Text

MF7633 & MF7634, UFSAR, Rev 22, Chap 02 Figures Part 1 of 2 - Redacted
	ML16167A456
Person / Time
Site:	LaSalle
Issue date:	09/06/2016
From:	Bhalchandra Vaidya; Plant Licensing Branch III
To:	Fewell J; Exelon Generation Co
	Vaidya B
References
	MF7633, MF7634
	Download: ML16167A456 (71)
	v • d • e

LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2 UFSAR, REVISION 22 AND FIRE PROTECTION REPORT (FPR), REVISION 7 THE SECURITY SENSITIVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED FROM THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT.

THIS DOCUMENT PROVIDES THE REDACTED VERSION.

THE REDACTED INFORMATION WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT IS INDICATED BY SOLID BLACKEDOUT REGIONS.

SCALE o

40 Miles

~I5_~;;;;;j.iiiiI b

50 Kilometers

~

H SITEo LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-1 LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

Township LA SALLE COUNTY

0. __ 8 16 24 Scale in Miles

¥ LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-2 LOCATION OF THE SITE WITH RESPECT TO LA SALLE COUNTY AND BROOKFIELD TOWNSHIP REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

MAJOR STRUCTURES,ANT) Sll'J~ lAYOUT LASALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAI...YSIS REJ)O_R_T__~

FIGURE 2.1..3 tr-..M !fO 1000

-9 SCAlf II 'rr,

\\

I

I..ASALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-4 f:XCLUSION AREA

- v*

-[J-

***0***

I I

II Interstate Hi.ghways U.S.

Highways State Highwoys County Hi ghways Railroads LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-5 TRANSPORTATION ROUTES IN THE SITE VICINITY REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

N s

FIGURE 2.1-6 0-10 MILE INSE T 1970 AND PROJECTED POPULATIONS WITHIN 50 MILES LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT EAST SECTOR 1970- 63994 1980- 69191 1990- 75964 2000- 83746 2010- 92328 2020-101794 1910 933907 1960. 1105443 1990 - 1237514 2000 -

136.. 361

.2010 - 150"207 2020. 165837' TOTAL POPULA TlON DISTRIBUTION o. 50 MilES ESE SECTOR 1970-46551 1980-"9029 1990-53514 2000-58995 2010-65040 2020-7 t 710 ENE SECTOR 1970-114318

'980~133e20 1990-149"66 2000-164792 2010-181F78 2020-200290 40769

..2372 46095 50817 56021 61766 SE SECTOR 1970- 15255 1980-14864 1990~ 15915 2000-175-17 2010-19350 2020-Z 1333 HE SECTOR 1910-20762'9 1980-266148 1990~329474 2000-363231 2010-400477 2020-4 4101512 7173 6830 7269 8013 6838 97-42 SSE SECTOR UHO~135"O tteo-13Ze.

"80*14256 2000~'5720

'OtO~1r332 aOto-Ut108 800lH seCTOR 1810-23&77 18aO-2.tti 1"0-21322 2000-30127 20'0"'33208 2020-3.'1.

SSW SECTOR 1970-13563 1980-14637 1D90-16060 2000-17708 20'O-19&2~

2020-21522 11749 13146

,..5....

16033 11678 19..89 SW SECTOA 1970-.'121 1980-42277 1990-45811 2000"50576 2010-55758 2020~e1A70 wsw SECTOR 1970-24"61 1880-2S451 1990-21690 2000~30S26 2010-33659 2020-37109 NORTk SECTOR 1970- 6e391 1~60- 8662i NNW SECTOR l~aO-9866e NNE Sl::C-OFl 1970*11487 2000~108186

/:;rO-177101 lV80-,S<$S5 2010-119938 1980-2g928 UU~O-20H~1 2020 -132229 h,9C-24,B26 2000~222eO

~'*G'>?666*2 2010-2454' 2010-293935 2020-21056 2020-324678

.'315 NW S£CTOR 51302 66054 1910~32*U3 72829 100446 H~80~32e11 80295 120685 19aO~36681 88524 135525 2000,,39228 149411 2010-43251 164727 2020,-41681 181617 117782 4600 114341

.871 3476 203122 5277 3486 223939 5817 3760 246891 6415

.,45 212190 7011 4510 5038 9172 79194 98918 WNW &ECTOR 9989 111753 1e10~&_e22 10983 1232.00 1180~5e273 12112 135834 UtOO-e'088 13352 149755 2000-87346 14720 20'0-1.2&3 9141 3807 2020~81866 9823 5585 6498 10711 7163 11874 13093 7898

,.434 8707

~ST SECTOR 1810-21618 1980-22601 19~O-2~627 2000-21 t'51 2010-28934 2020-33005 c

..*.~

..***....*..*.*:***.1'.

NNW SECTOR 1975-54 1980-54 1990-58 2000-60 2010-61 2020-62 FIGURE 2. 1-7 REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 PRESENT (1975) AND PROJECTED POPULATIONS LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT TOTAL POPUlAliON o - 5 MILES 1975 -

1106 1980 -

1081 1990 -

1165 2000 -

1204 2010 -

1243 2020 -

1273 EAST SECTOR 1975-46 1980-47 1990-50 2000-51 2010-52 2020-55 ESE SECTOR 1975-41 1980-41 1990-45 2000-,47 2010-47 2020-48 ENE SECTOR 1975~25 1980-25 1990-28 2000-28 20 1O~29 2020-30 NE SECTOR 1975,362 1980-310 1990-402 2000-414 2010-420 2020-425 331 339 368 379 384 388

/

22 22 24 25 26 26 13 13 14 15 15 16 15 17 9

19 10 19 SE 11 20 SECTOR 11 11 20 1975-38 11 1980-39 25 1990-43 30 2000-44 34 2010-45 33 2020-46 32 32 SSE SECTOR 1975-43 1980-49 1990-55 2000-54 2010-53 2020-54 9

9 10 10 10 11 t'.f __

SlCTOR 1975-54 1980-55 1990-60 2000-62 2010-63 2020-64 16 16 18 18 19 19 SOUTH SECTOR 1975-38 1980-42 1990-48 2000-46 2010-47 2020-47 NORTH SECTOR 1975-9 1980-9 1990-10 2000-10 2010-10 2020-11 13 12 13 13 14 14 13 13 14 15 15 15 31 32 34 35 36 36 9

9 10 10 10 1 1 16 12 12 14 15 16 SSW SECTOR 1975-56 1980-61 1990-68 2000-54 2010-67 2020-68 59 46 45 53 57 60 6

5 5

5 6

6 56 55 59 64 64 64 NW SECTOR 1975-124 1980-110 1990-114 2000- 127 2010-131 2020-135 13 10 10 12 12 13 SW SECTOR 1975-34 1980-28 1990-26 2000-32 2010-34 2020-36 WNW SECTOR 1975-54 1980-45 1990-46 2000-52 2010-54 2020-57 wsw SECTOR 1975-62 1980--52 1990-54 2000-59 2010-64 2020-66 WEST SECTOR 1975-67 1980-54 1990-55 2000-64 2010-66 2020-69

5

/0 Miles

.'_==--=::::J_IIt'==::=:========::j1

° 5

/0 Kilometers.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

. FI GURE 2. 1-8 CITIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

FIGURE 2.1-9

,REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 25 Miles 30 Kilometers j

SCALE PRESENT AND PROJECTED POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 50 HILES OF THE SlTE LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT o

10

~_......

Note:

For details of population centers, see Table 2.1-7.

o 5

5-...

1~!!!l~~~~~iIiiiiiii~~1 o

-5 Ki lometers l~5iiiiiiiiit."!!!!5iiiiiiiiiil!!!!!!t LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-10 TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND TRANSPORTATION ROUTES WITHIN THE LPZ REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

zo

~

..oJ 10 a.o 0..

A o

A a

o a

1980 o

o o

o LEGEND o

N a

NN E 6.

NE o

ENE Curve based on SOO people/sq. mile LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 1 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 zo

~

..oJ 10 a.o 0..

A o

A a

o a

1980 o

o o

o LEGEND o

N a

NN E 6.

NE o

ENE Curve based on SOO people/sq. mile LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 1 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

1980 t

Aa z

0 8

~

..J 10 Q.

0 i

Q.

a LEGEND o

E a

ESE 6

SE SSE Curve based on 500 peoplelsq. mile LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 2 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 1980 t

Aa z

0 8

~

..J 10 Q.

0 i

Q.

a LEGEND o

E a

ESE 6

SE SSE Curve based on 500 peoplelsq. mile LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 2 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

1980 A

A A

e 0

0 a

a a

z0

~

..J 10 0..

0a..

Q LEGEND o

s a

ssw 4

sw wsw Curve baled on eoo people/sq. mile o'--........-.r..---.L.---I'--..L.--£---"'----L_.l..--..&.__

~

10 20 30 40 50 MILES LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2. 1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 3 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 1980 A

A A

e 0

0 a

a a

z0

~

..J 10 0..

0a..

Q LEGEND o

s a

ssw 4

sw wsw Curve baled on eoo people/sq. mile o'--........-.r..---.L.---I'--..L.--£---"'----A._.l..--..&.__

~

10 20 30 40 50 MILES LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2. 1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 3 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

1980 a

a a

6 6

8 8

a 8

z 0

0

~

6

.J 10 a

a..

0 0

a..

LEGEND o

W a

WNW A

NW NNW Curve based on 500 people/sq. mile LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 4 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 1980 a

a a

6 6

8 8

a 8

z 0

0

~

6

.J 10 a

a..

0 0

a..

LEGEND o

W a

WNW A

NW NNW Curve based on 500 people/sq. mile LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 1980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 4 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

2020 Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile N

NNE NE EN E LEGEND o

a A

0 0

8 i

0 z

0 a

0 A

~

..J a

)

10 Q.

0 Q.

A 5

10 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 1 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 2020 Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile N

NNE NE EN E LEGEND o

a A

0 0

8 i

0 z

0 a

0 A

~

..J a

)

10 Q.

0 Q.

A 5

10 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 1 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

LEGEND o

E a

ESE SE SSE 2020 Curve based" on 1000 people/sq. mile 0

a 0

0 6

a z

8 0

~

-J

)

10 9

a.

0 0...

e LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 2 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 LEGEND o

E a

ESE SE SSE 2020 Curve based" on 1000 people/sq. mile 0

a 0

0 6

a z

8 0

~

-J

)

10 9

a.

0 0...

e LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 2 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

2020 Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile LEGEND o

s a

ssw 6

sw wsw I

I 6

z 0

~

4

..J 10 a

a..

0 CL.

e LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE' 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 3 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 2020 Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile LEGEND o

s a

ssw 6

sw wsw I

I 6

z 0

~

4

..J 10 a

a..

0 CL.

e LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE' 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 3 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

LEGEND o

w a

WNW A

NW NNW Curve based on 1000 people/sq. m",le 2020 A

8 a

D a

.6 A

8 A

.6 8

a 8

0 z

A 0

~

a

..J 0

)

to a..

~

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 4 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 LEGEND o

w a

WNW A

NW NNW Curve based on 1000 people/sq. m",le 2020 A

8 a

D a

.6 A

8 A

.6 8

a 8

0 z

A 0

~

a

..J 0

)

to a..

~

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 4 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

01.-

I 0

10 20 Kilometers P-M LEGEND Airports o No paved runway No paved runway (Restricted use)

<> Hard surface runway LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.2-1 AIRPORTS AND FLIGHT PATTERNS WITHIN 20 MILES OF THE SITE REV.

2 - APRIL 1986 01.-

I 0

10 20 Kilometers P-M LEGEND Airports o No paved runway No paved runway (Restricted use)

<> Hard surface runway LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.2-1 AIRPORTS AND FLIGHT PATTERNS WITHIN 20 MILES OF THE SITE REV.

2 - APRIL 1986

SCALE o

I - - -

~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijji 0 Mi les LEGEND Natural Gas Pipeline

._-- Refined Products Pipeline (gasoline, kerosene, a LPG)

- _ *. Crude Oil Pipeline

- - - - . Diluent Pipeline

~

MILITARY FACILITIES LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.2-2 MILITARY FACILITIES AND GAS PIPELINES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE REV. 18 - APRIL 2010 i

I I

~ I I i I

I I i I :

~D:VlESS m....£"SON

""£BAG I 3

3 5

I NO. OF TORNADOES CARROLl OGlE DE 8

6 PER COUNTY (1916-1969)

KALB 54YEAR PERIOD WHITESIDE LEE 3

6 6

BUREAU 5

5 4

LA SALLE o

SIT LIVINGSTON 5

VERMILION 19 CHRISTIAN 8

FAYETTE EFFINGHAM JASPER 2

7 4-CLAY MARION 2

2 WAYNE JEFFERSON 2

8 Scale of Miles o

20 40 60 80 100 II,~=:lli!!!!!!!!!!!lt:'=::::i'__li:'=::::::ll UNION 4

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-1 NUMBER OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

~D:VlESS m....£"SON

""£BAG I 3

3 5

I NO. OF TORNADOES CARROLl OGlE DE 8

6 PER COUNTY (1916-1969)

KALB 54YEAR PERIOD WHITESIDE LEE 3

6 6

BUREAU 5

5 4

LA SALLE o

SIT LIVINGSTON 5

VERMILION 19 CHRISTIAN 8

FAYETTE EFFINGHAM JASPER 2

7 4-CLAY MARION 2

2 WAYNE JEFFERSON 2

8 Scale of Miles o

20 40 60 80 100 II,~=:lli!!!!!!!!!!!lt:'=::::i'__li:'=::::::ll UNION 4

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-1 NUMBER OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

N r

w-I S

0.26-

. 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CALM*

i IIIIUIIIC,tW'.

1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS NOTE:

ANNUAL VALUES BASED ON DATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1.1976 THROUGH S;'PTEMBER 30.1978

- E LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-2 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 APRIL 198 N

r w-I S

0.26-

. 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CALM*

i IIIIUIIIC,tW'.

1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS NOTE:

ANNUAL VALUES BASED ON DATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1.1976 THROUGH S;'PTEMBER 30.1978

- E LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-2 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 APRIL 198

NNW w-wsw N

i I

S NNE SSE NE ENE

- E J*

0.26-3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CAL M I

IIIUllllf;;:;ZM4Jd 1.51-

=-

7.0 3.00 MPS LA SALLE COUNTY STATION I

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT, FIGURE 2.3-3 OCTOBER 1976 AND OCTOBER 1977 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 NNW w-wsw N

i I

S NNE SSE NE ENE

- E J*

0.26-3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CAL M I

IIIUllllf;;:;ZM_

1.51-

=-

7.0 3.00 MPS LA SALLE COUNTY STATION I

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT, FIGURE 2.3-3 OCTOBER 1976 AND OCTOBER 1977 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

0.2:6,-

3.01-8 ALM 1.50 I SI~il~~I""C;4.-.:!*"'+"'<'~.

1.51-

".0 3.00-MPS N,

I S

- E LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-4 NOVEMBER 1976 AND NOVEMBER 1977 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 0.2:6,-

3.01-8 ALM 1.50 I SI~il~~I""C;4.-.:!*"'+"'<'~.

1.51-

".0 3.00-MPS N,

I S

- E LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-4 NOVEMBER 1976 AND NOVEMBER 1977 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

NNW NW WNW 12.95 w~...-........

14.32 WSW 11.23 sw ssw 0.26 -

3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CAL M *~--C:=:::JnIlIIlIlG 1!'JIII-"'!I$~*,*;~::I*3 1.51.-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

I s

NNE NE ENE

- E ESE SE LA SALl.:E COUNTY STAT:ON UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-5 DECEMBER 1976 AND DECEMBER 1977 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL L-

-:-~~~-.----

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

NNW NW WNW 12.95 w~...-........

14.32 WSW 11.23 sw ssw 0.26 -

3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CAL M *~--C:=:::JnIlIIlIlG 1!'JIII-"'!I$~*,*;~::I*3 1.51.-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

I s

NNE NE ENE

- E ESE SE LA SALl.:E COUNTY STAT:ON UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-5 DECEMBER 1976 AND DECEMBER 1977 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL L-

-:-~~~-.----

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

WNW 0.26-3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CALM I.

Jlllllnll:*;:Z;,@U 1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 UPS N

I I

S

- E LA SAL~E COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-6 JANUARY 1977 AND JANUARY 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 WNW 0.26-3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CALM I.

JIIIIIIUI:*;:Z;,@U 1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 UPS N

I I

S

- E LA SAL~E COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-6 JANUARY 1977 AND JANUARY 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

0.26-3.01-e 1.50 7.00 CA LM 1

111IIIJIItfMk*:{$I 1.5. 1...

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

I

- E LA SALL.E COUNTY STATION

. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-7 t

FEBRUARY 1977 AND FEBRUARY 1978J WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 0.26-3.01-e 1.50 7.00 CA LM 1

111IIIJIItfMk*:{$I 1.5. 1...

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

I

- E LA SALL.E COUNTY STATION

. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-7 t

FEBRUARY 1977 AND FEBRUARY 1978J WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

w-0.26-3.01-8 1:.50 7.00 CALM '---(1==:::lIJnJnUlJlJJ.!lllC!-f::':;'~""".1!:=-Z:}:-::3;**'

1.51-

> 1.0 3.00 MPS N

I S

- E LA 5<ALLE COUNTY STATION

.UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-8 MARCH 1977 AND MARCH 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LE;EL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 w-0.26-3.01-8 1:.50 7.00 CALM '---(1==:::lIJnJnUlJlJJ.!lllC!-f::':;'~""".1!:=-Z:}:-::3;**'

1.51-

> 1.0 3.00 MPS N

I S

- E LA 5<ALLE COUNTY STATION

.UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-8 MARCH 1977 AND MARCH 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LE;EL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

NNW NW WNW w -

WSW sw ssw 8

.026-3.01-1.50 7.00 CALM I

. UIJUUllflI:"'!C+""""c-:**-:ar.-

1.51-7.0 3.00 MPS N

s NNE NE ENE

- E ESE SE SSE LA SALLE COUNTY STATiON f

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i FIGURE 2.3-9 APRIL 1977 AND APRIL 1978 WIND ROSE 37S-FOOT LE'~

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 NNW NW WNW w -

WSW sw ssw 8

.026-3.01-1.50 7.00 CALM I

. UIJUUllflI:"'!C+""""c-:**-:ar.-

1.51-7.0 3.00 MPS N

s NNE NE ENE

- E ESE SE SSE LA SALLE COUNTY STATiON f

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i FIGURE 2.3-9 APRIL 1977 AND APRIL 1978 WIND ROSE 37S-FOOT LE'~

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

w-0.26-3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CAL ~

nIiIIIiIrb:t:'~L~JMI

, 1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

- E LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-10 MAY 1977 AND MAY 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 w-0.26-3.01-8 1.50 7.00 CAL ~

nIiIIIiIrb:t:'~L~JU1

, 1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

- E LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-10 MAY 1977 AND MAY 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

w-0.26-3.01-e 1.50 7.00 CAL M

~

I

'111111111: t:,::JI 1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

I

- E LA SALLE COUNTY STAT!ON I UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-11

~

JUNE 1977 AND JUNE 1978

,I, WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL I

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

NNW NW WNW w-wsw sw

.026-3.0'-

8 1.50 7.00 CALM I

aunnu::::¥£.SG 1.51-

> 7.0 3.00 MPS N

s NNE NE ENE

-e ESE SE SSE LA SALLJ=: COU NTY ST ATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-12 JULY 1977 AND JULY 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 c*_..~*__ "

NNW WNW w-wsw sw 0.26-3.01-e 1.50 7.00 CALM I

IIJUIIJlEt.:::::;;3 1.51-_

7.0 3.00 MPS N

NNE NE ENE

-E ESE SE 11.05 S

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-13 AUGUST 1977 AND AUGUST 1978 WINO ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL a..-.....-------R~E~V~.~O--

~A~P~R~I:"="L~1~9 8~4

w-0.28-3.01-8 A L M 1.

5 0 I I~J;li~i~U *:::SCJ£.

1.51-

> 1.0 3.00 MPS N

I

-E s

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-14 SEPTEr*mER 1977 AND SEPTEt1BER 1978 WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL L..

~~~~~~~J REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

"I.A'fT QIIIAOI I!L.

, 10' -0" 100 e

100 100 100 100

.00 100 10C:

.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 U.

100 100 100

.00 100 100

.00

~

100 1II0AO-III III 100

~

100

""':r:!

100 III 11I0"0

It 100 100 e

100 100 100

'00 too I!K 1II0AO 100 100 100 IItOAO 100 100 iii AD 100 III0AO 100 100 11I0"0 "W

100 100 TOO

_III0AO -

N"W 100 100 OISTANCI U~,.. ISI LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL *SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-15 TOPOGRAPHIC PROFILES OF THE AREA 0 TO 5 MILES FROM THE LA SALLE COUNTY STATIon REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

,.I,.AlfT (U"'O.

IL..

rIO" 0"

10 100 "OA~~

It lOa 100 100 NN.

lOa lOa 100

.N' CANAl,.

lOa toO 100 lao lao 100 CIIlIIK

/

lao lOa "OAO CI'IIK 100 A.Ill.

/

~

lOa 100 100 C"IEK 7 II 100 lOa 100

.....- AOAD CRUIK \\

/

"OAD U.

lao 100 A ".

AD A

100 AOAO.

~

lao s!

lOa 100 ROAD CAllI(

lao 100 100

"'OAO AOAO~

CII.IK lOa lOa 100

- w lao 100 R.A

100 100 100 WNW 100 lao 100 HW 100 100 100 NN.

lao lao D'STAMCI

(~II"111 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL-SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-16 TOPOGRAPHIC PROFILES OF THE AREA 5 TO 10 MIL ES FRO~1 THE I A S.4I lE COUNTY ST.4TIO~:

....... ---------------------~

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

10 Miles J

o,~.C::l.IBI.II::JMiI*"=~~K i Iometers 5

l

Y--:S::T~A T iON r'

LA SALLE ~~E~~rNALYSIS REPORT I

UPDATED_F_~f_JA_L_________

7 t

FIGURE 2.3-1 Q

MT I C

~

r-u T"l

.:1. 1* -. I. l.. -

'f J:"~ATURES

~~

1'0';.~.~'1 5TATI C'l I

TOPOGRAPHIS'J~'"LA SALLl:. C v"AlpRIL 1984 r RADI US OF i ~.'-

REV.

o, 10 Miles I

10 Kilometers I

TY STATION LA SALLE ~OF~T~ ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATED FINAL SA FIGURE 2.4-1 SITE LOCATION PLAN o - APRIL 198

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-2 HYDROSPHERE REV.

0 - APRIL 1984

F REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 F

SURFACE WATER WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PLANT SITE REV. 0 -

APRIL 1984

°0 FIGURE 2.4-3 GENERAL SITE PLAN REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

2000 0

LiI rl FEET 2000 4000

6000, LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-4 DRAINAGE AREA REV.

0 -

APRIL 1~

320 300 I-0:::

o~

Q..o 280 260 240 220 140 160 180 200 RIVER MILES ABOVE GRAFTON, ILLINOIS 120 100 80 60 40 20 g3 I

I ~ ¥

(!)

H.W.+5.7 L.W.Df~ Oz

-I--.

r-1'-----

.J-fLO~PORiPOOL(Ill a

olz g~

ze

-I<D CL':o

.J_

-Ix

~d5

~

..to 0-O~

~ UJ. 2

~9 cll&.l a:

,~

il~

cD BRANDON ROAD POOL

./

UJ..J r-- -

I Q

-J

~2

<<z

.!1~

40 Zes cD

~~

/

~

(1)0

1-9 1-'

V

~

~ DRESDEN iSLAND poo':,j dS..J

,..-;-r

~--:d

' I II g

~>>:

/'

I

...J G:

/

~----.-,- i -,

I hJ i

MARS~'=!..S_P..29U /

0 1/

II:

UJ

~

./

-~

2 c~

"-~

Q

~

//

0:

-c

(/)

f.

0 dS

/

(f)~

1943 HIGH WATER" STARVE 0 ROC K POOL I

(IS

~

-0.

U_s-

..-- -.. _,..!LLINOIS_ ~ pLAJt£$ _CHICAGO SANITARY_

0-1-----

zt'n

¥

~---

I

-0 0

--I -- RIVER RIVER

,- - SHIP CANAL

...J-9

~----

I

-J<n c(

I 1--"'-"-

0:

A )

.. i

_.~

0 I

~I~

~%

~--...

L&J Z

0..

PEORIA POOL j

t=J::l t-f-

~

.- ~-----

J\\j~

~o

~~

-~

I 10-- --

<.!)

f (1)1 x

)..OW WAlkER DATUM (,L.W.OJ

(.!) ~----

3 LA GRANGE P~OL I

>Iz FOR LAKE MJCHIGA**

i=

.... w

~

~---~---

rvvV ZIUl

=576.8 rNTI~RNAT'ONAL u

~

/

) cr z

r' A

01° GREAT LAKES DATUM (I.G.L.D.)

)...,

ALTON POOL r--_o *(/)

(I J

~

..-.J

\\I**\\r-.j witt:

~

-'JW THALWEG

-J>

~iX

~

'r-

<<~

-'t v-----~

I I

390 o

~90 580 510

~60

~50 540 e30 0<<

<ft 520 N

(ft

..J era

<n 2

500 to-LL 490

~

480 enz 0

470

....c>w 460

.Jw 480 440 430 420 410 400 SOURCE:

REFERENCE 2.4-I LA SALLE COU NTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-5 ILLINOIS WATERWAY PROFILE REV. 0 - APRIL 1914

LSCS - UFSAR Rev. 14, APRIL 2002

800 r-------,--------r------.-----.,------.,-------,

6 5

4 3

TIME IN HOURS 2

--0+---- 768 CFS (USED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF I

FLOOD HYDR7GRAPHS)

I REFERENCE 71. FOR COMPARISON ONLY}

600 I-----if---+--+-I--+---+-----+-----+-----l------l 700 +---~-......-~ ----+------+-----+------+-------1 500 (I) l.L.

0

~ 400 l.L.

l.L.

0 Z

>a:

300 I

200 I

100 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-7 15-MINUTE UNIT HYDROGRAPHS REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAlYSIS REPORT 104

-J Ul

~

L&J l&J u..

103

~

.J bJ>

I.&J

-J 702 a:

t.LI.-

c:(

~

..J

..J i=

701 U) w

I':

cf

-J 700 250 200 150 100

50 l

43,880 CF S, PEAK P tie fr 704.3 FT. MSL MAXIMU..

LAKE LEVEL r,

\\.

..\\.

r l

LAK[ SnLLW4TER LEVEl WITH oo-'T. LONG AU.ILlA,V SPILLWAY

(~REST ELEVATION 702.1 fT. MSL)

..-"- L

/

l I

i

.1

/..~..""'"

!I!

.'/'

t7,760 CFS, PEAK SPF r+-PW, HYORGGR"PH r--- ~SPF "'fOR06RAPH

~l J \\

r-"\\.

..-.r-L..~

10 oo 15 30 40 I.&J to!)

ex 20 c:(

J:

U Ul (5

TIME IN HOURS FIGURE 2.4-8 HYDROGRAPH OF PMF WITH ANTECEDENT SPF MIl VARIATION Of LAKE lEVEL WITH TIME

~-------------_....

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

AREA

CAPACITY ELEVATiON AREA CAPACITY (fEET MSL)

(ACRES)

(ACRE-FEET) 610 15 20 680 512 1883 690 1537 132 U 700 20&8 31106 702 2162 35926 103 219~

38t04 704 2248 40332 106 2295 44875 o

500 IN ACRE S lOOO AREA 1500 2000 2500

~

V

\\

/

\\

/

\\V

~

/

\\~

V

~

V

\\,

/'

\\~

V

\\

/

\\,,

V

/

~,

.i/

-'ro-," \\.

\\.

"\\

\\

685 67 705 710 670 700 680

-J en

~

t-695 w

w l.L z

690 o

t-ea:

>w

-oJ W

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAl SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 665o 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 CAPACiTY IN ACRE-FEET 35000 40000 45000 fIGURE 2.4-9 AREA AND CAPACITY OF LAKE REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

RATE OF fLOW IN CFS ELEVATION THROUGH THROUGH (fEETMSU

~~~lta:,~

~~RVlCE TOTAL lLLWAY 100.0 0

t80 180 101.0 0

leO l80 702.0 0

180 180 702.5 0

180 t80 103.0 314 l82 496 704.0 1661 182 1849

--f-106.0 6175 183 6358 f

I

~V I

/~",""

t---OlSCHARGE THROUGH

~

I SERVICE SPILLWAY i

l I

OISCHARL THROU6H

.......~.

I*

AUXIUARY SPILLWAY

~,."

';"':::"'-TOT A L i*

IHSOtARGE

~",.

705 706 0::5 702~1-----.J------+-----l------i------I-------II--------t 0:

LU Ul LU 0:

..J CIl

E t-704 LUw U.

~

Zo 703

~w

..J LU 701 7000 3000 4000 5000 DtSCHARGE IN C.F. S.

2000 100 --...'----_.__-L__ -__-J.

---l~

.l__

..L_

...J_

o 1000 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-10 OUTFLOW RATING REV.

0 - APRIL 1994

o 4900 SCALE: FT.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

+....

FIGURE 2.4-11 PLAN OF AUXILIARY SPILLWAY REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

SC4lE IN FEET LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-12 CENTERlINE SECTION OF AUXILIARY SPILLWAY REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

SECTION A-A 10 8 6 4 2 0

10 SCALE IN FEET 20 i

LA SALLE COUNTY STATtON UPDATED FINAL SAfETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-12a CEHlERt'HE SECTION OF AUXILIARY SPILLWAY (t-tOOIFIEO)

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

t OF AUXILIARY SPILLWAY ( STA.346+001 700' 685' 695' 690' E L. 705' c:

-0or

~>

r-

~(I) 0

>>2 c: en

......-tr zr

...... -t

~P1 r-e

...... 0 en

(,/)*n

r:a......

c=

oz

c

~O

-<)::II fT1 r-

""e Ul N

~z

-a (/').

...... fT1

~

~-t r-n I

,-t z-<

E.t-t w

t:-

>>0 r(J)

-< :z

-<-t a

~~

Vl-t

~6

~z

0

-I o

~

to

~

H

~

\\0 00

~

t%j

FIGURE 2.4-13a SERVICE SPILLWAY PLAN SCALE FEET 8

4 0

4 8

12 16 t'""""""I MijM PLAN REV.

0 - APRIL 1984

SECTION F-F 8

4 0

4 8

f2 16

~

SCALE FEE T U NTY ST ATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-13b SERVICE SPILLWAY SECTIONS REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

(1.3)A' (2.0)G, (2.3)F2 (2.3) FI 2000 1000 0

2000 i

i SCALE IN FEET (0.6) c' (1.4)C, (2.8)F

~~~(2-.48)~E-,~~(-a~9~)E~~~-~-.48)~D-2~~-(-a42)~D~(2~)C2

(

)

FREEBOARD REQUIRED IN FEET FOR 40MPH SUSTAINED OVERLAND WINOS IN MOST CRITICAL DIRECTION LA SALLE; COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-14 FREEBOARD REQUIREMENTS REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

705.7' 4000 FEET o

2000 SCALE

! 705.7' LEGEND

!TOP OF 81KE/TOP OF ROAD t~IO N LELEVAn N ;'1:LEVATION 2 +00 1705,0 I ! 705 7 I 22+00 !

706.0' I 706.7' 82+00 ! 706.0' /706.7' 99+00 /706.S' I 707.3 t 202+00/705. O' I 705.7' 195+00/706.0' I 706.7' 1173+00 /706.0' /706.7' 707. 3~

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-15 TOP-OF-DIKE AND TOP-OF-ROAD ELEVATIONS REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984 2 + 00 1105,0 1

/ 105 7 1 22+00 / 106.0' I 706.7' 82+00 ! 106.0' /706.7' 99+00 /706.S' I 707.3 1

105.7'

/705.7' LEGEND

!TOP OF 81KE/TOP OF ROAD t

~IO N LELEVAn N ~LEVATION o

2000 4000 SCALE FEET 202+00/705.0' I 705.7' 195+00/706.0' I 106.7' 1173+00 /706.0' 1706.7' 707. 3~

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-15 TOP-OF-DIKE AND TOP-OF-ROAD ELEVATIONS REV. 0 -

APRIL 1984 2 + 00 /705 0' / 705 7 '

22+00 / 706.0' / 706.7' 82+00 /706.0' /706.7' 99+00 /706.6' / 707.3' 347+81.7 705.7' 344+18.3/705.0' /705.7' LEGEND ITOP OF 8IKE/lOP OF ROAD t

~IO N LELEVATI N LELEVATION o

2000 4000 SCALE FEET 202+00/705.0' /705.7' 195+00/706.0' / 706.7' 1,73+00 /706.0' /706.7' 707. 3~

LA SALLE COU NTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-15 TOP-OF-OIKE AND TOP-OF-ROAD ELEVATIONS REV. 0 -

APRIL 1984

NOTES LEGEND Public ground water supply within 10 miles 5,

Scale in Miles a

5'-

FIGURE 2.4-16 MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL GROUNDWATER USE WITHI~ 25 MILES 2.

Data for major municipal and industrial pumping centers within the regional area ore presented in Table 2.4-13.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l

Data for public ground water supplies within 10 miles are presented in Table 2 _4 -14.

3.

Base map modified from USGSt I: 250.000 series (topoqraphic).

Aurora, Jllinois (Nt< 16 -7) J 1958, and Peorio) Illinois (NK 16-10).

1958 (limited revision 1968).

Major municipal or industrial pumping center REV.

0 - APRIL 1984

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984 SYSTEM SERIES GROUP OR FORMATION HYDROGEOLOGIC UNIT DESCRIPTION HYDROGEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS Richland Loess Glacial Drift Aquitard Silty clay or clayey silt Silty clay or clayey silt with interspersed sand and gravel, some thin sand and gravel pockets Ground water occurs predominantly in thin sand and gravel pockets within the glacial drift. Yields are quite variable and typically low, suitable only for domestic and farm purposes. Wells or cisterns that intersect the more permeable zones may exhibit high, short-term yields. The glacial drift aquitard locally overlies the buried bedrock valley aquifers.

Wedron Formation QUARTERNARY Pleistocene Buried Bedrock Valley Aquifers Sand and gravel, some silt The buried bedrock valley aquifers consist of sand and gravel deposited in channels cut into the underlying Pennsylvanian strata. Ground water occurs under water table conditions.

Where the glaciofluvial deposits are clean and well-sorted, yields of 100 gpm or more can be sustained.

Missourian Modesto Formation Carbondale Formation Desmoinesian Spoon Formation PENNSYLVANIAN Atokan Abott Formation Pennsylvanian Aquitard Principally shale, with some interbedded under-clay, sandstone, lime-stone, and coal Ground water occurs primarily in thin sandstone beds and occasionally in joints in thin limestone beds. Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. The high proportion of shales make the Pennsylvanian strata generally unfavorable as aquifers.

Yields are low and are suitable only for domestic and farm purposes.

Galena Group Platteville Group Galena-Platteville dolomites Dolomite and limestone, locally cherty, sandy at base, shale partings Champlainian Ancell Group Glenwood-St. Peter sandstone Sandstone, shale at top, little dolomite, locally cherty at base ORDOVICIAN Canadian Prairie du Chien Group Eminence Formation Potosi Dolomite Franconia Formation Prairie du Chien,

Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites Sandy dolomite, dolomitic sandstone, cherty at top, inter-bedded shale in lower part Ironton Sandstone Galesville Sandstone Ironton-Galesville sandstone Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer Sandstone, upper part dolomite Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions in the sandstones and in joints in the dolomites. Yields are variable and depend upon which units are open to the well.

In terms of the total yield of a well penetrating the entire thickness of the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer, the Glenwood-St. Peter sandstone supplies about 15 percent, the Prairie du Chien, Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites collectively supply about 35 percent, and the Ironton-Galesville sandstone supplies about 50 percent.

Eau Claire Aquitard (upper and middle beds)

Shales, dolomites, and shaly dolomitic sandstone Insignificant amounts of ground water may occur in joints. These beds act as a confining layer between the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer and the Mt. Simon Aquifer.

Eau Claire Formation CAMBRIAN Croixan Mt. Simon Sandstone Mt. Simon Aquifer Sandstone Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. Ground water in this aquifer is too highly mineralized for most purposes. Adequate supplies for municipal and industrial use are more easily obtained from shallower aquifers.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION NOTE UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

1.

Modified from Willman et al., 1975; Hoover and Schicht, 1967, p. 4; and Csallany, 1966, p. 4 FIGURE 2.4-17 SITE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS AND THEIR HYDROGEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS

5 0

5 10

- 1::11-11::1*'-=====::1.__iii' Scole in Miles ContDur interval is 50 feet.

Ground water within the area of diversion flows toward pumping centers aloug the Illinois River.

Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles Dam is 483.25 feet MSL.

2.

3.

Datum is mean sea level.

5.

4.

NOTES J.

Modified from Hoover and Schichf,1967,p.l6, Figure 24.

LEGEND

__ 450 _

Potentiometric surface

contour, Cambrian - Ordovician Aquifer, Fall, 1963.

______.. Boundary of area of diversion due to ground water withdrawals.

T38N T39N T37N 1 T32N I T36N I

R 5E I

R4E I

R2E I

R3E I

R IE I

RH E I

~

LA SALLE /Sit~

\\

!i/~

/

I \\K 500 1

I R2W T--R-'-W-I -R-'-E- -I R 2 E r-R-3-E-"&---

I R 5 E I

RfOE I

R9E

---..r--

I RaE BUREAU 450-_---r""I T21N I I

R8E T22N I Tt8N TI7N Tl6N T20N J TI9N T'5N LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-18 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE CAMBRJAN-ORDOVICIAN AQUIFER, FALL 1963 REV~

0 -

APRIL 1984

5 0

5 10 J

Scate in Miles

~

Datum is mean sea level.

Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles Dam Is 483.25 feet MSL.

Contour Intervol Is 5Of**t.

Ground water east of the ground water divide flows to the 80St - southeast toward (or98 cones of depressIon developed In the greater metropolifan region around Ch!cogo; west of the divide J ground water flows to the south,and locally to the north, toward pumping centers located along the Illinois River.

Modified from Sosman et 01. f 1973) p.21, Figure 10.

",.-- -- Ground water divide Potentiometric surface contour J

-650-Cambrian - Ordovician Aquifer,October,J971 LEGEND

~NOTES T36N T38N T37N T39N T31N R7E I

R6E I

R7E R4E 2.

T35N 3.

4.

T34N 5.

T33N MORRt~

o

\\

~

'400 J 0"

450 T32N Site

\\

'\\

\\

--650

__ J_-

6'0o Tt8N I

R 8 E IRE I

R ICE I

RilE I

R I E I

R 2 E I

R 3 E I

R4 E I

R 5 E T22N ILEE - -

~vr-"J_ -

T21N Tj5N T16N Tl7N Tl9N T20N I LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-19 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE CAMBRIAN-OROOVICIAN AQUIFER, OCTOBER 1971 REV.

0 -

APRIL !IN

i H

',11 LEGEND

.' Domestic water well

-beep well installed for La Salle County Station CoteQory ( 5 tructure o Coolin~

toke Property line NOTES I.

Domestic wen dato are presented in To bl e 2.4 - t5 according to well num-bars.

2.

Base maps modified from USGS 15 minute series (topographic) t Odell Quadrangle, Illinois, 1958, and US GS 7.5-minute series (topographic),

Marseilles Quodran9te, tllinois, 1970.

3.

Data for the water wells installed for La SoUe County Station are presented tn Tobte 2.4-II 4.

Contour interval is 10 feet.

1000 0

1000 2000 1

Scale in Fetf LA SALLE COUNTY ST ATfON JPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-20 DOMESTIC WELL INVENTORY, INCLUDING LSCS WATER WELLS R,EV ~

0.-

AJ?l~,IIJ

'I

--~

c,'._

....:-.....~

\\.1

<<.\\~;'"

40-12 F

~~'~c_

l

~

~)

~

-~

"tS

--*;6'0

\\ "

'~--"':::"'<'-

//'

t.'_:~_~~_~:_:~~~;-"'-;

"~""

"\\

i'

~Z!-O-Ol H

.[:

n 1"1

/

//

NOTES

?O{X) 0

--=-~~-=-

Scolo In 2000 Ptezometer instolled May 28, 1970 thr_ October 30, 1973.

Observation weB, instoUed DecemberJ 1974.

Property line

~ Category I Structure CooII09 Ioke l.

Dates of piezometer installation and frequency of measurement are gil/en in Table 2.4 - 16.

2.

Dotes of water level measurement ore shown in TabJe 2.4-17.

3.

Water level fluctuations in se lected piezometers are shown in Figure 2.4-22'}

addft ianel unplatted pj ezometer data are pr e s en ted in Table 2.4 - 18, 4 -

W0 t er IeveIff uc tua t10nsin, the observation wells are shown In Figure 2.4-23~

~),

Contour interva I is 10 feet.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2~4-21 LOCATIONS OF PIEZOMETERS AND OBSERVATION WELLS REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

670 674 658 662 682 688 694 666 690 706 678 698 D.C......

10!J.I9.u 25 MARCH FEBRUARY

.JANUARY 2!

Q) 682 t-i--oo+'"--+-~~~"""""~--+---"+--'~~--+-~~~~""""""~""""""~~-"'~""""""'~'

j

~2 678..........+--t+--~~~~---~

Q)

Eo

~ 674....,...~.-.+-"'-i~~~~I----+-~-+....,-;....+-~~.............~~..;-.~~----+-"-+----..-..+-"

CD....oa..

+686 4.0 3.0 mtmffiEimtffiEm& 2.0 1.0 0.0 OCTca~R

.s 4.0 Et- ~4frJf:!1J=IrP:i:+ ~'+-o>:~........t*'h--t~:-:-+c~~t~:~';~~~4',tt~.1~,L1::'t..tt+,*q*-,r.t.H.t.+#~+i' +r+i..,....~!--t"'<-t:~+t....

H-.::::'~::H

3.0

~:..;..~ =1',,,'...t,H'-<-;"~""'" ';1."'-_.. ~";_'"

~.~~~~..l~~..j..++-.. -++.........

~

~;.:t"

+t... 1""++~*~*b+H'-'-;"i.,~-!,,*~ t""-r~-r1..,*~~~~***~**t"H"+""+H+

2.0 ' H""

..-0 k--+-,*'H ;...'~~.4-.l-t+~+h--~*f+1*'~**-~-t*f-o.+~+I;+*'*-i1"'~*H*+T:'

~++-""J~'M*h~,..,...t**,-",~~~.* +-,-+~-+2

_'~+"'~-j.+'t--t'rM~r;r..t+1:;;;t~+t:+t.:..1*4tr-"~-i*"""'*'*"*'rl'-+-*'

~~+,->-j.t..+..--:t+l1,+...+~*~~..;"'._..tt-l..;:~'J-~',+t~:~+~~'4'~~:.~~":,:..c:1.':t..~:.t.

1.0

'~T H- -,..*:ttJ......" :~:

+~

"w. ~*~-+-+t#*J-H-l~+~--~+t-H*~*+*H-ttt.!Utt::Wm:t~mtt; rl-f.t:"

...1-H~: H.7~t:tt~1

!-ttl ~ 4 r+-:+r,d. i-'H..,"~'+~'-"""'f.-'+

o0 1+++-4+H+++:"7

...-t~~*-i+r;'++h... +~+!-'+t H-r f.-i.+*H*++-'--tt*m....t+r1 +H

~ ~--HJ.!-h-*'~t"+H"""!4'~*~~-->-i!

S to 15 20 2&

8 10 1e 20 2S

~

to t& 20 25 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH NOTES 1970 installation J surface elevations, tested intervals J and measurements are given in Table 2.4-16.

Potentiometric revels are inferred Locations between dates of measurement.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-22 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS (SHEET 1 of 4) within the All piezometers are instolied glacial drift aquitard.

5.

of frequency Figure 2.4-21.

in ore shown of piezometers of level Dates water I.

3.

2.

4.

Precipitation data were recorded at the Marseilles Lock,4fo21' N 88°45 1 W Long..

Lat.,

REV.

0 APRIL 1984

£ 4.0 J::4++8'~1+'!!++-trL!'1':r*,~fT*_::=t-r:.IT-

-~t!1,.~r;':.-,-!!.**t:!=-stnt.:r*~*'!':tmrP+tmr~

h4~ ++-.-,...~~~~.~ 1'-,*--H*'*r-*'+;"" ~*"'r-~t'~**,*,...f**,..",.,H-~* **+'~~-~+~~-4-+i*+'

~..........~

~""

' *."'7,.... f.J.... +~,..-o.. ~>o~+*;"".-..,+I**~

to itS 20 215 FEBRUARY NOTES 1971 706 702 690 686 682 678 670 666 658 H,.t+t!'+'h'_+~"'H'+rlt+++t+H-i1H-ttH'"4.0 rtTtt1~tt;ttttiittmt:t:¢t113.0

~~~~~~,

~+HtJ; 2.0 1.0

..........................IoooW.oII-..~ 0.0 2.

Dotes of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, and frequency of water level measurements.' are given in Table 2.4-16.

L Locations of piezometers are shown in 3.

Potentiometric levels are inferred 4..

Precipitation data were recorded 88°45' W Long.

Figure 2.4-21.

between dates of measurement.

at the Marseilles Lock,41°21 1 N Lat.,

5.

All piezometers are installed within the glacial drift aquitard.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-22 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS (SHEET 2 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

DECEM.EIt 10 18 20 28 706 702 698 694 690 686 682 678 674 670 666 662 658 3.

Potentiometric levels ore inferred between dates of measurement.

4.

Precipitation dato were recorded at the Marseilles lOCk, 4f o 2f' N Lot.,

88°45' W Long..

2.

Dotes of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, and frequency water level measurements ore given in Table 2.4-16.

NOTES L

Locations of piezometers are shown in Figure 2.4-21.

of 5.

1970 AI f piezometers are installed glaciol drIft oquitard.

within the LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-22 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS (SHEET 3 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

...J 690......

~..;.+olI---~~~~"""""-~~~~~~~""""-";--+-

~

'to-+ 686

~

~ 682..........~--+----t---...;....,.~~+-:--+---t._+---+--

..............~~4-~-+~..............O+--..............---....---~-+

4l-l o

~i:

liE

.Q...c:

CD....o Q..

706 686 682 678 674 670 666 662 658 of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, and level measurements are given in Tobie 2.4-16.

between dotes of measurement.

3. Potentiometric leveh are inferred 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0

~

te 15 20 2!5 JANUARY NOTES J.

Locations 2.

Dates water of piezometers are shown jn Figure 2.4-2 r.

frequency of JUl.(

1971 5.

All piezometers ore installed wIthin the glacial drift aquitard.

4.0 3.0 2.0 Lv 0.0 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-22 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS (SHEET 4 of 4) 4.

Precipitation dato were recorded at the Marseilles Lock, 41°21 ' N Lat.,

88 0 45 J W Long.

REVe 0

APRIL 1984

720 710

-J 700 en

E

.po.

"to-690

+

J!2

<J.) 680 Q)

......J

.S:2 670 2l-(1)

E 0

..... 660 c:

<I,)

+-

0 C-It 650 640 630 620 c

.Q "0

"0..

o ell

\\-.

a...

FEBPUARY

,l,PRIL DEC.......

1S ao.e ITl2F£gffiBN1~~__9 740 720 710 700 690 680 660 630 620

- -'.- "j'-'"

-"'~- ~?, i+y~'~.H"

-~---H-"----' ~..~...,--;".,-, ;--I'-'--'--f'-i"+'-+~+

'f -H-t 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 NOTES I.

Locations of observation weJls are shown in Figure 2.4-21.

2.

Surface elevations of the observation wells are given in Table 2.4 -17.

3.

Observation weJls were installed during December 1 1974.

The average depth is 25 ft.;

granular backfill was placed around the lower 8 ft.

of each obser/offon well.

All ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift oquitordi 1975 4.

Dates of woter JIve' rneosuremenfs are shown in Table 2.4-17; potentiometric Jevels are in-ferred between dof.1 of mealuremen t, 5.

Precipitation doto wlr.

recorded at the Marseilles Lock, 41°2'-N., 88°4e'W.

LA SALLE COU NTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-23 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS (SHEET 1 of 4)

REV~

0

~ APRIL 1984

.5 c:o

~

0..

()

Q)a:

4.0

~~~tm':1mtt:ttttTt:tr::rtrt'i'!:ttrt::'~tt!1'!1~::r.ttt11".tt!!ttttr:tr:tr::t:rr~t:'Ttt!

3.0 J,+~~~~~~

..-4+-h-:.

2.0..,..'1~~+t#~~~~irl~~~~.

1.0 ~~i+"-r.~~.~++~~~W O.0

"'-""";'i5~-'O'''1~~Z''O'''''''~-'

JANUARY NOTES 740 730 7?O 710 700 620

,c>T?~~",,"r;~'~~>'i~';-?;r'Tfrr:rrm+rJ~G:~rrr;r~='t::~ttfT7::r:rr~r:rr:T:::1TTI:'T!7T:-p"~:'ITr::"Y~':-~rTrrrrr-'-:r~~i~:rr:mtrrITr;r:Tr;nJJrn-rrc~rTnTt,nrr::Trn:Trrn:r~~+r!Pt!'t1t1mnn:ttttm!l, 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1975 I..

Locations of observation wefts are shown in Figure 2..4-21.

2.

Surface elevations of the observation wells are given in Table 2..4-17.

3.

Observation wells were installed during December t 1974.

The average depth is 25 ft..;

granular backfill was placed around the lower 8 ft.

of each observation well.

AI t ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift aquitard.

4..

Dates of V<<1ter

!eveI measurements ore shown in Tobie 2.4 -17; potentiometric leve Is are in-fe rred between dotes of meo sure ment.

5..

Precipitation data were recorded ot the Marseilles Lock,41°21 r N., 88045 t W..

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-23 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS (SHEET 2 of 4)

I REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

680 690 710 650 620 740 630 660 640 670 730 720 700 DECEM.at S

10 111.0 **

710

~

to HS 20 MARCH 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 ~!T!!:f'!'1+P~+++t:1+tP1t!T!+tmtt"J:rrt'4+NT1~+mHrnH+!',

... rn1".:+ymb"+...m-,-rp~..-.m~,,#*;::mHTm:rp:p+n+++rrr+++1l 3

~0

~~ri-l<_~--"i'-"'-'~-t1~ ~ri-H-t-H-t*'l---'-*H-+i'C.......,.*t

. "'~1":"f--" t:--+°--th-Y-H-h.,.*~+.l-...~-.r. ~+*'..-t""f-++f+H-H+H**'-~~*~'J"~

"T;"1:~t0";"'H"'**.C"+-t-t-J *~+,,**:-,-"*t j++t--f*

t-1-'1 I-.......-+-t"'..!-'.. *->."i-;~"---t*_-:.,.*,t*rl~_*~*--t*~r---_*t!***".*.. ****f*, *....

-'~-

H-+-;++-;ri'.t-'-.-+--+..;..t-~.,.'t--i*+;r~

""~,'-t-i:+.,.++-T+~.".-r'"'+--i-;''~+'i-, ;"'i+"'"f'l\\"'" ':-t-.. +"+*--H--*H.... i*++t~++,H-~-*tT*r>-~*4",+t*t"t~<T1-*rc~i:---.."-**rt

'.TH.-r"t H 't-kiH '-+-1---"

~

~--' 'H*++~-*H~..,"-*-H*..;...'-+f+'..,.f.., >'-H-*H+-;-t+(."**~+..L.+rH..,,*~~t

~-1"**

.5 NOTES L

Locations of observation wells are shown in Figure 2.4-21.

2.

Surface elevations of the observation wells are given in TobIe 2.4 -17.

3.

Observation wells were installed during

December, 1974.

The average depth is 25 ft.;

granular backfiU was placed around the lower 8 ft.

of each observation well.

All ob-servation welfs are installed in the glacial dr jft aquitard.

5.

1975 Dates of water level measurements ore shown in Table 2.4 -17; potentiomefric levels are in-ferred between dates of measuremen t.

Precipitation data were recorded ot the Marseilles Lock, 41 0 21 I N., 88°45*W.

LA SALLE COU NTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-23 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS (SHEET 3 of 4)

REV.

0 -

APRIL 1984

J 700 U)

E

'+-

+ 690

.2

~

+-

Q)

E

.S!.-c:

Q)....o 0...

JANUARY e

'0 ns 20 2:5 FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL J () L.~.

AUGiJ )'.

~

t()

l~

.~1 j

~:T"'T-"~-

~~

~-~t**~1 I

~

."- t

~:

<:.!P'T£MB£f.I.

OCTOBER Deep...

10 U. ao **

740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 650 640 630

.s c

.Q 4-

~

.9-()

<V l.-

e..

NOTES L

Locations of observation wells ore shown in Figure 2.4-21.

2.

Surface elevations of the observation welts ore given in "T'obte 2.4-17.

3.

Observation wells were installed during December, 1974.

The averoQe depth is 25 ft.;

granular backfill was placed around the lowe r 8 f 1.

of each observation we J I.

A" ob-servation wells ore instof led in the glaciol drift aquitard..

1975 4.

Dotes of water level measurements ore shown in Tobie 2..4-17; potentiometric levels are in-ferred between dates of measurement.

5.

Water level meolur.ments in weB no. f8 ofter July 21,1975, may be affected by a

broken cap.

6.

Pr~cipitation data were recorded at the Marseif les L(,~kJ 41 0 21 1 N. t 88°45' W.

........,..,.",...,..,..."..~~4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-23 DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS OF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS (SHEET 4 of 4)

REV~

0 - APRIL 1984

ML16167A456

Text

Navigation menu

Search