ML16340B176
| ML16340B176 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 10/06/1980 |
| From: | Tompkins B NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8010100139 | |
| Download: ML16340B176 (8) | |
Text
REGU ORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUT 9
SYSTEM (RIDS)
I ACCESSION NBR:8010100139 DOC",DATE: 80/10/06 NOTARIZED:
NO DOC FACIL:50-275 Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant~
Unit ii Pacific Ga, 00 50 323 Diablo, Canyon Nuclear Power Planti Unit 2i Pacific Ga 05000323 AUTH BYNAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION TOMPKINSiB ~ AD Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal'anel RECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Pacific Gas 8 Electric~ Co..
SUBJECT:
Order consolidating L scheduling sequence of matters to be heard at seismic proceeding per 800620 order.
DISTRIBUTION CODE; DS02S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
. ENCL-SIZE!
TITLE: Non - Antitrust Issuances NOTES:J Hanchett w/1 copy all material.
J Hanchett. w/1 copy all material
~
05000275 05000323 RECIPIENT ID CODE'/NAME ACTION'EErJ ~
INTERNAL; ASLAP ILE OELDgBLANTON PUBLIC AFFAIRS EXTERNALS:
LPDR COPIES LlTTR ENCL 5
2 2
1 RECIPIENTS ID CODE/NAi4lE" BUCKLEYgB ~
NSICi COPIES LTTR ENCL OCT 14 1980 TOTAL, NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR ~
ENCL 18
It
~I I"
e I'
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLFAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD Richard S.
- Salzman, Chairman Dr. John H. Buck Dr. N.
Reed Johnson 8'UNCAN USNhc
~ fSQc 0 NotesSNAV Q
~8@4 r In the Matter of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Ogy.
jg80
)
)
)
)
Docket Nos.
50-275 OL
)
'0-323 OL
')
(Seismic Proceeds.ng)
)
)
)
ORDER October 6,
1980 l.
Our June 24th order posed nine specific questions.
A number of these are related,
- however, and we wish to hear the related inquiries together.
This will both aid our under-
.standing of the presentations and reduce the time several witnesses need be present at the hearing in San Luis Obispo.
In adopting the following order for presentation of testimony, we have endeavored to accommodate the special situation of Drs. Luco and Trifunac, who appear as Board witnesses, and have taken into consideration the suggestions of intervenors'ounsel in.his letter of August, 18,. 1980.
2.
Order in which matters will be heard:
g)$dZ g Oy
If I
f 4, 4
C.
Ij
Issues Witnesses (l)
Questions l through 4
and Question 7 (seismic motion)
Applicant:
Blume; Smith, Frazier and. Edwards Staff:
- Newmark, Rothman and Pau-Tsin Kuo SLOMFP:
Brune Governor:
Young, Brune, and Day Board:
Trifunac and Luco (2)
Questions 5 and 6
(Tau effect-soil interaction)
Applicant:
Blume, Hamilton, Seed and Smith Staff:
Newmark, Pau-Tsin Kuo SLOMFP:
None Governor:
Young Board:
Trifunac and Luco (3)
Question 8
(Steam plant)
Applicant:
Blume and Gangloff Staff:
Knight and Newmark SLOMFP:
None Governor:
None (4)
Question 9
(Hosgri Fault Lompoc Fault)
Applicant:
Hamilton Staff:
McMullen and Devine (USGS)
0
3.
We will hear all the witnesses on direct. and cross-examination on each numbered point before proceeding to the next one.
(Lest there be'ny misunderstanding, we will hear all the witnesses giving evidence on Questions l through 4 and 7 first (item 1), before proceeding to Questions 5 and 6 (item 2), etc.)
Where a party has more than one witness, they will be heard as a panel.
The matters at issue call for expert opinions in many instances.
It is our wish that all the wit-nesses be present to hear the evidence of those others testify-ing on the subject matter of their own presentations.
4.
The Board anticipates that testimony on the first two sets of questions will not exceed three days; the remaining two, no more than two days.
The hearing schedule will be adjusted to provide an earlier'starting time and late sessions if need be to meet this schedule.
Cumulative, repetitive, and argumentative cross-examination will not be permitted.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD Barbara A. Tompkins Secretary to the Appeal Panel
0
~
w J
I