ML17157A946

Discusses Util 900223 & 0427 Responses to Generic Ltr 89-13 for Facility.Advises That Since Detailed Technical Review of Response Has Not Been Performed,Approval of Svc Water Sys Program Is Neither Intended Nor Implied

ML17157A946
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	11/15/1991
From:	Raleigh J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Keiser H PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
GL-89-13, TAC-M74071, TAC-M74072, NUDOCS 9112040128
Download: ML17157A946 (5)

Text

November 15, 199 Oocket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 Mr. Harold W. Keiser Senior Vice President

- Nuclear Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101

SUBJECT:

NRC GENERIC LETTER (GL) 89-13, "SERVICE WATER SYSTEM PROBLEMS AFFECTING SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMQNT," SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1

AND 2 (TAC NOS'.

74071 AND f4072)

By letters dated February 23, 1990 and April 27, 1990, Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (PPIIL) responded to the subject generic letter for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2.

Your response indicated that activities to address the issues discussed in the generic letter either have been performed or will be implemented in accordance with the schedule included in your supplemental responses dated December 14, 1990, June 4, 1991 and September 9, 1991.

Since a detailed technical review of your response to the issues covered by GL 89-13 has not been performed, approval of your service water system program is neither intended nor implied; however, your confirmation does provide an adequate basis to consider the staff's review of your response to the GL complete.

Within 30 days following the completion of the scheduled

actions, you are requested to confirm their implementation to the NRC in writing.

This requirement affects fewer than 10 respondents and therefore, is not subject to Office of Management and-Budget review under P.L.96-511.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me on (301) 492-1447.

S in cere ly,

/S/

James J. Raleigh, project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:

See next page DISTRIBUTION-NRC

& Local PDRs PDI-2 Reading SVarga JCalvo CMi 1 le r JRaleigh MO'Brien(2)

OGC EJordao 3701 ACRS(10)

RBlough, RBN-I

JWhite, RGN-I

AChu, 14D1 FC

PDI-NAME

M r

-//7 A

PD I 2/P

JRalei

~

~

91: // //$ /91

PD 1-27D

. b:CMille

// /d'S /91 79 I'TQ/74071/2 ooumaoFEH.

N 9112040128 911115 PDR ADDCK 05000387 P

PDR Q)Po

'A U

)

h 1

A 1 ff UU

~'

I

'1 ~

A h

U 3) 1 I

(M

')',')

M,M I

It h

U r

~

t' 0 (

(1 I

. U f It h

lf I

t~

~

~

~S flEay~

(4 ~

Vp

+

0 ty O

I C

Vi 4'

+n gO

++*++

Docket Nos.

50-387 and 50-388 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 November 15, 1991 Mr. Harold W. Keiser Senior Vice President

- Nuclear Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101

SUBJECT:

NRC GENERIC LETTER (GL) 89-13$

"SERVICE WATER SYSTEM PROBLEMS AFFECTING SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT," SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1

AND 2 (TAC NOS.

74071 AND 74072)

By letters dated February 23, 1990 and April 27, 1990, Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (PPSL) responded to the subject generic letter for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2.

Your response indicated that activities to address the issues discussed in the generic letter either have been performed or will be implemented in accordance with the schedule included in your supplemental responses dated December 14, 1990, June 4, 1991'nd September 9, 1991.

Since a detailed technical review of your response to the issues covered by GL 89-13 has not been performed, approval of your service water system program is neither intended nor implied; however, your confirmation does provide an adequate basis to consider the staff's review of your response to the GL complete.

Within 30 days following the completion of the scheduled

actions, you are requested to confirm their implementation to the NRC in writing.

This requirement affects fewer than 10 respondents and therefore, is -not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under P.L.96-511.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me on (301) 492-1447.

S in cere ly, cc:

See next page James J. Raleigh, Project-Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

, ~

Mr. Harold W. Kei ser Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1

& 2 CC:

Jay Silberg, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts 5 Trowbridge 2300 N Street N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20037 Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.

Assistant Corporate Counsel Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. J.

M. Kenny Licensing Group Supervisor Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Al 1 entown, Pennsy 1 vani a 18101 Mr. Scott Barber Senior Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.

Box 35 Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603-0035 Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania P. 0.

Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. Jesse C. Tilton, III Allegheny Elec. Cooperative, Inc.

212 Locust Street P.O.

Box 1266 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-1266 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Harold G. Stanley Superintendent of Plant Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. Herbert D. Woodeshick Special Office of the President Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 1009 Fowles Avenue Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603 Mr. Robert G.

Byram Vice President-Nuclear Operations Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Al1 entown, Pennsy 1 vani a 18101