ML17138B196
| ML17138B196 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1980 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17138B195 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-08, REF-GTECI-CO, TASK-A-08, TASK-A-8, TASK-OR NUDOCS 8004080662 | |
| Download: ML17138B196 (14) | |
Text
Krafhverk Unlon-GKM II - M - Condensation Tests Hand out for the Meeting in Bethesda
- February, 1980'O0.408 O668
GO l I-M Test Hatrix Test Number Br'eak Size (mm)
Paol Temperature 0 210 (RCL) 0 190 (MSL)
0 110 (1/3 MSL) 0 80 (1/6 MSL) 24 C (75 F) 32 C (90 F) 55'C (130 F) 100 /o 234 56 9 10 11
'12 13 14 15 16 17 Drywell Air Content 85 % (approx.)
Repeat Test
QgL AWK',g,
+L 8PEAC5'.
gt(grAumeArArsod OpeWneg
- 2. Z TE57 ggglp oyEPVI84/
~~~~K llama kmrMs oF VSE A4>n/ P~&bqeagzs 9r~nf ~g R,dp',2
/flR, CogTElgr f,$
9~8'LL ~ MIErNf8LL-pgEgs~ jwE Ph~ks Es PAL 1'al~~
WHAAL1C ~l ~g g~ g
~PiKSSEb pgE5$vgz Tlirt'isro&m MCluRTlan1 pgbceyugz 5j FRGPUFAcy DSn88UvvoNS HAH Qp hlAu4&LVA~uES Atw'HAeerasc uu~z~s
$Nc)95 AraA4 ~APE EVAcuAztnn/ Pgocay uk'keq
~Mcy Pi S7R,i g,uTIo~s 6.5.'6th/
WHO A1~<~llln VWLggS p t RE@ TIOh/ pgggg (~<~~~ g p'it.Ah 7t A V/pe+ Qgpgg)g g 7e2.
CdhJ5545+T(O g
~e
~I
~I P C.C
~
Yv T $.1 TS.C
'5.1 T $.2 J PC.1 el I
~ Ie el II es y
WS PC.I TCI Oll im OI
~ ~
~I
~ I k
PQ TCTT II el
~ I Qp~l.lI TB!
Oehell>>
8101 I
Sl el
~$
~e
~I ePIT TCT I
Spe sew 6eho lier 8 TOT I
SS T 5.1 el eel
'eI IS P6.%
~
II Y
Y Y
LSV1 Speech>>
$ 6
+PI IO IIII I II I
IOS YYYY Y Y
Pl.l Tll el II ve T 5,5 T5.5 SII SpeIso>>
ST PS1 TS2 IM Y
Y 0
T 6.1 IIl
AnIW GKME-M-Condensation Tests Test Stand Schematic Diagram Jem ~ sw
0 4.3600-fhverk Union
, R 541 CD CD CQ 43000
'ohr 609,6x10 CD CD CD CD 412160 lA CV CD P)
P)
I
- 4) 3780 GKMII-M-Condensation Tests TC Sh Tank Normal Water Level
Fixed Parameters Drywell Volume including Vents 1)
Wetwell Free Air Volume 1) 1)
Drywell/Wetwell Air Volume Ratio Pool Area SSES Single Cell 77.9 m
48.4 m3 1.61 GKM II-M Test Vessel 75.6 m
47.0 m3 1.61 small cell at containment wall mean value 3 '
m 5.8.
m 3 '
m Downcomer Dimensions Length D.
Wall Thickness 13.86 ra o.6o96 r
9..5 mm 13.76 m
0.6096 m
10 mm Downcomer'ubmergence; Downcomer Clear ance (exit to pool bottom) 3.66 m
3.35 to 3.54 m.
3.66 m
3.63 m ')
- 1) at high water level (12 13.66 m submergence)
- 2) at the deepest point Comparison of fixed Parameters
kraftrrerk Union R S41 Legend-. P Reassure transducer T
Temperatwe transducer L
Wafer Level OR Oxygen Rate T 5.1 ooo oo C4 T 5.4 T5.3 P 5.1 T 5.2I-a BP5.6 0oo oo o
g OR 5.1 T6.9 P6.9 o
0) lh T5.5/ P 53 P 5.4 o
I 6.2 o
calho T
o CV o
L6.1 a T56/ P5.5 o
P
+ SG6.9 SG6.10
~I GKMII-M-Condensation Tests Test Instr Umentation
~ Normal Vfater Level
Legend: P Pressure transducer T Thermocouple.
OG Displacement Gage LP Level Probe LC Load Cell SG Strain Gage AF Air Fraction AG Accelerometer Gage
¹aftwerk Un<on R 541 OG 6.2 DG 6.3 DG6.6 DG6,5 o
CO C9 C9 P 5.5 LP 5./
LP 5.3 LP52 T6.10 LPK5 o
CDoo LC6.1 SG5.2 SG5.1
~ AG6.2 l
T6.1 OG6./.
G6.1/SG6.2 o
o o
c4 Ol
~
P 5.5 T 5.6 LP5.3.
LP52y
!pe2
=P 6.3 IT K3 G 6.3/SG6./.
- SG6.5/ SG6jD 6././P65/P6.6
'r6./,
oo C4Ill oo
~ co co tn n
cn CV SG 6.7 SG6.8 >
SG6.7 AG6.1 P 6.7 T 6.7 I-Eteam Section A-B 00 P65 T63 SG6.5,vertical SG6.6, hor.izonlal GKMII-M-Condensat! on 270o AF6.1/AF62' 180o Tests Test Instrumentation SG 63, vertical SG 6./, horizontal P 6.1...P6./,P6.7 T6.1...T 6.C.T 6.7
~ 4aa. + Mar
~
Wring j<<$trl
~ ahr + MR<<<<ao Pg g 8 ~ ><<8 IRAN
~
~
Rolv Vr$4teJF St RO
$8rl<<4 alt LH/~ f$8CJ g~ awt~$ <s W
~8 Henlege$ $8M
~ m. ~u. @Worn eaO818 OWER
$8$t tt<<888 <<A$$<<W
~
~
~$ 48 1 $88068
~1I
~ '
I Hr$$ g H K~r&ralRrbc
$ 8 $ 8
$ $8
@MJ
raftwerk Union R 541 00 SG 6.1 Bracing 1 270
~ 4
'G6.2 90o Bracing 2 GKMII-M-Condensation Tests Bracing. Configuration
Jzk'g 71 8 TE57 uter SUS@UPIANNR Wo FRANlE.S P~ G~nJ p 24" Do~NcomEP DillA@7-zg, TlNlE Sly Qi FURCAV'iOQ: S PARK
.T.
VEAT CCZAR,tQg TE57 hl0 elgZR ILIITIAL. MASS FLUX: 250 K9/(NI+5)
TaliTiAc Poor. T~p: ZR'c UEQT'~gj AC~
XIJITIAI AIASS FLIIX: g~
gg/(AlaS)
T.t4ITlAL PooL. TE~:. py.~ c.
coMDEhJSATiog
'TF5T. Name, pg.
Tl~<: Mc sFco~as AFTea. VasT. >Tp~
~p AN NASS F Lu)I; (g X9 /(Nla.S)
~l-T'F-KPERATURE:
t'O'C.
PA<T 3K
<<<DG~SAwtoQ vzsv. tVUNGER t 5 TllVlE-ECOh)D5 AFTEiZ. 'TEST'~
sTsAM MAss FLux:
'9 Ic'g /(III1s)
PooL 7'EN I'M.Avoca
~
C 5 c
GKN II M - TEST EVALUATION TO DATE WITH RESPECT TO SSES POOL BOUNDARY LOADS ls INTRODUCTORY REMARKS e
2s NAIN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA OBSERVED IN THE TESTS 6LOBAL BLOWDOWN HISTORY AND PARAMETERS PRESSURE EVENTS IN THE POOL OSCILLATION FREQUENCIES 3s DISCUSSION OF MULTI-VENT SYSTEM WITH RESPECT TO TEST EVALUATION 0s, EVALUATION OF TESTS NOs 3 TO 10 AND SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVE PRESSURE TRACES EVALUATION METHOD PRESSURE AMPLITUDES AND FREQUENCIES SELECTION OF TRACES 5s PRELIMINARY SYMMETRICAL POOL BOUNDARY LOADS FOR SSES 6s ANALYTICALJUSTIFICATION OF THE LOADS AND.CORRECTION OF AMPLITUDE FACTORS
~ ZNTjZOauCrionJ PP 8 L e Q'57 PLEA/
rgb NATv-v<
, gpqg gfgo <79 pg A.~kfEN l 5RT.
~ PUP,poSE
~ QLt.'ULATf0'~ac~oUP<
, coact-05iod Uhh, ] f3EcHTKL
'-PLAN SUPPRESS Oil P00 0
PRESENT QUENCHER LOAD DEFINITION FOR BOTH POOL BOUNDARY AllD SUBllERGED STRUCTURES CONSIDERED VERY CONSERVATIVE o
BUBBLES OSC ILLATI03 "IN-PHASE" o
BOUNDI'lG APPROACH TO PRESSURE AMPLITUDES AND FREQUENCIES COj'lSERVATIVE MULTIPLIERS EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL LOAD REDUCTION EFFORT SHONED.THAT-ACTUAL Il(l-PLA'lT TEST DATA >'OUB BE REQUIRED, SRI DEVELOPED A MECHANISil FOiR SIMULATING THE BUB(.LE LOADS RESULTING FRnM SRV DISCHARGE o
A,'lPLITUDE Ai'lD FREQUENCY, COULD BE V%RIED o
ONCE A GIVEN SOURCE
~'lAS CHOSEN IT COULD READILY BE REPRODUCED THE SAME SOURCE COULD. THEN BE USFD IN KARLSTEIN UNIT CELL AND SUSQUEHAN(<A SUPPRESSION POOL
'.lE BELIEVE THAT THE TEST DATA PROVIDES A(V EXCELLENT BASIS FOR PURSUING LOAD REDUCTIO>I FINAL DECISION ON OUR PURSUING THAT LOAD REDUCTION IS YET TO BE MADE