ML17177A464

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 920318 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md Re Status of Issue Prioritization Program.List of Attendees & Handouts Encl
ML17177A464
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Byron, Braidwood, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/1992
From: Siegel B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9206120167
Download: ML17177A464 (43)
v • d • e


Text

.,

(

i

ii<'-'

j *.~ '

  • Ys;T Docket Nos. STN 50-456, STN 50-457 STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-254, 50-265, and 50-295, 50-304 May 15, 1992 LICENSEE:

Commonwealth Edison Company FACILITIES:

Braidwood Units I and 2; Byron Units I and 2; Dresden Units 2 and 3; LaSalle Units I and 2; Quad Cities Units I and 2; and Zion Units I and 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (CECo) ON ISSUE PRIORITIZATION On March 18, 1992, a meeting was held with CECo in the NRC offices at OWFN.in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the status.of.their issue prioritization program. is a list of meeting attendees and Enclosure 2 is a copy of the handouts provided. John Renwick, BWR/PWR Projects Manager, briefly described CECo prioritization methodology and process that is being used at all six -stations to rank the issues consistent with the allocation of resources, $afety, and cost effectiveness. Mr. Renwick also discussed CECo's

  • finan.cfal budgets for capital improvements and the interrelationship between these budgets, resources, and major project schedules that were identified as

_,r having'h.igh priority.

  • .'.* -~*,.,

Both CECq,'and the* NRC*.staff expressed interest in working towards the approval

.-~;"'

_.c

  • *'"
  • o.Lar:i infegrated schedule for each site that would freeze licensee.commitments

-~~:'.: *.-

for.outage._plannin9.'..Pli.rposes.and would allow flexibility in the schedule if

_new~ ;more sign_iffcant'i'S,sues shmJld occur. It was agreed that both parties

  • ' j

~ *

\\'..,,..

.. _*. *would recommerid*,,the" i_rjjthtion of an implementation scheduling program for all~**.,"

  • '.., CECo -sitesito* µpp~r *managE!_ment for approval.

.h,~*'.:3.:

~.-~'..,. *.

-'1 *.. ****

  • . _.>h>-'*
  • ~.,..

'~*

~ 1/

.~-

/

\\.. **;:*

    • ~

'.~

~.

,(

7 ii

  • \\'

Origi~al signed by:

Byron L. Siegel, Project Manager Project Directorate III-2 Division of Reactor Projects 111/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

./.,..

Enclosures:

  • -*DISTRIBUTION:

' \\

I. *Meeting Attendees Docket Fil es EJordan RPulsi.fer.

2... Handouts NRC & Local PD Rs ACRS (10)

JHi ckman*" \\

POii 1-2 r /f GGrant, 17621 LOl sh an cc:

See next page TMurley/FMiraglia BClayton, Riii OGC JPartlow BSiegel ELeeds BBoger AMBongiovanni CMoore.

  • JZwol inski VOrdaz DHickman RBarrett PKadambi

,,,,,.----- ~. -

-*~

-~

- --~~,

9206120167 920515

\\.'

PDR ADOC!( 9500~B~7 p

._.t.P.11 !If Gu{

..,~

UNITED STATES

!~~-

    • -~{}

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c;.

'*' ~

"/~

, ~~. o~

/)

Docket Nos. STN 50-456, STN S0-457.

STN 50-.454, STN 50-455, 50-237, 50-249; 50-373, 50-374, 50-254, 50-265, and 50-295, 50-304 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 May 15, 1992 LICENSEE:

Commonwea 1th Edi son Company FACILITIES:

Braidwood Units 1 and 2; Byron Units 1 and 2; Dresden Units 2 and 3; LaSalle Units I and 2; Quad Citi.es Units 1 and 2; and Zion Units 1 and 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (CECo) ON ISSUE PRIORITIZATION On March 18, 1992, a meeting was held with CECo in the NRC offices at OWFN in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the status of their issue prioritization program. is a list of meeting attendees and Enclosure 2 is a copy of the handouts provided. John Renwick, BWR/PWR Projects Manager, briefly described CECo prioritization methodology and process that is being used at all six stations to rank the issues consistent with the allocation of resources, safety, and cost ef~ectiveness~ Mr. Renwick also discussed CECo's financial budg~ts for capital imp~ovements and the interrelationship between these budgets, resources, and major project schedules that were identifi~d as having.high priotity.

Both CECo and the NRC staff expressed fnterest in working towards th~. approval of an integrated schedule for each site that would freeze licensee commitments for outage planning purposes and would allow flexibility in the schedule if new, more ~ignificant issues should occur.

It was agreed that both parties

  • would recommend the initiation of an implementation scheduling program for all CECo sites to upper management fo~ approval.

Enclosures:

I. Meeting Attendees

2.

Handouts cc:

See next page

""~.,/

  • ~

~n L. Sie 1, Project Manager Project Directorate 111-2 Division of Reactor Projects 111/IV/V Office -0f Nuclear Reactor Regulation

.,T Commonweal th Edi son a any cc:

  • Mr. William P. Poirier
  • Westinghouse Electric Corporation Energy Systems Business Unit Post Office Box 355, Bay 236 West Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Joseph Gallo, Esquire Hopkins and Sutter 888 16th Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C~ 20006 Regional Administrator U. S. NRC, Region III.

799 Roosevelt Road, Bldg. #4 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Ms. Bridget Little Rorem Appleseed Coordinator

.

  • 117 North Linden Street

. Essex, Illinois 60935 Mr. Edward R. Crass Nuclear Safeguards and Licensin~

Division Sargent & Lundy Engineers 55 East Monroe Street thicago~ Illinois 6b603 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office Rural Route #1, Box 79 Braceville, Illinois 60407 Mr. Ron Stephens, Director Illinois Emergency Services and Disaster Agency 110.East Adams Street Springfield, Illinois 62706

  • Robert Neumann Office of Public Counsel State of Illinoi~ Center 100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-300 Chicago, Illinois 60601 EIS Review Coordinator.

Environmental Protection Agency Region V

  • 230 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Attorney General 500 South 2nd Street Springfield, Illiriois 62701 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Byron Resident Inspectors Office 4448 North German Church Road Byron, Illinois 61010 Ms. Lorraine Creek Rt. 1, Box 182
  • Manteno, Illinois 60950 Mrs. Phillip B. J9hnson 1907 Stratford Lane Rockford, Illinois 61107 Douglass Cassel, Esquire 17 East Monroe Street, Suite 212 Chicago, Illinois 60603 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office 105 Shiloh Blvd.

Zion, Illinois 60099 George L. Edgar Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.

1615 L Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036 Commonwealth Edison Company Byron Station Manager 4450 North German Church Road Byron, Illinois 61010 Illinois Dept. of Nuclear Safety Office of Nuclear Facility Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive -

Springfield,,Illinois 62704 Commonwealth Edison Company Braidwood Station Manager Rt. 1, Box 84 Braceville, Illinois 60407 Chairman, Ogle County Board Post Office Box 357

  • oregon, Illinois 61061 Chairman Will County Board of Supervisors Will County Board Courthouse Joliet, Illinois. 60434 Mayor of Zion Zion, Illinois.60099

Michael 1. Miller, Esquire Sidley and Austin One First National Plaza Chicago, Illinois

  • 60690 Mr. C. Schroeder Plant Manager Dresden Nuclear Power Station Rural Route #1 Morris, Illinois 60450
  • U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office Dresden Station Rural Route #1 Morris, Illinois 60450 Chairman Board of Supervisors of Grundy County Grundy County Courthouse Morris, Illinois 60450 Phillip P.. Steptoe, Esquire Sidley and.Austin One First National Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60603 Assistant Attorney General 100 West Randolph Street Suite 12 Chicago, Illinois. 60601 Resident Inspector/LaSalle, NPS
  • U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissi~n Rural Route No. 1 P. 0. Box 224 Marseilles, Illinois 61341 Chairman LaSalle County Board of Supervisors LaSalle County Courthouse
  • Ottawa, Illinois 61350 Dr. Cecil Lue-Hing Director of Research and Development Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago 100 East Erie Street Chicago, Illinoi_s 60611 Robert Cushing Chief, Public Utilities Division Illinois Attorney General's Office
  • . 106 West Randolph Street Chicago, Illinois 60601
  • Mr. G. Diederich*

LaSalle Station Manager LaSalle County Station Rural Route 1 P. 0. Box 220 Marseilles, Illinois 61341

  • Chairman Illinois Commerce Comlnission Leland Building 527 East Capitol Avenue Springfield~ Illinois 62706*

Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President*

Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P. 0. Box 4350 Davenport, lowa 52803 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of.Supervisors.

1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg.

Rock Island, Illinois 61201

  • Mr. Thomas J. Kovach Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edi son Company-Suite 300 OPUS West III 1400 OPUS Place Downers Grove, Illinois 60515
  • LIST OF ATTENDEES MEETING WITH COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ON PRidRITIZATION OF ISSUES MARCH 18, 1992 NAME AFFILATION Byron Siegel NRC Brent Clayton NRC
  • Ann Marie Bongiovanni NRC Vanna Ordaz NRC Prasad Kadambi NRC Don Hickman NRC Eric Leeds*

NRC John Zwolinski NRC Richard Barrett NRC Robert Pulsifer NRC John Hickman NRC Leonard Olshan NRC John Schrage -

CECo Darrell Taylor CE Co Milton Richter CECo Terence Schuster*

CE Co John Renwick CE Co

tt.

. Issue Prioritization

  • John C. Renwick
  • BWR/PWR Projects Manager

e e

Issue Prioritization Objectives

  • To Identify. and Prioritize Issues * * *
  • To Achieve an Effective Balance Betwee:

. - Safety

~* Reliability I Availability

- Cost Effectiveness

- *Quality**.

  • To Accomplish the Priority Issues.

Within the Available Resources**

  • To Integrate the Priority Issues into the
  • Long* Range Plan
  • To Establish a Scheduling Methodology

. that Recognizes the Need for Flexible *.

  • Alternative Actions in Response to.

Regulatory Issues *

/.

~ r *.

  • Issue Prioritization Why Change Current Practice?

Areas for.Improvement_*

--- Address Customer's Issues and Priorities

  • - Long Standing Technical Issue Resolution -

- _Program Durations

- Consistency Resourte Constraints *

-

  • Financial

-- Manpower

-. Schedule _-

  • Necessity to Manage the Cumulative Impact of

._New Issue Resource Demands and Ongoing

    • _- __ Resource Requirements
  • e :

e Issue Prioritization Process

  • Issue Review SubCo.mmittce
  • '.:
  • ISsue.Review All Stations
  • Committees

~-*

t Long Range Plan

  • e
  • Prioritization Methodology *

(

. Reviewed Processes in Place

  • Commonwealth Edison
  • Other Utilities Basic Methodologies Absolute Value
  • * * *.Weighted Value
  • Piloted a Weighted Value Methodology
  • *. Zion Investment.Projects over $400K.

ti:

INVESTMENT BUDGETS TYPES OF BUDGETS

.PROJEC'.I'S >

  • S 400,000 ANNUALS
  • . ADDmONS AND REVISIONS-COMPUTER FURNlTIJRE HEALTH PHYSICS EQUIPMENT CHEMISTRY EQUIPMENT.

WORK EQUIP,MENT CAPIT AIJZED SPARE PARTS REACTOR INTERNALS.

PROJECT BUDGETS BUDGETED IN THE FALL MUST HA VE 1USTIFICATION RANKED APPROVED BY V.P~S AND CPC FUNDED FROM 5 YEAR INVESTMENT BUDGET EACH PROJECT MUST ALSO BE APPROVED BY CPC

.. MUSTHAVEIUSTIFICATION ECONOMIC, REGULATORY, SAFETY,OIHER MOST PROJECTS RECEIVE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS LOOKING FOR 2 YEAR PAY BACK

Priority Hierarchy

  • A. Priority Issues that must be resolved *
  • *. receive appropriate priority for available discretionary resources.
1. Existing or imminent threat to nuclear safety _
2. Existing or imminent threat to personnel
3. Implementation of Federal or State Laws
4. Violation of regulatory requirements for which
  • no compensatory action* can be provided
5.
  • Prevention of plant shutdown
6. Prevention of delay ln return to start up B.
  • Issues that are routine base load *work*
  • use ba-seline resources allocated assumi_ng optimal Nuclear Operations..

C. Priority Issues that are new one time or

  • Periodic receive discretionary funds based on prioritization process.

Resource Allocation Total Resource Pool Allocation of

  • Discretionary Resources
e.

Issue Prioritization Methodology Eight Key Attributes.

  • Selected Based on Mission Statement Public Saf~ty *

.

  • Safety.System Performance Personnel s*afety. -

Plant Availability Productivity. *,

Regulatory Impact BOP Equipment Performance.

Plant Enhancement

  • Numerical Value Assigned to each

. *Attribute.

  • Scaled Weighting Factors Selected*
  • for each Attribute * *
  • Priority Ranking is Numerical Sum
  • of (Value X Weight) for each Attribute

Issue Priority *

  • Attribute

.Public Safety Safety. System Performance

.

  • Personnel Safety*

. Plant Availability Productivity Regulatory Impact Weight

(+/-Oto S)

BOP Equipment Performance Plant Enhancement Value *.Weight Valu<

  • 20 18 16
14.

12 8

6 4

Issue Priority: Weighted Value

. I __

SAFETY SYSTEM PEBFORMANCE Evaluate the extent to which the Issue/project contributes to maintaining or Improving the availability or perfonnance of a safety system~ INPO Safety Systems and Station Target Systems are evaluated one weighting fador* higher than similar improvement gains In other systems. Indicate the basis for the selection of the weighting factor by commenting on the applicable statements below.

Select +I* weighting factor based on potential lmpad SignHieant 5. High 4 Moderate 3*

Marginal 2 Low 1 O.

> 1.0%

>0.8%

>0.6%

>0.4%

>0.2°/o Increase Attribute Safety: System Perfonnance _

x 18 _

Consider the Impact the Issue has on*

1.

.increasing the system availability.

2.

Reducing the probability of challenges *to System Aduatlon *.

3.

Reducing the frequency of LCO entry *...

4.

Increasing the reliability of the system.

  • In availability
5.
  • Restoring the design feature for which a contingency Is In place. *
  • ~

\\

e* *.

e Issue Prioritization Process

~*~-~~*

\\

      • /"
  • -~. t?..

B.. lin

~

~

~e e

~~1 ScreeningProcess f

>Routine 1

Programs

ft-

Issue Review.

SubCommittee * *

  • . ISsue.Review 1~.

~*

Committee i

eo:!fttee !

All Stations Committees...

J_.,....

~

~ -

'~

I t

~---...

t 1.Dng Range Plan

e (J) w

(.)

c::

0

(/)

w

  • a:

~ Unllmlted Resources

  • Pro/tell I

.**Pro/tell I

Project I I Pro/et:t3 I

Pro/Rt1 Pro/ecta. I

,. Pro/ect4. I Pto/.at7**

,*.Project 8 *.:*":.~:... ':'":' *:.:.,

. Tl~1E I

I -

r Discretionary Resource Limits A -.

TIME

Prioritization**.

Consistent Allocation of Resources Toward NOD Mission Sa*fety

. Reliable Generation

~

-~

Cost Effectiveness

. Quality

  • $690M NOD

$599M ENC __

j ENC Resource ADOcations 3 Year Investment Budget

. :1992 * :1994

.Cost*

Effectiveness

.::la~.. 1 %
  • ENC 3 Year Investment Budget*

Ill Safety.

140 ~--------i llltl Reliability 120 II

  • Cost Effectiveness & Quality 100..-..... '!1111'1-___:.__ __ _f '.fUlliwi.mJl'il~----

60~

40 *f--llHfj, 20

$173 M

  • Tota1**

oLlmm~~lmlilml.._:__

1992....

.* $202 M Total 1993

&f~

1994

$144M Total c

9*

ENC Major Projects*

Prioritization Distribution*

  • ENC Total for 1992-1994 NRC Commitments ENC Projects in Progress *
  • ENC *F.l.P. Projects ENC Project Funds for New *Projects*

~

Commonwealth Edison Company 3 Year Inveshnenl Budget

  • . Division Operations 3.5 Billio11 EnJtineering
    • Nuclear *.

Operations

. Fossil Operations

.

  • ENC Investment Budget Trend *
  • 250--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

200 (J) c 150 0 -

~-100

~

50 0

1990.

1991

  • 1992 1993 1994

Priority Setting*

  • 1992 Objectives ENC Investment Issues
  • Upgrade Investment Process NRC Presentation Develop Malnframe*Program Apply Process to all Investment Projects Mar92.

Jun92.

1993 Budget..

  • Cycle.

Priority Setting 1992 Objectives ENC Expense Issues

. Evaluate Investment Process and Expand

  • to Selected Expense.

Piiot on 1992 Expense Budget.

Issue Guideline

  • Apply.Process to 1993-1994 Budget
  • Apr9~ *.

Jun92*

1993 Budget Cycle.

e.

Prioritization

. Investment Budg_et Task Force***

J. C. Renwick BWR/PWR Projects Manager G. Tietz T*echnical Supt, Quad Cities*.

.. T. Tamlyn Project M~nager, Qu*ad Cities.

  • D. Wozniak Technical Supt, Zion

~-

D. St. Clair Project Manager, Byron..

M. Lohmann Project Manager, Spec Projects

. L. Gerner.

  • Technical Supt. Dresden
  • P. Lucky Tech Staff. LaSalle * *.

R. Schleiter

  • Fl.P Coordi~ator. PM Staff

. *Expense Budget Task Force *.

  • M. Lohmann Project Manager, Spec Projects J. Larkin
  • Budget Engineer, PM Staff J. Bandurski ENC Support Supervisor K. Ainger
  • _*

J. Williams Site Engineering Supv. LaSalle.

S. Gaconis Sr Engineer. Elec/l&C Design R. Scott Sr Engineer, Mech/Struc Design K Brennan Configuration Management Supv

  • . Prioritization

.Barriers NRC Views vs CEco*wants.

  • Station Resources
  • *Document Decisions Non Equipment Issues vs Equipment Issues

. Mission Stateme.nt vs Resource Allocation (Maintaining INPO 1 vs Obtaining INPO 1)

Prioritization and Resource.

Management are an opportunity *.

for Nuclear Operations Division

~----~-.....__ ___

~.,----------------*:--..

1991 Priority Setting*

Report Card.

Station Manager All

1. Budget Allocallon Acceptable B*

. c+

2. Mel NOD.Mission

.e B*

3. Balance Regulatory /Station Issues
  • c-*..

c

4. Focused Partners c+

a

&. Beneflclal lo Prioritize all lasuea B

a+

Comments*

OSTI at Lasalle: *wllh minor upgrade an effective tool; *eafetr

  • NRC OSTI Report*

. LaSalle County *station The Te~m reviewed the CECo Engin~ering and

  • Construction Program ENC-PM-04 Project.*

Prioritization,.Revisio.n 0. The Program was still

. in the developmental/trial use stage. The Team commented that the.weig.hted value*

ranking system was an effective scientific way

.to prioritize work-implementation. However,*..

  • the A-Team (working level assessme.nt team) composition was not defined, the public safety attributes were not easily understood, and the.

values assigned to safety system performance. _

and plant availability appeared to be too similar to make system safety a clear priority

  • over plant availability. the Team stated th_at, with minor upgrades and clarification. the
  • Licencee's P~ogramcou_ld become an effective management tool for controlling bac~logs of plant modifications and project.*

activities_ with safety significance.

Issue Priority

  • Attribute Weight. -*value

(+/- 0 to 5)

Public Safety

  • Safety System Performance.**

. Personnel Safety

.Plant Availability Productivity Regulatory Impact*

BOP Equipment Performance Plant Enhancement 20

.18..

. 16.

14 12 8

6 4

Weighted

  • Value Issue Priority: Weighted.Value
  • l: __

1:

I t

  • Prioritization I

.**custom.er

. *Addressed all type~ of issues and Sets the proper balance of needs and resources *

(/')

c 0

250 200

~ 150

E 100

. 50 NOD INVESTMENT BUDGETS Actual/Proje.cted *

  • 1990 1991 1992 1993. 1994
    • ACCELERATED FUNDING MAJOR PROJECTS Ill NSD 1111 ENC ANNUALS
    • sTATION

.ANNUALS _

FACILITIES 9,

200 c.n " 150

c.

0

~

~ 100 50 NOD INVESTMENT BUDGETS Actual/Projected 1990 1991 1992 1993.. 1994.

Exclude$ Facilities II MAJOR PROJECTS 11!1 NSD

.* ENC ANNUALS STATION ANNUALS

MAJOR PROJECTS INVESTMENT BUDGETS MAJOR PROJECTS INVESTMENT BUDGETS (WllltOUT RANK VALUE ADJ~STMEN.TS)

. (WITH RANK VAWE ADJUSTMENTS)

PURE ADJ.

RANK STA PROJECT DESCRIPTION RANK STA PROJECT DESCRIPTION 262 LAS LASAUE REACTOR WATER TRIP SYS 916 LAS LASALLE U1,2-SAFElY VALVES 216 LAS LA$AUE U1,2-SAFETY VALVES 872 BYR RESPONSE TO NRC GENERIC LTR 89-13 212. BRW MSIV ROOM COOLING U2 846 BRW BRAIDWO..UNIT 1-0IAPHRAGM VALVES 212 BRW MSIV ROOM COOLING U1 846 BRW BRAl.DWD..UNIT 2-0IAPHRAGM VALVES 198 BRW BRAIDWOOD RESITANCE TEMP DET 826 BYR BYRON UNIT 1-DIAPHRAGM VALVES

.188' LAS HVAC UPGRADE PROGRAM 826

.BYR BYRON UNIT 2-0IAPHRAGM VALVES 182 ZIN DUAL UNIT SERVICE WATER OUTAGE.

814 ZIN CONTAINMENT ISOL APPENDIX J MODS 180 LAS REPLACE SAFETY RELATED BATTERIES 810 DRE PENETRATION BELLOWS REPlACEMENT 180

  • ZIN ZION DIESEL GEN CONTROL SYS U1&2 808 ORE STATION BLACKOUT 172 BYR RESPONSE TO NRC GENERIC LTR 89-13 808 aoc STATION BLACKOUT 166 BRW MEER COOLING & VENT 808 QOC O.C. LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST TAPS 158 BRW BORIC ACID ADDmON TO THE 2NO SIDE 804 BYR RCCA REPLACEMENT* U2 154 LAS ORYWEll COOLING SYSTEM 804 ORE RX WTR LEVEL MON U2 & U3 148 BRW BRAIDWD.UNIT 1-DIAPHRAGM VALVES 804 ORE U1 DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES 148 BRW BRAIOWO-UNIT 2-DIAPHRAGM VALVES 804 aoc QUAD REACTOR WATER LEV MO:IMPV 142 BYR REPLACE NOCT Fill 104 QDC RWCU PIPE REPLACEMENT 142 LAS RAOWASTE UPGRADE*

798 CDC UPGRADE RX RECIRC PUMP SUPPORTS 142 ZIN ZION DIESEL GEN AIR SYS U1&2 794 ZIN MOY HARDWARE* GENERIC LETTER 89-10 138 BYR RTO BYPASS ELIM.U1 792 BRW RESPONSE TO NRC 89-13 138 BYR RTO BYPASS ELIM-U2 792 ORE ISOLATION CONDENSER 138 LAS CORE INSTABILITY 788 DRE RWCU PIPE REPlACEMENT 138 ZIN SW CHEM INJECTION SYSTEM 788 CDC GENERIC LETTER 89-10 MOVS 130 BYR FW SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS-U1 784 DRE* GENERIC LETTER 89-10 MOVS 130 BYR FW SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS-U2 778 aoc REPLACE DRVWEU/TORUS PURGE SYS YLV 128 LAS CONTROL ROOM HUMAN FACTORS 178 CDC REPLACE ASBESTOS INSUL QUAD CTS 126 BYR BYRON UNIT 1-DIAPHRAGM VALVES 767 aoc PRIMARY CONTAINMENT BELLOWS 126 BYR BYRON UNIT 2-DIAPHRAGM VALVES 768 DRE EDSFI RELATED ISSUES 126 LAS DIGITAL FEED WATER CONTROL 788 ODC EDSFI RELATED ISSUES

c... _.

MAJOR PROJECTS INVESTMENT BUDGETS

. MAJOR PROJECTS INVESTMENT BUDGETS (WITHOUT RANK VALUE ADJUSTMENTS)

(WITH RANK VALUE ADJUSTMENTS)

PURE ADJ~

RANK STA PROJECT DESCRIPTION RANK STA PROJECT DESCRIPTION ea DRE ccxiuNo CANAL BANK IMPAOYEMENTS ea BRW RAISE COOUNO LAKE DIKE ea BRW RAISE C00UNG LAKE DIKE ea BRW CONTRACTOR PROCESSINO FACIUJY ea BRW CONTRACTOR PROCESSING FACl.riY *

. ea BYR MSIV ROOM COOlJNG.Ut ea BYR MSIV ROoM COOUNG-Ut ea BYR MSIV ROOM COOlJNO.U2 88 BYR MSIV ROOM COOUN<W2 ea ooc RHR CORNER ROOM SUMPS 68 aoc AHR CORNER ROOM SUMPS ea ZIN ZK>N ElEC CROSS-TIES OIESQ. OEN ea ZIN ZION EL£C CROSS. TIES OIESQ. OEN 68 ZIN FlRE DETECTOR REPl.ACEMENT

  • Ut&U2 68 ZIN ARE DETECTOR RE~CEMENT

ZIN F1RE PUMP. UPGRADES aoc PURCHASE UAT BRW SECONDARY SIDE IMPRCWEMENT8 ZIN ARE PUMP UPGRADES aoc RESOLUTION OF CORE INSTABllJJY DRE EDSF1 RELATED ISSUES ZIN EXPAND CHEMISTRY LAB CDC EDSF1 RELATED ISSUES 84 DRE YNMAY SWITai REPLACEMENT'

&e BRW SECQNOARY SIDE IMPROVEMENTS 84 LAS FEEDWATER SPARGER UNIT Z CDC RESOLUTION OF CORE INSTABUn'.

82 BRW FW079 CHECK VAL REL Ut 68 ZIN EXPAND CHEMISTRY lA8 82 BRW FW079 CHECK VAL REPL U2 84 DRE HARO PIPE VENT SVSTEM eo DRE NCADSYSTEM 84 DRE INSTRUMENT AIR UPGRADE,.

eo DRE INPROCE'SSINO FACIUTY M

DRE CORE INSTABILITY PROBLEM 118 BRW 8ECXJNDNW BIDE OtECK Vl.Y AEPl 84 aoc O.C..UNIT 1&2-PIPE VENT SVSTEM

'118 DRE TECH 8UPPORr CENTER ADOfTION 84 ODC QUAD.CITIES HYDRO ADO SYS U1 84 ODC HYDROGEN~

SYSTEM U2 I

84 DRE YNMAY SWITCH REPLACEMENI' 84 LAS FEEDWATER SPARGER UNf 2 82 BRW FW079 CHECK VAL REL U1 82 BRW FW079 CHECK VAL REPl. U2 eo ZIN AHR SYSTEM 04ECK VALVES eo DRE SEWAGE PLANT EXPANSION*

eo ZIN ACCESS FACILITY MD 8'J1POR1' OFFICE eo DRE NCADSYSTEM eo DRE INPROCESSING FACIUJY

r.

118 BYR Ut MSR'S

. 118 BYR U2MSR'S 118 ZIN ZION INCR STEAM OEN 8Y8 118 BRW 8EOONDMv SIDE CHEac Vl.V REPL 118 DRE TECH 8UPPORf CENTERADOmON 138 PAOJECT8) 122 PAOJECT8)

. Vision for Integrated Schedule

. o Effective Balance

  • o Long Range O Flexible Method Safety/Reliability/Quality/
  • Plan to Address Owner,9

. Cost Effectiveness.

  • Regulator Issues Levels of Communication 1

High Synergistic (Win/Win)*

  • Respectful (Compromise)

Low Defensive (Win/Lose or Lose/Win)

  • Low
  • . Cooperation**

High.

  • Methodology for

. Establishing*an Integrated Schedule W'ID/Win Character Supportive Systen1s (4) and Processes (S)

. BWR Primary Containrrient Bellows Issue: WiniWin RWCU Piping Replacement G.L. _ 88-01: -* Win/Lose -

  • i
  • .t e

C/')

w

(.)

c::.

0 h3*

c::

Unllmlted Resources Pro/Id I I

... *Pro/tetl I

Pro/ectl I Pro/1ct3 I

Pro/Rt1 Project I

. I Pro/ect4. I Pro/<<:t 7**

      • Pro/Kt I* -......,.,.. *** I

.. ""'v."***: *...

TIME I

I Dlscr~tlonary Resource Limits.*

  • Jr.

(/)

  • w*

(.)

a:

0 r.n w a:

. Pro/<<4 2.: *.=.<~...

TIME

LONG RANGE PIAN INVESTMENT AND EXPENSE Planning.

Long RB/lf/6

.* Contml

-Prioritization Planning Cootrlination Issues Management ~-..--......--~-~ AccounlBbilily A/E Daily.. Ou/ag8. \\l",ArdJ'a~

Planning Execution

.. ***~*

e.

-~-*.

.... --..10 11114rcao I

II

  • 3:JNYTVEI Wtll/901/cl 3S/Bc/X3ONV1N3WJ.S:JAN/

M'7c/ 39NVH 9N07 *

\\.

LONG RANGE Pl.AN.

INVESTMENT AND EXPENSE PROGRAM PROCESS Mnm/......

C*M91JAMwww

.ca.tr.. -*

.Qacl..........

I

LONG RANGE Pl.AN INVESTMENT AND EXPENSE ACTMTY PROCESS

-- I.II,.,,,,,,,

a.a.111*w I.II,.,,,,,,,

  • ~ I.II,.,,,,,,,

- UP.....,

I.-

\\

I.II,.,,,,,,,.

--..... UP.. -- I.II,,..,.

a.t*w

-.._UP,..,,

....... ~.

~

~**

I 4 ~

f--1 Oli.........

~

I i.-

ao,..-

an._..

-......... -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17177A464&oldid=5133169"