ML16193A542

NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) 2.206 Petition on Cooling Water Intake Security - Petition Review Board Decision

ML16193A542
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie, Turkey Point
Issue date:	06/30/2016
From:	Saporito T Saporito Energy Consultants
To:	Perry Buckberg Plant Licensing Branch II
References
Download: ML16193A542 (3)

Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Thomas Saporito <saprodani@gmail.com>

Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:40 AM To: Buckberg, Perry

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: 2.206 Petition on Cooling Water Intake Security - Petition Review Board Decision The interim decision by the NRC PRB related to the instant 2.206 Enforcement Petition places the National Security and Common Defense of the United States of America (USA) in grave jeopardy - from an attack by ISIS or ISLE or other terrorist organizations.

Please schedule a 2nd teleconference call to allow my to further support the 2.206 Enforcement Petition.

In addition, I request that the NRC invite a representative from the FBI and Homeland Security Department to attend the call.

Best regards, Thomas Thomas Saporito 401 Old Dixie Hwy. Unit 3525 Tequesta, Florida 33469 Voice: (561) 972-8363 Email: saprodani@gmail.com On 6/29/2016 3:27 PM, BUCKBERG, PERRY H wrote:

Mr. Saporito.

The Petition Review Board (PRB) that was selected to consider your 2.206 Petition regarding licensee security for cooling water intake structures, piping, and facilities has concluded that your petition should be rejected because it meets the following rejection criteria in NRC Management Directive MD 8.11:

• The petitioner raises issues that have already been the subject of NRC staff review and evaluation either on that facility, other similar facilities, or on a generic basis, for which a resolution has been achieved, the issues have been resolved, and the resolution is applicable to the facility in question.

Specific to plant security - nuclear plant operating licenses and existing federal regulations require that physical security threats be assessed and addressed by all NRC licensees. Protection against a waterborne (boat) attack or an attack with hand carried equipment (diver), falls specifically under 10 CFR 73.1(a)(1)(E)(iv) and 10 CFR 73.1(a)(1)(D) respectively. The petition, as supported, included discussion of waterborne terrorist attacks in general and the two St. Lucie diver incidents. NRC security staff advised that these attacks are all well within the current scope of consideration for any plants physical security, which is under constant review by well qualified security specialists. In addition, nuclear power plants have several security layers of increasing surveillance and defense protecting those facilities.

If you would like a second opportunity to address the PRB regarding this petition, please contact me.

Thanks, Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager 1

phone: (301)415-1383 perry.buckberg@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mail Stop O-8G9a Washington, DC, 20555-0001 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2937 Mail Envelope Properties (5774E8DA.5070108)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: 2.206 Petition on Cooling Water Intake Security - Petition Review Board Decision Sent Date: 6/30/2016 5:39:38 AM Received Date: 6/30/2016 5:39:47 AM From: Thomas Saporito Created By: saprodani@gmail.com Recipients:

"Buckberg, Perry" <Perry.Buckberg@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2692 6/30/2016 5:39:47 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: