ML16111A116
| ML16111A116 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island |
| Issue date: | 06/10/2016 |
| From: | Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Northern States Power Company, Minnesota, Xcel Energy |
| References | |
| Download: ML16111A116 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Date of Examination:
Item Task Description Initials a
b*
df.
- 1.
w
- "'3fl\\ I~ I~
R
- b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
~ ~
I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
- b1 T
T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
tS".11 v ~
E
- c.
N
- 501 I~ ~
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
- 2.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of
~
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major 601
~
s transients.
I M
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule
- / 4.,,..
L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at
~
A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0
- c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and I~ JiM.
R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
~
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as specified on the form
~
A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form
~
L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
~
K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T
the form.
H R
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
v 0
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form
.!:01 Jr...
u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G
(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
- c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of
~
~
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 'J;f)
- 4.
)OJ ~ ~
appropriate exam sections.
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
9;n v
~"'
N E
- c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
<;_(/) tr cl<.c..
R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
<01 v ~
A Vir' ~
L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
5:J1
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
.Yr ~ a-
~
J Printed N~e/Sjgn~
D7te
))
- a. Author
\\;4-ll.JZll
I,..
5/t l'=a
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
S+tZ-DheJ\\ SeilJ..Lffr!t.r I f -"
F 3/Z/1" 7
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
~I I?. Me--,Jeil',./
.tf~,/£/. ~ )" r/?7Z-Z/
~I(..
- d. NRC Supervisor R
.... \\.._,A(S. ('f:\\,\\c. *.h:., I //J /"L 'I
.J{!;JJ.lJ,;.~(.
I
¥ Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Date of Examination:
Item Task Description Initials a
b*
df.
- 1.
w
- "'3fl\\ I~ I~
R
- b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
~ ~
I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
- b1 T
T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
tS".11 v ~
E
- c.
N
- 501 I~ ~
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
- 2.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of
~
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major 601
~
s transients.
I M
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule
- / 4.,,..
L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at
~
A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0
- c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and I~ JiM.
R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
~
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as specified on the form
~
A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form
~
L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
~
K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T
the form.
H R
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
v 0
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form
.!:01 Jr...
u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G
(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
- c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of
~
~
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 'J;f)
- 4.
)OJ ~ ~
appropriate exam sections.
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
9;n v
~"'
N E
- c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
<;_(/) tr cl<.c..
R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
<01 v ~
A Vir' ~
L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
5:J1
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
.Yr ~ a-
~
J Printed N~e/Sjgn~
D7te
))
- a. Author
\\;4-ll.JZll
I,..
5/t l'=a
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
S+tZ-DheJ\\ SeilJ..Lffr!t.r I f -"
F 3/Z/1" 7
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
~I I?. Me--,Jeil',./
.tf~,/£/. ~ )" r/?7Z-Z/
~I(..
- d. NRC Supervisor R
.... \\.._,A(S. ('f:\\,\\c. *.h:., I //J /"L 'I
.J{!;JJ.lJ,;.~(.
I
¥ Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.