ML16307A197

Notification of Inspection and Request for Information for NRC Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection

ML16307A197
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	11/02/2016
From:	Bradley Davis Reactor Projects Branch 7
To:	Heacock D Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
References
Download: ML16307A197 (8)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 November 2, 2016 Mr. David A. Heacock President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711

SUBJECT:

SURRY POWER STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION

Dear Mr. Heacock:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Region II staff will conduct a problem identification and resolution (PI&R) inspection at your Surry Power Station during the weeks of January 30 - February 3 and February 13 - 17, 2017.

The inspection team will be led by Mr. Timothy Steadham, a Senior Construction Inspector from the NRCs Region II office. Mr. Steadham will also conduct a two day pre-inspection visit on January 3-4, 2017. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure, Procedure 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution, issued on February 26, 2015.

The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensees Corrective Action Program (CAP) complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews.

On October 13, 2016, Mr. Steadham confirmed with Ms. Lauren Helstosky, of your staff, arrangements for the two-week onsite inspection and the two day pre-inspection visit.

The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the inspection. Please have the referenced information available no later than December 30, 2016. Contact Mr. Steadham with any questions concerning the requested information. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents required for inspection preparation.

If additional documents are needed, they will be requested when identified. Prior to the onsite inspection, Mr. Steadham will discuss with your staff the following inspection support administrative details: availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection; access to licensee computers; working space; arrangements for site access; and other applicable information.

D. Heacock 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Steadham at (404) 997-4488.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Bradley Davis, Acting Chief Reactor Projects Branch 7 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32, DPR-37

Enclosure:

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SURRY POWER STATION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION cc: Distribution via Listserv PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0011.

PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

_ML16307A197__ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE OFFICE RII:DCO RII:DRP SIGNATURE /RA via Email/ /RA/

NAME TSteadham BDavis DATE 10/31/2016 11/2/2016 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

Letter to David A. Heacock from Bradley Davis dated November 2, 2016

SUBJECT:

SURRY POWER STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION Distribution:

T. Steadham

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SURRY POWER STATION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION (Jan. 30 - Feb. 3 and Feb. 13 - 17, 2017)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the information requested below corresponds to documents generated since July 2015. Please provide the requested documents in electronic format. If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate other available methods to provide the information.

1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. This should include procedures related to:

a) Corrective action process b) Cause evaluation c) Operating experience program d) Employee concerns program e) Self-assessment program f) Maintenance rule program and implementing procedures g) Operability determination process h) Degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20) i) System health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs j) Preventive maintenance deferral and Condition report (CR) extension process If any of the procedures requested above were revised after July 2015, please provide (or have available) copies of all revisions during the onsite inspection.

2. List of top ten risk significant systems, top ten risk significant components for each one of the top ten risk significant systems, and top ten risk significant operator manual actions

3. List of all CRs initiated including the following information for each CR:

a) CR Number b) Brief, but complete problem description c) Priority or level d) Affected system e) Affected component f) Responsible plant department g) CR completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)

CR # Problem Priority System Component Org Status CRXXX A RHR Pump 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open failed flow criteria PMP-A per SR 5.0.5.4 Enclosure

2

4. List of outstanding corrective actions including the following information for each action:

a) Corrective action number b) Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc) c) Brief, but complete corrective action description d) Associated CR number e) Corrective action initiation date f) Number of Extensions g) Corrective action due date h) Completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)

Corrective Type Description CR Initiation Extensions Due Status Action # Date Date AR0034 CAPR Revise CRXXX 01/05/12 2 06/15/12 Closed Procedure NGK-003-4585

5. List of control room deficiencies with a brief description and corresponding CR and/or work order (WO) number

6. List of operator workarounds and operator burdens with a brief description and corresponding CR number

7. List of all currently extended CRs or overdue, sorted by initiation date, with the following information:

a) CR #

b) Priority or Significance c) CR title and short description

8. List of all CRs that have been voided or cancelled. Please provide the following information for each CR:

a) CR Number b) Brief, but complete problem description c) Reason voided or cancelled

9. List of all structures, systems, and components (SSCs) which were classified as (a)(1) in accordance with the Maintenance Rule since July 2015. Please include the following information for each system in (a)(1):

a) Date of classification in (a)(1) b) Reason for being placed in (a)(1) c) Planned actions and their status

3

10. List of Maintenance Preventable Functional Failures (MPFF) of risk significant systems since July 2015. Please include CR numbers, actions completed and current status.

11. List of corrective maintenance work orders. Please include the following information for each work order:

a) WO number b) Brief, but complete work description c) Affected system and components d) Date of initiation e) Date of completion (if completed)

If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)

Work Description System Component Initiation Due Status Order # Date Date WO01345 Replace breaker SI 2A-SI-PMP, 01/05/12 03/15/12 Closed 2A-BKR-08-BB4 BKR-08-BB4 for 2A SI Pump.

12. Corrective action closeout packages, including CRs with description of corrective actions, for all NRC findings and Licensee identified violations (LIVs). Please include a cross reference linking NRC Finding numbers and LIVs to appropriate CR numbers.

13. Corrective action closeout packages, including CRs with description of corrective actions, for all licensee event reports (LERs) issued. Please include a cross reference linking LER number to appropriate CR number.

14. List of all NRC generic communications (e.g., Information Notices, Generic Letters, etc.)

and industry operating experience (OE) documents (e.g., Part 21 reports, vendor information letters, information from other sites, etc.) evaluated by the site for applicability to the station, regardless of the determination of applicability. Please include the reference number (e.g., CR number) for the documents that evaluated the aforementioned OE information.

15. Copies of all quality assurance audits and/or assessments issued, including the last two audits/assessments of the corrective action program.

16. Copies of all department self-assessments for those programs related to the Corrective Action Program (e.g. Operating Experience, Maintenance Rule, etc).

17. Copy of the most recent integrated plant trend report, departmental trend report(s), and corrective action trend report, including any human performance and equipment reliability trends.

18. Copy of the latest Corrective Action Program statistics (if exists) such as the number of CRs initiated by department, human performance errors by department, and others as may be available.

4

19. Please provide a list of routine meetings involving the CAP to be held while team is onsite during either the bagman trip or the onsite inspection weeks.

20. List of CRs related to equipment aging issues in the top ten risk significant systems since January 2014 (e.g., system erosion and/or corrosion problems; electronic component aging or obsolescence of circuit boards, power supplies, relays, etc.;

environmental qualification). Please provide the following information for each CR:

a) CR number b) Priority c) CR problem description

21. If performed, please provide any recent self-assessment of the site safety culture completed.

22. Copies of corrective action program documents related to cross-cutting issues (human performance, problem identification and resolution, and safety conscious work environment) identified via trending, self-assessments, safety review committee or other oversight methods

23. List of all root cause evaluations with a brief description and cross reference to the applicable CR(s).

24. Copy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment importance measures report, if available.

25. System Health Reports, system design basis documents, and system description information for the top ten risk significant systems.