ML17177A602

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/92-22,50-249/92-22,50-254/92-19, 50-265/92-19,50-295/92-20,50-304/92-20,50-373/92-17, 50-374/92-17,50-454/92-14,50-455/92-14,50-456/92-16 & & 457/92-16 on 920727-29.Violation Noted But Not Cited
ML17177A602
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Byron, Braidwood, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/1992
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML17177A603 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 NUDOCS 9208280074
Download: ML17177A602 (3)


See also: IR 05000237/1992022

Text

..

1,

-

l

_] . '

"'-.....,.: .

Docket Nos~ 50~237~'

50-249:* 50-254;*~0-265;

50-295; .50-304; 50-j7J;

50~374; 50-454; 50-455;'

50-456; 50-457

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN:

Mr. Cordell Reed.

Senior Vice President .

Opus West.III

- 1400 Opus Pl ace

Downers Grove, IL

60515

Dear Mr. Reed:

.. -**--*~- -* ***----**-----* . ~ .

AUG 2 O 1992

This refers to the inspection conducted by. Mr. T. Ploski and others of this

office on July 27-29, 1992. * The inspection included a review of authorized

activities for your corporate emergency preparedness department.

At the

conclu~ibn of the inspection, the findings were discussed wtth those members

o( ydur staff identified in the.enclosed report.

.

.*

.*.

.

.'

.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the enclosed report.*

Within these areas, the inspection consisted.of a selective e~amiriation of

procedures and represerttative records,.observati~n~, and interviews with

personnel.

During this inspection~ certain of youf activitiei ap~eared to be in violation

of NRC requ i reme.nts.

However, as described in the enclosed inspection report,

you identified the violation. Therefore, the violation will not be subject to

enforcement act iOn because your efforts in i dent ifyi ng and correcting the -

violation meet the criteria specified in Section VI LB of the nGener*a l

Statement of Policy and Procedur~s for NRC Enforcement Actions," (Enforcement

Pol icy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1992}).

In addition, we h~ve identified a significant issue concerning your ability to

activate your.Emergency Operation Facilities (EOF) in a timely manner.

Your

most recent augmentation drills indic~te that minimum staffing would take at

least two to three hours after your staff membe.rs were notified and complete *

staff augmentation would take as long as four bolirs::;-:'. NRC ".'egulations *require

timely augmentation of response capabilities. ~URE.fu.0137,:'Supplement 1, .* .. *

specifies that facilities shall have as a goal emergency activation times for

their EOF within the guidelines of Table 2 of the NU~EG. The NRC's position

is that an EOF should be staffed in ~bout one hour after the decision to

activate the facility is made.

Supplement 1 to the NUREG also states that

"reasonable.exceptions" to this goal "should be justified and will be *

considered by NRC staff". The NRC is not aware of justification for staff

augmentation times indicated by. your recent ._drJlJs. __ .Therefore, your ~urrerit

emergency ~reparedness program does not appear to adequately meet the intent

of the regulations pertaining to timeliness.

We request a written resp~~se

~-~{' .'l {

9208280074 920820

-_;_,

. PDR .. ADOCK *050-00237 -

l

0

.

P.DR

. l.t

-

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

AUG 2 _0 1992

winthin 30 days describing your actions to address this inadequacy in your

1!mergency preparedness program. *

  • . Your response shoul~ also include a description of how the r~sults of your

corrective ~ctions will be assessed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(l4)

which requires you* to conduct exercises to evaluate major portions of your

emergency response* capabilities. .

  • * .. *
  • *

..

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosed inspection re~ort, and your response to thi~ letter

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

  • *

The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance

procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork.

Reduction Act of 1980, .PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

  • Sincerely,

. *. ORIGINAL .SIGNED av* CHARLES E. NOREUUS

  • See Att~ched Distribution:

.

III.

. ~I .

Rfft

Knop *

g/t6fq1-

~ *.

~ick-Barger*

. ~!Jq~

.

e~~on

)us

.

  • 08//o/92

fh.o qv

..

,,

Commonwealth Edison Company

3

Distribution:

cc w/enclosure~

.

M.

Wallace~ Vice President, PWR Operations* *

T. Kovach, Nuclear Li~ensing Manager

A. Checca, Nuclear Licensing Administrator

K.

Kofron~ Station Maniger

A .. Haeger, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor .

D. Galle, Vice President~ BWR, Operations

C. Schroeder, Station Mahager

  • R. Radtke, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor.

G. J. Di~derich, Station Manager

R. L. Baxi Station Ma~ager

T. Joyce, Station Manager

R. Chrzanowski, Re"gulatory Assurance

  • Supervisor

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFOCB

.

.

Resident Inspectors, Byron,

Braidwood, Zion, LaSalle, *

Dresden, Quad Cities

  • D. W. Cassel, .Jr., Esq.

Richard Hubbard

J *. W. *Mccaffrey, Chief, Public

Utilities Division

Licensing Project Mgr., NRR

Robert Newmann, Office of *public

. Counsel, .State of Illinois Cent~r

State Li~ison Officer

T. S~huster, Nticlear Licensing

Administrator

R.

~leniewicz, St~tion Manager

D. Brindle, Regulatory Assurance

  • Supervisor

Diilne Chavez, DAARE/SAFE

.

Robert M. Thompson, Administrator

Wisconsin Division of Emergency

Government

.

  • .

Patricia O'Brien, Governor's

-Office of Consumer Services

Mayor, City of Zion

Chandu Patel, LPM, NRR

I. Johnson, CECo, Emergency Preparedne~s Director*

D. Bement, FEMA, RV

R. Bissel 1, FEMA, RVII

~--, *~ -~-**-*.