ML15288A030

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2015 Dresden Station Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
ML15288A030
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2015
From: Randy Baker
Operations Branch III
To:
Shared Package
ML14337A759 List:
References
Download: ML15288A030 (1)


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Dresden Date of Exam: 4/15/15 Exam Level: RO ~ S Item Description

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,+/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature

a. Author Chuck Kolotka
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
d. NRC Supervisor(*)

a

(!. I:..

{!,.( ffi J(.

IB CL. m CK.

VJ cl( m Date 4/15/15 4/15/15

.<t (J.z / J;)

$'¥/1

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Dresden Date of Exam: 4/15/15 Exam Level: RO ~ S Item Description

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,+/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature

a. Author Chuck Kolotka
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
d. NRC Supervisor(*)

a

(!. I:..

{!,.( ffi J(.

IB CL. m CK.

VJ cl( m Date 4/15/15 4/15/15

.<t (J.z / J;)

$'¥/1

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5