ML17156A911
| ML17156A911 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 10/20/1988 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17156A910 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8811080142 | |
| Download: ML17156A911 (4) | |
Text
~st ssaog
~4
~o ss csO I
0 V/+n gO
+sb*dz+
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION'ASHINGTON, D. C. 20S56 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.
83 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-14 AND AMENDMENT NO. 51 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
NPF-22 PENNSYLVANIA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC.
DOCKET NOS. 50-387 AND 50-388 SUS UEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated December 18, 1987, Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company requested an amendment to Facility Operating License Nos.
NPF-14 and NPF-22 for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES),
Units 1 and 2.
The proposed amendments would revise the Technical Specifications for Units 1 and 2 as follows.
Correct errors of inconsistency in the nomenclature in Technical Specifications and the plant drawings, Delete redundant information, and Delete "Manager - Nuclear Licensing" from offsite organization chart.
2.0 EVALUATION The staff has reviewed the licensee's request for the above changes and finds that the proposed changes do not affect any systems, components, procedures, and/or operation of SSES Units 1 and 2.
The proposed changes are, therefore, acceptable.
- 3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION These amendments relate to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements.
Accordingly, these amendments meet the eligibilitycriteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement nor environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
- 4. 0 CONCLUSION The Comission made a proposed determination that these amendments involve no significant hazards ccnsideraticn which was published in the Federal
~Re ister 88ii080i42 88i020 PDR ADOCK, 05000387 P
~ ~
4 I'g (53 FR 30141) on August 10, 1988 and consulted with the State of Pennsylvania.
No public comments were received, and the State of Pennsylvania did not have any comments; The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security nor to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
Mohan C. Thadani Dated:
October 20, 1988
~ f