ML15287A452

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2015 Dresden Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4
ML15287A452
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2015
From: Randy Baker
Operations Branch III
To:
Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML15287A452 (1)


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4

(

Facility: Dresden Date of Exam: 4/6/2015 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 / 30perating Test Number: 2015-301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of er.. fP, ~

service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

',/?Ir ii ~

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunclion(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

~

the expected operator actions (by shift position) 4'( g, the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario t/( $ ~

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

t!L f8 ~

6.

Sequencing and timing of events Is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain Ct. IA

~

complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Ct.. fA ~

Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

/111 ~ ~

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 OCFR55.46(d), any open simulator lt performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated CK. 7,8. ~

to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

CK ~ w All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 Cit ~ ~

(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly Involved in the minimum number of transients and events 1J specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

Ct.

~

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

CL 18 ~

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section 0.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 I 8 I 7 tl {A ~

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 r.v fl>

~

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 4 I 2 tl. <" ~

4.

Major transients (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2

/t_,k-a, ~

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2 tf.. fA ~

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 2 I 1 f'.t

~A if=l{J

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 5 I 3 I 2

[:,(,( f A ~

'¥ \\..9\\ '\\-L

'.)'f.lh~'I

\\) tU2-1 J"G- &-> Si l 'l"li'" '(N..-*C>A. \\\\ D r...J -

~~ '3/"-/t~

ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4

(

Facility: Dresden Date of Exam: 4/6/2015 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 / 30perating Test Number: 2015-301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of er.. fP, ~

service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

',/?Ir ii ~

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunclion(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

~

the expected operator actions (by shift position) 4'( g, the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario t/( $ ~

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

t!L f8 ~

6.

Sequencing and timing of events Is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain Ct. IA

~

complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Ct.. fA ~

Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

/111 ~ ~

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 OCFR55.46(d), any open simulator lt performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated CK. 7,8. ~

to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

CK ~ w All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 Cit ~ ~

(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly Involved in the minimum number of transients and events 1J specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

Ct.

~

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

CL 18 ~

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section 0.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 I 8 I 7 tl {A ~

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 r.v fl>

~

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 4 I 2 tl. <" ~

4.

Major transients (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2

/t_,k-a, ~

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2 tf.. fA ~

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 2 I 1 f'.t

~A if=l{J

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 5 I 3 I 2

[:,(,( f A ~

'¥ \\..9\\ '\\-L

'.)'f.lh~'I

\\) tU2-1 J"G- &-> Si l 'l"li'" '(N..-*C>A. \\\\ D r...J -

~~ '3/"-/t~

ES-301, Page 25 of 27