Comment (008) of Nima Ashkeboussi, Senior Project Manager for Radiation and Materials Safety - Nuclear Energy Institute (Nei), Regarding Individual Monitoring Devices for Industrial Radiographic PersonnelML17018A431 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Nuclear Energy Institute |
---|
Issue date: |
01/18/2017 |
---|
From: |
Nuclear Energy Institute |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
81FR78732, Docket No. NRC-2016-0182, PRM-34-7 |
Download: ML17018A431 (3) |
|
|
---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML24310A0552024-11-0404 November 2024 Comment (001) - Request for Extension of Comment Period from the Nuclear Energy Institute on Part 53 Rulemaking - Risk-Informed Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML24298A0652024-10-23023 October 2024 Comment (010) from Kati R. Austgen on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50, 52 and 73 - Alternative Physical Security Requirements for Advanced Reactors ML24264A1122024-09-20020 September 2024 Comment (008) from Martin J. Oneill on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-51 - Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review ML24082A0972024-03-21021 March 2024 Comment (005) of Jennifer Uhle on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-2, 15, 37, 73, 110, 140, 170 and 171 - Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2024 ML24023A6042024-01-22022 January 2024 Comment (011) from Jennifer Uhle on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50, 51, and 71 - Increased Enrichment of Conventional and Accident Tolerant Fuel Designs for Light-Water Reactors ML23296A0792023-10-18018 October 2023 Comment Period Extension Request from the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50, 51, and 71 - Increased Enrichment of Conventional and Accident Tolerant Fuel Designs for Light-Water Reactors ML23177A2492023-06-23023 June 2023 Comment (012) from Thomas Basso on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50 - American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Cases and Update Frequency ML23171B0032023-06-15015 June 2023 Comment (011) from Thomas Basso on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50 - American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Cases and Update Frequency ML23123A4072023-05-0202 May 2023 Comment (0018) from Jennifer Uhle on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-51 - Renewing Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses - Environmental Review ML23095A0372023-04-0404 April 2023 Comment (001) from Mark A. Richter on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50 - American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Cases and Update Frequency ML23093A1882023-03-31031 March 2023 Comment (003) from Dr. Jennifer L. Uhle on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-170 and 171 - Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2023 ML23080A1862023-03-17017 March 2023 Comment (001) from Douglas E. True on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-30, 40, 50, 70 & 72 - Alternatives to the Use of Credit Ratings ML23062A7162023-03-0303 March 2023 Comment (006) from Frances Pimentel on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PRM-50-124 - Licensing Safety Analysis for Loss-of-Coolant Accidents ML23031A3022023-01-30030 January 2023 Comment (006) from Tony Brown on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50 - Reporting Requirements for Nonemergency Events at Nuclear Power Plants ML22333B0322022-11-28028 November 2022 Comment (014) from the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-71 - Harmonization of Transportation Safety Requirements with IAEA Standards ML22243A2572022-08-31031 August 2022 Comment (115) of Doug True on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML22243A1972022-08-30030 August 2022 Comment (092) from Bruce Montgomery of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning ML22087A0522022-03-24024 March 2022 Comment (003) of Jennifer Uhle on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-170, 171 - Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2022 ML22025A2332022-01-21021 January 2022 Comment (01) of Janet Schlueter on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-11, 25 and 95 - Access Authorization Fees ML21309A5782021-11-0505 November 2021 Comment (080) of the Nuclear Energy Institute and the U.S. Nuclear Industry Council on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML21288A1302021-10-14014 October 2021 Comment (004) of Dr. Jennifer L. Uhle on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-52 - NuScale Small Modular Reactor Design Certification ML21287A1462021-09-30030 September 2021 Comment (008) of Nuclear Energy Institute on PRM-50-119 - Access to the Decommissioning Trust Fund for the Disposal of Large Components ML21274A0702021-09-28028 September 2021 Comment (062) of Douglas True on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML21265A4442021-09-15015 September 2021 Comment (007) of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-2,21,26,50,51,52,55,73 - Alignment of Licensing Processes and Lessons Learned from New Reactor Licensing ML21244A3312021-08-31031 August 2021 Comment (061) of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML22133A2292021-08-30030 August 2021 EPFAQ 2021-001 Clarification of Section 4.3 of NUREG-7002, Criteria for Development of Evacuation Time Estimate Studies, Regarding Acceptable Error And/Or Confidence Interval ML21203A2252021-07-21021 July 2021 Comment (006) of Martin O'Neill on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on ANPR-51 - Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review ML21197A1032021-07-16016 July 2021 Comment (056) of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML21196A4982021-07-14014 July 2021 Comment (054) Submitted by Nuclear Energy Institute on Behalf of Multiple Stakeholders as Unified Industry Position on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML21168A0952021-06-15015 June 2021 Comment (002) from the Nuclear Energy Institute on PRM-37-2 - Advance Tribal Notification of Certain Radioactive Material Shipments ML21166A1192021-06-14014 June 2021 Comment (045) of David Young on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML21145A1722021-05-25025 May 2021 Comment (004) of Thomas Basso on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50 - American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2019-2020 Code Editions ML21144A2892021-05-20020 May 2021 Comment (024) of William Gross on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding PR-26 - Fitness for Duty Drug Testing Requirements ML21144A1642021-05-14014 May 2021 Comment (005) of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-2,21,26,50,51,52,55,73 - Alignment of Licensing Processes and Lessons Learned from New Reactor Licensing ML21095A1002021-04-0101 April 2021 Comment (006) from the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50 - Approval of American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Code Cases ML21083A2882021-03-24024 March 2021 Comment (005) of Jennifer Uhle on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-15, 170 & 171 - Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2021 ML21068A3572021-03-0909 March 2021 Comment Period Extension Request of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-2,21,26,50,51,52,55,73 - Alignment of Licensing Processes and Lessons Learned from Nr Licensing ML21068A0972021-03-0808 March 2021 Comment (004) of Douglas True on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-30, 40, 50, 70, and 72 - Alternatives to the Use of Credit Ratings ML21042B8892021-02-11011 February 2021 Comment (016) of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML21048A3602021-02-0101 February 2021 Comment (004) of Ellen C. Ginsberg on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-1 - NRC Enforcement Policy ML21061A0442021-01-0707 January 2021 Comment (03) of Douglas True on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Proposed Evaluation Policy Statement ML20363A2272020-12-23023 December 2020 Comment (004) of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-53 - Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors ML20289A6322020-10-15015 October 2020 Comment (001) of David Young on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PRM-50-123- Public Protective Actions During a General Emergency ML20267A3262020-09-22022 September 2020 Comment (194) of Marcus Nichol on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PR- 50, 52- Emergency Preparedness for Small Modular Reactors and Other New Technologies ML20233A5892020-08-10010 August 2020 Comment (03) of Hilary Lane on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PRM-50-121 - Voluntary Adoption of Revised Design Basis Accident Dose Criteria ML20128J3402020-05-0606 May 2020 Comment (01) of James E. Slider on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-Chap 1- Retrospective Review of Administrative Requirements ML20077K3382020-03-16016 March 2020 Comment (003) from Jennifer Uhle on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-170 and 171 - Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2020 ML19338D2552019-12-0202 December 2019 Comment (017) of William Gross on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding PR-026 - Fitness for Duty Drug Testing Requirements ML19325C8352019-11-19019 November 2019 Comment (043) of Janet Schlueter from the Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-061 - Greater-Than-Class-C and Transuranic Waste ML19228A1842019-08-15015 August 2019 Comment (07) of Michael Tschiltz on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on PR-50, 52, 73 - Physical Security for Advanced Reactors 2024-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
PRM-34-7 81FR78732 8 RulemakingComments Resource From: ASHKEBOUSSI, Nima <nxa@nei.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:33 PM To: RulemakingComments Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] Comments on Individual Monitoring Devices Petition for Rulemaking (Docket No. PRM-34-7; NRC-2016-0182)
Attachments: 01-18-17_NRC_Individual Monitoring Devices PRM.pdf January 18, 2017 Ms. Annette Vietti-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff
Subject:
Comments on Individual Monitoring Devices Petition for Rulemaking (Docket No. PRM-34-7; NRC-2016-0182)
Project Number: 689
Dear Ms. Vietti-Cook:
On behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institutes[1] members, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the petition for rulemaking (PRM) requesting that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) amend its regulations to authorize the use of modern individual monitoring devices for industrial radiography personnel (Docket No. PRM-34-7; NRC-2016-0182). Specifically, the petitioner seeks authorization to use enhanced electronic personnel monitoring dosimeters and dual-function alarming rate meters and electronic dosimeters. While the PRM focuses on 10 CFR Part 34, emerging monitoring technologies can be adopted by other licensees that would also benefit from revised rule language and related guidance. Therefore, in principle, we support the PRM and recommend that NRC revise the prescriptive language in Part 20 and related guidance documents, such as the NUREG-1556 Series and Regulatory Guide 8.34, to allow a more performance based approach that recognizes the use of emerging personnel monitoring technology to demonstrate regulatory compliance.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely, Nima Ashkeboussi Sr. Project Manager, Radiation and Materials Safety Nuclear Energy Institute 1201 F St., NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 www.nei.org P: 202-739-8022 M: 202-375-0490 E: nxa@nei.org 1
Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect y ou r priv acy ,
Outlo ok prev ented auto matic downlo ad o f this pictu re from the In ternet.
TAKE THE NEI FUTURE OF ENERGY QUIZ, www.NEI.org/whynuclear FOLLOW US ON Right-click here to Right-click here to Right-click here to Right-click here to download pictures. To download pictures. To download pictures. To download pictures. To help protect y ou r priv acy , help protect y ou r priv acy , help protect y ou r priv acy , help protect y ou r priv acy ,
Outlo ok prev ented Outlo ok prev ented Outlo ok prev ented Outlo ok prev ented auto matic downlo ad o f auto matic downlo ad o f auto matic downlo ad o f auto matic downlo ad o f this pictu re from the this pictu re from the this pictu re from the this pictu re from the In ternet. In ternet. In ternet. In ternet.
This electronic message transmission contains information from the Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. The information is intended solely for the use of the addressee and its use by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or by electronic mail and permanently delete the original message. IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Sent through www.intermedia.com
[1]
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include all entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.
2
NIMA ASHKEBOUSSI Sr. Project Manager, Radiation and Materials Safety 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 P: 202.739.8022 nxa@nei.org nei.org January 18, 2017 Ms. Annette Vietti-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff
Subject:
Comments on Individual Monitoring Devices Petition for Rulemaking (Docket No. PRM-34-7; NRC-2016-0182)
Project Number: 689
Dear Ms. Vietti-Cook:
On behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institutes1 members, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the petition for rulemaking (PRM) requesting that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) amend its regulations to authorize the use of modern individual monitoring devices for industrial radiography personnel (Docket No. PRM-34-7; NRC-2016-0182). Specifically, the petitioner seeks authorization to use enhanced electronic personnel monitoring dosimeters and dual-function alarming rate meters and electronic dosimeters. While the PRM focuses on 10 CFR Part 34, emerging monitoring technologies can be adopted by other licensees that would also benefit from revised rule language and related guidance. Therefore, in principle, we support the PRM and recommend that NRC revise the prescriptive language in Part 20 and related guidance documents, such as the NUREG-1556 Series and Regulatory Guide 8.34, to allow a more performance based approach that recognizes the use of emerging personnel monitoring technology to demonstrate regulatory compliance.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely, Nima Ashkeboussi 1
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include all entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.