ML16340C326
| ML16340C326 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 01/29/1982 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Deyoung R, Engelken R, Vollmer R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16340C327 | List: |
| References | |
| CLI-81-30, NUDOCS 8202190359 | |
| Download: ML16340C326 (4) | |
Text
<4g s.,~
<e i0 JQN 2 g ]g f/FHORAHDUH FOR:
R.
H. Vollmer, Director, Division of Engineering, NRR R. C. DeYoung, Director, Office of Inspection 8 Enforcement R.
H. Engelken, Regional Administrator, RV FRY'I:
SUBJECT:
D. G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, NRR DIABLO CANYON REVERIFICATION PROGRA>l - PHASE I The purpose of this memorandum is to sumnarize current status of the subject program.
As you are all aware, PG8E responded to the Commission Order CLI-81-30 with a December 4, 1981 s<lbmittal which submitted their Phase I progrzn.
The 15-day comment period provided by the Commission' Order on this submittal has been extended to seven-days after the current ongoing Region V investigation is concluded and its report made publically available.'espite the above, we have received some interim corments from the parties which h6 have enclosed for your information (Enclosures 1 and 2).
As you also
- know, we intended to meet with PGSE to discuss staff concerns on his proposed program.
Since the meetinq conflicted with the start, of the full power hearinnc, it was cancelled and it is now anticipated such a meeting will occur during the week of February 8.
In addition to the concerns identified in the cancelled January 19, 1982 meeting agenda, the staff has recently cormunicated to PGSE additional concertos on their program.
By letter of January 13,
- 1982, PGSE submitted its Phase II program (copies of thi s submittal has been provided to you in normal distribution).
While the staff has indicated to PGAE that the. comment period for Phase II would. start not earlier than that for Phase I, each of you is requested to review the Phase II program and provide your comments to H. Schierling (XZp423) by c.o.b.
February 5, 1982.
Enclosures:
As stated 0 ~~q>>Zs Sned. 5V Darren G. use u
Darrel 1 G. Fisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regul ation h
1 hh h
h
" n
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES 5 DISTRIBUTION:
oracy>
DL:LB/3" DL:AD/L*
<<<-,-~;~ FJMiragl ia: 'b RLTedesco L
~ ~
<5'8202i90359 820i29-';PDR ADOCK 05000275 l
- .~P;,~
- "..'BR ', I,.
D DG enhut 1
82 OFFIC(AL RECORD COPY h
h h,
~ usom: >as>-sr~-ohio
4
'a l
C K
g ~ ~
1'
t1EttORANDUtt FOR: '.
H.
R. C.
R.
H.
D. G.
FROt1:
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON REVERIFICATION PROGRAl'1 -
ASE I Vomer, Director, Division of Engineering, R
DeYoung, Director, Office of Inspection nforcement
- Engelken, Regional Administrator, RV Eisenhut, Director, Division of Lice sing, NRR The purpose of t> s memorandum is to sumnarize curr nt status of the subject program.
As you are all aware, PG&E responded to the Co,ission Order CLI-81-30 with a December 4, 1981 sub. ittal which submitted eir Phase I program.
The 15-day comment period p
vided by the Comai ion' Order on this submittal has been extended to seve -days after the urrent ongoing Region V investigation is concluded and its repor made publical y available.
Despite the above, we have re ived so e interim comments from the parties which we have enclosed for your info ation (Enclosures 1
and 2).
As you also
- know, we intended to meet with P
~E to discuss staff concerns on his proposed program.
Since the meeting confl ted >>ith the start of the full power hearings, it was cancelled and it is now a i
pated such a meeting will occur during the week of February 8.
In addition to the concerns dentified the cancelled January 19, 1982 meeting
- agenda, the staff s recently c unicated to PG&E additional concerns on their program.
By letter of January 1
, 1982, PG&E submitte its Phase II program (copies of this submittal has be provided to you in no al distribution).
While the staff has indicated o
PG&E that the comment p
iod for Phase II would start not earlier than t t for Phase I, each of you a e requested to -review the Phase II program d provide your comments to H.
chierling (X28423) by c.o.b. February
, 1982.
Encl ur es:
As ated H. R. Denton r r Darrell G. Eisenhu Director Division of Licensi Office of nuclear Rea tor Regulation DISTRIBUTION Docket File 50 275 LPDR LB83 Files HSch'erling PDR DGEisenhut BBuck ey NSIC RLTedesco JKnigh FSchauer WHaass OFFICEI SURNAME/
DATE Q DL:
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
FJN ia:j
/82 DL:
D/
esco ly.Q/82 P.f,.:.L.;MB.
DGEisenttut.
1/
/82 NRC FORM 310 u0-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY U$GPO: 1981~~.060
.4L:
k-klk.-
J
\\l
'l k
~
~
kk k
)gk k k v
Sa)4
"~,
k