ML17187A774

Discusses 961219 Meeting at Plant Training Ctr in Morris,Il to Discuss Progress in Completing Actions Outlined in CAL RIII-96-16.Meeting Viewgraphs Encl

ML17187A774
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	02/10/1997
From:	Hiland P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Jamila Perry COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
CAL-RIII-96-16, NUDOCS 9702180039
Download: ML17187A774 (36)

Text

• '*

Mr. J. S. Perry Site Vice President Dresden Station Commonwealth Edison Company 6500 North Dresden Road Morris, IL 60450 February 10, 1997

SUBJECT:

DRESDEN CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER (CAL) MEETING

Dear Mr. Perry:

This refers to the meeting conducted at the Dresden Station Training Center in Morris, Illinois on December 19, 1996. This meeting was to discuss your progress in completing actions outlined in the Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) No. Rlll-96-016. Topics discussed included your progress in completing the actions outlined in the CAL and other improvement initiatives.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

We appreciated your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this meeting, please contact me at 630/829-9603.

Docket Nos: 50-237; 50-249 License Nos: DPR-19; DPR-25

Enclosures:

1. Attendance List

2. Licensee Presentation Sincerely,

/s/ P. L. Hiland Patrick L. Hiland, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 1 DOCUMENT NAME: A:\\MMINDEC.WPD l \\

To receive a copy of this 'document, indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFACE Riii A/

NAME Roth/co ~~k~

DATE 2//1//97

.9702180039 970210 PDR ADOCK 05000237 P

PDR Riii IY I

I Hiland PJ..l~ -

2/ltl/91 OFACIAL RECORD COPY

1'.'.'-

J. S. Perry cc w/encl:

Distribution:, T. J. Maiman, Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations Division D. A. Sager, Vice President, Generation Support H. W. Keiser, Chief Nuclear Operating Officer T. Nauman, Station Manager Unit 1 M. Heffley, Station Manager Units 2 and 3 F. Spangenberg, Regulatory Assurance Manager I. Johnson, Acting Nuclear Regulatory Services Manager Richard Hubbard Nathan Schloss, Economist Office of the Attorney General State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Document Control Desk-Licensing Docket File w/encl PUBLIC IE-01 w/encl OC/LFDCB w/encl SRI LaSalle, Dresden, Quad Cities w/encl RAC 1 (E-Mail)

Project Manager, NRR w/encl DRP w/encl Riii PRR w/encl CAA 1 w/encl (E-Mail)

A. B. Beach, w/encl H. B. Clayton, w/encl W. L. Axelson, w/encl

Attendance List S. Perry, BWR Vice President, Dresden R. Freeman, Engineering Manager F. Spangenberg, Regulatory Assurance Manager D. Winchester, Site Quality Verification Director T. O'Conner, Operations Manager E. Connell, Design Engineering Supervisor R. Capra, Director, Project Directorate 111-2, NRR G. Grant Director, Division of Reactor Safety, Riii B. Clayton Director, Office of Enforcement, Riii W. Kropp, Chief, Engineering Specialists 1, DRS, Riii R. Gardner, Chief, Engineering Specialists 2, DRS, Riii P. Hiland, Chief, Branch 1, Division of Reactor Projects, Riii C. Vanderneit, Senior Resident Inspector, Dresden, Riii J. Hansen, Resident Inspector, Dresden, Riii

. /

ComEd DRESDEN STATION ENCLOSURE 2 Dresden Station Presentation To NRC I

on Status of CAL Action Items

• Dece1nbe*r* 19, 1996 u

• <

ComEd Agenda DRESDEN STATION 9 1) Status of CAL Action Iten1s

2) Audit Results

• 3) Engineering Assurance Group

4) Closing Re1narks Russell Free1nan Engineering Manager Dennis Winchester Site Quality Verification Director f'

Ken Frehaf er Engineering Assurance

'Group Lead Russell. Freen1an Engineering Manager

ComEd DRESDEN STATION Engineering:

R. D. Free1nan Site Eng.ineering Manager

ComEd CA.L Actions DRESDEN STATION

'4 J

I

\\I:

I (I)

Establish Engineering Assurance Group (EAG)

• Status - Completed (2)

Revise the Nuclear Engineering Procedures to Provide Direction When a Design Basis Discrepancy is Ide.ntified

.'.)

ComEd DRESDEN STATION Engineering* Department Organizational Chart Sita Engineering Manager R. Free m an Engineering Assurance Group Engineering Mgr Asst I

Plan I Engineering Supt J.Williams I

System Engineering Component Engineering Performance Monitoring System P Ian t Nuclear Engineering Maintenance Rule Im plem en1ation K. Frehafer C.Beck H. Campbell

• J. Basak I

Design Engineering Supl E. Connell, Ill I

Design Changes Design Change Field Engineering Design Change Tesling Temporary Alterations

• S e tp o Int C h an g e s Drawings Rigg in g Shielding Engineering Data Base Design Bases

• Engineering Analyses Special Projects P. Planing I

Engineering Programs Supv (TB D)

I Flow Accelerated Corrosion ln*Service Inspection in-Vessel Visual Inspection Performance Centered Maintenance Testing Oil Vibration Thermography Post Maintenance Surveillance Program ER Backlog Reduction FSAR Review VET IP K. Mertes C. Tomashek R. Throne I

Engineering Administration K. Peterman

• Scheduling

• Budget I

Resource Tracking

• E':1siness Planning

• Engineering Data Steward

• Training Procedures

• Configuration M anagem en!

Modification Administration

• Quality Engineering

• Engineering Clerical Sup port

.<0-..

-:: ~

ComEd CAL Actions (continued)

DRESDEN STATION j,-

I 1'

• Configuration Discrepancies:

- A Flow Chart has been Produced Outlining the General Approach to Re?olution of Design Basis Discrepancies

- Draft NEP Proc~dure to be Produced by December 20, 1996

- NEP to be Approved by January 21,: 1997 c

~

.?

~--

/

.-~\\

ComEd

CAL Actions (continued)

DRESDEN STATION 9 CONFIGURATION DISCREPANCIES Discrepancy is Between UFSAR and Plant

+

Was the Plant Properly Modified with a Previous 50.59 Evaluation?

• • Yes UFSAR Update Probler:n Exists Update the UFSAR Relying upon Earlier 50.59 Evaluation No Modify the Plant Discrepancy

• lde_ntified Verify*that UFSAR is Correct Select One of the Options Below

- Write A PIF

- Evaluate Operability No Change UFSAR Utilizing a 50.59 Evaluation Discrepancy is Between Design Documents and the UFSAR Does the UFSAR Reflect the Licensing Basis?

Yes Consider Design Docvment Upgrade

~.*

.J

.. ~ ::.:..

ComEd CAL Actions.(continued)

DRESDEN STATION (3)

Revise NEP for Co11trol of Calculations to Provide Clear Guidance, Expectat~ons and Directions on Reviews, Control, and Reconstruction of Cales :For Syste1ns Affected by Modifications

• Three NE.Ps Revised

- NEP 12-01

~ NEP 12-02

- NEP 12-02.DR

• • Status - Will con1plete final training by 1/31 /97

(

ComEd

.CAL Actions (continued)

DRESDEN STATION

( 4)

Provide Screening of Key Parameters For 12 Syste~s Most I1nportant Fro1n a Risk Perspective

• Dedicated Tea111 of Senior, Experienced Con1Ed anq Non-ComEd personnel

• Status - Systems and Paran1eters Identified

• Team :Being Assen1bled

• Co1nplete by Febrt1ary 28, _1997

(0

~

.

ComEd CAL Actions (continued)

(*

I DRESDEN STATION 12 KEY SAFETY SYSTEM PARAMETERS

• SR 125/250 VDC

• 4 l<V/480 VAC (excluding EDGs)

• LPCT

., ADS*

. ccsw

• Isolation Condenser (including mal<eup)

• Feedwater I Condensate

• TBCCW

• Mai11 Steam Safety &

Relief Valves tD Service Water o HPCI

• ECCS Initiation Logic

./~'\\

.\\

}:

ComEd

. CAL Actions (continued)

DRESDEN STATION

( 5)

Reconstitt1te or Validate the Design Basis and/or Cales Affected by Modifications

• O.ngoing as M*odifications Are Perfor1ned

• Key Element of the Review of the 12 S_yste111s Most Important Fron1 Risl< Perspective

• Status - Tea1n Being Asse1nbled

l, ComEd

. :CAL Actions (continuecl)

~-

I

'I DRESDEN STATION (6)

Perforll1 Audits of Nuclear Steam Supply System (N.SSS) suppliers/ AEs -

In Progress

• Performed by SQV and Co1nEd Corporate Engineering

.

• Status - Co1nplete for S&L c'.--.....

ComEd DRESDEN STATION Special Audit Sargent & Lundy;LLC Novembe1~ 1996 D*.. Win chester SQV Director

/~.

Scope*

DRESDEN STATION ii

• Specia1 Audit Pro.1npted By ISI Design Control Issues

• Focused on S&L Q.A. Design Control

• Program*

• 24 Calc*ulations Reviewed

• Focus Areas of Audit

. - Corrective Actions

- Internal Audits

- Q.A. Records

- Software 'Control

- Docum*ent Control

ComEd

.

• AuditTeam DRESDEN STATION e

• M. Salva - AuditTea111 Leader Tech S_pecialists:.

- Robert Scott - SQV ISEG Dresden _

~ Randy Weidnet - SQV ISEG Dresden

- Ernie *Bra11ch - SES Desig11 Eng Dresden

- John Minichiello - Corporate :Engineering

- Raub Randall - Corporate* E11gineering

- Mel Pietraszewsl<i Corporate Engineering

- Neil Smith - Corporate E11gineering

- Sl1yan1 Dt1a - Ge11eral Electric

)

/~**

ComEd A ittlit Re~~ults DRESDEN STATION

• Six Findings (S&L)

-* Six Recomn1endations (S&L).

• One Finding ( Co111*Ed Corporate Engineering)

- One Re.co1n1nendatio11 (Co111Ed Nuclear Oversight)

.}

I.

. /

/~

ComEd S&L Findings DRESDEN STATION

• Finding #1 Failure to Promptly Ide11tify and Correct a Non-Conforming Conditio11

• Finding #2

- Calculations Contai11ed Inappropriate, Unverified, Incorrect Assu1nptions ai1d Design Inputs

~ Finding #3

~ Independent Revie'v Process Failed to Identify Co11cer11s Discovered i11 AL1dit Noted I

I l

l

.~-,

• I I

S&L Findings (cont'd)

DRESDEN STATION

• Finding #4

- Inter11al Audits Were Progra1111natic in Nature ai1d Failed to Ide11tify Design Control Issues

• Finding #5

- Co1npleted Calct1.lations_ Were Never Distributed or Microfilmed

• Finding #6

- QA Software Co11trol Co11cerns for Piping

• A11alysis Progra111

~

. *.,, ):

ComEd Audit Reconi111e11datio11/~s DRESDEN STATION I

I l,

It

• S&L Should Clarify a11d Provide Additional Detail to Su_p_port the October 30, 1996 Safety Significance Position on the

• CCSW/LPCI Hydraulic* Calculations

• S&L Should Develop a Governing Procedure & Flowchart For The Corrective Actions Prograln Element Interrelationships

• S&L Needs to Define NEP and EQ Relationships 111 Tl1eir :Procedures

I

• <?-...

~*

A tldit.Reco1,11111e11{/atio11s DRESDEN STATION (cont'd)

• S&L Should Provide Procedural Guidance 'for Perfor1nance of Third Party Reviews

• . S&L Should Document *011 Calculation Cover

.*Letters the Affect 011 Otl1er Calc11lations and

.9 Documents I

I I

It fi

<<> S&L Needs to Perfor111 a For1nal Review of Files When*Utilizi11g Co1nputer Calculation

. Fields

/--.......*

I S&L Prelbninary Corr. Actions CornEd in Response to Dresden Audit DRESDEN STATION l

I It l

'/*

• An S&L Improven1e-i1t Process Will Be Imple1nented.For All ComEd Projects Similar to the ComEd PIF Process. *

• The Design Process *Between S&L and ComEd Will Be Reinforced to *Assure Additional Design Formality.

~

o S&L Will:Incorporate Lesso11s Learned fro1n the Audit in Their.Design Process Procedures.

Results--Will Be.Revie-wed With ComEd i11 early 1997.

,,..,,--..~'

~

i.

I ComEd S&L Prelbnina1JJ Corr. Actions in DRESDENSTATION Response to Dresden Audit (cont'd)

• Training for S&L Co1n*Ed *Project Teams Will Be Perfor1ned

• Trajning Will Address:

- Calculations

• - Design Cha11ge Process

• - Evaluations

- Use of Desig11 Basis DocL1111e11ts I.

f.t c

I I,

ComEd S&L Preliniinary Corro A.ctions in DRESDENSTATION Response to Dresden Audit (cont'd) o An Engineering Asst1rance Organization Will Be Developed *

• ComEd Will.Re-Audit S&L in 6-9 Months 9

to Determine Corrective Action Effe.ctiveness I

I I.

ComEd DRESDEN STATION

• • Finding:

-~

~

ConiEd l'o111orate

• Engineering

- Failure to Control the Safety-Related Design Activities of Its AE (S&L) 1.*

J I

.().2'\\

ComEd.

ComEd Nuclear Oversight DRESDEN STATION I

I I

)

I

• RecoITIITie11datio.n ~ Corporate Nuclear Oversight and Site Quality Verification

• Need to Review FutL1re At1dit Practices of A Es

.<'.~\\

ComEd Co1iclusio11s DRESDEN STATION 4

fl'

l. I J

I

• Programmatic DeficiencieS Were Identified in S&L Q.A. Progra111 I1nple111entation

• .Dresden PIFs Were Written for Calculations Where.Operabilitywas a Question

• Corporate Engineeri11g De1nonstrated Lack*

of Control and Oversight of AEs

• Corporate AE Audits Failed to Ideritify the

. Design Control. Issues

• r

• <~**.

ComEd 1997 Audits

• DRESDEN STATION

• Bechtel Engineering

• Duke Engineering

• Westinghouse'(Fuel & NSSS)

• GE (NSSS)

• Siemens (Fuel).. *

• S&.L Followup

~.

c) t*

1.** i l

1 D

ComEd DRESDEN STATION Engineering Assurance Group

~

~ -.. '

l 1

K. Frel1ate1~

Engineering Assl1rance Grot1p Lead

'.4-*

• ~...

Engineering Issues DRESDEN STATION

• Dresden Station Desig11 Bases InforITiatior1

• Lack of Questio11ing Attitude within the

. Engineering* Organizatio11

- Failure to Recog11ize Conditions Adverse to Quality

- Weak Safety Evaluations I

- Reliance on Engi11eering Jttdg1nent I

1 I

~

.<77\\.

ComEd DEAG - Purpose DRESDEN STATION

• :Foster Change ii1 Engineering

- Ensure Engi11eering Activities Maintain ai1d

• Validate the Statio11 Desig11 Bases

- Promote Questioning Attitudes

• *Provide Coachi11g for Li11e Engi11eers

- Supply Technical Expertise to the Engineering Organization

- Provide Real-Ti1ne Assistance

• Manage1nent Expectation - "Raise the Bar"

(!~:

\\

ComEd DEAG -/1nplementation DRESDEN STATION

• Team For111ed N*ove111ber 1.1, 1996

- Four Full-Time 1ne111bers *

- Three Part-Time Me111bers

- Retains ISI :Engi11eeri11g Discipline Expertise e

• Charter Approved N*ove1nber 18, 1996

• Desktop Approved N ove1nber 18, J 996

<l,

~ '_, t/

.1

~

DRESDEN STATION e*

. ISI Related Issues Reviewed LPCI/CCSW

• Operability Detenninations

• LER

• PLA

- HPCI Issues e

. Stean1 Trap Safety Evaluation--

• GSLO Operability 125/250 voe battery

• Operability Detern1inations

• LER

(

• PlantModifications

ComEd *DEAG-Statlls (continued)

DRESDEN STATION e-

• Other Issues *Reviewed

• e-

- CR Operability Deter111.i11atio11

- 3B Recirc Motor M,ove, I11s_pectio11, and Testing I

- Feedwater Logic Cha11ge

- Setpoint Cha11ges

• :Preliminary Conclt1sions

. - Engineers Starti11g to Validate* Design lnpt1ts

- Lack of Big Pictt1re*" T11ougl1t Process

- Atte11tio11 to Detail Nee(is I111proven1ent