ML17157C195

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Insp Repts 50-387/92-23 & 50-388/92-23 on 920824-1009 & Forwards Notice of Violation
ML17157C195
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/1993
From: Hodges M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Keiser H
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML17157C196 List:
References
EA-92-234, NUDOCS 9302190045
Download: ML17157C195 (6)


See also: IR 05000387/1992023

Text

FORD 1

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9302190045

DOC.DATE: 93/02/11

NOTARIZED: NO

DOCKET

IL:50-387 Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station, Unit 1, Pennsylva

05000387

50-388

Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station, Unit 2, Pennsylva

05000388

UTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

HODGES,M.W.

Region

1 (Post

820201)

RECZP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

KEISERiH.W.

Pennsylvania

Power

& Light Co..

R

SUBJECT: Discusses

insp repts '50-387/92-23

& 50-388/92-23

on

920824-1009

& forwards notice of violation.

P

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE01D

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR

ENCL U

SIZE:

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response

NOTES'ECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD1-2

PD

INTERNAL: ACRS

AEOD/DEIB

AEOD/TTC

NRR MORISSEAU,D

NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10

NRR/DREP/PEPB9H

NRR/PMAS/ZLPB 2

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS2

RGN1

FILE

01

EXTERNAL

EG&G/BRYCEiJ ~ H ~

NSIC

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

.1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RECIPIENT

ZD CODE/NAME .

CLARKiR

AEOD

AEOD/DSP/TPAB

DEDRO

NRR/DLPQ/LHFBPT

NRR/DOEA/OEAB

NRR/PMAS/ILPB 1

NRR/PMAS/ILRB12

OE DIR

NRC PDR

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NOTE TO ALL RIDS

RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK.

ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION

LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

25

ENCL

25

FEB i y 199)

Docket Nos.

50-387

50-388

EA No.92-234

Mr. Harold W. Keiser

Senior Vice President - Nuclear

Pennsylvania Power &Light Company

2 North Ninth Street

Allentown, Pennsylvania

18101

Dear Mr. Keiser:

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION- INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-387/92-23

AND 50-388/92-23

This refers to the special fire protection safety inspection conducted from August 24 to

October 9, 1992, at both the Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station and at your Allentown,

Pennsylvania, offices.

During the inspection, four apparent violations related to your fire

protection program were identified. The inspection report which documents

these findings

was transmitted to you on December 4, 1992.

The issues related to the apparent violations

were discussed at an enforcement conference at the NRC Region I office on

January

19, 1993.

Persons attending the conference are identified in Attachment 1.

Also,

copies of your visual presentation material used at the conference are included as

Attachments 2 and 3 to this letter.

The first apparent violation concerned your apparent failure to perform Technical

Specification inspections on Kaowool fire barrier cable raceway wrap systems and gypsum

board fire enclosures

since their installation over ten years ago.

This finding was based on

information contained in the surveillance procedure in use at the time of our inspection and

discussions with personnel performing the surveillance inspection.

Your investigation

subsequent

to our inspection determined that Kaowool wrap and gypsum board enclosures

had been inspected until a procedure change made in December

1989 deleted inspections for

these fire barrier materials.

An NRC inspection, performed on January 20 and 21, 1993, to

be documented in NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-387/93-01 and 50-388/93-01, reviewed

your records and confirmed your finding. You further indicated you are now in the process

of enhancing your procedures

and processes for performing these surveillance inspections.

Also, surveillances have been re-performed in plant areas containing the fire barrier materials

in question using enhanced

methods.

No significant additional discrepancies

were identified.

9302190045

9302ii

PDR

ADOCK 05000387'

PDR

OFFICIALRECORD COPY

G:ENFCONFM.LET

0

'r.

Harold W. Keiser

The second apparent violation concerned the inadequate implementation of the fire protection

program quality assurance

requirement to have field personnel verify that fire protection

installations were installed in accordance with design specifications.

You have nearly

completed a comprehensive plant walkdown of installed fire wrap barriers.

Allidentified

fire barrier defects have been or are being repaired.

The third apparent violation concerned the failure to follow procedures to apply adequate

quality measures

to fire protection program design drawings.

You have nearly completed a

comprehensive plant walkdown to compare their drawings to the installed fire wrap barriers.

Allthe drawing errors found have been corrected and further drawing enhancements

are

planned.

The fourth apparent violation concerned the finding that Kaowool fire barrier material had

been installed in an area that was not protected by automatic fire suppression

and where

Kaowool has not been specifically approved for use.

Your plant walkdowns have identified

no other areas that contained Kaowool that were not protected by a suppression

system or did

not have an NRC approved exemption.

To correct this deficiency, you are planning to

remove the Kaowool and replace it with Thermo-Lag material.

V

Although not an enforcement action, an unresolved item (URI 387 and 388/92-03-01) that

concerned the use of a Thermo-Lag configuration in three areas was also discussed

during

the enforcement conference.

In response to this unresolved item, you noted that our

inspection report had stated that:

(1) there was reasonable

basis for PP&L to believe the

NRC's rejection of the cable tray portion of the test results in 1982 applied only to the three

fire areas for which there had been an exemption request,

and (2) that in 1982, PP&L was

not aware of and was not attempting to meet the 250 degree temperature rise criterion. At

the enforcement conference, you indicated that our inspection report adequately defined

PP&L's position, with respect to SSES spray-on Thermo-Lag fire barrier configuration.

Therefore, you believe that your staff had addressed

all of the NRC's concerns at the time of

licensing.

Based on our inspection findings as documented in the subject inspection report and your

presentation at the enforcement conference,

we consider this unresolved item to be closed.

However, closure of this item does not constitute an NRC position on the acceptability of the

use of Thermo-Lag installed in your plant or the Thermo-Lag test acceptance

criteria which

you used.

These items are part of a generic issue concerning the acceptability of Thermo-

Lag which is currently under review by the NRC.

Licensee actions concerning the use of

Thermo-Lag are addressed

in NRC Bulletins 92-01 and 92-02, Supplement

1; and Generic Letter 92-08.

OFFICIALRECORD COPY

G:ENFCONFM.LET

~

~

Mr. Harold W. Keiser

Although the four apparent violations noted above were collectively initiallyconsidered for

escalated

enforcement action, we have determined that this action was not appropriate in this

instance.

Our determination is based on your description of the causes,

safety significance of

the violations and your corrective actions to the identified deficiencies,

as well as a

subsequent review of our overall inspection findings.

However, the above activities appear to be in violation of NRC requirements,

as specified in

the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice).

The violations are of concern because

each of

these violations could be attributed to the inadequate application of quality and lack of

management oversight to changes in the fire protection program that allowed these violations

to occur undetected over a considerable period of time. It is noted that all of the violations

were NRC identified; it was also noted that once these problems were identified, you

initiated prompt and extensive corrective action.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the

enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your response,

you should document the

specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence.

After

reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the

results of future inspections,

the NRC willdetermine whether further NRC enforcement

action is necessary

to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and

its enclosures wiH be placed in the NRC Public Document room.

The responses

directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject to the clearance

procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96.511.

Sincerely,

Qr)gina) Sign~ai ~cV:

Marvin W. ik@:: -"

Marvin W. Hodges, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A, Notice of Violation

2.

Attachment 1, Personnel Attending The Enforcement Conference

3.

Attachment 2, Licensee Response

Presented

at the Enforcement Conference

4.

Attachment 3, Supporting Information to Licensee Response

OFFICIALACCORD COPY

G:ENFCONFM.LET

Mr, Harold W. Keiser

cc w/encls:

J. M. Kenny, Nuclear Licensing

H. G. Stanley, Superintendent of Plant-SSES

Vice President, Nuclear Operations

M. M. Urioste, Nuclear Services Manager, General Electric Company

R. M. Peal, Supervisor, Nuclear Compliance

H. D. Woodeshick, Special Office of the President

J. C. Tilton, III, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

K. Abraham, PAO (2)

NRC Resident Inspector

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

RI'DRP

Qzggp

02/A(93

02/03/93

bcc w/encls:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

J. Lieberman, OE

M. Thadani, NRR

M. Hodges, DRS

L. Bettenhausen,

DRS

W. Lanning, DRS

E. Wenzinger, DRP

J. White, DRP

DRS/EB SALP Coordinator

J. Trapp, DRS

J. Noggle, DRSS

V. McCree, OEDO

J. Raleigh, NRR, Project Manager

P. Madden, NRR

G. Kenna, OI

G. Mulley, OIG

D. Holody, EO

¹ Blumberg, DRS

F. Bower, DRS

R. Mathew, DRS

DRS Files (2)

RI:DRS:D

Bower/dmg/ajk/dmg Blumberg

RI:DRS

Bettenhausen

02/+93

RI:DRS

02//o/93

OFFICIALRECORD COPY

G:ENFCONFM.LET