ML16069A264
| ML16069A264 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/2016 |
| From: | Boland A Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| To: | Blanch P - No Known Affiliation |
| Pickett D, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15348A325 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML16069A264 (2) | |
Text
Mr. Paul Blanch 135 Hyde Road West Hartford, CT 06117
Dear Mr. Blanch:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mm:h Z2., 2016 I am writing in response to your letter dated December 14, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15348A324), to Mr. Christopher Miller of the U.S. NuClear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in which you expressed disagreement with our letter to you dated November 6, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15287A257),
regarding your concerns over the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines that intersect the owner-controlled property at the Indian Point Energy Center (Indian Point) in Buchanan, New York. Our letter to you included detailed responses to the 39 questions included in your letter dated July 27,-2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15251A050), which was a followup action from your presentation before the Petition Review Board on July 15, 2015.
Your letter, which disagreed with nearly all of our responses to your 39 questions, included 45 additional questions. lr.i general, the concerns you raised were addressed in previous correspondence, including letters to you dated November 6, 2015, and June 29, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15097A190).
We recognize that your opinions on the adequacy of the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines near the Indian Point facility differ from those of the NRC staff. We do not plan to take any further action with regard to the concerns you have expressed to date on this matter. If you decide to submit new information on this subject, we will review it for appropriate action.
Sincerely,
~~
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
regarding your concerns over the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines that intersect the owner-controlled property at the Indian Point Energy Center (Indian Point) in Buchanan, New York. Our letter to you included detailed responses to the 39 questions included in your letter dated July 27, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15251A050), which was a followup action from your presentation before the Petition Review Board on July 15, 2015.
Your letter, which disagreed with nearly all of our responses to your 39 questions, included 45 additional questions. In general, the concerns you raised were addressed in previous correspondence, including letters to you dated November 6, 2015, and June 29, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15097A190).
We recognize that your opinions on the adequacy of the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines near the Indian Point facility differ from those of the NRC staff. We do not plan to take any further action with regard to the concerns you have expressed to date on this matter. If you decide to submit new information on this subject, we will review it for appropriate action.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Anne T. Boland, Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION:
L TR-15-0613-1 PUBLIC RidsRgn1 MailCenter RidsNrrDlr RidsNroDsea ABurritt, R-1 GDentel, R-1 RidsNrrDlr LPL 1 1 R/F RidsNrrDorl RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrPMlndian Point RidsNrrLAKGoldstein RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 RidsNrrMailCenter RidsACRS_MailCTR RidsEdoMailCenter RidsNrrDprPgcb RidsSecyMailCenter ADAMS Accession Nos.: ML16069A264 Package: ML15348A325 OFFICE DORL/LPLl-1/PM DORL/LPLl-1/LA NRO/DSEA/RPAC/BC Region l/DRP NAME DPickett KGoldstein MMcCoppin GDentel by (LRonewicz for) phone on DATE 03/14/16 03/14/16 03/14/16 03/15/16 OFFICE DPR/PGCB/BC DORL/LPLl-1/BC OGC NRR/DORL/D NAME SStuchell TTate STurk ABoland DATE 03/15/16 03/17/16 03/17/16 03/22/16
Mr. Paul Blanch 135 Hyde Road West Hartford, CT 06117
Dear Mr. Blanch:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mm:h Z2., 2016 I am writing in response to your letter dated December 14, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15348A324), to Mr. Christopher Miller of the U.S. NuClear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in which you expressed disagreement with our letter to you dated November 6, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15287A257),
regarding your concerns over the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines that intersect the owner-controlled property at the Indian Point Energy Center (Indian Point) in Buchanan, New York. Our letter to you included detailed responses to the 39 questions included in your letter dated July 27,-2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15251A050), which was a followup action from your presentation before the Petition Review Board on July 15, 2015.
Your letter, which disagreed with nearly all of our responses to your 39 questions, included 45 additional questions. lr.i general, the concerns you raised were addressed in previous correspondence, including letters to you dated November 6, 2015, and June 29, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15097A190).
We recognize that your opinions on the adequacy of the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines near the Indian Point facility differ from those of the NRC staff. We do not plan to take any further action with regard to the concerns you have expressed to date on this matter. If you decide to submit new information on this subject, we will review it for appropriate action.
Sincerely,
~~
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
regarding your concerns over the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines that intersect the owner-controlled property at the Indian Point Energy Center (Indian Point) in Buchanan, New York. Our letter to you included detailed responses to the 39 questions included in your letter dated July 27, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15251A050), which was a followup action from your presentation before the Petition Review Board on July 15, 2015.
Your letter, which disagreed with nearly all of our responses to your 39 questions, included 45 additional questions. In general, the concerns you raised were addressed in previous correspondence, including letters to you dated November 6, 2015, and June 29, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15097A190).
We recognize that your opinions on the adequacy of the existing and proposed natural gas pipelines near the Indian Point facility differ from those of the NRC staff. We do not plan to take any further action with regard to the concerns you have expressed to date on this matter. If you decide to submit new information on this subject, we will review it for appropriate action.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Anne T. Boland, Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION:
L TR-15-0613-1 PUBLIC RidsRgn1 MailCenter RidsNrrDlr RidsNroDsea ABurritt, R-1 GDentel, R-1 RidsNrrDlr LPL 1 1 R/F RidsNrrDorl RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrPMlndian Point RidsNrrLAKGoldstein RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 RidsNrrMailCenter RidsACRS_MailCTR RidsEdoMailCenter RidsNrrDprPgcb RidsSecyMailCenter ADAMS Accession Nos.: ML16069A264 Package: ML15348A325 OFFICE DORL/LPLl-1/PM DORL/LPLl-1/LA NRO/DSEA/RPAC/BC Region l/DRP NAME DPickett KGoldstein MMcCoppin GDentel by (LRonewicz for) phone on DATE 03/14/16 03/14/16 03/14/16 03/15/16 OFFICE DPR/PGCB/BC DORL/LPLl-1/BC OGC NRR/DORL/D NAME SStuchell TTate STurk ABoland DATE 03/15/16 03/17/16 03/17/16 03/22/16