ML17180B247

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Insp Repts 50-237/95-05 & 50-249/95-05 on 950307-0424.Violations Noted
ML17180B247
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/1995
From: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Wallace M
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
EA-95-074, EA-95-74, NUDOCS 9506210044
Download: ML17180B247 (4)


See also: IR 05000237/1995005

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

EA 95-074

Mr. Michael J. Wallace

Vice President and Chief

Nuclear Officer

Commonwealth Edison Company

Executive Towers West III

1400 Opus Place, Suite 300

Downers Grove, Illinois 60515

REGION Ill

801 WARRENVILLE ROAD

LISLE. ILLINOIS 60532-4351

June 2, 1995

SUBJECT:

DRESDEN STATION - UNITS 2 AND 3

EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-237/249-95005(DRP))

Dear Mr. Wallace:

This letter refers to an NRC inspection conducted at the Dresden Nuclear Power

Station, Units 2 and 3, between March 7, 1995, and April 24, 1995.

One of the

issues addressed in the inspection report, which was sent to Mr. T. Joyce on

May 22, 1995, was the identification of a significant contaminated material

control problem. A management meeting was subsequently conducted on May 31,

1995.

The problem involved your discovery of approximately 450 uncontrolled

contaminated items during an extensive site search and survey. These items.

were found outside of radiologically protected areas (RPAs), which is a

violation of your radiation protection procedures. Although you could not

determine how long each item was in the uncontrolled area, this is clearly a

long-standing problem in that the items were uncontrolled for times ranging

from several days to many years.

Of particular concern is your failure to recognize the scope of this problem

earlier when taking corrective actions for contaminated material control

violations identified in 1993 and 1994.

Proper control of potentially

contaminated/radioactive material, including its surveying and handling, is a

fundamental part of a radiation protection program.

The problems with

contaminated material control, as well as in other areas of radiation

protection performance, including perennially high dose expenditure at the

site, are not only problems of the Radiation Protection Department, but are

problems of all site personnel. Without the cooperation of site personnel,

poor performance will most likely persist.

The NRC's concern with the general performance at Dresden has been well

documented.

Most recently, procedural adherence problems resulted in the

April 5, 1995, Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty -

$100,000 (EA 95-030), and this contaminated material control problem also

represents a failure to properly adhere to procedures.

However, in this case,

your thorough response to the initial discovery of four uncontrolled

contaminated items on April 3, 1995, led to your identification of the full

scope of this problem.

-9506210044 6~838~37

PDR

ADOCK

PDR

G

Michael J. Wallace

2

June 2, 1995

While this problem is of regulatory concern, the NRC acknowledges that the

actual consequence to safety was minimal due to the low contamination levels

on the uncontrolled items.

The NRC also recognizes your corrective actions

taken or planned to correct the process by which you control contaminated

material.

Initial actions included an extensive site survey during which the

movement of material was restricted. The planned actions include, but are not

limited to:

(1) minimizing satellite RPAs; (2) implementing rigid

restrictions on removing material from the power block; and (3) limiting the

background radiation level in which material is unconditionally released. It

now appears that you appre~iate the importance of improving your contaminated

material control program.

With an effective program in place and other recent

improvements in contamination control within the plant, you should be able to

concentrate on more safety significant radiation protection and material

condition problems at the facility.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC

Enforcement Actions," (Enforcement Policy) 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C,

enforcement action would normally be considered for this problem due to the

repetitive nature of the problem and programmatic concerns based on the high

number of uncontrolled contaminated items.

However, I have been authorized,

after consultation with the Director, Office of Enforcement, and the Deputy

Executive Director for Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Regional Operations and

Research, to exercise enforcement discretion in accordance with the guidance

set forth in Section VII.8.(6) of the Enforcement Policy, and not to issue

enforcement action in this case. The NRC notes that the decision to exercise

enforcement discretion in this case was significantly influenced by your

response to the problem after it was identified by routine surveys.

NRC

.

considers your extensive site-wide survey, undertaken to determine the scope

and magnitude of the problem, and the subsequent actions taken to prevent its

recurrence, to be indicative of your efforts to improve your staff's

responsiveness in the identification and correction of problems.

NRC is

cautiously optimistic that this type of positive response evidences a change

from your previous performance in addressing deficiencies. However, the NRC

emphasizes that any similar violations in the future could result in escalated

enforcement action.

No response to this letter is required.

In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter will be placed in

e NRC Public Document Room.

Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249

Licenses No. DPR-19; DPR-25

Michael J. Wallace

3

cc:

J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations

T. Joyce, Site Vice President

J. C. Brons, Vice President,

Nuclear Support

T. Nauman, Station Manager Unit 1

E. D. Eenigenburg, Station Manager Unit 3

R. Bax, Station Manager Unit 2

P. Holland, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

Services Manager

Richard Hubbard

Nathan Schloss, Economist,

Office of the Attorney General

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

June 2, 1995

)

Michael J. Wallace

4

DISTRIBUTION

PUBLIC

SECY

CA

JTaylor, EDO

JMilhoan, DEDR

JLieberman, OE

LChandler, OGC

JGoldberg, OGC

WRussell, NRR

RZimmerman, NRR

Enforcement Coordinators

RI, RII, RIV

Licensing Project Manager, NRR

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspectors LaSalle

Dresden, Quad Cities

Flngram, GPA/PA

DWil 1 i ams, OIG

GCaputo, OI

EJordan, AEOD

OE:EA(2)

MSatorius, OE

Docket File

Public IE-01

DRP

NU DOCS

State of Illinois

RAO: RII I

SLO: RII I

PAO: RII I

IMS:RIII