ML16111A116

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2016 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
ML16111A116
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/10/2016
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Northern States Power Company, Minnesota, Xcel Energy
References
Download: ML16111A116 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

Date of Examination:

Item Task Description Initials a

b*

df.

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
  • "'3fl\\ I~ I~

R

b.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with

~ ~

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

b1 T

T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

tS".11 v ~

E

c.

N

501 I~ ~
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
2.
a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of

~

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major 601

~

s transients.

I M

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule

/ 4.,,..

L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at

~

A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T

applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and I~ JiM.

R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

~

3.
a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w

among the safety functions as specified on the form

~

A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form

~

L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

~

K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T

the form.

H R

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

v 0

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form

.!:01 Jr...

u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of

~

~

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

'J;f)
4.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the

)OJ ~ ~

appropriate exam sections.

G E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

9;n v

~"'

N E

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

<;_(/) tr cl<.c..

R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

<01 v ~

A Vir' ~

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

5:J1

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

.Yr ~ a-

~

J Printed N~e/Sjgn~

D7te

))

a. Author

\\;4-ll.JZll

I,..

5/t l'=a

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

S+tZ-DheJ\\ SeilJ..Lffr!t.r I f -"

F 3/Z/1" 7

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)

~I I?. Me--,Jeil',./

.tf~,/£/. ~ )" r/?7Z-Z/

~I(..

d. NRC Supervisor R

.... \\.._,A(S. ('f:\\,\\c. *.h:., I //J /"L 'I

.J{!;JJ.lJ,;.~(.

I

¥ Note:

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

Date of Examination:

Item Task Description Initials a

b*

df.

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
  • "'3fl\\ I~ I~

R

b.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with

~ ~

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

b1 T

T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

tS".11 v ~

E

c.

N

501 I~ ~
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
2.
a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of

~

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major 601

~

s transients.

I M

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule

/ 4.,,..

L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at

~

A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T

applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and I~ JiM.

R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

~

3.
a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w

among the safety functions as specified on the form

~

A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form

~

L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

~

K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T

the form.

H R

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

v 0

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form

.!:01 Jr...

u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of

~

~

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

'J;f)
4.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the

)OJ ~ ~

appropriate exam sections.

G E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

9;n v

~"'

N E

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

<;_(/) tr cl<.c..

R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

<01 v ~

A Vir' ~

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

5:J1

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

.Yr ~ a-

~

J Printed N~e/Sjgn~

D7te

))

a. Author

\\;4-ll.JZll

I,..

5/t l'=a

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

S+tZ-DheJ\\ SeilJ..Lffr!t.r I f -"

F 3/Z/1" 7

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)

~I I?. Me--,Jeil',./

.tf~,/£/. ~ )" r/?7Z-Z/

~I(..

d. NRC Supervisor R

.... \\.._,A(S. ('f:\\,\\c. *.h:., I //J /"L 'I

.J{!;JJ.lJ,;.~(.

I

¥ Note:

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.