ML17180A637

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 940111-0222.Violation Noted:Between 930101-1231,licensee Failed to Submit Required LERs for Repetitive Failures of Rwk ECCS Initiation Instruments
ML17180A637
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  
Issue date: 03/11/1994
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17180A636 List:
References
50-237-94-02, 50-237-94-2, 50-249-94-02, 50-249-94-2, NUDOCS 9403220057
Download: ML17180A637 (1)


Text

. 4 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Dresden Station, Units 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249 License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25 During an NRC inspection conducted on January 11 through February 22, 1994, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In.accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50.73(a)(l) stated the licensee shall sub~it a licensee event report for any reportable event within 30 days after the discovery of the e~ent.

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) required written notification for any condition that alone could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of a system needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident.

Contrary to the above, between January and December 1993, the licensee failed to submit required licensee event reports for repetitive failures of the reactor water level emergency core cooling system initiation instruments.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Convnission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555, with a copy to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinots, 60532-4351, and a ~opy to the NRC Resi~ent Inspectors at the Dresden Nuclear Station within 30 days of the date of the letter* transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken to a~oid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration wi11 be given to extending tbe response time.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this *_j/__ day of March 1994 9403220057 940311 PDR ADOCK 05000237 G

PDR