ML16342C751
| ML16342C751 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde, Wolf Creek, Cooper, Arkansas Nuclear, Columbia, River Bend, Diablo Canyon, Waterford, South Texas, San Onofre, Comanche Peak, Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 11/22/1994 |
| From: | Gwynn T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9411290193 | |
| Download: ML16342C751 (54) | |
Text
1P,R RKCI 0
Cy
~
0O D$
~0
++*++
UNITED STATES CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO REGION IV 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011 6064 hl0V 22 l994 MEETING
SUMMARY
Licensees:
Facility:
Dockets:
Arizona Public Service Company Southern California Edison Company Pacific Gas and Electric Washington Public Power Supply System Houston Power and Light Texas Utilities Omaha Public Power District Nebraska Public Power District Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Entergy Operations - ANO Entergy Operations River Bend Entergy Operations Waterford Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
Washington Nuclear Power-2 South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1
and 2
Fort Calhoun Station Cooper Nuclear Station Wolf Creek Generating Station Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2
River Bend Station Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 50-528/-529/-530/-361/-362/-275/-323/-397/-498/
-499/-445/-446/-285/-298/-482/-313/-368/-458/-382
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- REGION IV OPERATOR LICENSING This refers to the meeting conducted in the Region IV office on November 10, 1994.
The meeting was related to discussion of training and operator licensing issues with Region IV licensee training representatives with special emphasis on consolidation, training rule, and changes to examiner standards.
The meeting was attended by those listed in Attachment 1.
The meeting agenda is presented in Attachment 2 with copies of the presentation handouts provided in Attachment 3.
The meeting was considered beneficial and provided an open forum for discussion by the NRC staff, licensees, and others in attendance.
gg(6 One of the topics discussed at the meeting concerned possible utility development of licensing examinations.
At that time, none of the NRC staff in attendance had seen the NRC's response to a proposal from Virginia Electric and Power Company to implement this process, even though it had been issued the week before.
For your information, enclosed as Attachment 4 is a copy of NRC's position on this issue.
9411290193 941122 PDR ADQCK 05000275 V
PDR 28003."
Meeting Summary In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sine el homas P.
Gwy n, ir to Division of Re or S f ty Attachments:
l.
Attendance List 2.
Agenda 3.
NRC Presentations 4.
Response
to Utility Development of Licensing Examinations cc:
Standard Licensee Lists
Meeting Summary bcc:
DMB (IE 45)
J.
L. Milhoan, DEDR (MS 17G21)
H. L. Thompson, DEDS (MS 17G21)
W. T. Russell, D/NRR (HS 1201)
A. C. Thadani, ADT/NRR (HS 12G18)
L. A. Reyes, ADP/NRR (HS 1209)
J.
Lieberman, 0/OE (HS 7H5)
L. J. Chandler, OGC (HS 15818)
NRR Project Managers:
T. Alexion R.
Bevan T.
Bergman K. Connaughton S.
Bloom E. Baker L. Kokajko
- 0. Wigginton W. Reckley S.
Peterson C. Trammell H. Fields J. Clifford OEDO RIV Coordinator (MS 17G21)
L. J. Callan, RA J.
'M. Montgomery, DRA G.
F. Sanborn, EO C. A. Hackney, RSLO J. Gilliland,
- PAO, RIV T.
P.
- Gwynn, D/DRS J.
A. Mitchell, ADD/DRS T.
F. Westerman H.
F.
Runyan C. J.
Paulk RA Secretary DRA Secretary Carol Gordon Division Secretary L. S. Ousley J.
L. Pellet RIV:C:OB*
JLPellet 11/
/94 D:DRP*
ABBeach 11/
/94
- Previously Concurred 0:DRS*
TPGwynn 11/
/94
Meeting Summary bcc:
DHB (IE 45)
J.
L. Hilhoan, DEDR (HS 17G21)
H. L. Thompson, DEDS (HS 17G21)
W. T. Russell, D/NRR (MS 12D1)
A. C. Thadani, ADT/NRR (MS 12G18)
L. A. Reyes, ADP/NRR (MS 12D9)
J.
Lieberman, D/OE (MS 7H5)
L. J,
- Chandler, OGC (HS 15B18)
NRR Project Managers:
T. Alexion R.
Bevan T.
Bergman K. Connaughton S.
Bloom E. Baker L. Kokajko D. Wigginton W. Reckley S.
Peterson C. Trammell M. Fields J. Clifford OEDO RIV Coordinator (MS 17G21)
L. J. Callan, RA J.
H. Montgomery, DRA G.
F. Sanborn, EO C. A. Hackney, RSLO J. Gilliland,
- PAO, RIV T.
P.
- Gwynn, 0/DRS J.
A. Mitchell, ADD/DRS T.
F.
Westerman H.
F ~
Runyan C. J.
Paulk RA Secretary DRA Secretary Carol Gordon Division Secretary L. S. Ousley J.
L. Pellet RIV:C:OB*
JLPellet 11/
/94 D:DRP*
ABBeach 11/
/94
- Previously Concurred D:DRS*
TPGwynn 11/
/94
ATTACHNENT I ATTENDANCE LIST Utilities and Contractors B. Byford, Manager, Training and Emergency Preparedness, Arkansas Nuclear One D. Sealock, Supervisor, Simulator Training, Arkansas Nuclear One M. Brehlman, City of Austin E. Jackson, Hot License, Cooper Nuclear Station S.
- Jobe, Operations Training Programs Supervisor, Cooper Nuclear Station D. Shallenberger, Requal Training, Cooper Nuclear Station G. Ellis, Operations Training Instructor, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station S. Falley, Operations Training Supervisor, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station R. Flores, Shift Operations
- Manager, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station W. Norris, Operations
- Training, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station J.
- HcHahon, Manager Nuclear Training, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station R. Sargent, Operations
- Training, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station E. Schmitt, Operations Training Manager, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station G. Taylor, Operations
- Training, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station R. Jett, Licensing/Nuclear/Simulator Supervisor, Diablo Canyon Power Plant H. Jones, Operations Supervisor, Diablo Canyon Power Plant J.
- Welsch, Operations Requal Supervisor, Diablo Canyon Power Plant H. Lazar, Operations and Technical Training, Fort Calhoun Station B. Ide, Operations Director, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station R. Nunez, Operations Training Manager, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station J. Vellotta, Director Nuclear Training, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station S. Zerkel, Operations Training Coordinator, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station J.
- Baggett, Operations Initial Supervisor, River Bend Station L. Woods, Operations Requal Supervisor, River Bend Station M. Kirby, Operations Support Supervisor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K. Rauch, Operations Training Supervisor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J.
- Reeder, Manager Nuclear Training, Southern California Edison R. Sandstrom, Assistant
- Manager, Nuclea'r Training, Southern California Edison/San Onofre J. Calvert, Requal Supervisor, South Texas Project K. Lewis, Licensing Engineer, Washington Public Power Supply System B. Shaeffer, Operations Training Manager, Washington Public Power Supply System G.
- Weimer, Washington Public Power Supply System T. Brown, Operations Training Supervisor, Waterford Steam Electric Station, R. Guyer, Initial License Supervisor, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation NRC Personnel S. Richards, Chief, Operating Licensing Branch, Division of Licensee Performance 8 guality Evaluation, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation H. Bundy, Reactor
- Engineer, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety R. Doornbox, RIII, Operating Licensing Section I, Division of Reactor Safety
F. Ehrhardt, Region III, Operating Licensing Section 2, Division of Reactor Safety L. Hurley, Licensing Assistant, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety R. Lantz, Reactor
- Engineer, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety T
S. HcCrory, Reactor
- Engineer, Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
. HcKernon, Reactor
- Engineer, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety T. Neadows, Reactor
- Engineer, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety J. Pellet, Chief, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety J.
- Tapia, Reactor
- Engineer, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety
ATTACHMENT 2 Agenda for November10, 1994 Operator Licensing Challenges and Changes Meeting 10 a.m.
Welcome &Opening Remarks by Region IV Deputy Regional Administrator Opening Remarks From Program Office Attendee (S Richards) 10:30- 11 a.m.
Region IV/VConsolidation Status
~
Branch Staffing
~
Facility Examination Needs Projection
~
Facility Requalification Dates & Inspection Projection
~
License Condition Adherence
~
Facility Material Retention By The Region
~
Electronic Copies Of Facility Material
~
Medical Issue (New Doctor)
~
Performance Issues SRO Outside CR Reactivity Manipulations Emergency Preparedness Activities (JLP) 11 - 11:30 a.m.
Requalification Program Inspection Results
~
Sign%cant Findings To Date (TOM) ll:30- 11:45 a.m.
ll:45 -12:30 p.m.
Supplement1 to Rev. 7 of Operator Licensing Standards (JLP) 12:30-1 p.m.
Training Rule Impact - Inspection Protocol & Results
~
Sign%cant Findings To Date
~
Predictive Flow Chart (SLM) 1:00- 1:15 p.m.
1:15 - 2:15 p.m.
2:15 - 2:30 p.m.
Open Question Forum Closing Remarks (JLP)
ATTACHMENT 3
REGIOIA OPERATIONS BRANCHOOSTER (B17)860-Sxxx John Pellet - xl59 Laura Hurley - x253 Licensing Assistant Howard Bundy - x172 South Texas Project 1/2 River Bend Ryan Lanfz - xl58 Fort Calhoun Waterford 3 Steve M'Crory - x265 Palo Verde 1/2/3 LERs Tom M'Kernon - x153 Arkansas Nuclear One 1/2 WashIngton Nuclear Plant 2 Tom Meadows - xl56 Comanche Peak 1/2 Cooper Mike Murphy - x152 San Onofre UnBs 2/3 Foreign Data Joe Tapia - x102 Diablo Canyon 1/2 WolfCreek
Revised: 11/07/94 Filename: OAOS>SCHEDULBFAC-EXAM.REQ Region IV Facility Examination Requests Based On Generic Letter Responses 5 Other Communications ANO1 AN02 CP CNS DC FCS PV RB SON STP W3 WC WNP AL Resp FY95 1
FY96 1
FY97 1
FY98 1
GF 4/95 GF 10/95 2/6/95 1I 6U 2/97 BR 7/17/95 6R 3U 3I 12/97 6R 3U 3I 1 1/28/94 10R 2I 4U 11/13/95 10R 2I 11/96 7R 3l 5/96 4R 2U 10/24 10R 4I 2U 10/11 5R 4I 2U 5/8/95 5R 3I 3U 9/25/95 BR 12U 4L 9/25/96 8R4U 4I 9/97 BR 4U 4L 8/7/95 6R 2U 2I 7/96 6R 2U 2I 7/97 6R 2U 2I 0
0 11/14/94 6R 6U 10I 3/95 RT 9/95 9U 6I 3/96 11R 7I 9/96 9U 6l 3/97 10R SI 9/97 6U 3I 3/98 10R 5I 9/98 6U 3I 18 0
2/27/95 6U 2I 9/95 RT 9/96 10R BU 2I 2/97 RT 9/98 10R BU 2I 0
10 m>WNFe~:
4/17/95 6R3U 5I 10/96 6R 3U 6I 4/98 6R 3U 6I 0
0 8/14/95 6R 111 2U 11/96 4R 6I 4U 11/97 4R 6I 4U 3/98 4R 6 4
0 0
Requal 95 96 97 8/7-9/15 8/11-9/19 6/18-7/26 6/95 6/97 10/31-12/5 10/30-12/4 11/4-12/9 5/16-26 5/96 5/13-23 9/95 9/97 2/20-3/27 2/26-4/1 2/24-3/31 1/96 10/10-11/7 10/9-11/6 10/17-11/4 11/7-12/12 3/4-4/8 2/24-3/21 9/5-10/10 9/3-10/8 9/9-10/14 9/5-10/9 9/3-10/7 7/21 8/25 1 1/20-12/19 10/28-12/2 10/27-12/1
0
Revised:
11/08/94 Filename:
0:(OS(SCHEDULE)RQ-PROJ Re ualification Pro ram Ins ection Projection Site Start End RQ Date Current SALP Period Next SALP Period Estimate RQ Insp Date Sched on HIPS?
CT Req?
71001 Att?
42001 HIP?
Next RQ Inspection Ofc DIE-,
Ltr?*
ANO CP CNS DC FCS PV RB SONG STP WNP2 WC 07 11 93 05 29 94 04 25 93 09 01 94 07 31 94 06 01 93 01 30 94 07 01 94 09 25 94 04 01 94 10 31 93 04 10 94 Ol 07 95 11 25 95 1
31 95 03 02 96 01 21 96 11 30 94 07 29 95 12 31 95 03 23 96 09 02 95 04 29 95 10 07 95 08 20 93 1 95-7 96 8 21 95 06 12 95 12 95-6 97 06 96 12 10 93 2 95-8 96 11 16 95 05 22 95 3 96-9 97 05 97 09 18 95 2 96-8 97 09 96 05 16 94 12 94-5 96 3
13 95 01 24 95 8 95-2 97 01 96 10 23 95 1 96-7 97 10 96 12 05 94 4 96-10 97 12 96 11 28 94 9 95-3 97 11 96 09 12 94 5 95-11 96 09 96 08 22 94 10 95-2 97 08 96 Per the 71001 IP, a letter is required when requesting material to perform in-office direct snspectio (i.e., presite visit exam review).
When performed in a single week, IP 71001 would require 3
inspectors.
When a procedure module is coperformed, the added inspector would make the activity a major site activity.
Since IP 71001 specifically endorses in-office direct inspection, by requesting the material early and performing in-office DIE, the site IP 71001 contingent drops to two inspectors and the total site team to three, avoiding unnecessary HSA use.
~
~
Examiner Standard ES-301 ES-302 ES-303 ES-501 Changed Pa e(s}
3 -8,13,14 3-8 1,2,5,6,13 5-8,13,14 9,10 9 -12 1,2 1-41 1 -10, 31, 32 1 -13
THE TRAININGRULE 10 CFR 50.120 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL Inspection Procedure 41500 Training and Qualification Effectiveness 6-1220 Training Review Criteria and Procedures
1,
550.120 Training and qualification of nuclear power plant personnel.
(a) Applicability. The requirements of this section apply to each applicant for (applicant) and each holder of an operating license (licensee) for a nuclear power plant of the type specified in 5 50.21(b) or 5 50.22.
(b) Requirements.
(1) Each nuclear power plant applicant, by November 22, 1993 or 18 months prior to fuel load, whichever is later, and each nuclear power plant licensee, by November 22, 1993 shall establish, implement, and maintain a training program derived from a systems approach to training as defined in 10 CFR 55.4.
The training program must provide for the training and qualification of the following categories of nuclear power plant personnel:
(i)
Non-licensed operator.
(ii)
Shift supervisor.
(iii)
(iv)
Instrument and control technician.
(v)
Electrical maintenance personnel.
(vi)
Mechanical maintenance personnel.
(vii)
Radiological protection technician.
(viii) Chemistry technician.
(ix)
Engineering support personnel.
(2) The training program must incorporate the instructional requirements necessary to provide qualified personnel to operate and maintain the facility in a safe manner in all modes of operation.
The training program must be developed so as to be in compliance with the facility license, including all technical specifications and applicable regulations.
The training program must be periodically evaluated and revised as appropriate to reflect industry experience as well as changes to the facility, procedures, regulations, and quality assurance requirements.
The training program must be periodically reviewed by licensee management for effectiveness.
Sufficient records must be maintained by the licensee to maintain program integrity and kept available for NRC inspection to verify the adequacy of the program.
[58 FR 21912, Apr. 26, 1993; 58 FR 39092, July 21, 1993]
DIPACT RB'ACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMP T
Development Implementation Maintenance Inspection
TRAININGINSPECTION TRIGGERS 1.
Indication of declining human performance that appears to have a training-related cause 2.
An unsatisfactory requalification program (significant negative findings in a requalification inspection) 3.
Training program accreditation probation or withdrawal by the National Nuclear Accrediting Board 4.
Request from the facility licensee
kes,d prtersw
~rnt lor dtcenrsd A
~>>I>>Nonce
~I Traini'rogram Inspectiott Protocol
"'OA dn anfne I yes lo Q
porter>>once
~IOIINA Operodtne
~elakd~y yes I~
~tcerdne p>>f>>A>>Ace poll POOVIV42
~ 2 7es tlo A
o~
I orle>>
~ ln<<I) Ndkete 'o asm>>hsl ~ nftfy COACtrnst/
'yes Rtevoll 4CO h>>s tact lrry ewk>> rtsvrts Irdkote procron
>>t otan Its 1
(
~ r<<Covrt RO Ctndvct '122ty
~n Iho Iptctec proer>>s
~rto>>fden 1 IsoAIA~
ll
~ 'rorCevso'o
~
f 1 220'sspeceen y
nttdedy
'yes I~
no JCO tntdsavotot
'yes Ctndvtt
'1220'n OPI TIVAIAS
>>Ithtn 1 nwfrthl, Ctndvct Op Stst Innw44IVy
~nd Candvct 'I120'n Ops TIVrdne>>IPdrt I year, Do '122fy ftsldls IAdk<<o ~
cantenl Steal>>st 7es no Do
'122ty resvlls
~ldk ok Nr SAT practso protdowy
'yes Do lt<<o>> Itwe~
trtec elt Irsnw4lole
~Very cencel~al yes no Legend Cen4vcl '1 220'E F
E or F
on at200RI proewwe sdlMA 1 year.
Sctwd vie Ss>>s 1st nnl roar.
~ I llenltorlne ra ~'1 IAC44O trars IOPNII, fnfatcatnrtPNI ~, LSRI, IAdltsldtAf Insptclar Insknlf Are
~row rosvlts hO a/P
~cctptstdoy
~ 2 Oet>> Adnttlon Ihsvld IKhrdt
'tcrn 41 pNINrsonc ~ INOIKIcoAr ore
~ Rt<<4onllelpoclat Inslshl ~
~ OPOIOOAe hffr>>yINI4~ ttjR ~ ~IC )
Accrtdnaaoll ~toter
'ye
~ 1 Rois trn>>trd Anln at AWSI CeACen ere Ihost Illlt4 in 2 0 101 Oo
'1120 rotvlto lndkete ~
cenknl pratd>>sy no Do
'1220'owlls lll4fcoto Nt SAT process prtWI>>st no Inpvl lo'oI' n pons ts I nevi 4 Ircfvd~ Rtcwn
~Ad Reer NAOtfko <<ac v nits SA4 It>>o>>
Rerk>> rsoy Inctvdt rrrtNIASI>>nh ecoAIt\\ vp lo NldlAIIO4IAS~ IItnftrc>>rwnf COAINOACt
'yes Oo
>>fvserI roeelrslnes>>s
~eovatn>>Atty no
'yes Tost Ippro elfate
~cvollo.
Itonf>>odlhrvor/).oo Ta II en I fr ed Ihrv Ica 14 lQ Renfere4eewnrlto.
Co To It ttrfrt2
r
~
oo
~
~
~
~ ~;
~
s t
o I ~
~
~
t
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
o s
~
~
~
~
~
t
~
~'
~
~ t ~ t
~
~ ~
~
o '
s
~
~
~
s s
~
~
I '
~
I
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
o I I ~
~
I I s ~:
~
s ~
~,
I ~
s 0
~
~
I
~
o
~
o o
~
~
~
R
~
~ t
~
~tto s
os
~
o
~ s,
~ 's I
~
~
~
I
~
~
o
~'
o
~
o
~ ~
~ '
~ ~ ~
~ '
RESULTS Two Sites Reduced Scope Inspection Trigger Declining Human Performance Site 1 Licensed Operators IdkC Technicians Site 2 Non-licensed Operators IRC Technicians Generally very good results Programs other than licensed operator still showed inexperience and need to mature.
~gyt ((tg(
4 0
~~i
)~
I o
O~Y/y (5
+a+s+
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION vvASHIHGTON, D. C. 25555 November 2,
1994 ATTACHMENT 4 Mr. James P. O'Hanlon Senior Vice President - Nuclear Virginia Electric and Power Company 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, VA 23060
SUBJECT:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER
- COMPANY, SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1
AND 2, NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNITS 1
AND 2, UTILITY DEVELOPMENT OF INITIAL LICENSING EXAMINATIONS PROPOSAL (TAC NOS.
- M90588, M90589,
- M90693, AND M90694)
Dear Mr. O'Hanlon:
We have completed our review of your proposal dated August 30,
- 1994, in which you recommended that the operator licensing examination process be changed to allow the facility licensee to be responsible for developing the written examinations and operating tests.
We have concluded that your proposal should be denied.
The NRC is bound by the Atomic Energy Act to prescribe uniform conditions for licensing individuals as operators and to determine the qualifications of such individuals.
The NRC's regulations and examination procedures that are currently in place satisfy both statutory requirements.
The changes you have proposed would likely lead to a significant increase in the national variation of the level of knowledge tested and examination difficulty, despite the NRC staff's efforts to control those. factors during the examination review and approval process.
Additionally, the NRC staff considers independence and objectivity to be critical factors in the initial operator licensing process.
Examinations drafted by a facility licensee could be unconsciously biased toward the specific material taught by the facility, or could lack the elements required to confidently measure operator knowledge and performance.'our proposal states that the same justification used to support the recent revision to the manner in which the NRC monitors facility requalification programs can likewise be used to justify your proposed changes to the initial licensing process.
The NRC staff considers the initial licensing of individual operators and the requalification of operators who have already demonstrated the knowledge and ability to receive a license to be significantly different as regulatory functions, and, therefore, disagrees that the justification to revise one provides sufficient support to revise the other.
Hr. James P. O'Hanlon Please note that the existing examination procedures encourage facility licensees to include their test item banks with the reference material that they submit to the NRC for use in examination development.
The procedures do not prohibit facility licensees from submitting proposed examinations, but they do place an upper limit on the percentage of test items that NRC examiners can take directly from the facility's item banks.
This completes our effort on this issue and we are, therefore, closing out TAC Nos.
- H90588, M90589,
- H90693, and H90694.
Please contact Hr. Stuart Richards, Chief, Operator Licensing Branch, on (301) 504-1031, if you have any questions regarding this action.
Sincerely, (Original Signed By)
Mohan C. Thadani, Acting Director Project Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.
cc:
See next page Distribution Docket File PUBLIC PDII-2 RF S.
Varga J. Zwolinski Nr Thadani E. Dunnington B. Buckley L. Engle OGC ACRS (10)
D. Verrelli, RII 50-280 50-281 50-338 50-339 FILENAME P:XVEPCO-C.BLA OFFICE LA:PDI I-2 PH: P 1-2 PM:PDII-2 NAME DATE COPY Dunnin on
/ "/94 es No BBuc ley 1// +94 Ye /No LEn le
/ 4/94 Yes/No dani
/I /2/94 Ye /No
Virginia Electric
& Power Company CC:
Mr. William C. Porter, Jr.
County Administrator
. Louisa County P.O..Box 160 Louisa, Virginia 23093 Michael W. Maupin, Esq.
Hunton and Williams Riverfront Plaza, East Tower 951 E. Byrd Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dr.
W. T.
Lough Virginia State Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation P.O.
Box 1197 Richmond, Virginia 23209 Old Dominion Electric Cooperative 4201 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Mr. M. L. Bowling, Manager Nuclear Licensing
& Programs Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Office of the Attorney General Supreme Court Building 101 North 8th Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 78 Mineral, Virginia 23117 Surry Power Plant (1&2)
North Anna Plant (1&2)
Robert B. Strobe, H.D., M.P.H.
State Health Commissioner Office of the Commissioner Virginia Department of Health P.O.
Box 2448 Richmond, Virginia 23218 Regional Administrator, RII U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W.,
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. J, A. Stall, Manager North Anna Power Station P.O.
Box 402 Mineral, Virginia 23117 Mr. J.
P. O'Hanlon Senior Vice President - Nuclear Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Mr. David Christian, Manager Surry Power Station Post Office Box 315 Surry, Virginia 23883 Chairman Board of Supervisors of Surry County Surry County Courthouse Surry, Virginia 23683
0 I