ML16340A741

Order Denying Intervenors 770829 Motion to Qualify Ld Denike to Proceed W/Discovery.Grants 60-day Extension for Intervenors to Refine Contention & Produce Qualified Witness on Security Issue

ML16340A741
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	11/03/1977
From:	Bowers E Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
Shared Package
ML16340A739	List: ML16340A740 ML16340A741 ML16340A742 ML16340A744 ML16340A746
References
NUDOCS 8001100333
Download: ML16340A741 (4)

Text

'1'3

~

~ ~

~

~

~ <

J

~

HDQRS) S3%23 OF AHERXCA NUCLEAR BEGUIAXOBY (XHMXSSXCH Before the'tomic Safe and Licens 'Board

)Af I

~Q'j

~>

/ "

CO

.'n the Matter of

'L, PACXFXC GAS 6c EL'ECIRXC CGHPANY

"..": (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Pcarer Plant,'rd.ts 1 6 2)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Hos.

50-275 OI.

'0-323 Or.

1

'I

~ ~

h (e

r

ORDER RELATVlE TO YQZXOHS CONCERNS'6 XNZRVEbX)RS'ECURXTY OZLZFBZXQI The parties have referenced the mxious documents issued by um Licensing Board, the Appeal Board, and the Ccamission concerni~ ACSmith

'.. Xntervenors 'ecurity contention.

I I

II C'

~

h Jt

~

I Xn'texvenors moved on August'.29, 1977, to have the Licensing Boy

~

~

y ~

"~

detenrine that: Dr.. L. Douglas DeNike is qualified to proceed with discovery on all information described in the Licensing Board's Orce of June 17, 1977.

PG&E opposed the motion on September 21, 1977, ~

moved that the Board dismiss the security contention or at least 1Lzit the time for Intervenors to propose an acceptable expert to proceed with discovery under the security contention.

/

Q 1I s

EXHXBXT 2 4

800)1 00 A3$

On October 4, 1977, the NRC Staff opposed Intexvenors'otion md also PG&E's motion to dismiss the security contention but did support PG&E's motion that: a time limit be placed on the offeri~~ of a quaLL-fied expert and supported the suggested revision of the contention.

Gn

~ g October 14, 1977, Intervenars opposed PG&E's cation.

1 H

~

~

~

~

~

~

fthm f ~

~

~

JOE 0 \\ ~

- ~

~

~

e

~

m I

~

~ ~

l

2 After considering the position of the parties on a11 matters, the Board has determined that (1) Dr. L. Douglas DeNike is not a qualified expert to proceed. with discovery of the caaponents of the security system referenced in the Board's Order of June 17, 1977; (2) the Inter-venors'ontention mill'ot be dismissed but should be mended and r

particularized in'order to relate to the present; Part 73; and (3)

Intervenors are'granted sixty (60) days aft:er receipt of this Order to refine the contention and produce a qualified expert or experts on security to participate in the discovery process.

Therefore, Inter-venors'ation is denied and.PG&E's motion is denied in part and

~

~

~

~

granted in part.

XT IS SO ORDERED I

~

4

~

I

'I I

I,*h

. ~

h

..%OR THE AIXMXC SAHZE AND LXCENSQQ BQABD '

A A*

I' I

~ ~

A

~

~

A ers q

~

I I I

~ A

~

Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 3rd day of Hovember,'977.

'I

~

IA A

II

, ~

I A

A I,AI A A

I

\\

A

~ I

'4

~ ~ 8 8

~

~

~

~

'h I'g