ML17157C300

Documents 930325 Emergency Exercise Meeting W/Util,Fema & Commonwealth of PA to Discuss Potential Improvements in Development & Review Process for Exercise Scenarios

ML17157C300
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	04/16/1993
From:	Cooper R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	Keiser H PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9304270052
Download: ML17157C300 (16)

Text

Docket Nos:

50-387 50-388 Mr. Harold W. Keiser Senior Vice President - Nuclear Pennsylvania Power &Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101

SUBJECT:

MARCH 25, 1993 EMERGENCY EXERCISE MEETING

SUMMARY

This letter documents the subject management meeting held by NRC with representatives ofyour

staff, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to discuss potential improvements in the development and review process for exercise scenarios.

Enclosed, for record purposes, is a list of meeting attendees, and a,copy of the handout used for your presentation.

We believe that this meeting was beneficial in identifying scenario issues for consideration by your staff, the NRC, FEMA, and the Commonwealth.

We expect to consider lessons learned from the Susquehanna exercise in future scenario

reviews, and will follow-up on recommendations identified during the meeting, Thank you for your staff's effort in coordinating scenario production during Full Field Exercise-3 (FFE-3) planning, for your efforts in developing a new scenario followingFFE-3 cancellation, and for assisting the NRC and FEMA to address the Commonwealth's exercise scenario concerns during the March 25 meeting.

Sincerely, Enclosures; As stated Original Signed By'.

Richard W. Cooper Richard W. Cooper, II, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards 93042700S2 9304i6 PDR ADOCK 05000387 F

PDR OPPlt gg. RECORD COPY

Pennsylvania Power and Light Company APA 16 3993 cc w/encls:

J. M. Kenny, Nuclear Licensing H. G. Stanley, Superintendent of Plant-SSES Vice President, Nuclear Operations H. D. Woodeshick, Special Office of the President M. M. Urioste, Nuclear, Services Manager R. M. Peal, Supervisor, Nuclear Compliance J. C. Tilton, III, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.

T. M. Majusiak, FEMA Region IIIRAC Chairman J. Jordan, Director, Bureau of Plans and Preparedness, PEMA R. J. Casto, Deputy Director, Bureau of Training and Education, PEMA A. R. Simpson, Chief, Radiological Preparedness Division, PEMA J. LaFleur, Director, PEMA M. A. Reilly, Chief, Division of Environmental'Radiation, DER/BRP Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

K. Abraham, PAO (2)

NRC Resident Inspector Commonwealth of Pennsylvania OFFlGlALRECORD COPY

Pennsylvania Power and Light Company bcc w/encls:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

E. Wenzinger, DRP J. White, DRP DRS/EB SALP Coordinator J. Trapp, DRS J. Noggle, DRSS V. McCree, OEDO R. Clark, NRR, Project Manager Gordon C'~

4/If/93 Chawaga 4/9/ 3 Mc abe Joyner C+

4/i~/93 4// A3 4/I /93 OFFICIALRECORD COPY

ENCLOSURE 1

Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Management Meeting Attendees March 25, 1993 rRe ul o

mi.io T. T. Martin, Regional Administrator R. W. Cooper, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards J. H. Joyner, Branch Chief, Facilities Radiological Safety and Safeguards Branch C. Z. Gordon, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector J. R. White, Section Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2A E. C. McCabe, Section Chief, Emergency Preparedness Section S. L. Johnson, Emergency Response Assistant T. H. Fish, State Liaison Officer J. H. Lusher, Emergency Preparedness Inspector E. C. Wenzinger, Branch Chief, Projects Branch No. 2 R. J. Bores, Technical Assistant D. J. Chawaga, Emergency Response Coordinator E. F. Fox, Jr., Emergency Preparedness Branch, NRR J. Quissell, Incident Response Branch, AEOD A. Mohseni, Emergency Preparedness Branch, NRR Fede 1Emer enc Mana emen A enc S. Adukaitis, Region III T. M. Majusiak, Region IIIRAC Chairman Penn 1

ni Emer en Man emen A

n J. Jordan, Director, Bureau of Plans and Preparedness R. J. Casto, Deputy Director, Bureau of Training and Education A. R. Simpson, Chief, Radiological Preparedness Division Penns lvania Po er and Li h om an C. Myers, Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Affairs R. Halm, Emergency Coordinator C. J. Roszkowski, Senior Emergency Planner R. M. Peal, Supervisor, Nuclear Emergency Planning De a men of En ironmental Re urc

/Bur i of R dia i n Pro ion M. A. Reilly, Chief, Division of Environmental Radiation

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED Scenario Development Timeline Description, Scope and Objectives to NRC (75 -100 days prior, 75-90 days per FEMA)

Exercise Package Sent for Review (45-60 days NRC, 45-60 per FEMA)

Resolve NRC (FEMA) Comments (30-50 days NRC, 35-45 days FEMA)

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED ec ives NUREG 0654 FEMA Demonstration Requirements NRC Participation Past Open Items/Deficiencies (NRC, In-House, Local, State)

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED Objectives cont.

Procedures Industry Events In-house Review Send Out for NRC Review

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED Scenario Timeline PPS.L Requirements State/local Requirements NRC Requirements

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED Extent of Play PPS.L Counties Fire/Ambulance Companies

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED Extent of Play Cont.)

Local Municipalities HAZMATSupport NRC INPO ANI

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED

~ Scenario Summary Developed

~ Develop Detailed Timeline

~ Develop Radiological Data

~ Develop Controller Message Sheets

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED

~ Develop any mockupsiprops needed

~ Develop scenario on simulator

~ Prepare Exercise Manual

HOW PPS.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED Distribute Exercise Manual for Review NRC Region State (PEMA, DER/BRP)

FEMA FEMA Contractor

HOW PP&.L EXERCISES ARE DEVELOPED Conduct a Review Meeting with Major Participants Meet to review; Objectives will be Driven Input Received from Participants Add New Items to Scenario Review Expected Participant Response

Normal Planning Process NOT Implemented As a result no face to face meetings to; develop the objectives, review the scenario timeline, logic or content, review the radiological data,

No face to face meetings to; review weather data, review anticipated participant response, review the scenario technical aspects, set up a precise mechanism for termination of the exercise.