ML17191A937

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/98-23 & 50-249/98-23 on 980831- 0923 & Notice of Violation Re Failure to Specify Appropriate Containment Cooling Svc Water Pump Flow for Inservice Testing
ML17191A937
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/21/1998
From: Jeffrey Jacobson
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Kingsley O
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML17191A939 List:
References
50-237-98-23, 50-249-98-23, NUDOCS 9810270191
Download: ML17191A937 (3)


See also: IR 05000237/1998023

Text

,'! ...

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley

President, Nuclear Generation Group

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Regulatory Services

Executive Towers West Ill

1400 Opus Place, Suite 500

Downers Grove, IL 60515

O:;tober 21, 1998

SUBJECT:

NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-237/98023(DRS) & 50-249/98023(DRS),

NOTICE OF VIOLATION, AND EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION

Dear Mr. Kingsley:

On September 23, 1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your Dresden facility. The focus

of this inspection was to review the engineering and technical support provided to the station. In

addition, an assessment of the effectiveness of controls for identifying, resolving, and preventing

problems was performed. The endosed report presents the results of that inspection.

Overall, the NRC concluded that the engineering and technical support provided by the

engineering organization remained acceptable and had improved. Only minor deficiencies were

identified regarding the modifications, calculations, and 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluations

reviewed. In addition, engineering department self-assessments were effective. The threshold

for the identification of problems was low; identified problems were elevated to ~e proper levels

of management for resolution; operability issues were addressed; and corrective actions were

adequate, timely, and properly prioritized.

However, the NRC identified three examples in which the temporary alteration program was not

adequately implemented. In one case, two temporary alterations were installed without utilizing

the temporary alteration process. In a second case, a number of temporary alterations were not

reviewed for extended installation. In a third case, required quarterly walkdowns of installed

temporary alterations were not performed.

The NRC also reviewed various aspects of the inservice testing program during this inspection.

Following that review, the NRC identified two examples of a violation of technical specifications

regarding the implementation of this program. In the first example, a procedure failed to specify

appropriate containment cooling service water pump flow for inservice testing: In a second

example, test acceptance criteria in a procedure used to demonstrate that check valves were

sufficiently leak tight was not adequate.

Regarding your controls in identifying, resolving, and preventing problems, the NRC concluded

that problem identification was at an appropriate low threshold, root cause evaluations were

thorough, and effective corrective actions were implemented for identified problems. In addition,

9810270191 991021

POR

ADOCK 05000237

Ci

PDR

--

~ *-****-*-*

~ -*--**---;.**-**- .. _. __

---~--*

'*---- ----** .

.,_ .. -........ ***--

0. Kingsley

2

the conduct of safety review committee meetings and the review of operating experience

information was effective, and the nuclear oversight organization was effectively identifying and

eorrecting problems.

As discussed above, the NRC has determined that violations of NRC requirements occurred.

These violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice) and the circumstances

surrounding them are described in detail in the subject inspection report. The violation

regarding the temporary alteration program is of concern because adequate implementation of

this program is important to ensure that changes to the plant are properly evaluated prior to

installation and periodically reviewed following installation. The violation concerning the

inservice testing program is also of concern since proper implementation of this program is

required to ensure that equipment which is important to safety is operating properly.

The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violations associated with

implementation of the temporary alteration program and the inservice testing program, and the

corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violations and prevent recurrence, is already

adequately addressed in this inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to respond to

this letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or

your position. In that case, or if you choose to provide additional information, you should follow

the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice.

In addition, during this inspection, the team reviewed a number of violations which were self-

identified. These violations will not be subject to enforcement action because your efforts meet

the criteria specified in Section Vll.B.1 of the *General Statement of Policy and Procedures for

NRC Enforcement Actions,* (Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2. 790 of the NRC's *Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249

License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

Sincerely,

Original I sf J. M. Jacobson

John M. Jacobson, Chief

Lead Engineers Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

2. Inspection Report 50-237/98023(DRS);

50-249/98023(DRS)

See Attached Distribution

DOCUMENT NAME: G:DRS\\DRE98023.DRS

To rec-a

DATE

0. Kingsley

3

cc w/encls:

D. Helwig, Senior Vice President

G. Stanley, PWR Vice President

C. Crane, BWR Vice President

Distribution:

R. Krich, Regulatory Services Manager

D. Greene, Licensing Director

DCD - Licensing

M. Heffley, Site Vice President

P. Swafford, Station Manager

F. Spangenberg, Regulatory Assurance

Manager

Richard Hubbard

M. Aguilar, Assistant Attorney General

State Liaison Officer

Chainnan, Illinois Commerce

Commission

SAR(E-Mail)

RPC (E-Mail)

.

Project Mgr., NRR w/encl

J. Caldwell, Riii w/encl

C. Pederson, Riii w/encl

B. Clayton, Riii w/encl

SRI Dresden w/encl

DRP w/encl

TSS w/encl

DRS (2) w/encl

Riii PRR w/encl

PUBLIC IE-01 w/encl

Docket File w/encl

GREENS

IEO (E-Mail)

DOCDESK (E-Mail)

r-.... : ... . ., .-.

~ . -

.

. . . .

. . ~ . .

. "-' \\ ~