ML17179A693

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/92-28 & 50-249/92-28 on 921026-930104 & Notice of Violation.Expresses Concern That Violation Re Failure to Promptly Replace Oversized Safety Related Fuses Could Have Resulted in Damage to Components
ML17179A693
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/20/1993
From: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Delgeorge L
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML17179A694 List:
References
NUDOCS 9301250019
Download: ML17179A693 (4)


See also: IR 05000237/1992028

Text

Do~ket No. 50-237/1z;Z'a

Docket No~ 50-249 .

.

commonwealth Edison Company

JAN 2 0 1993

ATTN:

Mr. L.

O~ DelGeorge, Vice President

Nuclear Over.sight *and Regu~atory * .*

  • Services

Executive Towers West III

1400 cip~~ Place* - Suite 300

  • Downers Grove, IL

60515

Dear Mr. DelGeorge:.

This refers to the special inspe.ction conducted by*

Messrs. z. Falevits and R. A. Winter of this office on

October 2 6, 1992, tprough January 4, 19.93.

The inispection

included a review of activities authorized for your. Dresden

Nuclear Power station, Units 2 and 3.

We discussed our *

  • ~nspec;::tion*findings*with Mr. J .. Kotowski and others of your staff

at the conclusion of the inspec;:tion.

T.he purpos~ of this

inspection w~s *.to *review your fuse co*ntrol program, . ground

detection and removal process, control room annunciators and

selected design c~anges and modifications.

Areas examined dur ipg the . inspectTon are* identif i.ed . in the

  • report.

The inspection consisted of a selective examination of

procedures and representative records,* field walkdowns and*

inter_views with. personJ?el.

Based 6n the result~ 6f this inspection, *certain of your

. activities .were in violation of NRC requiiements, as specified in

the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice).

The first violation

is. of *concern because *t_he failure fo promptly replace oversized*

safety relat~d fu~es could have resulted in damage to s~f ety

related components.

The ~econd violation is of concern because

the failure to isolate and remove 125Vdc grounds could have

resulted in the .impr6~er operation of safety related components.

.

.

.

You are required to respond to this letter and should-follow the

instructions specified in. the enclosed Notice when preparing your

response.

In your respqnse, you should document the.specific

acti6ns ta~en and any additional actioris you plan to prevent

recurrence. *After reviewing your .response tG this Notice,

including your pioposed correcti~e acitions and.th~ results of

future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC .

enforcement action is. necessary to ensure compliance with NRC

regulatory requirement~.

9301250019 930120

PDR

ADOCK 05000237 .

G

. PPR

r

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

JAN 2 *o 1993.

Also, during this inspection, one other activity was in violation

of NRC requirements.

However, as described*. in the e.nclos*ed

inspection report, you identified this violation, anci to .

. encourage and support licensee initiatives for self-*

.*

  • identification and correction of violations, this violation is

not being cited because the criteria specified in Section

_ VII.B. (2) of the "General State~ent of Policy and Procedures for

NRC Enforcement Actions," (Enforcement Policy, .10 CFR. 2,

Appendix c (19 9 ~) ) , .were satisfied.

In* accordance with. 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,

.a copy of this letter, the enclosures, .and your response to this

letter w,lll be placed.in.the NRC Public Document Room.

The respons_es directed by this letter and the*accompanying Not1ce.

are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Off ice of

Management and Budget as required by the PaperworkReduction*Act

of 19SO, PL 96-511.

.

We* will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this

inspection.

Enclosures:

1.

Notice bf Violation*

2.

Inspection ~eports . *

No~ 50-237/92028(DRS);

  • No. so:..249 /92028 (DRS)

See Attached Distribution

R;III

RIII

RI Ii*

Sincerely,

- .

. - .. :*"";~:<:~:~:-_ SI*~;~*~~~). J-~*~

  • ~*'. C).

!:/..~*~~ .. ~*.~

T. * o ., Martin, Acting Dir.ector

Division 6f Reactor Safety .

RIII

-RII*


see Following Page------------~~------~-----

,,-;v.A.

-

M'tirtin*

01/Lv /9.3

Falevits/jk

01/11/93

Winter.

Hiland

Gardner

Ring

01/

/93 . 01/

/93

01/

/93

01/

/93

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

.

.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2. 790 of the Commiss1on'_s regulations,

a.copy of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this

_letter will. be placed in the. NRC PuJ?lic Document Room ....

. .

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice

are not subject to the clearance procedures of. the Office of

Management and Budget as required by the_ Paperwork Reduction Act

of 1980, PL 96-511 *

. *

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this

inspection.

  • Enclosures:

1.

Notice of-Violation

2.

Inspection Reports

No.

50~231/92028(DRS); .

. No.

50-~49/92628(DRS)

See Attached Dist~ibution

R~II

.

RIII

RIII

. y,{J*r

R,I\\~~

P..L \\.d-

.

Falevits/jk

Winter

Hiland .

01/11/93

01// I /93. 01/l( /93

sincere~y,

T. o. Martin, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Safety

RIII

~I,

RII

R.W

1rY

Gardner

. Martin

. Ol/11 /93

11 r')/93

01/

/93

.. Commonweal th Edison Company ...

Distribution

cc w/enclosures:

M. D. Lyster, site Vice

.. President .

.

J .. Shields, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

Services Manager

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspectors -

Dresden~

LaSalle, Quad cities

Richard Hubbard

  • *

J. w. Mccaffrey, Chief, Public

Utilities Division

3

  • Robert Newmann, Office of Public

Counsel, state of Illinois Center

B. Siegel, LPM, NRR

  • state Liaison Officer.

~* O. Martin; DRS

W. L. Axelson, DRSS

J. * E. Dyer, NRR

E. J. Leeds, NRR

M. J.; Jordan, DRS

. S~ Stasek, SRI, Davis-Besse

w. Hodges, RI

A. Gibson; RII

S~ Collins, RIV

K. Perkins, RV

JAN 2 0 1993