ML17083B072

Board Notification 82-109:forwards Info Re Status of Activities Performed Under Design Verification Program by Participating Organizations

ML17083B072
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	10/26/1982
From:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Ahearne J, Gilinsky V, Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
TASK-AS, TASK-BN82-109 BN-82-109, NUDOCS 8211120137
Download: ML17083B072 (36)

Text

W4 F9Ce5 5%

OCT 86 1982 Docket No.:

50-275 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Chairman Palladino Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Ahearne Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine FROM:

SUBJECT:

Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation INFORMATION ITEMS REGARDIHG THE DESIGN VERIFICATION ~6' PROGRAM -

FOR DIABLO CANYON, UNIT 1 (Board Notification No. 82-1O9)

In accordance with present NRC procedures for Board Hoti'fications, the following items are enclosed for information of the Commission:

1.

Teledyne Engineering Services, Independent Design Verification Program:

Program Plan for Construction guality Assurance, Rev. 1, October 1, 1982.

u 2.

Teledyne Engineering Services, Independent Design Yerification Program:

IDVP Comments to PG&E Phase I Final Report, October 7, 1982.

3.

4 ~

Teledyne Engineering Services, Independent Design Verification Program:

TES Semi-tlonthly Report, October 8, 1982.

R. L. Cloud Associates Inc.,

Open Items Reports, October 8, 1982.

5.

R. F. Reedy Inc., Semi-Monthly Report, October 8, 1982.

6.

Stone

& 'webster Engineering Corp.,

SPEC October Semi-llonthly Report, October 8, 1982.

~7.

Teledyne Engineering Services, letter to G. A. Ilaneatis, PG&E, et. al.

regarding independence of RFR employees, October 14, 1982.

r 8.

Teledyne Engineering Services, letter to G. A. Maneatis, PG&E, regarding TES evaluation of URS/Blume model, October 15, 1982.

OFFICpg SURNAME/

'@a~ v

~ ~ 000 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0

\\o ee ~

SOOSChoiFAXtloieG yooQHRRO ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 00 ~ 0 ~

9.

Teledyne Engineering Services, letter to H. R. Denton regarding TES evaluation of BHL report, October 15, 1982.

, 9+1 1 1'20'f37 "82102' PDR PDR ADOCH, 05000275 P

~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~\\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~ ~

~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

DATg 238

~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~

~ \\ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ ~

~ ~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~

0

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 NRC FORM 318 (1040) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL R ECOR D COPY USOPO: 1981~9 960

0 f

'C

~

f 4

E

The Commission 2

10.

Teledyne Engineering Services, letter to D. G. Eisenhut, October 15, 1982, regarding NRR letter of October 6, 1982 requesting IDYP consideration of Region V comments.

v

'1.

Teledyne Engineering Services, letter to D. G. Eisenhut, 1982, regarding ERR letter of August 19, 1982 requesting views on structures, systems and components required for loading.

October 12, IDYP fuel The enclosures provide information on the status of activities performed under the Independent Design Yerification Program

( IDVP) for Diablo Canyon Unit 1 by the participating organizations.

The information is relevant to the safety issue on the design adequacy of Diablo Canyon Unit 1.

This is the subject of Commission Order CLI-81-30 which is the basis for the IDYP.

The staff is evaluating the information as part of its ongoing review of

,the IDVP efforts and will report on the results prior to reinstatement of the license.

The material does not pertain to those matters that were resolved by ALAB 644.

yriginal signed bV farrell G. Eisenhub

Enclosures:

As stated>>

'c:

ASLB ASL(P SECY,',

OGC OPE':,'oa,d Service List I

Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OFFICEI SURNAME/

DATEP PL: LBi>>3(

Joe/yt

"'l0gg8'2-

-'L:LB&'3 HSchierli "I'0'-'QK2"'"'L:

~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0

~

F 0' 0

i gan 1ii'@7m"""

DL:AD/L

~ ~

~ 0

~

~ 1 ~ 0 Tt k

~0]

~

F 0' 0 ~ ~ 0 ~

~ 0 ~I~ ~

~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~\\ ~\\ ~

~

~

~

~ e

~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 00 ~ ~

D ut 1'(ij")Ti1""""

~

~ 0

~ ~

~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~I~ ~ ~ ~ 0 NRC FORM 318 (10.80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY US0 PO: 1&81-4Kr960

<ev C

l I

~

e.

J

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

Docket Nos. 50-275 OL 50-323 OL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Leonard Bickwit, Esq.

General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Dr. John H. Buck Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Dr.

W.

Reed Johnson Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Thomas S.

Moor e, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 John F. Wolf, Esq.,

Chairman Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr. Glenn 0. Bright Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington,"DC 20555 Dr. Jerry Kline Administrative'Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington.

DC 20555 Philip A. Crane, Jr.,

Esq.

Pacific Gas 5 Electric Company P.O.

Box 7442 San Francisco, CA 94120 Mr. Frederick Eissler Scenic 'Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc.

4623 More Mesa Drive Santa

Barbara, CA 93105 Elizabeth Apfelberg 1415 Cozadero San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 David S. Fleischaker, Esq.

P.O.

Box 1178 Oklahoma City, OK 73101 Mrs.

Raye Fleming 1920 Mattie Road Shell

Beach, CA 93449 Richard E. Blankenburg, Co-publisher Wayne A. Soroyan, News Reporter South County Publishing Company P.O.

Box 460 Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Mr. Gordon Silver Mrs. Sandra A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

I

Diablo Canyon Units 1&2 Joel R. Reynolds, Esq.

John R. Phillips, Esq.

Center for Law in the Public Interest 10951 West Pico Boulevard Third Floor Los Angeles, CA 90064 Arthur C. Gehr, Esq.

Snell

& Wilmer 3100 Valley Center

Phoenix, AZ 85073 Paul C. Valentine, Esq.

321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94302 Harry M. Willis Seymour

& Willis 601 California Street Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA 94108 Janice E. Kerr, Esq.

Lawrence g. Garcia, Esq.

350 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102 Mr. James

0. Schuyler Nuclear Projects Engineer Pacific Gas

& Electric Company 77 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94106 Bruce Norton, Esq.

3216 North 3rd Street Suite 202

Phoenix, AZ 85012 Mr. Richard B. Hubbard MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue, Suite K

San

Jose, CA 95125 Mr. John Marrs, Managing Editor San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribune 1321 Johnson Avenue P.O.

Box 122 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Herbert H. Brown Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, Christopher

& Phillips 1900 M Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036 Byron S.

Georgiou Legal Affairs Secretary Governor's Office "

State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Mark Gottleib California Energy Commission MS-18 1111 Howe Avenue Sacramento, CA 95825 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Document Management Branch Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

e

ACRS Members Dr. Robert C. Axtmann School of Engineering and Applied Science Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08540 Mr. Myer Bender 9524 Twelve Trees Lane Knoxville, TN 37922 Or.

Max W. Carbon, Chairman Nuclear Engineering Department Engineering Research Building University of Wisconsin

Madison, WI 53706 Mr. Jesse C. Ebersole 103 Newell Lane Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Mr. Harold Etherington 84 Lighthouse Drive Jupiter, FL'3458 Or. William Kerr Department of Nuclear Engineering Phoenix Laboratory North Campus University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Or. Harold W. Lewis Dept. of Physics -

RM 6114 University of California Santa

Barbara, CA 93106 Or. J.

Carson Mark Los Alamos Scientific Lab.

Theoretical Division P.O.

Box 1663 -

MS 210 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Mr. William M. Mathis 455 Mainmast Court

Richland, WA 99352 Dr. Dade W. Moeller, Head 27 Wildwood Drive

Bedford, MA 01730 Dr. David Okrent Energy and Kinetics Dept.

5532 Boelter Hall School of Engineering Applied Science University of California Los Angeles, CA 90024 Dr. Milton S. Plesset California Inst. of Technology 104-44

Pasadena, CA 91109 Mr. Jeremish J.

Ray 819 Lantern Lane Langhorne, PA-19047 Dr. Paul G.

Shewmon 2477 Lytham Road

Columbus, OH 43220 Dr. Chester P. Siess 805 Hamilton Drive Champaign, IL 61820 Mr. David A. Ward E.I.

du Pont de Nemours 5

8 Company Savannah River Laboratory Building 773-A, A-219

Aiken, SC 29808

C

~

BOARD NOTIFICATION BN-82-109

• w/enclosure Document Control (50-,2?5)~~

NRC PQR*

L PDR*

TERA*

NSIC*

LB83 Reading*

G. Knighton*

Project Manager*

H. Schierling J.

Lee T.

M. Novak L. Berry D. Eisenhut/R.

Purple M.

Wi 1 1 i ams H. Denton/ED Case*

PPAS J.

Youngblood A. Schwencer E.

Adensam C.

Thomas R. Vollmer H. Thompson R. Mattson S.

Hanauer

Attorney, OELD*

E. L. Jordon J.

M. Taylor Regional Adminstrator Resident Inspector W. J. Dircks, EDO (3)

-= E. Christenbury, OELD*

J. Scinto, OELD*

A: Bennette'(3)

S.

Chesnut cc:

Board Service List

DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM PROGRAM PLAN REVISION 1 t'

~

ADJUNCT PROGRAM FOR EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION EQUALITY ASSURANCE OCTOBER 1, 1982 PREPARED BY TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES AS PROGRAM MANAGER, TES PROJECT 5511 Docket No. 50-275 License No.

DPR-76 8211120137--

0 g 4

~)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 OBJECTI YES AND ORGAN!ZATION

2. 1 Objec tives 2.2 Organization 3.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE (CQA)

PLAN 3.1 Scope 3.2 Task A - Quality Assurance 3.2.1 Objective 3.2.2 Subtasks 3.3 Task B - Construction Yerification Review 3.3.1 Objective 3.3.2 Subtasks 3.4 Task C - Processing of Findings 3.4.1 Objectives 3.4.2 Subtasks 3.5 Task D Report 4.0 TES METHODOLOGY AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION 4.1 TES Nethodo logy 4.2 Project Organization 5.0 PGKE ACTIONS 6.0 PROGRAM REPORTING 6.1 Types of Reports 6.2 Semimonthly Interim Technical and Final Reports.

6.3 Application of Open Item Report Systems 7.0 DOCUMENTAT!ON

0

QQW(QI cd~(=hq "~R~~ JQ %=ROC ADJUNCT PROGRAM FOR EVALUATION OF CON STRUCT ION UALI TY ASSURANCE OCTOBER 1, 1982

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Program Plan defines the management and technical aspects of an evaluation of construction guality Assurance being conducted by the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (DCNPP)

Independent Design Ver ification Program (IDVP) as an adjunct* to the Phase II Program.

The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PGKE) advised the Nuclear Regulatory Comnission-Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC-NRR) of their intent to proceed with such an evaluation by letter of September 7,

1982, Reference 1.

The objective is to complete the evaluation and issue an interim report prior to mid-November 1982 and to issue a final report prior to mid-December 1982.

The "Adjunct Program for Evaluation of Construction guality Assurance" is a

programnatic guality Assurance audit of a

representative sample of construction activities.

It is termed as "Adjunct Program" to the Phase II Program because it is to be performed under the direction of the IDVP Program

Manager, Teledyne Engineering Services (TES);

by an organization which is participating in the IDVP, Stone.and Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC);

in accordance with the applicable portions of the Phase II Program Management

Plan, Reference 2; in the general time frame of the Phase II Program; but, is not design related nor required by the NRC Order or Letter so it is not an essential part of the IDVP Phase II Program.

This construction guality Assurance Program was voluntarily proposed by PGEE at an NRC-PGEE-IDVP meeting of September 1,

1982 to "Lay this unwarranted public concern to,rest, and to avoid further delay in the licensing of Diablo Canyon,..." (Tr, Pg.

11, 13-15).

The Program Management Plans for the performance of an Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1

(DCNPP-1) are intended to respond to an NRC "Order" and "Letter,"

respectively.

The program is being conducted in two phases, corresponding to the NRC requirements for restoration of the low-power license

("Order" )

and for operation above 5X power

("Letter" ),

respectively.

These NRC requirements relate to the design efforts performed internally by the PGEE, or

.on behalf of PGEE by service-related contractors, on safety-related structures,

systems, and components.

Phase I

.is restricted to seismic-related efforts of PGEE and of their service contracts performed prior to June 1,

1978.

Phase II includes non-seismic service-related contracts performed prior to June

1978, PGEE internal'esign activities, and all service-related contracts post-January 1978.

• Webster:

"Something joined or added to another thing but not essentially a part of it."

IDVP -PROGRAM PLAN-CQA

~ph~ppl ~i'/iXfp EiNGlih:":Rii~~GSFRVK 'ES Each IDVP phase is conducted in accordance with a

Program Management Plan which includes a number of Program Procedures as appendices.

For each, phase, the corresponding procedure provides an Engineering Program Plan which defines the technical work to be performed.

The text of the Phase II Program Management Plan itself, separate from the appendices, includes the following sections:

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Introduction (references NRC Order and Letter)

Background

nd Objectives (NRC requirements, general organization and participant scopes)

Engineering Program Plan (summarizes methodology, criteria and performance gui de 1 i nes)

TES Methodology and Project Organization (identifies senior individuals and suranarizes technical and management assignments)

PGEE Actions (surrmarizes PGEE Internal Technical

Program, relationships with IDVP)

Reporting (defines the types of reports including the Open Item Report System)

Documentation (requires that all results be documented and based upon documented information)

The "Adjunct Program for Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance" (CQA) is to be performed in accordance with the technical "CQA Program Plan" which is defined by 3.0 of this document in accordance with the objectives defined in 2.0.

The remainder of this

document, 4.0 through 7.0 invokes and supplements, the similarly numbered sections of the Phase II Program Management Plan for management of the CQA.

2.0 OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION

.1

~0 This review is intended to assess whether the construction of Diablo Canyon was 'erformed in accordance with quality requirements appropriate for the time of plant construction.

The approach is to evaluate the work of two of the principal contractors which performed work important to safety at the plant.

The review is structured to provide reasonable confirmation that the construction quality program meets the app licable standards for the time of nuclear power plant construction.

2.2 The review will start with an evaluation of whether the construction documentation gives confidence that the construction'ork correctly incorporates essential design features.

To confirm this, samples of actual construction will be used to verify that the facilities were correctly built and that other construction requirements were met.

In addition to the TES and SWEC scopes defined in 2.3 and 2.4, of Reference 2

0 0

ss IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA )) la~lYt~~

EihG;i'~F. WINGSERAC 3

'a ~

b.

TES shall perform the additional scope defined in 4.0 of this document.

SWEC. shall perform the CQA scope of work defined in 3.0, shall report the work in accordance with 6.0 and document the work in accordance with 7.0 to satisfy the objectives of 2. 1.

All cited numbers being those contained in this document.

3.0 CONSTRUCTiON QUALITV ASSURANCE (CQA)

PLAN 3.1

~Sco e

Construction work of two major <construction contractors has been selected as the subject area for the evaluation.

The contractors and the work performed by

them, to be covered by the

review, are as fo 1 lows:

o Guy F.

Atkinson Co.

(GFA) civil/structural work on the containment building o

Wismer and Becker (W-8) installation of NSSS piping.

An appropriate sample for evaluation will be selected from the work of each contractor to provide evidence of his quality practices in ea'ch

---

major area of activity.

The sample shall be submitted for approval to TES prior to use.

This review will be conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Stone Im Webster "Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program

-SWSQAP 1-74A".

However, the documents to be used during this review, in determining the extent of compliance with the requirements, will be those applicable to the contractors when their work was performed.

Detailed descriptions of tasks A through D included in this program are in the following subsections.

The SMEC procedures for tasks A and 8 ) gev I

will be provided to TES for comments.

Potenti al

Findings, as identified in Tasks A and B will be processed in Task C and reported as required by Task D.

3.2 Task A - Qualit Assurance 3.2.1

~0b ective Evaluate the two designated contractors'uality programs to determine if adequate controls and pr actices to assure the quality of

,construction and the incorporation of essential design features into

'he completed plant were evident and to determine if controls were consistent with applicable NRC requirements at the time the work was performed.

IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CgA 3.2.2 Subtasks a.

Develop procedures and check lists, as appropriate, to:

Evaluate each contractor's quality program and procedures to determine if practices adequate to assure that construction requirements (iee.

drawings, instructions, specifications) were met by those responsible for the construction activity.

Evaluate each contractor's quality program to determine if practices covering audits and inspections were adequate.

o Evaluate each contractor's quality program to determine if practices governing the identification, control and dispositioning of construction nonconformances were adequate.

b.

Conduct the specified evaluations utilizing experienced auditors qualified and certified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.23.

Areas and items examined and the results of the examination shall be identified and documented on checklists so as to be repeatable.

c.

All Potential Findings identified in conjunction with the accomplishment of Task A shall be processed and reported in accordance with Tasks C and D, respectively.

3.3 Task B

Construction Verification Review 3.3.1

~0b'ective Evaluate if physical installation of selected components of safety system and structures conforms to the requirements of design drawings and specifications; and that required inspections were performed.

3.3.2 Subtasks a.

Develop procedures and checklists as appropriate to:

o Verify that construction of selected components reflects essential design features.

.o Verify that appropriate documentation was provided to record variations,

and, where required, as-constructed conditions.

b.

Choose items for physical verification of key elements from work of the contractors and specify these in a walkdown list.

The list of items and attributes to be verified will be sufficiently representative to permit conclusions to be drawn

.as to the adequacy of installation work.

0

IDVP-PROGRA~'I PLAN-CQA

)> TELBDYih" p)q)g(~)q)~~(~i)q~~ ~~m~y p)gg g c ~

Conduct the specified walkdowns and verifications utilizing experienced personnel certified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6 in the discipline being examined.

Areas and items examined and the results of the examination shall be identified and documented so as to be repeatable.

The walkdown shall be primar ily a visual verification of compon nt installation to provide confidence that dimensional requirements have been met.

d.

All Potential Findings identified in conjunction with the accomplishment of Task 8 shall be processed and reported in accordance with Task C and D, respectively.

3.4 Task C - Processin of Findin s

3. 4.!

~0 Review all Potential Findings identified during the review and provide for evaluating and classifying the significance of Potential Findings.

3.4.2 Subtasks a.

SWEC will establish a

Findings Review Comnittee composed of several senior SWEC personnel with broad experience in nuclear power plant engineering, quality assurance and construction.

management and a similar TES employee.'.

The Comnittee shall define criteria for determining the degree of impact that Potential Findings have on plant adequacy for DCNPP-1.

c.

The Coranittee shall establish a procedure to process Potential Findings.

This procedure shall provide an opportunity for PGKE to comnent on the definition and accuracy of Potential Findings.

d.

The comnittee shall review each Potential Finding for definition and accuracy and will assess its impact on the adequacy of the plant.

The comnittee shall recoranend classification of Potential Findings to TES in accordance with the following:

Comnittee Determination 1.

Finding accurate and has potential for significant impact on adequacy of Diablo Canyon Unit 1

(DCNPP-1) 2.

Finding accurate but does not have potential for significant impact on adequacy of DCHPP-1 3.

Finding. not accurate Cl ass ificat i on Finding Observation Inva1 i d

0

IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA 3.5 Task D Report Reports shall be prepared in accordance with 6.0.

4.0 TES METHODOLOGY AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION 41

~EE

. I 1

In addition to the contents of the simi1 arly numbered section of Reference 2,

TES shall assure that the CQA Program is performed in a

technically competent, independent and timely manner which is consistent with its objectives.

4.2 Project Or anization In addition to the contents of the sections 4.2 through 4.7 of Reference 2:

a.

Dr.

W.

E.

Cooper, as Project Manager for TES shall review the recorrmendations of the Findings Review committee for compliance with established criteria and, when criteria have been properly applied and documented, he shall declare the Potential Finding as a Finding or Observation as recorrmended by the Findings Review Committee and transmit and report the item in accordance with this plan.

In

addition, he shall be responsible for the verification of PGKE Corrective Action taken in response to a

Finding and the reporting of resolutions.

b.

Mr. L. C. Noriega's scope is increased to include the efforts of SWEC in performance of their CQA activities.

c.

Mr. J.

A. Flaherty will serve as the TES employee on the Findings Review Committee.

This will be Mr.

Flaherty's, only IDVP assignment and he will not be under the direct supervision of Dr. Cooper.

5.0 PGKE ACTION In addition to the contents of the similarly numbered sections, of Reference 2,

PGEE shall comnent on the definition and accuracy of Potential Findings in accordance with the procedure established by the Findings Review Corrmittee

.for the processing of Potential Findings.

Review by the Guy F. Atkinson, Co.

(GAF) and Wismer and Becker (W-8) shall be requested and coordinated by PGEE.

0

IDVP-PROGRP~1 PLAN-CQA 6.0 PROGRAM REPORTS S.l 6.2 The following types of reports wiil be prepared:

(1)

Semimonthly Report (2)

Interim-, Technical Report on Construct. on Quality Assurance (ITR-CQA)

(3)

Final Report on Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance.

In addition, the Error or Open Item (EOI) report system used in Phase II, and described in Ref.

2, Appendix E, will be adapted to the CQA effort in the manner defined in 6.3 of this document.

Semimonthly, Interim Technical and Final Reports Each of these is defined as follows:

6.3 (1)

Semimonthly reports shall be prepared in accordance with 6.2 (1) of Reference 2.

(2)

The ITR-CCA shall have the sae intent as does the Final Report

) /Pl

(

and will be issued by mid-November 1982ee (3)

The Final Report on Evaluation of Construction ()uality Assurance will be issued in mid-December 1982 and will compile all evidence R6V

~

reviewed, Potential

Findings, Observations and

Findings, including their description,

comnents, assessment of

impact, results of the Findings Review Comnittee, results of the review of PGEE corrective action

plans, and will assess the PGICE QA Program for construction of DCNPP Unit 1.

The report will include a

description of the work performed, an identification of documents used in or generated by this project, the results of the

review, and the conclusions drawn from each task.

A lication of 0 en Item Report S stem The EOI System described by 6.3 of Reference 2 and by DCNPP-IDYP-PP-

003, Revision 1 will be utilized as a tracking

system, using the following interpretations.

, a.

Open Item Reports (OIR) sha'il be issued by SWEC to report Potential Findings.

The file number shall be assigned in sequence from the range of numbers 9000-9999.

b.

Issuance of the OIR will initiate PGRE action in accordance with 5.0 to verify the definition and accuracy of Potential Findings.

PGEE shall report their results to TES and SWEC by use of a PG1mE Resolution sheet.

0

IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA Aw)~~PQ~)x(glP ERG!iV'=FRY)"~G"FRViCFS c.

The Findings Review Cormittee shall report their recoamendation to TES, with a copy to PG&E, as follows:

(1)

A Potential Error Report as a Class A Error (ER/A) shall be used for recommended Findings.

(2)

A Potential E'ror Report as a Class C Error shall be used for recommended Observations.

(3)

A Potential Program Reso lution Report as a Closed Item shall beused for recoamended invalid Potential Findings.

d.

When the recomnendation of the Findings Review Comnittee are considered by TES to be in compliance with established criteria:

(I)

An Error Report as a

Class A Error shall be issued for Findings.

(2)

An Error Report as a

Class C Error shall be issued for Observations.

(3)

A Program Reso lution Report as a Closed Item shall be issued for invalid Potential Findings If the recomnendations of the Findings Review Cormittee are not considered by TES to be in compliance with established criteria, TES will issue an Open Item report, keeping the same File Number, referring the item back to the Findings Review Committee.

e.

In response to a Finding (ER/A),

PG&E shall develop and implement corrective action.

They may consult with the IDVP, through

TES, in the development and implementation of such action.'ollowing completion of the corrective action, PG&E will so notify TES and SWEC by issuance of a PG&E Completion Report; TES will issue an Open Item Report, keeping the same File number; and SWEC will verify the corrective action.

f.

When SMEC verifies the corrective action, including review by the Findings Review Committee, the Findings Review Committee will report its recormendation to TES, with a copy to PG&E as follows:

(1)

A Potential Error Report as a Class A Error shall be used if the PG&E Corrective Action is not acceptable.

(2)

A Potential Program Resolution Report as a Closed Item when the PG&E Corrective Action is acceptable.

g.

The recomnendations of the Findings Review Coomittee will be reviewed and reported by TES as follows:

(1)

An Error Report as a Class A Error if TES concurs that the PG&E Corrective Action is not acceptable.

(2)

A Program Completion Report as a Closed Item when the PG&E corrective action is acceptable, so that the Finding is deemed to be resolved.

I0VP-PROGRAM>

PLAN -CQA h.

An IDVP Completion Report wil 1 be issued by TES following issuance of an Error Report as a Class C Error (Observation) and following issuance of a

Program Resolution Report as a

Closed Item (invalid Potential Findings or resolved Finding).

7.0 DOCUMENTATION The principles of 7.0 of Reference 2 apply to the CQA program.

l~ ~ I )~ ltd

~ ~f PP f

/g P

'Vgd WVl g AI l f 0 l

~ kl/P 0

'll 1 7V'NIW ilk'

$5 I 'l,l ~y lt(, gtjgg+,J)5 /

0 0

REFERENCES 1.

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

Letter (Crane) to NRC-NRR (Eisenhut) of September 7, 1982.:

2.

"Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant-Unit 1,

Independent Design Yerification

Program, Pr'ogram Management

Plan, Phase II", prepared by Teledyne Engineering Services as Program Manager, June 18, 1982.

0