ML17132A155

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response to Formal Disagreement and Appeal with Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, for Tactics Employed as Part of an NRC-Evaluated Force on Force Exercise - Callaway Disputed Item 05000483/2017201-01
ML17132A155
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 05/12/2017
From: Marissa Bailey
Division of Security Operations
To: Herrmann T
Ameren Missouri
Andrew Woyanski NSIR/DSO/SPEB
References
IR 2017201
Download: ML17132A155 (3)


See also: IR 05000483/2017201

Text

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

May 12, 2017

Mr. Timothy Herrmann, Site Vice President

Ameren Missouri

Callaway Plant

P.O. Box 620

Fulton, MO 65251

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO FORMAL DISAGREEMENT AND APPEAL WITH ADVERSARY

CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED OR

PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE

EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000483/2017201-01

Dear Mr. Herrmann:

This letter provides the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) staffs formal response to

your disagreement with a tactic, technique or procedure (TTP), and subsequent appeal of the

staffs decision, consistent with NRC Inspection Procedure 71130.03 Contingency Response -

Force-on-Force Testing. By letter, dated May 9, 2017, titled Formal Disagreement with

Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as Part of an

NRC-Evaluated Force-on-Force Exercise, you disputed a TTP within Scenario 1 developed by

the NRC Force-on-Force inspection team.

The NRC carefully reviewed your dispute, and concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for

use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the design

basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data, (3) it is within your ability to provide

defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and controlled, and (5) it provides a credible

and realistic challenge to your sites protective strategy. The NRCs detailed response to your

appeal has been entered into the NRC Response to Disputed Item Database, Disputed Item 05000483/2017201-01, and is provided as Enclosure 1 to this letter, marked Safeguards

Information.

The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated

from the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

T. Herrmann

2

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

Upon notification by Robert Johnson, Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch,

Division of Security Operations of the NRCs decision that the disputed TTP was approved for

use, you requested to appeal the decision to me. I received your appeal via phone call on

May 9, 2017. After further discussion the NRC carefully reevaluated your dispute and

determined that the disputed item is still appropriate for use in an NRC-evaluated Force-on-

Force exercise.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Marissa Bailey, Director

Division of Security Operations

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

Enclosure:

NRC Response to Disputed Item 05000483/2017201-01

cc w/enclosure: Billy Brown, Site Security Manager

ML17132A155

OFFICE

NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO/SPEB

NSIR/DSO/SPEB

NSIR/DSO

NAME

A. Woyansky

J. Berry (EByre for)

C. Johnson (JWillis for)

M. Bailey

DATE

5/10/17

5 / 12 /17

5 / 12 /17

5 / 12 /17