ML17157A102
| ML17157A102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1990 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17157A101 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-86-10, NUDOCS 9004090369 | |
| Download: ML17157A102 (2) | |
Text
~
r
~p,R RECy~
Vp0 A
W~*y4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. 95 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-14 AND AMENDMENT NO.
63 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-22 PENNSYLVANIA POWER
& LIGHT COMPANY ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC.
DOCKET NOS.
50-387 AND 50-388 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 5, 1988, Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company requested an amendment to Facility Operating License Nos.
NPF-14 and NPF-22 for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2.
The proposed amendments would change the License Condition 2.C(6) of License No. NPF-14 and License Condition 2.C(3) of License No. NPF-22 to permit modifications of the Fire Protection program using the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 as recommended by the NRC in Generic Letter 86-10.
- 2. 0 EVALUATION In Generic Letter 86-10, the NRC recommended that the licensees'ire Protection program and other major commitments including fire hazards analysis be incorporated by a reference into the licensees'inal Safety Analysis Reports.
This would permit the licensees to make changes to the Fire Protection
- program, systems, the administrative and technical controls, the organization, and other plant features associated with fire protection consistent with other plant features described in the FSAR.
The proposed revisions to the License Conditions are consistent with the recommendations of the Generic letter 86-10 and will not affect the level of fire protection at the facility.
The proposed changes are, therefore, acceptable.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
These amendments involve changes to a requirement with respect to the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that these amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that these amendments involve no significant hazards consideration and there 9004090369 900327 PDR ADOCK 05000387 P
vn t
~
(
I%
e has been no public comment on such findings Accordingly, these amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement nor environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission made a proposed determination that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration which was published in the Federal Reqister (55 FR 5112) on February 21, 1990 and consulted with thee osmonwealth oOOennsylvania.
No public comments were received, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did not have any comments
~
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical tn the common defense and security r or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
tisohan C. Thadani Dated:
March 27, 1990