below (as applicable) is requested.

- - This column will be completed by FRC as the requested information is received.

E-4

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Fronklln Institute

TER-C5 25 7-4 61 DATE RECEIVED BY FRC***

For BWRs, Sections:

I IE4. 2, I ID3 , I IB3 , I IE4. 1, I IK3

13 ,

I IK3

15 , I IK3

19 , I IK3

21 , I IK3 *2 7 *

[The correlation is needed to ensure that all items ar~ included in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is identified as a TMI Action Plan item, are the cable and terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?]

d. *For all installed TMI Action Plan May 3, 1982 [6]

- equipment identified, a System Component (Preliminary SCEWS)(l)

Evaluation Worksheet (SCEW) (in accordance with 79-0lB format) is requested.

e. 'nle approximate installation date for the TMI May 3, 1982 [6](1)

Action Plan equipment items is requested so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation.

2. The qualification documents, e.g., the actual test reports and associated correspondence cited as evidence of qualification listed on the SCEW sheets, for all identified TMI Action Plan equipment are requested. [The identification of those reports considered to be proprietary is requested so that proper control of documents can be maintained.]

. 3. Where the Licensee has a standard Owners' May 3, 1982 [6](1)

Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area or has requested extensions of implementation dates, this information is requested in order to incorporate it into the review *.

E-5

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461 B. INSTRUCTIONS FOR TRANSMITTING INFORMATION REQUESTED

1. The schedule for completion of the FRC assignment requires that the Licensee provide the requested information within 3 weeks of the date of the RAI.

2. The Licensee' may transmit the requested information as follows:

o cowplete package directfy to the NRC project manager or o copy of cover letter to NRC project manager and complete package to FRC *

~nklin Research Center E-6 A Division of The Franklin Institute

TER-C525 7-461 REFERENCES

1. Commonwealth Edison Company Response to NRC Safety Evaluation Report on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment, Att~chments A, B, and C September 1981

2. J. S. Abel Letter to J. G. Keppler, NRC..

Subject:

Response to IE .Bulletin 79-0lB, Supplement No. 3, "Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment" Commonwealth Edison Company, 02-Feb-81

3. Telephone Memorandum from FRC to N. Smith 01-0ct-81

4. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Safety Evaluation Report for Dresden Station Unit 2 Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment NRC, 10-Jun-81 .

5. NUREG-0737, "Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements" NRC, November 1980

6. E. D. Swartz Letter to D. G. Eisenhut, NRC.

Subject:

Dresden Station Units 2 and 3, Quad Cities Station Units 1 & 2 Environmental alification of TMI Action Plan E ui ment Commonwealth Edison, 29-Apr-82

7. Report: Post LOCA/HELB Radiation Exposure Levels Received by ESF System Components Bechtel Power Corp., 18-Jul-80°<1)

~nklin Research Center E-7 A Division of The Franklin Institute

y.

TER-C525 7-461 APPENDIX F - EQUIPMENT NOT IN SCOPE OF THE REVIEW In the Licensee's 90-day response to the NRC SER [29], certain items were considered out of the scope of the review because they are located in a mild environment with respect to both normal and accident operating conditions.

Appendix F contains ~11 such items and a Licensee ~xplanation of the specific conditions.

The following items, which are located in the southeast or southwest corner rooms, were deleted from the review because they are exposed only to mild environments. The Licensee stated:

"These components are located in a mild temperature and nonharsh radiation environment. The post-accident room temperature will not exceed 114F based on room temperature measurements. Qualification for radiation is not required. Qualification for aging is 'llot justified because the equipment is located in an area of the plant where the temperature is controlled to. less than 103F during normal operation."

EQUIPMENT ITE~ NO. 6C MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE SW CORNER ROOM LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB-0 (WITH PEERLESS DC MOTOR)

ACTUATES HPCI PUMP SUCTION VALVE (M0-2-2301~36)

LICENSEE REFERENCE NOT CITED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 12 DAYS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.2.13 LICENSEE. SUBMITTAL PAGE B23 [29]; SCEW 350, 351 [2]

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6D (PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED IN ITEM 6C)

MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATORS LOCATED IN THE SE AND SW CORNER ROOMS LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB, SIZE AND MOTOR INFORMATION NOT STATED ACTUATES CCSW FLOW CONTROL VALVES (M0-2-1501-3A, B)

FINAL LICENSEE REFERENCE 3.10 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: CONTINUOUS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.2.14 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B24 (29]; SCEW 297, 299 [2]

F-1

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin lnsUtute

TER-C5257-461 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 PRESSURE SWITCHES LOCATED IN THE HCPI ROOM AND THE SW CORNER ROOM MERCOID MODEL DA7043-804 HPCI TURBINE EXHAUST PRESSURE SWITCH (PS-2-2368A, B)

LICENSEE REFERENCE NOT CITED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 12 DAYS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.1.1 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B52 [29]; SCEW 362, 364 [2]

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 34 PRESSURE SWITCHES LOCATED IN THE HCPI ROOM AND THE SW CORNER ROOM MERCOID MODEL DAW443132R26E HPCI PUMP SUCTION PRESSURE SWITCH (PS-2-2360)

LICENSEE REFERENCE NOT CITED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 12 DAYS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.1.1 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B53 [29]; SCEW 358, 359 [2]

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 38C FLOW SWITCH LOCATED IN THE SW CORNER ROOM BARTON MODEL 289

- MONITORS HPCI PUMP DISCHARGE FLOW (PS-2-2354)

LICENSEE REFERENCE 3.13 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 12 DAYS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.1.9 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B58 [29]; SCEW 360, 361 [2]

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 49-2 PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS LOCATED IN THE SE AND SW CORNER ROOMS GENERAL ELECTRIC TYPE 551 CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE (PT-2-2359)

LICENSEE REFERENCE 3.5 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 12 DAYS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.1.2 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B69 [29]; SCEW 354, 355 [2]

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 50 PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS LOCATED IN THE SE AND SW CORNER ROOMS AND THE HCPI ROOM GENERAL ELECTRIC TYPE 551 HPCI PRESSURE (PT-2-2382)

LICENSEE REFERENCE 3.5 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 12 DAYS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.1.2 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B70 (29]; SCEW 356, 357 [2]

F-2

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin lnsUtute

TER-C5257-461 IPMENT ITEM NO. 52-3 LOW TRANSMITTERS LOCATED IN THE SE AND SW CORNER ROOMS GENERAL ELECTRIC TYPE 553 HPCI FLOW (FT-2-2358)

LICENSEE REFERENCE NOT CITED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 12 DAYS REFERENCE 26, SECTION 4.5.1.5 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B75 [29]; SCEW 352, 353 [2]

Equipment Item No. 64 was deleted by the Licensee because it is a subcomponent of another equipment item (MCC-28-2), which was incl~ded in the Licensee's Equipment Item No. 60A:

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 64 SILICON-CONTROLLED RECTIFIER LOCATED IN THE TURBINE BUILDING FOXBORO, MODEL NOT STATED STANDBY GAS TREATMENT TRAIN A HEATER CONTROLLER FOR AIR HEATER (SCR-2/3-7541-36A, B)

LICENSEE REFERENCE NOT CITED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED FERENCE 26, SECTION 4.4.6 ENSEE SUBMITTAL PAGE B82 [29]; SCEW 346, 347 [25]

F-3

~nklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin Institute

ML17194B417

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Description:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY