ML17139A421
| ML17139A421 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1981 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Paolino R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17139A419 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-81-14, 50-388-81-07, 50-388-81-7, NUDOCS 8109280583 | |
| Download: ML17139A421 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000387/1981014
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE
OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
Report Nos.
50-387/81-14
50-388/81-07
Docket Nos;
SO-387
50-388
Region I
CPPR-101
License
Nos.
CPPR-102
Priority
Category
B
Licensee:
Penns
lvania Power and Li ht
Com
an
2 North Street
Allentown
Penns
1vania
18101
Facility Name:
Sus
uehanna
Steam Electric Station
Units
1 and
2
Inspection at:
Berwick, Pennsylvania
Inspection
conducted:
July 6-10,
1981
Inspectors:
J. Paolino,
eactor
Inspector
date
signed
Approved by:
S.
D. Ebneter,
Chief, Plant Systems
Section,
DETI
date
igned
Ins ection
Summar
Combined Ins ection of Units
1 and
2 on Jul
6-10
1981
Combined
Re ort
Nos.
SO-387/81-14
and 50-388/81-07).
Areas Ins ected:
Routine,
unannounced facility inspection
by one regional
based
inspector of licensee
work activities
and documentation
pertaining to
the installation of safety related electrical/instrumentation
components;
review of previously identified items; facility inspection
and interviews with
craft personnel.
The inspection
involved 39 inspection
hours
on site by one
regional
based
inspector.
8109280583 8f083f
ADQCK 05000387
'DR
Results:
Of the six areas
inspected,
no items of noncompliance
were
identified in 5 areas
of inspection;
one item of noncompliance
was identified
in the area of installed instrument
components,
(installed components
not per
certified vendor print).
DETAILS
1.
Persons'Contacted
Penns
lvania Power
and Li ht
- R. Beckley, Resident
NQAE
"J. Buczynski,
NQA CSG
P. Capotosto,
Site
QAE
D. Casal,
Resident
Engineer
~S.
Denson,
Project Construction
Manager
- R. Matthews, Analyst,
NQA
Bechtel
Power Cor oration
A. Bisesti, Assistant Project Manager
G. Bell,
QAE
- G. Cranston,
Resident Project Engineer
"G. Gelinas, Assistant Project
FQAE
S. Hoffman, Resident
Engineer
(Mechanical)
E. Kleha, Assistant Field Engineer
C. Manley,
Lead Cable Pulling Engineer
"W. Mourer, Project Superintendent
"J. O'ullivan, Assistant Project Engineer
R.
Rezek,
Lead Instrument Engineer
- H. Lilligh, Project
QAE
~A. Sherwood,
QCE
S. Santopietro,
Construction
Engineer
R. Stiegerwald,
Lead Equipment Separations
Engineer
- K. Stout, Project Field
QCE
P.
Weisman,
QCE
U.S. Nuclear
Re viator
Commission
- G. Rhoads,
Resident
Inspector
~denotes
personnel
present at the exit meeting.
The inspector
observed
work activities in progress,
completed
work and
plant status
in several
areas of the plant during
a general
inspection of
Units
1 and 2.
The inspector
examined work items for obvious defects
or
noncompliance
with NRC requirements
or licensee
commitments.
Particular
note was taken regarding
the presence
of quality control inspectors
and
indication of quality control activities through visual evidence
such
as
inspection
records,
material identifications,
nonconformance
and
acceptance
tags.
In addition,
the inspector interviewed craft and
supervisory
personnel
encountered
in the work areas.
No items of noncompliance
were identified.
3.
Status of Previousl
Identified Items
Closed
CDR Item 387/388-79-00-01
pertaining to defective
Raychem
Co-Axial Cable
f09
.
The inspector
reviewed licensee
correspondence
PLA-347,
nonconformance
report no.
3447,
MCAR
1-35'nd
audit no. CL(4) which documents
the cable deficiency and
disposition.
The documentation
indicates that the f09 cable is not
used in the containment
and was limited to one production run.
Disposition consists
of replacing the
damaged
cable and/or splicing.
The inspector
had
no further questions
regarding this item.
This
item is closed.
b.
Closed
Unresolved
Item 387/79-08-05 pertaining to the
use of the
CR120A relay in safety related
equipment and/or in non-safety
related
areas
in which a fire resulting
from the flammable relay
contact cover could affect safety related
equipment.
The inspector
reviewed licensee
response
to gA action request
no. H-81-02 dated
May 29,
1981.
The licensee
states
that the subject relays
identified in IE Bulletin 78-01 are
not, applied at Susquehanna
in
areas
that
may have
a potential
for damaging
safety related
equipment
and that the subject relay is not included in the spare
relay inventory or on order.
This item is closed.
C.
Closed
Unresolved
Item 387/79-23-01
and
CDR Item 387/388-79-00-05
pertaining to damaged
cable reported in Deficiency Report 0092,
0096
and
MCAR 1-35.
The inspector
reviewed
NCR Nos.
3581,
3887,
3992,
4036,
4085,
4130,
5027 which identify the cable deficiency and the
disposition.
In addition, the inspector
reviewed the construction
corrective action control
document
nos.
PCLBC-3181,
6374 and 7743;
licensee
correspondence
letter
nos.
PLA-383,
478 and 546;
and
licensee
closeout letter no.
PLI-12396 dated
March 4,
1981.
The inspector determined
the action taken
by the licensee
to be
acceptable.
This item is closed.
d.
0 en
CDR Item 387/388-80-00-25
80-00-20 pertaining to the
undersized
cable
problem in
MOV control circuits (DR-0138)
and the
results of the licensee
engineering
review of Power and Control
Cable Applications recorded
in the minutes of November 7,
14 and 21,
1980 meeting with the Architect Engineers at the
home office in San
Francisco
which identifies
a problem area
in not verifying actual
circuit lengths versus
scheduled circuit lengths.
The inspector
reviewed the following documentation
and the licensee's
response
no.
PLB-13204 dated June
5,
1981 which concludes that the reports are
inadequate
in describing actual
problem,
causes
and resolution.
This item remains
open.
4.
Instrumentation
Com onents/S
stem Work Observations
The inspector
observed
work performance partially completed
work and
completed work, as appropriate,
relative to the installation of
instrument
components
associated
with the
assembly
as
defined
on certified vendor drawing nos.
13811-2
and 13811-3 for damper
nos.
HDM-17508A and B, respectively.
Visual inspection of the installed
control assembly for damper
nos.
HDM-17508A and B, located
in the Unit 1
Reactor Building, elevation 779'-0", area
27
show that the component
layout of the installed
Damper Control Assembly does not conform to the
certified drawing configuration.
Discussions with licensee
personnel
and
a review of the material receiving reports indicate that the
Control Assembly is not inspected
when received
on site except for visual
damage
and documentation.
Construction quality control inspection
reports indicate the installed
Damper Control Assemblies
were inspected
and accepted
on May 5,
1980
and turned over to the startup
group
on
December
19,
1980.
The inspector
noted that the quality control
inspection
performed
by field quality control personnel
pertains
only to
the orientation of the installed
Damper Control Assembly
and not to the
individual component location.
The inspector questioned
the licensee
on the adequacy
of his quality
assurance
program which permits the installation of nonconforming
material
or fabricated
assemblies
in safety related
systems.
,The inspector
informed the licensee that this was
an item of
noncompliance
and
an infraction of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria VII
which states,
in part, that:
"Measures
shall
be established
to assure
that purchased
material,
equipment
conform to the procurement-
document.
These
measures
shall include - examination of products
upon
delivery. -The effectiveness
of control of quality shall
be
assessed - at intervals consistent
with importance,
complexity
of
product or service."
(387/81-14-01;
388/81-07-01)
5.
Instrumentation
Com onent/S
stems ualit
Record
Review
During the review of quality records for the
Damper Control Assembly,
the
inspector
observed that the assumptions
made for the seismic analysis of
the regulator solenoid
mount for the
AMV series
12865
Damper Control
Units did not take into account the condulet
and metal flex cable
attached
to the solenoid valve.
The solenoid valve is attached
to the
filter regulator
by a 1/2 x 2 inch long pipe nipple.
The regulator is
attached
to
a mounting plate.
The analysis
assumes
that the solenoid,
regulator
and pipe connector to be rigid.
Construction
personnel
have
experienced
numerous
problems in supporting
the solenoid valve with the
pipe connection.
6
'iscussions
with licensee
and construction
personnel
indicate that
a
redesign of the assembly is in progress.
A prototype unit in which both
the filter regulator
and the solenoid valve are bolted in place
has
been
tested.
Engineering is reviewing the results
and intends to replace
all units following approval.
This item is unresolved
pending
NRC review of licensee
evaluation
and
resolution.
(387/81-14-02;
388/81-07-02)
6.
Unresolved
Items
Unresolved
items are matters
about which more information is required in
order to ascertain
whether they are acceptable
items or items of
noncompliance.
Unresolved
items identified during this inspection
are
discussed
in Details,
paragraph
5.
7.
~Ei
The inspector
met with licensee
and contractor representatives
(denoted
in paragraph
1) at the conclusion of the inspection
on July 10,
1981.
The inspector
summarized
the
scope
and findings of the inspection
as
described
in this report.