ML17192A691

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proposed Amend to App A,Tech Specs, Incorporating Organizational Changes.Fee Encl
ML17192A691
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/1980
From: Janacek R
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17192A692 List:
References
NRC, NUDOCS 8005200283
Download: ML17192A691 (2)


Text

..

.. es Commonwea.dlson.

.. *... /.... *..

. One First National. Pplaza.

0 ch 11 i_cago 8

. lllin 7

o 6

i 7

s

. Address Reply to:

ost ice ox Chicago. Illinois 60690 i0052oo 2~~--

p May 13, 1980

Director ~f *N~clear Re~ctor ~egulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatbry Com~ission Washington, DC 20555 * *

Subject:

  • De a r. Si r :.
  • Dresden Station Units 1, 2, and :3" Quad Citie~ Station Units l ~nd 2 Proposed ~fuendments to Technical S~ecifications to Incorporate Organizational Changes NRC Dotket Nos.

50~10/237/249 and.50-254/265 P~rsur~nt to lb CFR 50.59~ Com~onwealth Edisrin Co. proposes tci amend Appendix A, -Technical *Spetifications, to Operating Licens~s OPR-2, DPR-19, DPR-25 for Dresden Units li 2t ~nd 3 and DPR-2~ and DPR~30 for Quad Cities Units l *and 2, respectively.

These amendments incorporate recent corporate and station organizational changes.

The major change* is the elimination* o,f the two figures which illustrate the corporate and station organizations.. These

. organization charts already exist and wi'll remain in the Commonweal th Edison Topical* Re po rt No. CE-1-A,. "Commonweal th Edi son Company Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear.Generating Stations."

Revisions to this topical report also require review and approval by the N~clear Regulatory Commission~ Eliminating the duplication Df information in the Technical Specifications and the Quality.

Assurance Manual (CE-1-A) will avoid errors, simplfy the review process, and eliminate future iicerise amendments if organizaiional chariges bccuri Since these ch~nges are administrative.in nat~re only,.-they present no unreviewed safety question.*

  • The.:proposed amendments are enclosed in At tachnients 1, 2, 3, : 4 '* and 5 f o r D re s de n l, 2 and 3 and
  • Q u a: d Ci ti e s. l a n d 2,

respectively.

These proposed aniendfuents have received on~Site and Off-Site review and approval.

Pursuant to. 10 CFH

  • 170, *Commonwealth Edison Co.-, has reviewed the proposed changes and determin.ed them to be* two Clas*s II.

and three.Class I Amendments.

As such, a fee remittance in the amount of $3, 600. 00 has been provided.

~,-n\\

i n

. ~~1~"'"'

..,>\\~

.. rO

. ~~~-

~*. *~~*,1:-~:.

  • Commonvi/ealth Edison -

Ditectbr of N~clear Reactor Regulaiion May 1. 3, -19 8 0 -

Page 2 Please address -any questions you may have -c_once!fiing this

~atter t6 this office.

T~re~ (3) signed original~ andfifty-s~ven (57) c~pies of this transmittal are provided for you+/- use.

SUBSCRI~Ed and SWORN to be f o re me _ } hi s /~ --;/ d a y ao*

0 f

_ _,...-:_. I

_J 19

-~~/*<2,/-'~~~-~---~--

3491A V~iy truly yours, f'.r io~

R; F~IJanecek*

Nuclear Licensing Administratoi

.Boiling-Water Reactors *