ML17193A077

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards State of Il Second Amended Contentions Re Spent Fuel Pool Mod.Contentions 2-9 Will Be Subj of Litigation Beginning 801119.Submits Schedule for Preparation of Testimony
ML17193A077
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  
Issue date: 09/04/1980
From: Goddard R
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Oconnor P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17193A076 List:
References
NUDOCS 8010020029
Download: ML17193A077 (2)


Text

e UNITED STATES e

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 September 4, 1980 ENCLOSURE 2 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Paul O'Connor, Project Manager, Dresden 2/3 SFP FROM:

Richard J. Goddard, Attorney Office of the Executive Legal Director

SUBJECT:

PREPARATION OF TESTIMONY

1.

Enclosed are copies of the State of Illinois' (Intervenor) Second Amended Contentions in the Dresden Spent Fuel Pool Modification Pro-ceeding.

While the Board has not yet determined which contentions will be admissible, and will probably promulgate additional questions to be answered by Staff on their own initiative, I. consider it 1 ikely.

at this time that Contentions 2-9 set forth therein.will be the sub-ject of litigation in the evidentiary hearing scheduled.to begin on November 19, 1980.

Accordingly, I would like to begin at this time to proceed toward identifying the appropriate reviev1ers on each of these contentions; and the preparation of testi~ony for presentation at the hearing.

Until I rec~tve the order of the Licensing Board following the Special Prehearing Conference~ which rules on the ad-missibility of each of the contentions, I am not concerned with assign-ment of a reviewer for Contentions 1 and 10 or the preparati6n of testi-mony which would address those contentions.

2. *Due to the relatively short time period preceding this hearing, I pro-pose that we adhere.to the following schedule:

September 15 - The ~eviewers who will prepare the testimony addressing Contentions 2-9 should be identi-fied to me.

September 22 - I would like to arrange a meeting with you and each of the reviewers who have been identified.

By this time, each of the reviewers should have a position with regard to the contentions and any problems 1vhich they foresee should be pre-sented to you prior to this meeting.

October 6 October 14

- An outline of each revieh*er's testimony should be available to you and m~ for our review.

- Draft testimony (draft means in detail appro-priate for presentatiori at an evidentiary hearing, subject to our editing or modifi-cations) should be made available t6 you and to me.

8010020 \\

1.. -*

.. l-*

1'*

1*

l'.*

t:

);:

I' t:,..

.. I J*:

j:.

i::

.. October 28

- All testimony should be in final form on this date withbut exception in order that it may be delivered to reproduction for the appro-priate number of copies to be reproduced in time for our filing deadline.

November 4 All testimony is due to be served on this date.

Because two of the three Licensing Board members do not live in the Bethesda area, I would like to be able to serve our testimony by mail before this dat~.

November 19

  • The hearing is scheduled to begin in the Chicago or Morris, Illinois area.
3.

If the schedule set forth herein is not acceptable to you, or if any modifications thereof are in order, please let m~ know.at your earliest convenience.

4.

My co-counsel in this proceeding v1ill be Charles Barth (27455).

Enclosure:

As stated D. Crutchfield ~

\\.L 01 mstead cc:

C. Barth g. '.*..:.../-. *. "--

~-s~--<---(.:

/.'

Richard J. Goddard, Attorney Office of th~ Executive Legal Director