ML17082A540

2017-02 Public Forms

ML17082A540
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	02/22/2017
From:	Vincent Gaddy Operations Branch IV
To:
References
Download: ML17082A540 (23)

Text

OBDI 202 - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING PROCESS EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER (Written Exam Before the Op Test)

Revision 7 Chief:

Osterholtz Facility:

AN2 2/22/2017 U/I:

Kirkland Start of Op Test:

2/13/2017 2/17/2017 Due Date Date Complete Initials 8/15/2016 6/28/16 9/12/2016 6/28/16 9/12/2016 6/28/16 9/12/2016 6/29/16 10/10/2016 N/A 11/14/2016 11/7/16 11/21/2016 11/15/16 11/21/2016 11/15/16 12/12/2016 11/29/16 12/19/2016 12/1/16 12/27/2016 12/1/16 Document review on ES-401-9 1/9/2017 1/6/17 1/16/2017 1/13/17 1/16/2017 1/13/17 1/16/2017 1/13/17 1/9/2017 1/9/17 1/30/2017 2/8/17 1/30/2017 2/10/17 2/6/2017 2/10/17 2/6/2017 2/10/17 2/6/2017 2/15/17 2/6/2017 2/6/17 2/13/2017 2/13/17 2/24/2017 3/14/17 3/1/2017 2/24/17 3/1/2017 2/27/17 3/8/2017 3/14/17 3/15/2017 3/16/17 3/22/2017 3/16/17 3/22/2017 3/16/17 3/22/2017 2/27/17 4/5/2017 3/22/17 4/12/2017 3/22/17 4/19/2017 N/A Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 10, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 Facility post-exam documentation due Signed ES 303's to BC produced by CE License/Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results SUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals Examination Report Issued Branch Chief review of exam results completed RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision NRC written exam grading completed ES-403-1 to BC Chief Examiner review of written exam & op test completed Feedback on DRAFT exam provided to facility Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's Final applications approved & waiver letters sent Branch Chief approves FINAL exam (Written & Op Test)

LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5)

Final applications due & List of Applicants prepared ES-201-4 prepared by LA Proctoring/written exam admin guidelines reviewed w/ facility Exam material to exam team Administer Operating Test On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications Preliminary license applications due NRC Forms 398/396 Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed DRAFT exam reviewed by CE; feedback approved by BC Peer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9 DRAFT exam / docs / support reference material due Written exam and operating test reviews completed Date of Written Exam:

Description Notes Written Exam & Op Test Dates Confirmed End of Op Test:

Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Facility Licensee management queried regarding the licensee's views on the examination NRC Examiners & Facility Contact Assigned Facility Contact Briefed on Security & Other Reqs Integrated exam outlines due Outlines reviewed by CE; feedback approved by BC ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC Corporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE Reference material due (if NRC authored)

ES-201 Att-3 Feedback on integrated outlines provided to facility

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: ANO Unit 2 Date of Examination: 2/13/17 Item

1. w R

I T

T E

N

2.

s I

M u

L A

T 0

R

3.

w A

L K

T H

R 0

u G

H

4.

G E

N E

R A

L Task Description

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c.

Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note:

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

1. Initial NRC written exam outline developed by the NRC.

Initials

~*

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: ANO Unit 2 Date of Exam: 02/22/17 Exam Level:

Item Description

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2.

a.

NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.

b.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3.

SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4

The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR/NRO OL program office).

5.

Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

_The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_the examinations were developed independently; or X the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_other (explain)

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution(s) at right Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.

Bank Modified New 32/16 12/12 56/72 Memory CIA 45.3/28 54.7/72 References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

Form ES-401-6 RO II SRO Initial a

b*

c*#

f!AJ

~

(,,.u

~

Date

a.

Author

~~~~~dl~S===~~t{jaV1 1/11/l'l

b.

Facility Reviewer (*)

1-1 q-11

/'-!ii ~11-

~

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d.

NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

• ~

The facility reviewer's initials or signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initials items in Coiumn "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

1.

The written exam sample plan was generated ar.d provided to the site by the N RC. The rejected KIA list was implemented by selecting alternate K/As randomly and systematically. No more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last two exams.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit : ANO Unit 2 Date of Examination: 2-13-17 0 eratin Test Number: 2017-1

1. General Criteria

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sam lin uirements e.., 10 CFR 55.45 o erational im ortance, safe function distribution.

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination.

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a

licants at the desi nated license !evel.

2. Walk-Throu h Criteria

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

b.

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.

Initials I a b*

Date

a.

Author

b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

c.

NRC Chief Examiner(#)

1/1°1/17 1-r'l--11

/-31-11

d.

NRC Supervisor i/fl4'7 NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. lnde ndent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence ~

uired.

c#

I

(!"2 l Cao

~'l:;

&v

~

~I

~I

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: ANO Unit 2 Date of Exam: 2-13-17 Scenario Numbers: 2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 2017-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,

~

f.c._ ~

but it does not cue the operators into expected events.,

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. '

222-- Vt.c-ti>

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event *

'71!1' to the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew "

~

the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• I the event termination point (if applicable),

I

-et_ ~

~

14.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

115.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete

~

f!.tc-e,a evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.,

I 6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

I Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

eL- ~- Cll Cues are given.,

I

'Zl2- (l.,,c_. 6/,1

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.,

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance et2-UJ deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional iAc-fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other IZ22-- t/4c-- ~

scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. *

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the z:A-it?,c.,,_ ~

form along with the simulator scenarios).,

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable

~(?K- ~

rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ~

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified ~ eo on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).,

.Be-I

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.,

'2112_ flt<- ~

i Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes I

I

~

~

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1/1/2 '

ltf)

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 4 I 4 '

ee. t.c.- dll()

3.

Major transients (1-2) 1 I 2 I 1 -

~

liK- (!Ad

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 '

ze.__ "'--

(".4)

5.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 1 I 0 '

~

~- ~

6.

EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 2/3/3 1

~

Ptt-l~

NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

Revision 1

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility: 2017 ANO Unit 2 Date of Exam: 02-22-2017 Exam Level:

RO YES SRO YES Item Description Initials a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~

f*- l.:o

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and P/!f documented

,V(A-P//I

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) i~- ~- t.o

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, ;J)fj as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

Vf4 µ/4

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades ri)!J are justified t/Pr µ/A

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training A-deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of Pk'- ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader a/L[,J.~~ ;2,-':).3-//

I

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

12~-c:l..._I Jf'.cr-r-+-..... t~ 2-24-17

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) '!"-c!l.,k Os-krl.oik/ Cf!ff6t.t/-- 3 /rf L 11-

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

Untl!J.l~;.f/t/lfi<<,JtdJ;

~/!bill

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

Report 21 From 01/01/2017 To 03/30/2017 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 4

5 Examiners Assigned Chief Examiner Exam Author

1. Candidates Exam Week Type Site/Docket No./Insp Rpt #

Region:

Phase Code:

Page 1 of 4 02/27/2017 08:35:41 HAYES, MAHDI O.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

STEELY, CHRISTOPHER D.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

09/09/2016 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2017301 Prep TAC #: X02585 HAYES, MAHDI O.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

STEELY, CHRISTOPHER D.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

01/09/2017 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2017301 Prep TAC #: X02585 HAYES, MAHDI O.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

STEELY, CHRISTOPHER D.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

01/14/2017 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2017301 Prep TAC #: X02585 HAYES, MAHDI O.

HERNANDEZ, NICHOLAS A.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

STEELY, CHRISTOPHER D.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

NFF SROU - 3 RO - 8 02/13/2017 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2017301 Admin TAC #: X02585 HAYES, MAHDI O.

HERNANDEZ, NICHOLAS A.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

STEELY, CHRISTOPHER D.

OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

02/20/2017 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2017301 Doc TAC #: X02585 ANO ALL ALL Sites:

Orgs:

Exam Author:

Report 21 From 01/01/2017 To 03/30/2017 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 4

5 Summary By Date Region:

Phase Code:

Page 2 of 4 00/00/0000 00:00:00 09/2016 RO - 0 SROU - 0 LSRO - 0 SROI - 0 Total for Arkansas Nuclear One: 0 ANO - Arkansas Nuclear One RO - 0 SROU - 0 LSRO - 0 SROI - 0 Total for 09/2016: 0 09/2016 01/2017 RO - 0 SROU - 0 LSRO - 0 SROI - 0 Total for Arkansas Nuclear One: 0 ANO - Arkansas Nuclear One RO - 0 SROU - 0 LSRO - 0 SROI - 0 Total for 01/2017: 0 01/2017 02/2017 RO - 8 SROU - 3 LSRO - 0 SROI - 0 Total for Arkansas Nuclear One: 11 ANO - Arkansas Nuclear One ANO ALL ALL Sites:

Orgs:

Exam Author:

Report 21 From 01/01/2017 To 03/30/2017 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 4

5 Summary By Site Region:

Phase Code:

Page 3 of 4 00/00/0000 00:00:00 RO - 8 SROU - 3 LSRO - 0 SROI - 0 Total for Arkansas Nuclear One: 11 ANO - Arkansas Nuclear One ANO ALL ALL Sites:

Orgs:

Exam Author:

Report 21 From 01/01/2017 To 03/30/2017 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 4

5 Summary By Region Region:

Phase Code:

Page 4 of 4 00/00/0000 00:00:00 RO - 8 SROU - 3 LSRO - 0 SROI - 0 Total for Region 4: 11 Region 4 ANO ALL ALL Sites:

Orgs:

Exam Author:

1 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3

&J/3 ta4- /o 1

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weeks of 02,106 & 02/13 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Pvmintinn 1/3 a/,

To the best of my knowledge,I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of O/6&&01 21. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME 1.

2. L.,,

(L,.&

3.eVE

-J

4. br-

-)

6.

Jis L1r(wt

7. zcL. Lv

8. PFej r) /-k-1 A,syi ioL.,r (lLJcIK4rJr ii.frer Cxt\\

12. 1 kF 7i*i 1 3.iD A-E-4 t.i

,i\\i 15.77\\3)UiZ JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY NE)(4

+frL.

4 bi / e)1M. f )./1f PL(7I(

I)

.ru4/ir.

4 £eew..

ofl O-t es qfL 2i?

L.e

._.-..t. f9e(

aPS JLT.77VE o_ SArd 3 ippr 4

oS\\

LJ,

gEI4cTDE E,t.EER Tr S4- / FtC\\

3 j levr LXI\\

\\JALUJ\\\\OS.

SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE NOTES:

(

1c etr,4 rb

/f_(

F i-k d m4 1,i c-c p%(

C/C f2a1Jfi4-l erik iS/-e 4 tj e4 J2,uc_

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES.2O1 3 1.

Pre-Examination ci I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

PRINTED NAME l.üA)12

2. cJLi

3. i2,,d i7yc 4.

5.

3 LJ-cb----

6.C) Lnz 7.-.-\\RS ?-S

8. j4j ()J V 9.NcJc Leae4t4 10.,3 IJvf/eY jli 12.T/Ø44A t?/a!

13.

(tyfJ 14.

15. 4he/IPeA,c,.

NOTES:

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY XI4(t y4u L KI.1 :I 4

w yii Vai,dp,Lov (r / /

?

Lmc -

C&I Jc,jid.*or 4cL})t tMt \\J 4 XCtrb 1

ct

%.,S,?.4ef- / fifam/)

11fL-.

I Z*bi/S 1 f I rjbi.,dp ç 4

2.

Post-Examination 4/)7 To the best of my knowIedgeI did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 01/30 &02/06 2017. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I

did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

DATE SINATURE/(2)

DATE NOTE 1/

/J)

!/C 2C)

,c--,\\-

1i.

f!I1J (?

U t 1

• c.

l-5-7 3

(-(-ii Z.riI17____

)o7

CL1S, i-,o-

ç- >4J 1b-4.- 22Thi l

/1 7 j

)

.; £*7 z_-I7 2.

z.

I 7 2-13-17 4>)

2 l 1/

AJ\\

(

-,9 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 2/13 and 2/20 2017 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 2/13 and 2/20 2017. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I

did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

1. dok 2.

3.nprPrLzJb 47?4.14 &4Ji 5-t7A4DCt4W&-

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

7 2

L.4 3Lc..1 22? i)

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

( c4 OPøTAJ 4i/ec IT.?...

b !.Z L

1/