ML17180A860

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/94-13 & 50-249/94-13 on 940624-0726.No Violations Noted
ML17180A860
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/08/1994
From: Grant G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Lyster M
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML17180A861 List:
References
EA-94-148, NUDOCS 9408110052
Download: ML17180A860 (2)


See also: IR 05000237/1994013

Text

Docket No. 50-237

Docket No. 50-249

EA 94-148

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN:

Mr. M. D. Lyster

Site Vice President

Dresden Nuclear Power Station

6500 North Dresden Road

Morris, IL

60450

Dear Mr. Lyster:

August 8, 1994

This letter refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. H. A. Walker of this

office from June 24 through July 26, 1994.

The inspection included a review

of authorized *activities for your Dresden Nuclear Power Station. At the

conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those members

of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

and representative records, interviews with personnel and observation of

activities in progress.

The purpose of the inspection was to review the

actions taken on inspection follow-up item 249/94003-03{DRS) and Licensee

Event Report {LER) 237/94-010.

The LER, dated May 9, 1994, was issued as a

result of licensee actions on the inspection follow-up item.

One apparent violation was noted regarding inadequate and untimely actions to

correct inadequate design calculations.

Inadequate design calculations were

identified by licensee personnel in January of 1992.

Delayed action on the

cal£ulations resulted in a.degraded condition of the.Hig~ Pressure Coolant

Injection {HPCI) ventilation system.

Under degraded voltage conditions, the

HPCI system might not have performed the safety related functions required by

plant Technical Specifications. The failure to promptly determine and correct

noted problems, as in this case, can result in equipment that is not capable

of performing the intended safety function.

This issue is being considered for escalated enforcement action in accordance

with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement

Actions" {Enforcement Policy), 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C.

Accordingly, no

Notice of Violation is presently being issued for this inspection finding.

Please be advised that the number and characterization of apparent violations

described in the enclosed inspection report may change as a result of further

NRC review.

You will be notified when further action is required .

~gRs1 l88EK2 o9s4ooosoa .

G

0237

PDR

  • .

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

August 8, 1994

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Enclosure:

Inspection Reports

No. 50-237/94013(DRS);

No. 50-249/94013(DRS)

cc w/enclosure:

J. C. Brons 9 Vice President

Nuclear Support

S. Perry, Vice President

BWR Operations

G. F. Spedl, Station Manager

J. Shields, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

Services Manager

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspectors, LaSalle,

Dresden 9 Quad Cities

Richard Hubbard

Nathan Schloss, Economist

Office of the Attorney General

Licensing Project Manager, NRR

Station Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

Commission

S. Stein, SRS

J. Lieberman, OE

J. Goldberg, OGC

R. Zimmerman, NRR

bee:

PUBLIC IE-01

YJ1V

Walker

8/ ~/94

RII{Q

sWlr

8/ q-/94

eFay~t(e

8/ ~ /94

Sincerely,

Is/ M. A. Ring (for)

Geoffrey E. Grant, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

RI I ~l

/JJ..r:r*

Hiland

8/ f /94 m

Wright

8/ 't /94

RI II (!

../~tf-7

Gr~

8/ J /94