LR-N17-0034, Salem Generating Station, Units 1 & 2, Revision 29 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Table 3.10-1, Summary of Seismic Qualifications for Safety-Related Equipment
Text
Control Console Nuclear Instrumenta-tion System Cabinet; Process Control Equipment Cabinets; Solid State Protection Actuation Cabinet 12 KVA (Unit 1) 10 KVA (Unit 2) Vital Bus UPS Auxiliary Control Terminal and Cabinets SGS-UFSAR TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATIONS FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Test & Dynamic Analysis Test Axis Triaxial Random Motion Test Test Single Axis 1 of 9 . . 1 Simultaneous Tlme Hlstory Test producing accelerations greater than design basis (DBE). Test results were Accelerations at the device location were determined by T-H dynamic analysis. Sine Beat Test with electrical functions of the equipment monitored. Single axis Sine Sweep Resonance search test in front-to-back, and vertical axes followed by 30 second duration Triaxial Multifrequency Random Motion test. The specimen was subjected to 5 Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) tests and one Basis (DBE) test. Single axis Sine Sweep Resonance search test in front-to-back, side-to-side, and vertical axes followed by 30 second duration Triaxial Multifrequency Random Motion test. The equipment functioned satisfactorily. Revision 25 October 26, 2010 I
- Equipment Relay Racks 125V and 28V de Distribution Cabinets Terminal Cabinets Diesel Control Cabinets Control Room Recorder Panels SGS-UFSAR
- TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATIONS FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Method Dynamic Analysis and Test Multiple Axis Test Biaxial Static Analysis Multiple Axis Test Biaxial Dynamic Analysis Multiple Axis 2 of 9 Results The finite element dynamic analysis shows that the stress in the racks are within acceptable limits. The acceleration at different locations of the rack were also determined by analysis. The relays were qalified by test to a level higher than the acceleration level of the rack. 1 Simultaneous Time History Test was performed. The distribution cabinet components functioned properly. Structural integrity of the cabinets was justified. 1 Simultaneous Time History Test
- It was demonstrated that the specimens possessed sufficient integrity to withstand, without compromise of structures or electrical function, the prescribed simulated seismic environments.
- A finite element computer analysis was performed. It was demonstrated that the panel possessed sufficient integrity to withstand, without compromise of structural integrity, the prescribed simulated seismic environment. Revision 13 June 12, 1994 *
- Equipment Solid State Protection Output Test and Interface Cabinets Radiation Monitoring Cabinets and Components Safeguards Equipment Control Replacement CEU's SGS-UFSAR
- TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATIONS FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Method Test Biaxial Test Biaxial Test Single Axis Dynamic Analysis Multiple Axis .Dynamic Analysis Multiple Frequency Test Multiple Axis 3 of 9 Results Simultaneous Time History Test1 with the functionality monitored. Random multifrequency test with functionality monitored. It is demonstrated, thru a combination of Analysis and Dynamic Testing of similar equipment, that the equipment will perform its function under a design basis earthquake event . Each of the three existing Control Electronics Units (CEU's) in the SEC's are replaced with a new CEU, a new test panel, and various other more minor modifications (switches, pushbuttons, etc.). Analysis of the reconfigured cabinet(s) confirmed seismic structural integrity, anchorage integrity, and II/I interaction acceptability; and produced Required Response Spectrum (RRS) for the CEU location in the cabinet(s). Seismic testing, employing simultaneous three axis,* multi-frequency random motion, was acceptably completed in conformance with the requirements of IEEE-344. Revision 13 June 12, 1994 *
- Equipment Control Centers Unit Substations and de Switchgear 5 kV Switchgear Diesel Generator and Accessories Tray and Hangers SGS-UFSAR
- TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATION FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Method Test Single Axis Test Single Axis Static Analysis Multiple Axis Static Analysis Single Axis Dynamic Analysis Multiple Axis 4 .of 9 Results The MCC was tested in the three orthogonal directions and the transmissibility was determined. The individual components were tested separately. The unit was shock tested at accelerations greater than the design basis earthquake (DBE). Test results are acceptable. It is justified thru analysis that the equipment maintains its structural integrity when subjected to Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) event. It is justified thru analysis that the equipment maintains its structural integrity when subjected to Design Basis Earthquake {DBE) event. It is justified thru analysis that the equipment maintains its structural integrity when subjected to Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) event. Revision 13 June 12, 1994 *
- Equipment Battery Charger 125V Battery Charger 28V Batteries 28V & 125V Battery Racks Electrical Penetrations SGS-UFSAR
- TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATION FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Method Test Biaxial Test Single Axis .Test Biaxial Static Analysis Dynamic Test Static Analysis Multiple Axis 5 of 9 Results A resonant search was performed. The unit was then subjected to a resultant acceleration greater than the Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) at the determined natural frequencies. Test results were acceptable. Resonance search from 1-35Hz and a random multi-frequency test with functionality monitored. The test results were acceptable. Random multifrequency testing for 5 OBE and 1 DBE with functionality monitored. Test results were acceptable. Qualified on the basis of dynamic testing and testing and static analysis. Stresses were determined using maximum g level obtained from response spectra. Results of the analysis were acceptable. Revision 13 June 12, 1994
- Aux. Bldg. Vent. Fan Motors Service Water Pump Motors Aux. Feedwater Pump Motors Engineered Safeguards Motors SGS-UFSAR TABLE 3.10-1 FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Static Analysis Static Analysis Static Analysis Analysis The analysis substantiates that the motor will function both and under DBE conditions. The analysis substantiates that the motor will function both mechanically and electrically under DBE conditions. The substantiates that the motor will function both and under DBE conditions. Pump motors supplied by Westinghouse with seismic 6 of 9 Revision 25 October 26, 2010
- Equipment Radiation Monitoring Transformers Radiation Monitoring system circuit Breaker Panel boards Pressure Transmitters, Differential, Absolute, and Gauge SGS-UFSAR *
- TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATION FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Method Test Bi-axial Test Single Axis Single Frequency Test Multiple Axis 7 of 9 Results Subjected to a biaxial random multifrequency test with functionality monitored during and after the test. The unit was vibrated in all of the three orthogonal axes and the functionality monitored. RMF tests were performed in three mutually perpendicular axes. During testing the transmitters maintained structural integrity and met functional requirements. The tests establish the functional adequacy of the transmitters to a certain input acceleration level. Analysis of the supporting structure ensures that the actual seismic loading is within the qualified level. Revision 14 December 29, 1995
- Equipment Limit Switches ASCO Solenoid Valves Instrument Panels, Cabinets, NEMA 12 Enclosures, Racks SGS-UFSAR
- TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATION FOR SAFETY*RELATED EQUIPMENT Method Test Single Axis Test Single Axis Test Dynamic Analysis Multiple Axis 8 of 9 Results Seismic tests performed on limit switches qualify the switches for a certain acceleration limit. Analysis of the supporting structure ensures that the postulated seismic loading is within the qualified level. The seismic test establish the valve adequacy to a certain input level. Analysis of the supporting structures ensures that the actual seismic loading is within the qualified levels. Some of the panels are qualified by a finite analysis. Some panels were tested, with devices mounted on them. Revision 13 June 12, 1994
- Equipment Pressure Switches Instrumentation -Controllers -Thermostats E/P Converters Power -Indicating Stations -Terminal Blocks Stations -Timers -Pneumatic Controllers -Switches Indicators Pressure TABLE 3.10-1
SUMMARY
OF SEISMIC QUALIFICATION FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Method Test Multiple Axis Test Axis Results Tests were performed in three mutually perpendicular axes. The switches met their structural and functional requirements. Tests were performed in three mutually axes. The equipment met their respective structural and functional 1All time history tests were performed using the time history response spectra of floor Elevation 122' in the Auxiliary Building. 9 of 9 SGS-UFSAR Revision 25 October 26, 2010 I