ML17188A010
| ML17188A010 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/1998 |
| From: | Beach A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Heffley J COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17188A011 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-237-97-01, 50-237-97-1, 50-249-97-01, 50-249-97-1, NUDOCS 9801130212 | |
| Download: ML17188A010 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000237/1997001
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION Ill
Mr. J. M. Heffley
Site Vice President
Dresden Station
Commonwealth Edison Company
6500 North Dresden Road
Morris, IL 60450
Dear Mr. Heffley:
801 WARRENVILLE ROAD
LISLE. IWNOIS 60532-4351
January 2, 1998
Enclosed for your review is the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) 15
Report for the Dresden Nuclear Plant, covering the period December 29, 1996, through
November 22, 1997. This report will be discussed with you at a public meeting to be held at
Dresden on January 16, 1998, at 1 :00 p.m.
During this meeting you are encouraged to candidly discuss any comments you may have
regarding our report.
In accordance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) policy, I have reviewed the
recommendations resulting from the SALP Board assessment and concur with their ratings. The
functional areas of operations, maintenance and plant support were rated as Category 2. The
area of engineering was rated as Category 3. It is my view that conduct of nuclear activities in
connection with the Dresden facility was improved from the previous assessment period.
At the SALP meeting you should be prepared to discuss our assessments and your plans to
improve performance in the area of engineering. Additionally, you are requested to respond in
writing, within 30 days after the meeting, specifically addressing corrective actions planned to
improve performance in engineering.
Good performance in the conduct of plant operations and strong management support of a
conservative operating philosophy were evident throughout this assessment period. We noted
that substantial improvement was made in the material condition of the plant. This was
significant because during past rating periods operators were frequently challenged by equipment
problems that unexpectedly affected plant performance. The improved material condition
resulted in longer periods of plant operation with fewer challenges to the operators. The area of
material condition remains an area deserving close attention, however, because equipment
problems still sometimes challenged operators during this period. Improvements made in the
work control processes increased the station's ability to get work done and should aid in further
plant improvement efforts.
Another function that contributed to performance improvement was departmental
self-assessment activities and the assessments performed by the Quality and Safety Assurance
organization. Personnel performing these activities asked probing questions and identified
substantive issues that resulted in effective improvement initiatives. The Dresden engineering
\\
assessment group, engineering audits, and assessments in operations were notable examples of
\\
effective self-assessment activities. Overall, self-assessment appears to be a developing
7 1 0
strength in all performance areas.
< t,, 'l _ ~
.//
I llllll 111111111111111111111111111111111
I
I
2
C
5
F
J. Heffley
-2-
Although performance in the area of engineering continued to improve, sustained improvement
remains to be demonstrated. When engineering efforts were focused on a specific issue such as
the torus suction strainer replacement or the containment pressurization issue, the results were
very good. However, engineering is faced with continuing challenges including consistently
providing timely engineering products of good quality, and improving the record of the plant
design basis.
One other aspect of performance you have worked to address was personnel performance on
the individual level. Many problems encountered in this assessment period involved errors
committed by individuals. Continued management attention is needed to reduce these errors.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter, the SALP report, and your response will be placed in
the NRC's Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning the SALP Report, we would be pleased to discuss
them with you.
Docket No. 50-237
Docket No. 50-249
Enclosure: SALP 15 Report
Sincerely,
/s/ A. Bill Beach
A. Bill Beach
Regional Administrator
No. 50-237/97001; 50-249/97001
See Attached Distribution
See Previous Concurrence
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SALP\\DRE97001.SLP
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without
attachment/enclosure
"E" = Co
with attachment/enclosure
"N" = No co
OFFICE
Riii
Riii
Riii
Riii
Riii
NAME
RLerch:nh
MRin
RCa ra
JJacobson
GGrant
DATE
01 / /98
01 / /98
01/ /98
01 / /98
01 / /98
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
A
01 / l-/98
- .
J. Heffley
-2-
Although performance in the area of engineering continued to improve, sustained improvement
remains to be demonstrated. When engineering efforts were focused on a specific issue such as
the torus suction strainer replacement or the containment pressurization issue, the results were
very good. However, engineering is faced with continuing challenges including consistently
providing timely engineering products of good quality, and improving the record of the plant
design basis.
One other aspect of performance you have worked to address was personnel performance on
the individual level. Many problems encountered in this assessment period involved errors
committed by individuals. Continued management attention is needed to reduce these errors.
In accordance with Section 2. 790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice, n Part 2, Title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter, the SALP report, and your response will be placed in
the NRC's Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning the SALP Report, we would be pleased to discuss
them with you.
Sincerely,
/s/ A. Bill Beach
A. Bill Beach
Regional Administrator
Docket No. 50-237
Docket No. 50-249
Enclosure: SALP 15 Report
cc w/encl:
No. 50-237/97001; 50-249/97001
0. Kingsley, Nuclear Generation Group
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
M. Wallace, Senior Vice
President, Corporate Services
J. S. Perry, Vice President1BWR Operations
Liaison Officer, NOC-BOD
D. A. Sager, Vice President,
Generation Support
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory
Services Manager
I. Johnson, Licensing Operations Manager
Document Control Desk-Licensing
T. Nauman, Station Manager Unit 1
See Attached Continued Distribution
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SALP\\DRE97001.SLP
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without
attachment/enclosure
"E" = Co
with attachment/enclosure
"N" = No co
OFFICE
Riii
Riii
NAME
Rlerch:nh
A Beach
DATE
12/31 /97
12/ /97
J. Heffley
-3-
cc w/encl:
0. Kingsley, Nuclear Generation Group
Distribution
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
M. Wallace, Senior Vice
President, Corporate Services
J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations
Liaison Officer, NOC-BOD
D. A. Sager, Vice President,
Generation Support
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory
Services Manager
I. Johnson, Licensing Operations Manager
Document Control Desk-Licensing
T. Nauman, Station Manager Unit 1
F. Spangenberg, Regulatory Assurance
Manager
Richard Hubbard
Nathan Schloss, Economist
Office of the Attorney General
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
Chairman Jackson
Commissioner Dicus
Commissioner Diaz
Commissioner McGaffigan
L. Callan, EDO
J. Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcemer.it
R. Zimmerman, Associate Director for Projects, NRR
B. Sheron, Acting Associate Director for Technical Review, NRR
E. Adensam, Acting Director, Division of Reactor Projects Ill/IV, NRR
SALP Program Manager, NRR (2 copies)
DRP Division Directors RI, Rll, RIV
J. Caldwell, Riii
R. Capra, NRR
J. Stang, NRR
TSS, Riii
Docket File
PUBLIC IE-40
SRI Dresden
CAA 1 (E-Mail)
Riii PRR
Riii Enf. Coordinator
DRS (2)
DOCDESK (E-Mail)