ML16152A313
ML16152A313 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Diablo Canyon ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/25/2016 |
From: | Vincent Gaddy Operations Branch IV |
To: | |
References | |
Download: ML16152A313 (5) | |
Text
Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 2 DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: Diablo Canyon First Exam Date:
April 18, 2016 Written Exam Outline (Review done January 25,2016)
Comment Resolution 1
RO outline, Rejected K/A Tier 2 group 1, 073 K5.03. Correctly identified that the verbiage did not match the listed K/A, which should have been K3.01. Wrote question to K3.01. However, the tier/group table totals still show it is on a K5 question, thus the total number of K3 in T2G1 should be 3 and the total number of K5 is T2G1 should be 2.
Skyscraper was updated correctly with this change.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft written examination.
2 Be cognizant of repeating questions from the last 2 written exams because 10 questions on this exam have identical K/As from the previous 2 written exams.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft written examination.
3 3 questions in tier 3 have identical K/As in the RO section as the SRO section, including 1 which was a replacement for a rejected K/A (SRO rejected 2.3.5, replaced with 2.2.12). Ensure that these are different questions at the proper levels and if not then replace KAs as necessary to eliminate any potential overlap of knowledge asked for each question.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft written examination.
4 Delete the password from the ES-401-3 table, in conduct of ops section RO exam outline.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft written examination.
Administrative JPM Outline (Review done January 25,2016)
Comment Resolution 1 None Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Review done January 25,2016)
Comment Resolution
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 2 1
P-1 JPM from 2012 same title as P-3 for this years exam (perform local start of a DG-alt path) yet classified as different SF. This JPM cant be SF8 since DG start is SF6, also system is 068 which would be wrong as well.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
2 Rev 9 form used for all three applicant types (the ES-301-2 you submitted is a rev 9 form). The EN JPM is required for all three applicant types (ie > 1 > 1 > 1).
Please resubmit with correct forms.
Ensure all three types get this JPM.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
3 JPM S2 is also an E type JPM for type code, please add.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
4 Why is SF9 not ever used on the NRC exams? Last three did not have a SF9 JPM.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
5 How do you pick the upgrade JPMs? On the last several NRC exams, 4/5 SFs match for the SRO-U JPMs picked.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 2 Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Review done January 25,2016)
Comment Resolution 1
General comments on scenarios:
a) No CT tables for any scenario.
Will send examples (as discussed in workshop) to licensee for CT, bounding criteria, and basis for each.
b) Too many normal events that have minimal grading value and take too much time in the scenarios. The reason that one for one substitutions of Normal and/or Reactivity events was allowed in Rev 9 of NUREG-1021 was because of these two factors. It is okay to use one or so provided they dont take too much time and they have higher numbers of verifiable actions on which to grade the competency of an applicant but one on every scenario does not allow the examiners to adequately determine license decisions.
c) There is way too much overlap on the scenario events and CTs for this exam and the previous two NRC exams. Too much to itemize in this form. Sending separate spreadsheet of overlaps and will discuss required changes on the call.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
2 Scenario 1 a) looks like very long scenario-did it validate at 90 minutes or do you know yet?
b) On the summary page 2 of D-1 it states that applicable short action TS calls are included.
What does short action mean?
c) Is there a time associated with restoring seal flow where it is acceptable to do so? If so then how do we ensure the scenario is outside of that time so CT-27 is valid?
d) Why do you lose a DG on fuel failure?
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 2 e) How can you fail CT-24-energize one bus prior to exiting this procedure? Does not seem performance based. The performance measure does not seem discriminating to me.
Discuss with licensee.
f) Need to discuss the TCOA discussion on page 4. I am not sure this is legally defendable as one big TCOA. The PRA may have numbers for restoring power for the coping time, but do you need power to isolate the seals? If not then how are these connected? Is the TCOA bases of 54 minutes really based on the 54 minutes to restore inventory control? If so is this an FSAR commitment or a PRA risk assumption?
3 Scenario 1 event 4 used on 2012 Scenario 1 NRC exam-FYI only.
N/A 4
Scenario 2 a) Scenario 2, critical task CT-48.
Need to better define what controlling temperature and pressure actually means.
b) ECG-what are these calls? Can we replace this with a TS call?
c) CT-1 is repeat from 2014 exam Scenario1-FYI. Also, you need to define before emergency boration is required in the CT table.
d)
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
5 Scenario 3 a) CT-36 may take too long to complete? Validated yet? It doesnt look very discriminating either.
b) CT-36-how long does it take to get from 33% RWST level to 4
%?
c) Where is the challenge to a SF for CT-9? need to define what the minimum number of ASW pumps is.
d) Change event 2 from OC trip to shaft shear New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.
6 Scenario 4
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 2 a) Event 2 change to shaft shear of pump from OC trip b) What SF is challenged for CT-10? It is not clear in the D-1.
c) CT-10 already on another scenario-need a different CT.
Scenario 5 a) TS call using ECG-need an actual TS call here b) CT-1 already used on another scenario c) CT-2 need a tighter band on this CT. Is there really a challenge to the SF? If not then it should not be on the exam.
d) CT-11 what is the challenge to the SF? Many of the CTs in this submittal are tied to procedure transitions and this is a last resort for measurable performance indicators and therefore is not discriminating enough to be on the NRC exam.
If there is no actual challenge to a SF then how does it discriminate and how is it actually critical?
e) I am not sure I understand the TCOA notes. Discuss with licensee.
New Chief Examiner assigned. All outline comments addressed through development of draft operating test.