ML17139B357
| ML17139B357 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/1983 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17139B356 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8302180034 | |
| Download: ML17139B357 (4) | |
Text
I gI,q Re0V 1p0 p0~
0O
~/4,
+w*w+
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVAL'UATION AMEN
'8'USQUEH
-14 ON;-UNIT 1 Introduction The licensee in a letter dated October 22, 1982, proposed changes to the Technical Specifications of the operating license for Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 1 which are as follows:
a)
In Technical Specification 4.6.1.2.h, change the end of the sentence from "per Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.8.3."
to read "per Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.8.2.".
b)
In Technical Specification 3.8.3.1.b.2.c)1),
change load group "1D622" to read "10662".
c)
In Action Statement b) of Technical Specification 3.8.3.1, add to the end of the statement "24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />."
d)
In Technical Specification 4.11.2.7.1, change the end of the sentence from "Specification 3.3.7.12."
to read "Specification 3.3.7.11.".
Evaluation Each of the above changes proposed by the licensee is as a result of typographical error. in the Technical Specifications.
These changes are administrative in nature and serve to clarify the Technical Specifications effected.
On this basis the above changes are found acceptable to the staff.
Environmental. Consideration We have determined that this amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amount nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact.
Having made this determination, we have further concluded that this amendment involves action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental
- impact, and, pursuant to 10 CFR Section 51.5(d)(4), that an environmental impact statement or negative declaration
. and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
8302180034 830207 PDR ADOCQ 05000387 P
PDR V.
hk E
~
J E
r Conclusion Me have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) because the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered, does not create the possibility of an accident of a type different from any evaluated previously, and does not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, the amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be
'ndangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Dated:
FEB y
~g83
[~